Doctor Who Stars Praise Premiere's Stealth Take on [Spoiler] Culture, Tease Mystery of ‘Bouncing' TARDIS
The following contains spoilers from the April 12 season premiere of , now streaming on Disney+.
Doctor Who with its Season 15 premiere on Disney+ pulled a switcheroo on what appeared to be a tale of a mighty, evil AI — by revealing that the entity lording over the episode's titular 'Robot Revolution' in fact had once been a regular ol' human, albeit one who mentally abused Fifteen's new companion.
More from TVLine
Surface Season 2 Finale Solves Series' Biggest Mystery Yet - Who Killed Sophie's Mom?
Yellowjackets Finally Reveals the Antler Queen and Girl in the Pit in Season 3 Finale - Grade It!
From ER to The Pitt: Shawn Hatosy Talks 20-Year Relationship With John Wells and Hopes for Abbot in Season 2
Saturday's season premiere brought back Andor's Varada Sethu, who in last season's 'Boom' guest-starred as Anglican marine Mundy Flynn, this time as Belinda Chandra, an ER nurse from present-day Earth. Mild-mannered Belinda was descended up by robots and dragged by spaceship to Belindachandra-1, a planet that had been named after her, and where she was invited to rule as queen.
Luckily, the Doctor (Ncuti Gatwa) had been led to Belindachandra-1 six months prior, and in that time established himself as a historian of sorts. The two strangers teamed up to escape this robot-led society, only to wind up face to face with its 'AI GENERATOR' overlord, who aimed to wed Belinda — 'your mind subsumed within mine.'
But when this 'AI' made a quip that gave Belinda a serious case of déjà vu, she and in turn Fifteen came to realize that it in fact was Alan Budd, a boyfriend of hers from 17 years prior. And one who did not treat her well, ergo her rebuffing of his original, long-ago marriage proposal.
'All you ever did was correct me and tut and huff and roll your eyes and tell me off,' Belinda reminded 'AI,' whose signage was now revealed to say 'AL.' She then observed with more than a bit of horror that by leading the robot revolution on Belindachandra-1, 'You've taken coercive control and made it complete control, of the whole planet.'
Or as she put it moments later, 'Planet of the Incels.'
AL, the Doctor deduced (by listening to his every ninth word that the robots couldn't), was privately suffering beneath all of his wiring and mods. 'Help me save me pain' was the message AL slipped through, earning the cyborg a modicum of sympathy.
TVLine spoke with series lead Gatwa and his new leading lady, Sethu, about the season opener's stealthily delivered message.
'We went about it very much knowing that it was a statement on incel culture — but also just that whole condition, the male loneliness epidemic thing that's happening right now,' Sethu shared.
'And to actually come at it from a place of compassion…,' she continued.
'…was very interesting,' added Gatwa, completing his co-star's thought.
In fact, as those who make the show dealt with this problematic topic through the lens of a sci-fi series, 'We had a lot of really great discussions about it on-set as well,' Sethu recalled. Surveying the on-screen outcome, she offered, 'I think it was really well done.'
As it turned out, Belinda was able to ease her ex's pain, because when she touched her copy of the star-naming certificate that Alan gave her in 2007 to his, the paradox, as Fifteen had predicted, caused an explosion. The energy burst obliterated AL (into a sperm and egg that the dutiful cleaner robot swept up), while Fifteen as a Time Lord was able to absorb the part of the blast directed at Belinda.
There is still the matter of where that second copy of the star-naming certificate came from, but Belinda begged off joining the Doctor on that journey. She just wants to go home. But when Fifteen went to return Belinda to her Earth and time, the TARDIS angrily 'bounced' against… something. And no amount of body English from the Doctor, no combination of flipped levers and adjusted knobs, could force the usually reliable time machine to do his bidding.
Will the Doctor and his new, somewhat-begrudging companion set out to investigate this timey-wimey anomaly? Or will out-of-this-world adventures derail their best efforts?
Gatwa and Sethu both let out a hearty laugh before responding in tandem, 'Very good question!'
'That is the goal,' Sethu previewed, 'but 'as happens' with the Doctor, there are side quests. The direction is to get home, that is always is the intention, but….'
'We get curious!' chimed in Gatwa.
Though those aboard the TARDIS are puzzled by this 'bouncing,' those of us watching from at home were made privy to why they cannot reach their destination. Judging by the debris floating through space on the other end — including pieces of the Statue of Liberty and Eiffel Tower — it appears that Earth will go the way of Alderaan in just a few weeks.
Will Belinda and the Doctor gradually pick up on clues to our big green marble's calamitous fate?
In a word, 'Yes,' Sethu answered.
'That's all part of the mystery of why they can't get home to a specific date, which is the 24th of May, 2025,' the actress noted. 'The whole thing is that the Doctor keeps trying to direct [the TARDIS] back to Earth through different angles, and it just keeps bouncing back — and we don't understand why.'
But as the season unfolds, Sethu affirmed, the magnitude of what they are up against, the very source of it, 'is revealed.'Best of TVLine
Yellowjackets' Tawny Cypress Talks Episode 4's Tai/Van Reunion: 'We're All Worried About Taissa'
Vampire Diaries Turns 10: How Real-Life Plot Twists Shaped Everything From the Love Triangle to the Final Death
Vampire Diaries' Biggest Twists Revisited (and Explained)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Brenda Song Defended From 'Weirdo' Trace Cyrus After Allegations Of Fake Pregnancy During Romance
Brenda Song is receiving an outpouring of support from fans amid bombshell allegations from her ex-boyfriend, . The brother of pop star recalled harrowing details of their seven-year relationship, accusing the Disney alum of telling "lies." However, fans think Trace, who has been making headlines for bizarre social media rants, is only seeking attention. The drama began on Wednesday, June 11, after a fan insulted Trace in an Instagram comment section. "Ahhhh, now we know why Brenda left. Good riddance," the user wrote, as seen in a screenshot shared on X. The "Seventeen Forever" star didn't take the remark lightly and decided to spill the tea on what ended the relationship. "Yes, because she stole thousands of dollars from me and faked multiple pregnancies," Trace replied. He alleged that Song lied to his family about being "terminally ill," giving them a breast cancer and brain tumor diagnosis. "It was all a lie," he slammed. The 36-year-old further claimed that his mother, Tish Cyrus, confronted the "The Suite Life of Zack and Cody" actress for her lies. However, due to the humiliation suffered, Song never associated publicly with his family. "Thanks for reminding me of another scenario where I was a great, loving person and someone did me wrong for no reason," he added. Trace continued his outburst online, this time accusing Song of faking an abortion. "Oh, she also faked an abortion with fake blood covering the bathroom floor," he penned. The Metro Station guitarist recalled he and Tish took Song to the hospital, where "all the lies started unraveling and [they] realized it was fake." Trace then took to his Instagram Stories to give an update on when things with his ex-girlfriend finally came to an end. He explained that the "Wendy Wu" actress visited him after allegedly lying about "the best surgeon in Chicago" removing her tumor. Calling it the "funniest part," Trace claimed he embarrassed Song, writing: "She didn't realize we were catching on to her lies. So when she showed up to my house with a bandage on her head claiming she just got out of surgery I ripped it off exposing no surgery had been done." Per Page Six, the Cyrus sibling concluded his rant, calling his ex-girlfriend's actions "proof of how f–ked in the head child stars are." He then expressed hope that Song is doing better mentally. Trace's post wasn't well-received by fans online, who believed he was trying to cause an unnecessary stir. "She's been in a new relationship for years, and this loser is still talking about her like we're supposed to care. Move on horse face @TraceCyrus," this user on X blasted. Another fan urged, "Ummmmm…. Leave Brenda Song alone, you weirdo," while a third comment read, "He's just mad that Brenda is in a happy marriage and has a successful career while he's a flop." This fan theorized, "2012 breakup. Trace [is] clearly hurting for money. Sorry Metro Station didn't work out." Other branded the "Prescriptions" singer for being "bitter" and a "misogynist." Trace and Song's relationship dates back to 2010 after they went public, following his breakup with Demi Lovato. A year after their debut, the former couple announced their engagement in an October 2011 tweet by the guitarist. However, they broke it off less than a year later. The ex-lovers continued to date on and off for six more years before finally going their separate ways in February 2018. US Weekly reports that Trace released a track named after Song that detailed the breakup. The "Running Point" actress has since moved on with fellow actor Macaulay Culkin, to whom she is engaged. Together they have two sons, Dakota, 4, and Carson, 2. Trace's outburst at Song comes just days after he publicly attacked his father, Billy Ray Cyrus. In a disturbing Instagram post, the aggrieved son labeled the country artist "evil" and "pathetic." The music artist slammed his father for being "so hungry for fame," expressing frustration that Billy chose the spotlight over their family. Trace was particularly offended that the "Achy Breaky Heart" singer flew to Italy with Elizabeth Hurley. He alleged that Billy skipped out on his maternal grandmother's funeral in LA to vacation with his new girlfriend. "You're the lamest man to ever walk planet earth," Trace wrote of his dad.


Forbes
8 hours ago
- Forbes
Hollywood Drops The Hammer On AI, Midjourney And Stable Diffusion
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA - OCTOBER 16: A sign refers to A.I. as striking SAG-AFTRA members and supporters ... More picket outside Disney Studios on day 95 of their strike against the Hollywood studios on October 16, 2023 in Burbank, California. Contract negotiations between the actors union and the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (AMPTP) broke down last week in the strike which began July 14. (Photo by) The simmering tensions between creative industries and artificial intelligence companies erupted into open legal warfare this week, as Disney and Universal filed a landmark copyright lawsuit against AI image generator Midjourney, while Getty Images' high-profile case against Stability AI began in London. Mickey Mouse et Minnie Mouse présentant la maquette d'Euro Disneyland. (Photo by Yves ... More Forestier/Sygma via Getty Images) On June 12, Disney and Universal filed a 110-page complaint in Los Angeles federal court, accusing Midjourney of 'systematic, ongoing, and willful' copyright infringement. The studios allege that Midjourney trained its AI on 'countless' copyrighted images, then enabled users to generate unauthorized reproductions of beloved characters like Darth Vader, Shrek, and Homer Simpson with a simple text prompt. The complaint includes side-by-side comparisons of original movie stills and AI-generated images, and language characterizing the image generators as a 'bottomless pit of plagiarism.' AUSTIN, TX - MARCH 09: David Holz, now CEO of Midjourney, speaks onstage at the Leap Motion & the ... More Disappearing User Interface panel during the 2013 SXSW Music, Film + Interactive Festival at Austin Convention Center on March 9, 2013 in Austin, Texas. (Photo byfor SXSW) Midjourney, which reportedly generated $300 million in revenue last year and boasts over 20 million users, did not comment on the lawsuit. In a previous interview, founder David Holz has described his popular AI model in ways I'm sure he wishes he could take back. 'It's just a big scrape of the internet,' he said. 'We weren't picky.' NEW YORK - JUNE 15: Cast of "The Lion King" perform on stage during the 62nd Annual Tony Awards at ... More Radio City Music Hall on June 15, 2008 in New York City. (Photo by Theo Wargo/WireImage) *** Local Caption *** 'Piracy remains piracy, and the fact that it is perpetrated by an AI company does not diminish its infringement,' said Horacio Gutierrez, Disney's chief legal and compliance officer, in a statement. 'Our world-class intellectual property is built on decades of financial investment, creativity, and innovation, investments that are only viable due to the incentives enshrined in copyright law.' Kim Harris, general counsel for NBCUniversal, echoed the sentiment: 'We are initiating this action today to safeguard the hard work of all the artists whose creations entertain and inspire us, as well as to protect the significant investments we make in our content.' Legal experts say the case will hinge on whether Midjourney's outputs are 'transformative' enough to avoid infringement, and whether scraping content from the internet without consent crosses a legal line. 'The similarity is so strong there,' said Dustin Taylor, an IP attorney at Husch Blackwell. 'If the courts agree, this could set a precedent that fundamentally changes how AI companies train their models.' Canadian filmmaker James Cameron joined the board of directors for Stability AI, in September, 2024. ... More (Photo by JOEL SAGET / AFP) (Photo by JOEL SAGET/AFP via Getty Images) While Stable Diffusion's influence has waned, Midjourney remains among the most popular image generators. One of the reasons behind its popularity is that it creates ultra realistic cinematic images that look like they are from big movies. There are dozens of other companies that do this, too, including Runway, Ideogram, Freepik, ChatGPT, Grok, and Leonardo (owned by Canva), to name just a few. These lawsuits will have a chilling effect on their use, creating a new hierarchy in Generative AI, with companies like Google's Veo, which indemnifies its users, as do others like Adobe. Moonvalley's new AI model, Marey, is trained on fully licensed content. Small shops like Invisible Universe and Toonstar train their own models without external data. Runway has a deal with Lions Gate to do their same thing with their IP. DANA POINT, CALIFORNIA - SEPTEMBER 27: Craig Peters, CEO of Getty Images speaks onstage during Vox ... More Media's 2023 Code Conference at The Ritz-Carlton, Laguna Niguel on September 27, 2023 in Dana Point, California. (Photo byfor Vox Media) Across the Atlantic, Getty Images' lawsuit against Stability AI began in London's High Court. Getty accuses Stability AI of scraping millions of its copyrighted photos to train Stable Diffusion. Getty CEO Craig Peters told CNBC, 'We're spending millions and millions of dollars in one court case… AI companies are making the argument that paying for access to creative works would 'kill innovation' by raising costs, but taking copyrighted work without permission or compensation is really stealing.' Stability AI has admitted to using some Getty images for training but claims its practices fall under 'fair use' and that its models do not reproduce original works directly. 'Artists utilizing our tools are creating works that build upon collective human knowledge, which is fundamental to fair use and freedom of expression,' a Stability AI spokesperson said. Getty is bringing a parallel lawsuit against Stability AI in the United States. NEW YORK, NEW YORK - MAY 29: Bryn Mooser speaks onstage during WSJ's Future of Everything 2025 at ... More The Glasshouse on May 29, 2025 in New York City. (Photo by) Bryn Mooser, head of new, AI-focused Asteria Studios, partnered with Moonvally to create an AI video generator trained exclusively on licensed content, Marey. 'There's no question to me that the studios are right. AI models must have consent,' he said on the AI/XR Podcast last week. Disney and Universal are seeking up to $150,000 per infringed work, but this is not about the money as much as it is defeating the fair use argument, which will set the legal and ethical boundaries for how AI companies use copyrighted material in the years to come.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘The Last of Us' Ratings Declined During Season 2. But Why?
The first season of The Last of Us was a ratings blockbuster for HBO, setting records from the moment it premiered in 2023. The adaption of the postapocalyptic PlayStation game was the second-biggest series debut for network since 2010 and grew its audience significantly over its first few weeks. The second season told a slightly different story, and in more ways than one. More from The Hollywood Reporter Jason Isaacs Supports Johnny Flynn Cast as Lucius Malfoy in HBO's 'Harry Potter' Series 'Surviving Ohio State' Review: HBO's Sexual Abuse Doc Is Thorough and Persuasive, but Lacks a New Smoking Gun 'The Last of Us' Creators Confirm Kaitlyn Dever-Led Season 3: "I Was Sure They Wouldn't Let Us Do This" The Last of Us season two was still an extremely popular and acclaimed success. But according to Nielsen, the seven-episode second season has been softer in the ratings overall, despite kicking off slightly higher. The season's fourth and fifth episodes — the most recent episodes with third-party ratings available — had smaller audiences than any season one episodes. Measured on a week-by-week basis, Nielsen's season two tracking goes from 805 million minutes streamed during premiere week to 937 to 827 to 738 to 745. Overall, season two has averaged 18 percent fewer viewers than the first five episodes of season one. Granted, second seasons often performer lower than debut seasons, but The Last of Us is a show where potential growth seemed very possible, if not likely. The show is a heavily serialized Emmy-winning sensation that had two years to accumulate new fans. The season two trailers looked fantastic. Reviews were extremely strong (if just a tad softer than season one — 92 percent Fresh on Rotten Tomatoes versus 96 percent for the first season). There was plenty of marketing and publicity. And several buzzy HBO dramas have grown their audiences after their debut seasons (such as Game of Thrones, Succession and The White Lotus). So what gives? There is, of course, the obvious: The new season's second episode brutally killed off the show's beloved co-lead Joel (Pedro Pascal), leaving his ward Ellie (Bella Ramsey) to embark on a quest for revenge against his killer, Abby (Kaitlyn Dever). It could be as simple as that. And, yes, there are fans who have criticized Ramsey's portrayal of Ellie in season two, but there is actually evidence pushing back on that as the culprit, as we'll get to below. Here is another point of comparison to be made with Thrones: Fans feel that epic fantasy show started to lose its footing, if not its ratings, late in its run. Many point out that's around the same point in the story when showrunners David Benioff and Dan Weiss ran out of books to adapt from George R.R. Martin. What I find interesting is that Martin ran into enormous difficulty finishing his story around the same point that two entirely different writers began to struggle with their adaptation, despite Benioff and Weiss having previously pulled off many original deviations from the books. In other words: There is probably something inherently difficult about making A Song of Ice and Fire work — regardless of the medium or writer — after Jon Snow gets stabbed to death and Daenerys gets stuck in her Meereen pyramid. Likewise with The Last of Us, there might be something inherently more difficult about pulling off this tale after the first game/season. Once the story stops being about a 'wolf and cub' wandering the apocalypse and becomes the story of a dead wolf and an angry cub chasing a villain who is a mirror universe version of herself, something just slips for some percentage of viewers. The second season's trope-busting story is intensely clever, and has Something to Say about the nature of storytelling and heroes and how we invest in a point of view. You can respect the all artistic choices being made, but that doesn't mean the same number of people will enjoy that kind of story. It is, admittedly, a bit of a bummer. For more evidence, let's look at the sales of The Last of Us games. The first game — which inspired the first season — sold more than 20 million copies. The second game (which was hugely divisive in the gaming community) sold more than 10 million copies. These numbers are out of date (and don't account for the first game having a longer sales history). But by all reported accounts, the second game's sales lagged the first. Given both had Ellie voiced by Ashley Johnson — whom gamers loved in the role — pointing fingers at Ramsey for any slippage seems off base (particularly as the show has seemingly maintained its audience better than the sequel game). One could argue the mission of HBO's The Last of Us shouldn't have been absolute fidelity to the games, but rather fidelity to telling the best possible story with the games as merely an inspiration. Of course, there is no winning that one. Even the smallest change — of which there are many in the series — gets analyzed and criticized, and major shifts would likely get blasted even more. In a way, staying close to the game is the safest route, even if the story itself is more risky. If people don't like what you're doing, you can always say, 'We're being faithful to the game.' I suspect a key reason for the show's ratings slippage has less to do with season two and more to do with the end of season one. The end of the first season of Thrones (yes, back to that again) left viewers bursting with questions about what happens next for a large number of compelling characters. But the end of The Last of Us season one was actually a perfect conclusion. Once Joel saved Ellie from the Fireflies and they settled into a safe and thriving survivor camp, it felt like The End. If you're a viewer watching these two likable characters endure all sorts of grisly horrors, this was just about the best outcome for Joel and Ellie you could realistically hope for. A second season of The Last of Us can only be written as 'but then more — and even worse — bad stuff happens' for a tale that felt resolved. Indeed, the first PlayStation game was written as a complete story. The Last of Us Part II was partly inspired by the same market forces that typically result in sequels — namely, that the first game was a hit. But just imagine if Martin had ended his first Song of Ice and Fire book with all the Stark kids safely back at Winterfell and then he had to figure out a sequel. Or imagine, if after killing off Ned Stark, the only remaining major season one character was Arya, and there was no Tyrion, Jon Snow, Sansa, Dany, Cersei, Jaime and others. In either case, season two could have still been cool, but it would almost certainly have been less popular than the version we got. From HBO's viewpoint, a critically acclaimed, Emmy-worthy appointment television hit is still a hit. Viewers will still line up to check out season three and the recent season will continue to rack up additional viewership on Max over time (when all forms of viewing are tallied over time, both seasons will easily be over 30 million views per episode). There is a 'so what?' counter-argument to be made about all this. But the audience reaction still reflects something interesting about the challenges of adaptation and how some great stories come with knots that cannot be untied. — Rick Porter contributed to this report. Best of The Hollywood Reporter 'The Studio': 30 Famous Faces Who Play (a Version of) Themselves in the Hollywood-Based Series 22 of the Most Shocking Character Deaths in Television History A 'Star Wars' Timeline: All the Movies and TV Shows in the Franchise