One in five first home buyers turn to the bank of Mum and Dad
New research from comparison site Finder has revealed that almost 20 per cent of new home buyers dipped into the bank of mum and dad to purchase their new home.
The Finder's First Home Buyer Report 2025 - based on a survey of more than 1000 first home buyers in Australia - found almost 1 in 5 (17 per cent) of first home buyers received financial help from their parents to save their deposit.
Know the news with the 7NEWS app: Download today
This equates to almost 20,000 first home buyers a year who are now lucky enough to receive financial assistance from their parents.
The report also revealed that the proportion of new buyers tapping into the bank of mum and dad has increased significantly from just 11 per cent in 2022.
Sarah Megginson, personal finance expert at Finder, said millions of Aussies are now counting on the bank of mum and dad to secure a home in Australia.
"The bank of mum and dad has become one of the biggest unofficial lenders in the country," Megginson said.
"For many young Australians, homeownership feels like a dream that won't be realised, unless you've got parents who can tip in some financial help - sometimes up to six figures," she added.
She said first home buyers with parental help aren't just getting into the property market earlier, they are also getting in "with more savings, bigger budgets, and a huge head start."
The report reveals first home buyers who receive financial support from their parents had 41 per cent more money left over in savings after buying their first home, compared to those who didn't receive any money from their parents.
The research also found that for buyers without family support, 40 per cent took five years or more to save a deposit.
In comparison, among buyers who received assistance, just 29 per cent took five years or more to save for a house.
The other top strategies young Australians use to save for their first home include living at home with their parents (21 per cent of first home buyers); spending less on dining out (20 per cent); and taking on a second job (17 per cent).
Meanwhile, the number of first home buyers who said they simply saved slowly over a long period of time fell from 23 per cent in 2022 to 17 per cent.
While increasing numbers of parents are supporting their children to buy their first home,
Megginson warned that too much generosity from parents' could hurt their own standard of living in retirement.
"Supporting your kids is part and parcel of being a parent, but you need to do it in a way that's sustainable for everyone," she said.
"I've heard of parents who end up working longer than they planned, delaying retirement or leaving themselves financially short once they retire, because they were too generous when giving their kids a financial leg-up," she warned.
The report also found that the percentage of first home buyers who bought out of a worry that property prices would soon become too expensive has increased from 31 per cent in 2022 to 38 per cent in 2025.
Meanwhile, 60 per cent of first home buyers say recent interest rate cuts influenced their decision to buy now.
However, the survey also revealed that nearly two in three, or 65 per cent of first home buyers, spend or expect to spend 30 per cent or more of their income on mortgage repayments, placing them in mortgage stress.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Tax reform on the table as summit eyes negative gearing
An overhaul of how Australians could be taxed will be put in the spotlight as a productivity roundtable draws to a close. The third and final day of the federal government's economic reform summit in Canberra will focus on tax reform and budget sustainability on Thursday. The government went into the federal election in May promising not to make changes to negative gearing and the capital gains benefit, but forum attendees are still expected to make the case for the reforms. Unions are set to argue for a full suite of tax measures including limiting negative gearing to one investment property, with existing laws allowed to stay in place for the next five years. A minimum tax rate of 25 per cent for people earning more than $1 million per year has been pitched by union attendees. Capital gains and negative gearing reform needed to be considered by the government to take to voters, tax expert Dale Boccabella said. "Aspects of the tax system is just unfair and the big one is the capital gains tax discount," the associate professor of tax law at the University of New South Wales told AAP. "If you look at who gets the benefits, it goes to the top end, they don't need a 50 per cent tax break." Assoc Prof Boccabella said sustainability of the tax system needed to be front and centre during the final day of the roundtable. "Sustainability and fairness go hand in hand, and underlying that, of course, is generational unfairness," he said. "The government should not be criticised for acting on (negative gearing), it should be done in a sustainable way." The third day of the summit will include a presentation on budget sustainability by Treasury secretary Jenny Wilkinson. A pitch on a better tax system will be delivered by Grattan Institute chief executive Aruna Sathanapally. Discussions on how to make government services and spending more efficient will be another topic for debate. The roundtable had produced consensus for areas of economic reform, Treasurer Jim Chalmers said. "We've already got a big agenda to ease the burden on businesses, cut red tape and build more homes but we're keen to do more where we can," he said.
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Tax reform on the table as summit eyes negative gearing
An overhaul of how Australians could be taxed will be put in the spotlight as a productivity roundtable draws to a close. The third and final day of the federal government's economic reform summit in Canberra will focus on tax reform and budget sustainability on Thursday. The government went into the federal election in May promising not to make changes to negative gearing and the capital gains benefit, but forum attendees are still expected to make the case for the reforms. Unions are set to argue for a full suite of tax measures including limiting negative gearing to one investment property, with existing laws allowed to stay in place for the next five years. A minimum tax rate of 25 per cent for people earning more than $1 million per year has been pitched by union attendees. Capital gains and negative gearing reform needed to be considered by the government to take to voters, tax expert Dale Boccabella said. "Aspects of the tax system is just unfair and the big one is the capital gains tax discount," the associate professor of tax law at the University of New South Wales told AAP. "If you look at who gets the benefits, it goes to the top end, they don't need a 50 per cent tax break." Assoc Prof Boccabella said sustainability of the tax system needed to be front and centre during the final day of the roundtable. "Sustainability and fairness go hand in hand, and underlying that, of course, is generational unfairness," he said. "The government should not be criticised for acting on (negative gearing), it should be done in a sustainable way." The third day of the summit will include a presentation on budget sustainability by Treasury secretary Jenny Wilkinson. A pitch on a better tax system will be delivered by Grattan Institute chief executive Aruna Sathanapally. Discussions on how to make government services and spending more efficient will be another topic for debate. The roundtable had produced consensus for areas of economic reform, Treasurer Jim Chalmers said. "We've already got a big agenda to ease the burden on businesses, cut red tape and build more homes but we're keen to do more where we can," he said.
Courier-Mail
11 hours ago
- Courier-Mail
Revealed: The hidden cost of Australia's ute tax breaks compared to EVs
Don't miss out on the headlines from Motoring. Followed categories will be added to My News. OPINION: We've all seen the headlines: electric vehicle (EV) tax breaks are costing taxpayers billions. According to Government modelling, the Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT) exemption for EVs, alongside other related perks, is forecast to cost Australians $23.4 billion by 2036. That's a staggering figure, especially when you consider this policy only began in July 2022. As the Productivity Commission highlighted in its second report, the cost of the EV FBT exemption has blown out from an initial forecast of $55 million per year to a staggering $560 million, leading to calls to scrap it. But have you ever wondered about the figures for subsidising big, diesel and fuel-chugging utes over the past decade? Well, that number doesn't exist. RELATED: What Albo's new road tax means for you 2025 Ford Ranger Wildtrak PHEV. Picture: Supplied While policymakers and commentators are lining up to slam EV incentives as 'inefficient' or 'costly', Australia's longstanding love affair with utes is being ignored. HUGE COST OF UTES IGNORED These vehicles, which make up four of the top five best-selling models in the country, are quietly driving away with generous tax perks – and Aussies are paying for it. Under Australia's tax system, commercial vehicles, such as dual-cab utes, can claim a Fringe Benefit Tax exemption, provided they're used 'primarily' for work. But the rules are so vague, that many use utes for personal reasons, which is allowed as long as it's 'minor, infrequent, and irregular'. In reality, many of these utes aren't ferrying tradies and tools. They're doing school drop-off, towing jet skis, and sitting in suburban streets. According to the Australian Institute, there are 1.5 times more utes on the road than there are actual tradies, which suggests a lot of people are claiming a tax break for a 'tool of trade' that's really just a big, comfy family car. MORE: New ute to spark price war Federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers during Prime Minister Anthony Albanese opening remarks at The Economic Reform Roundtable at Parliament House in Canberra. Picture: NewsWire / Martin Ollman It's not just FBT, utes also avoid the Luxury Car Tax, even if they cost well over six figures, because technically, they're not 'passenger vehicles'. So you can buy a RAM 1500 and avoid paying LCT, while someone buying a more efficient EV might get slugged. In 2023, high-end American-style utes alone cost Australians over $250 million in foregone revenue from the Luxury Car Tax, according to a report by the Australia Institute. That figure doesn't even count the tax revenue lost from the FBT exemption. Australia Institute research director Rod Campbell said Australia is subsidising 'big, dumb utes by hundreds of millions of dollars each year'. 'These vehicles are damaging roads, reducing safety and increasing emissions, yet they are given a massive tax break,' he said. I'm not ignoring the $23 billion figure attached to EV tax breaks, including FBT exemptions, import tariff relief, and other incentives but these tax breaks are designed to make EV ownership more accessible and affordable, particularly through novated leasing. MORE: Chinese brand moves into Holden's home A driver charging his car at an EV charging station in Caringbah. Picture: Jonathan Ng According to the National Automotive Leasing and Salary Packaging Association, more than 100,000 Australians have taken up an EV novated lease since mid-2022. These policies are critical to making EVs accessible, especially as the upfront costs are a little higher than petrol and diesel equivalents. These EV tax breaks are part of a broader push by the Federal Government to reach net zero by 2050, with transport making up 20 per cent of national emissions. HALF-PREGNANT APPROACH But the Productivity Commission's report now recommends scrapping the EV FBT exemption, arguing it's too costly and now 'duplicative' with the New Vehicle Efficiency Standards (NVES). Sure … the (NVES) will encourage automakers to import cleaner cars into the market, but that's only half the battle. If consumers aren't incentivised to buy them, nothing changes. You need both; one brings supply, the other brings demand. BYD electric cars for export waiting to be loaded onto a ship at a port in Yantai, in eastern China's Shandong province. (Photo by AFP) / China OUT As the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries (FCAI) noted, without continued consumer support, the 'continuation of current customer buying preferences will inevitably lead to the accrual of substantial penalties.' Automakers can't just absorb these costs; they will likely have to raise prices on popular models, reduce their availability, or exit the market altogether. Countries that have successfully transitioned to high EV adoption rates such as Norway, have almost always used both strong efficiency standards and generous consumer incentives. Relying solely on one or the other often leads to slower progress. So if we're serious about being fair and decarbonising the transport sector, then shouldn't we be looking at everything? Including utes. So why are we ignoring the ute loophole? Is it because it's politically uncomfortable? Talking about utes means comforting one of Australia's most beloved vehicle segments. Tradies vote and Aussies rely on them. If the Federal Government decides to pull EV tax breaks now, while leaving the ute loophole wide open, that's like turning off a light in a room and calling it a major win for energy efficiency. We need better policy and smarter decisions. Originally published as EV cuts loom while Aussies pay for ute tax
