
One in five first home buyers turn to the bank of Mum and Dad
With housing affordability an ongoing issue in Australia, with house prices continuing to outpace incomes, many young Australians are turning to their parents for help to buy their first property.
New research from comparison site Finder has revealed that almost 20 per cent of new home buyers dipped into the bank of mum and dad to purchase their new home.
The Finder's First Home Buyer Report 2025 - based on a survey of more than 1000 first home buyers in Australia - found almost 1 in 5 (17 per cent) of first home buyers received financial help from their parents to save their deposit.
Know the news with the 7NEWS app: Download today
This equates to almost 20,000 first home buyers a year who are now lucky enough to receive financial assistance from their parents.
The report also revealed that the proportion of new buyers tapping into the bank of mum and dad has increased significantly from just 11 per cent in 2022.
Sarah Megginson, personal finance expert at Finder, said millions of Aussies are now counting on the bank of mum and dad to secure a home in Australia.
"The bank of mum and dad has become one of the biggest unofficial lenders in the country," Megginson said.
"For many young Australians, homeownership feels like a dream that won't be realised, unless you've got parents who can tip in some financial help - sometimes up to six figures," she added.
She said first home buyers with parental help aren't just getting into the property market earlier, they are also getting in "with more savings, bigger budgets, and a huge head start."
The report reveals first home buyers who receive financial support from their parents had 41 per cent more money left over in savings after buying their first home, compared to those who didn't receive any money from their parents.
The research also found that for buyers without family support, 40 per cent took five years or more to save a deposit.
In comparison, among buyers who received assistance, just 29 per cent took five years or more to save for a house.
The other top strategies young Australians use to save for their first home include living at home with their parents (21 per cent of first home buyers); spending less on dining out (20 per cent); and taking on a second job (17 per cent).
Meanwhile, the number of first home buyers who said they simply saved slowly over a long period of time fell from 23 per cent in 2022 to 17 per cent.
While increasing numbers of parents are supporting their children to buy their first home,
Megginson warned that too much generosity from parents' could hurt their own standard of living in retirement.
"Supporting your kids is part and parcel of being a parent, but you need to do it in a way that's sustainable for everyone," she said.
"I've heard of parents who end up working longer than they planned, delaying retirement or leaving themselves financially short once they retire, because they were too generous when giving their kids a financial leg-up," she warned.
The report also found that the percentage of first home buyers who bought out of a worry that property prices would soon become too expensive has increased from 31 per cent in 2022 to 38 per cent in 2025.
Meanwhile, 60 per cent of first home buyers say recent interest rate cuts influenced their decision to buy now.
However, the survey also revealed that nearly two in three, or 65 per cent of first home buyers, spend or expect to spend 30 per cent or more of their income on mortgage repayments, placing them in mortgage stress.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Labor faces critical 'negotiations' with the Trump Administration to avoid section 899 'revenge tax', WAM Global's lead portfolio manager Catriona Burns declares
Donald Trump's controversial 'revenge tax' will force Australia to bargain with the United States on major points of contention as Labor looks to protect the $4.2 trillion super pool and investment. Section 899 of Trump's 'big beautiful bill' will allow the US to force taxes on nations it believes unfairly treats US firms – such as tech giants Meta and Alphabet. This comes as Australia targets big tech through its media bargaining incentive, while the nation's Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme has also drawn the Trump Administration's ire. If the bill passes, Australians may be forced to pay upwards of 20 per cent more tax on US investments. WAM Global's lead portfolio manager Catriona Burns said the Albanese government will be forced to bargain with the US. 'We give up some of the penalties that we're potentially putting on the tech companies, for example, in exchange for walking back the penalties that would be put on Australia,' Ms Burns said on Business Now. 'There's absolutely negotiation that will still likely go on and we could come to a much more favourable resolution than what is being proposed at this point.' Treasurer Jim Chalmers on Wednesday told reporters he had discussed section 899 with US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and made Australia's case against the looming tax. "We do not want to see our investors and our funds unfairly treated or disadvantaged when it comes to developments out of the US Congress,' the Treasurer said. This comes as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese vowed to protect beef trade, the media bargaining code and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme after Trump first revealed sweeping "Liberation Day" tariffs. Despite the threats to Australia's super industry and investment returns, Ms Burns argued that investing in the US may still be more beneficial if section 899 of the bill goes through considering the greater potential for returns. 'When you look at the companies, particularly in the tech space for example, that are in America, there (are) still some wonderful businesses to invest in,' she said. 'Some of the best businesses in the world are in the US, so even with this potentially capping the returns that you can generate out of investing in the US, it still may well be the best place to invest. 'Importantly, it may incentivise the companies that you invest in in the US to actually give more back to investors in the form of buybacks rather than dividends.' Many in Australia's $4.2 trillion superannuation system have expressed concerns about diminished returns if the legislation passes as hundreds of billions of dollars of members' funds is invested in the US. AMP's chief economist Shane Oliver earlier this month said section 899 of the bill, alongside other economic policies by the Trump Administration, 'called into question 'US exceptionalism' and its 'safe haven' status'. The Future Fund chair Greg Combet also expressed concerns about the bill where he argued the US was hurting itself by thwarting investment through section 899. 'Section 899 of the Bill will potentially and dramatically escalate tax rates for Australian institutional investors like the Future Fund,' Mr Combet said in a speech to the Committee for Economic Development of Australia earlier this month. 'In combination these policies and dynamics are making the US a more risky and uncertain investment destination.'

The Age
3 hours ago
- The Age
Climate-friendly gas claims challenged in landmark ACCC greenwash case
As oil and gas companies talk up their initiatives to shift to less-polluting fuels of the future, the national consumer watchdog wants to draw a line in the sand limiting how far those claims can go. On Thursday the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) launched a landmark lawsuit alleging millions of Australians were misled by a series of advertisements suggesting the gas that flows into household heaters and stovetops could be 'renewable' within a generation. Gas distribution company Australian Gas Networks ran an advertising campaign called 'Love Gas' in 2022 and 2023, featuring a father and his young daughter using gas-powered appliances for cooking, heating and bathing. The advertisement then fast-forwards in time to show the daughter, now an adult, engaging in the same activities. 'Some things will never change, but the flame we use will,' said the voiceover in the ad. 'It's becoming renewable.' As the gradual switch to all-electric homes threatens to leave billions of dollars of gas pipeline infrastructure as stranded assets, the promise of cleaner fuels – such as gases made from organic waste or hydrogen – being blended with and one day replacing polluting methane gas used in homes and businesses has become one of the industry's main survival plans. Loading But renewable gases are not yet commonly used nor available to residential gas customers. The ACCC alleges Australian Gas Networks' advertising overstated the likelihood it could overcome 'significant technological and economic barriers' within the time frame it suggested. 'It is not currently possible to distribute renewable gas at scale and at an economically viable price, and throughout 2022 and 2023 it was highly uncertain whether, and if so, when, this would be possible,' ACCC chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb said.

Sydney Morning Herald
3 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Climate-friendly gas claims challenged in landmark ACCC greenwash case
As oil and gas companies talk up their initiatives to shift to less-polluting fuels of the future, the national consumer watchdog wants to draw a line in the sand limiting how far those claims can go. On Thursday the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) launched a landmark lawsuit alleging millions of Australians were misled by a series of advertisements suggesting the gas that flows into household heaters and stovetops could be 'renewable' within a generation. Gas distribution company Australian Gas Networks ran an advertising campaign called 'Love Gas' in 2022 and 2023, featuring a father and his young daughter using gas-powered appliances for cooking, heating and bathing. The advertisement then fast-forwards in time to show the daughter, now an adult, engaging in the same activities. 'Some things will never change, but the flame we use will,' said the voiceover in the ad. 'It's becoming renewable.' As the gradual switch to all-electric homes threatens to leave billions of dollars of gas pipeline infrastructure as stranded assets, the promise of cleaner fuels – such as gases made from organic waste or hydrogen – being blended with and one day replacing polluting methane gas used in homes and businesses has become one of the industry's main survival plans. Loading But renewable gases are not yet commonly used nor available to residential gas customers. The ACCC alleges Australian Gas Networks' advertising overstated the likelihood it could overcome 'significant technological and economic barriers' within the time frame it suggested. 'It is not currently possible to distribute renewable gas at scale and at an economically viable price, and throughout 2022 and 2023 it was highly uncertain whether, and if so, when, this would be possible,' ACCC chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb said.