logo
Alternative Grass Grub Weapon Now Urgent

Alternative Grass Grub Weapon Now Urgent

Scoop15-07-2025
Federated Farmers says urgent action is needed to plug a looming gap in treatments to fight native grass grub, which costs the agricultural sector hundreds of millions of dollars each year.
"This is our biggest agricultural pest by a country mile, yet there's a real risk farmers' arsenal to fight it will soon be empty," Feds biosecurity spokesperson David Birkett says.
"It's pleasing that manufacturers have work developing new chemicals underway.
"We also need the Environmental Protection Authority to prioritise and fast-track their assessment of any new options."
Costelytra giveni is a scourge for pasture and lawn, and also a risk to horticulture and native plant root systems.
The two most effective chemicals to control the grub - chlorpyrifos and Diazanon - are both being phased out after decisions by the EPA to ban them.
Chlorpyrifos, a broad-spectrum organophosphate insecticide, is banned in the European Union and Canada, and its use is heavily restricted in Australia.
It is in the process of being phased out internationally via the Stockholm Convention, of which New Zealand is a signatory.
The EPA recently consulted on banning chlorpyrifos here. After considering new information, and holding a public hearing, a decision-making committee found risks to people and the environment - especially to those spraying it - outweighed the benefits.
"We're pleased the EPA listened carefully to our submission, and decided that for the agricultural sector, the ban would come at the end of an 18-month phase-out period," Birkett says.
"However, stocks of chlorpyrifos are already very limited and in the face of bans, manufacturers are taking it out of production."
The other potent weapon for combating grass grub, Diazanon, will also be banned from 2028.
Federated Farmers understands AgResearch and ag chem companies are well underway with developing a new tool for combatting grass grub.
"We'd really like to see them accelerate that development work. It would be disastrous for food production and our agricultural exports if our farmers are left high and dry for any period without an effective control method," Birkett says.
A 2018 study said native scarab grass grub causes losses of up to $380 million on dairy farms and $205 million on sheep and beef farmers every year - and that was with access to chlorpyrifos.
Birkett says the EPA also needs to play its role swiftly.
"Federated Farmers has been critical of the EPA's failure to get on top of a backlog of assessment applications for agri-chemicals and animal health treatments.
"We've welcomed Government announcements on new measures aimed at streamlining assessment processes, particularly in cases where chemicals are already being used safety in other countries.
"But the the EPA also needs to adjust its priorities and not focus on assessing generic chemicals that are already available," Birkett says.
"Their work stream needs to take better account of how far off approvals are for effective replacement products, including biosecurity and pest increase issues, and how much delays would cost the country.
"The new chemicals that offer the greatest economic benefits should get priority in the queue - and I would put any new treatment for grass grub in that category," Birkett says.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Alternative Grass Grub Weapon Now Urgent
Alternative Grass Grub Weapon Now Urgent

Scoop

time15-07-2025

  • Scoop

Alternative Grass Grub Weapon Now Urgent

Federated Farmers says urgent action is needed to plug a looming gap in treatments to fight native grass grub, which costs the agricultural sector hundreds of millions of dollars each year. "This is our biggest agricultural pest by a country mile, yet there's a real risk farmers' arsenal to fight it will soon be empty," Feds biosecurity spokesperson David Birkett says. "It's pleasing that manufacturers have work developing new chemicals underway. "We also need the Environmental Protection Authority to prioritise and fast-track their assessment of any new options." Costelytra giveni is a scourge for pasture and lawn, and also a risk to horticulture and native plant root systems. The two most effective chemicals to control the grub - chlorpyrifos and Diazanon - are both being phased out after decisions by the EPA to ban them. Chlorpyrifos, a broad-spectrum organophosphate insecticide, is banned in the European Union and Canada, and its use is heavily restricted in Australia. It is in the process of being phased out internationally via the Stockholm Convention, of which New Zealand is a signatory. The EPA recently consulted on banning chlorpyrifos here. After considering new information, and holding a public hearing, a decision-making committee found risks to people and the environment - especially to those spraying it - outweighed the benefits. "We're pleased the EPA listened carefully to our submission, and decided that for the agricultural sector, the ban would come at the end of an 18-month phase-out period," Birkett says. "However, stocks of chlorpyrifos are already very limited and in the face of bans, manufacturers are taking it out of production." The other potent weapon for combating grass grub, Diazanon, will also be banned from 2028. Federated Farmers understands AgResearch and ag chem companies are well underway with developing a new tool for combatting grass grub. "We'd really like to see them accelerate that development work. It would be disastrous for food production and our agricultural exports if our farmers are left high and dry for any period without an effective control method," Birkett says. A 2018 study said native scarab grass grub causes losses of up to $380 million on dairy farms and $205 million on sheep and beef farmers every year - and that was with access to chlorpyrifos. Birkett says the EPA also needs to play its role swiftly. "Federated Farmers has been critical of the EPA's failure to get on top of a backlog of assessment applications for agri-chemicals and animal health treatments. "We've welcomed Government announcements on new measures aimed at streamlining assessment processes, particularly in cases where chemicals are already being used safety in other countries. "But the the EPA also needs to adjust its priorities and not focus on assessing generic chemicals that are already available," Birkett says. "Their work stream needs to take better account of how far off approvals are for effective replacement products, including biosecurity and pest increase issues, and how much delays would cost the country. "The new chemicals that offer the greatest economic benefits should get priority in the queue - and I would put any new treatment for grass grub in that category," Birkett says.

Does New Zealand need a common will repository?
Does New Zealand need a common will repository?

RNZ News

time01-07-2025

  • RNZ News

Does New Zealand need a common will repository?

One of the most common queries the Citizens' Advice Bureau fields is to do with death and dying. More than 6000 enquiries about this topic were made to the CAB in 2023 - many over what to do if someone dies intestate - without a will - and the consequent impacts of that. Also of concern, setting up Enduring Power of Attorney and how to manage funeral costs. The organisation's Deputy Chief Executive is Andrew Hubbard, and he joins Kathryn to talk about why New Zealand needs a common will repository and a publicly funded service for wills and setting up EPAs. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.

Ratepayers foot bill for rubbish dumped along South Wairarapa coast
Ratepayers foot bill for rubbish dumped along South Wairarapa coast

RNZ News

time28-06-2025

  • RNZ News

Ratepayers foot bill for rubbish dumped along South Wairarapa coast

The local council described the dumping as "enormously irresponsible and disappointing". Photo: Emily Ireland Ratepayers will foot the $145,000 bill to to remove 26 tonnes of illegally dumped rubbish along on the South Wairarapa Coast. Environmental Protection Authority, police and specialist contractors needed more than two weeks to clean up waste dumped along the coast, which included 3.7 tonnes of scrap metal - bikes, whiteware and even a car. The clean-up was an urgent recommendation from the Environmental Protection Authority. "The overall cost came in at approximately $145,000, which is about $50,000 less than originally forecast," said South Wairarapa District Council chief executive Janice Smith. Rubbish is removed from the South Wairarapa coastline. Photo: Supplied/SWDC Smith said people dumping this amount of rubbish was "enormously irresponsible and disappointing", as items like bikes and whiteware can be disposed of at transfer stations for no cost. The council said illegal dumping was a serious issue, as it could pose a serious health issue, when it contained harmful materials, such as glass, metal and hazardous matter. It said the clean-up process also ended up being expensive for both the council and ratepayers, and on the environment, with abandoned waste damaging ecosytems, polluting airways and harming wildlife. The site is now permanently blocked off, with security cameras in place to monitor it. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store