logo
Paper to port: How Bills of Lading Bill signals India's next shipping logistics leap

Paper to port: How Bills of Lading Bill signals India's next shipping logistics leap

India Today22-07-2025
In a largely empty House, amidst the din of a post-lunch Opposition walkout on July 21, the Rajya Sabha quietly passed a piece of legislation that could transform India's maritime logistics and global trade flows. The Bills of Lading Bill, 2025, which replaces the archaic 169-year-old Indian Bills of Lading Act of 1856, might lack the dramatic political appeal but its implications could ripple far deeper than most realise.The bill was cleared by the Lok Sabha during the budget session in March and will now go for the president's assent before becoming a law.advertisementAt its heart, the new legislation aims to modernise how India handles the most fundamental document in global shipping—the bill of lading (BoL). For centuries, this humble document, often printed on crisp bonded paper, has served as the holy trinity of international commerce: a receipt of goods, a contract of carriage and, most crucially, a document of title. Whoever held it—physically—owned the cargo. Until now.The Bills of Lading Bill legally recognises electronic bills of lading, enabling shipping lines, freight forwarders, banks and importers/exporters to digitally issue, endorse and transfer BoLs. In essence, it does to international cargo what the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) did to money: it removes the friction of physical presence and accelerates trust through secure digital systems.
The bill's passage comes not a moment too soon. India is working aggressively to reduce logistics costs, currently hovering around 13-14 per cent of the GDP, well above global averages. If the country is to become a serious node in resilient global supply chains, it must offer more than cheap labour and tax incentives. It must offer speed, predictability and interoperability. And that's where the BoL reform matters.Shipping experts have long flagged the use of physical BoLs as a bottleneck in India's export value chain. When a container travels faster than the paper that certifies its ownership, cargo sits idle at ports, buyers incur demurrage, and insurers pull their hair out over liability gaps. In many cases, the absence or delay of BoLs forces importers to issue Letters of Indemnity (LoIs), exposing banks and businesses to legal and financial risk. These frictions aren't just technical—they're economic handbrakes.The government has finally responded with an overhaul backed by international best practices. The new law aligns with the UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Transferable Records (MLETR)—a global framework adopted by countries such as Singapore, the UK and Bahrain to facilitate legally valid electronic documents in trade and shipping. It also syncs with India's broader Gati Shakti logistics platform, the National Logistics Policy and digital trade initiatives such as the Unified Logistics Interface Platform (ULIP).'This bill is not a procedural tweak—it's a statement of intent,' said a senior official in the shipping ministry. 'We are signalling to the world that India will no longer be held back by 19th-century processes for 21st-century trade.'Data from the Digital Container Shipping Association (DCSA) suggests that global adoption of electronic BoLs could save over $4 billion annually, not to mention the environmental savings from reduced paper, courier transport and redundant handling. Indian shippers stand to gain even more, especially in time-sensitive sectors such as textiles, pharmaceuticals and perishables, where even a 24-hour delay can mean loss of market or spoilage of goods.advertisementThe private sector has been cautiously optimistic. Platforms such as TradeLens (a now-defunct Maersk-IBM venture), CargoX and Bolero have already rolled out blockchain-based BoL solutions, but without a domestic legal framework, adoption in India remained stunted. With this law now passed, digital BoLs can be issued with legal confidence, negotiability and enforceability within Indian courts and regulatory systems.Yet, challenges remain. Critics such as Biju Janata Dal MP Niranjan Bishi raised concerns in the Rajya Sabha that loosening title transfer protocols without airtight cybersecurity could lead to fraud, data leaks or forged documents. Moreover, the real test will lie not in the law's text but its implementation. India's port systems remain unevenly digitised; many freight forwarders are small, informal operators who lack the tech backbone to adopt eBoLs overnight. Customs, excise and judicial authorities will also need training and updated protocols to recognise and process digital documents in disputes or enforcement cases.advertisementThere's also the international angle. For digital BoLs to be truly frictionless, cross-border recognition is essential. If Indian exporters are sending goods to countries that don't yet legally recognise eBoLs, or demand physical documents for banking, the full benefits of the new law may remain unrealised. Much like the journey of UPI's internationalisation, this too will require careful diplomatic and trade coordination.Nonetheless, the government's strategy seems clear. By pushing through the Bill now—despite the Opposition walkout and with minimal fanfare—it is laying the plumbing for India's emergence as a digitally savvy, high-efficiency trading power. With 90 per cent of India's trade by volume moving via sea, the digitisation of maritime paperwork could bring about a silent revolution in how India trades, settles disputes and scales its global presence.Some might dismiss the bill as a technical upgrade. But in the complex chessboard of global trade, even small moves—when executed well—can change the game. The Bills of Lading Bill, 2025 is one such move. Now, it's up to the shipping lines, exporters, fintech platforms and customs authorities to make the most of it.Subscribe to India Today Magazine- Ends
advertisement
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Govt says no debate on SIR due to rules
Govt says no debate on SIR due to rules

Hindustan Times

time41 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Govt says no debate on SIR due to rules

New Delhi: The government on Wednesday turned down the Opposition's demand for a discussion on the Election Commission's ongoing special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar and said in the Lok Sabha that matters pending before the judiciary cannot be discussed on the floor of the House. Opposition MPs create ruckus in Rajya Sabha during the Monsoon Session of the Parliament, in New Delhi on Wednesday. (ANI) Some Opposition leaders said that instead of SIR, they have proposed a debate on 'electoral reforms' as a way to end the deadlock in Parliament. However, government managers indicated the ruling side is unlikely to accede to any such debate. 'The government has been very open to taking up discussion on any matter... However, any discussion in the Parliament has to be in accordance with constitutional provisions and also in accordance with the rules as prescribed in the rules of procedure and conduct of business in the Lok Sabha,' parliamentary affairs minister Kiren Rijiju told the Lok Sabha. 'On the issue of intensive revision of electoral rolls in Bihar for which they (opposition members) are disturbing the House from first day of the session, we all know that the matter is under consideration of the Supreme Court and as such it is sub judice and a hence a discussion cannot be held on the subject,' he added. The minister also cited a 1988 ruling by then Lok Sabha Speaker Balram Jakhar that under the existing constitutional provisions, the House cannot comment upon the actions of the Election Commission. Jakhar, according to Rijiju, had said that he cannot break the rules by allowing a discussion on the functioning of EC. The Supreme Court is hearing a bunch of petitions challenging the ongoing SIR exercise in Bihar. On Wednesday, the top court directed EC to file a reply by August 9 in response to allegations that over 6.5 million names were deleted from Bihar's draft rolls. Rijiju underlined that the issue relates to the functioning of EC, which is an autonomous body. The minister also urged the Opposition members to participate in the debates for the passage of key legislations. 'I urge the members not to disrupt the House. There are important bills to be taken up,' he added. Meanwhile, several opposition party leaders urged Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla to refer two bills — the National Sports Governance Bill, 2025 and the National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Bill, 2025 — to a joint committee of Parliament for further scrutiny. In a joint letter to the Speaker, the opposition leaders said there is a need for a broader consensus on the two significant bills, listed for consideration and passage in the House, considering their national importance. Proceedings in both houses have been disrupted by the Opposition, which has been creating uproar in Parliament on their demand for a discussion on SIR, which they allege is aimed at disenfranchising a large number of voters. Addressing a joint press conference of the Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance (INDIA) bloc, Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge rejected the argument that the functioning of EC cannot be discussed in Parliament as it is an independent constitutional body. Kharge cited former Rajya Sabha chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar's July 21, 2023 ruling that the House is authorised to debate anything under the sun and under the planet. 'We have been urging the speaker, chairman and the government again and again that the voting rights of people should not be stolen... That is what is happening in the SIR exercise,' the Congress chief said. Alleging that government was manipulating the electoral system according to its own convenience, Kharge said that while a huge number of voters were added in the electoral list in Maharashtra, the names of voters are being deleted in assembly poll-bound Bihar.

LS passes Merchant Shipping Bill, 2024 by voice vote
LS passes Merchant Shipping Bill, 2024 by voice vote

United News of India

timean hour ago

  • United News of India

LS passes Merchant Shipping Bill, 2024 by voice vote

New Delhi, Aug 6 (UNI) Amid noisy protests by Congress and Opposition members, the Lok Sabha today passed the Merchant Shipping Bill, 2024, by voice vote after a brief discussion. When the House reconvened at 2 PM after second adjournment, presiding officer Sandhya Rai called for the proceedings of the House. However, the Opposition members had already entered the Well of the House raising slogans. Amid the din, Union Minister for Ports, Shipping and Waterways Sarbanand Sonowal moved 'The Merchant Shipping Bill, 2024 for consideration and passing. Despite the uproar, Sonowal said the Bill ensures greater safety at sea, robust protection of marine environment, faster response to emergencies and comprehensive welfare for the seafarers. It streamlines compliance, boosts tonnage under the Indian flag and enhances India's bankability as a maritime trade hub. He called the Bill as progressive, advanced and modern and said India has emerged as the largest supplier of Merchant Shipping Act 1958 presently governs merchant shipping in India and implements certain international maritime organisation convention. However, the present Act is outdated since it does not provide for some of the critical obligations under the international convention that have been adopted by India, he added. The Act is no longer adequate to realize the country's developmental vision and address the contemporary challenges of the maritime sector. He said that additionally the 1958 Act prioritises regulation over enablement and as a result does not adequately represent the bankability of India as a maritime trade hub aligning the domestic law with international best practices. "The focus of the Bill is increasing India's bankability in maritime sector." The Bill seeks to replace the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958. The Bill provides for temporary registration to unregistered vessels which are to be recycled in India. The Bill instead requires all vessels to be registered regardless of type of propulsion or weight. It expands the definition of vessels to include types such as mobile offshore drilling units, submersibles, and non-displacement crafts. The Bill adds that a foreign vessel chartered by an Indian person may be registered as an Indian vessel. This will apply where the ownership is intended to be transferred to the charterer after a specified period. The Bill states that the central government may create a new body to regulate security of vessels and ports. Amid the din, Captain Brijesh Chowta while discussing on the Bill termed it as a "landmark bill". He said, the Bill will modernize the country's maritime, create jobs and encourage foreign investments. Moreover, Mukeshkumar Chandrakaant Dalal too supported the Bill. The Bill was passed even as the Opposition chaos continued. After the Bill was passed, Sandhya Rai adjourned the House for the day. UNI RBE RB

Logjam over SIR: Rijiju says House can't discuss EC's functioning, Congress counters
Logjam over SIR: Rijiju says House can't discuss EC's functioning, Congress counters

Indian Express

time2 hours ago

  • Indian Express

Logjam over SIR: Rijiju says House can't discuss EC's functioning, Congress counters

Parliament saw little legislative business Wednesday as the Opposition attempted to bring up the SIR in Bihar and the government said rules and precedent do not allow for a debate on the Election Commission, which is conducting the exercise. Lok Sabha was adjourned within minutes of its proceedings getting underway. Rajya Sabha proceedings were adjourned until 2 pm soon after it commenced. The RS was later adjourned for the day after the passing of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Bill by voice vote. Opposition parties have repeatedly sought a discussion during this Parliament session on the SIR exercise. Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju, during the second half of LS, told the Opposition that the government is 'very open to take up for discussion any matter'. 'On the issue of SIR which they are disturbing the House (on) from day one, we all know the matter is under the consideration of the Supreme Court and is sub-judice. Under Rule 186 (8), any matter can be discussed in the House only if it does not relate to a matter which is under adjudication by a court of law…' he said. In the past, he said, it had been clearly established in LS that matters 'falling under the domain of the Election Commission cannot be discussed'. 'The House cannot have a discussion on the working of an autonomous body like the Election Commission. Do you want to break the rules established by this House? Do you want to throw out the provisions of the Constitution of India?' he said. Deputy Leader of Congress in LS Gaurav Gogoi said: 'Just to jog the memory of the BJP-led NDA government — Parliament has a long history of discussing electoral reforms and functioning of the EC… There is ample precedent,' he said, citing debates in 1961, 1981 and 1991, among others. Congress MP Manish Tewari said the Rijiju was 'absolutely wrong' and that the House had 'discussed many times' in the past the 'conduct of the Election Commission'. In RS, after ministers laid papers on the table of the House, and an obituary was read out for former J&K governor Satya Pal Malik, Deputy Chairman Harivansh said he would not admit 35 notices received under Rule 267. MPs can seek discussions on urgent matters under Rule 267. '…none of these notices are in adherence to the rules as enunciated in the past…' Harivansh said, sparking protests. Harivansh appealed to members to let the House function during Zero Hour. With the MPs not relenting, the Deputy Chairman adjourned the proceedings till 2 pm. After the House reconvened, members of the Opposition tried to raise a point of order. Bhubaneswar Kalita, who was then chairing Rajya Sabha, said he would allow a point of order only when there was order in the House. He asked all the members to return to their seats. Leader of Opposition in RS Mallikarjun Kharge said: 'When members from this side raise a point of order then you say that the House is not in order. There, they are giving speeches. And, you are allowing them. This is unfair, untenable…' To this, the leader of House J P Nadda said: 'Sir, those who create disorder in the House have no right to raise point of order. If you are so interested, obey the rules accordingly, otherwise the Chair's direction is final.' When Opposition MPs were called to speak on the Bill, they either did not go back to their seats and forfeited their chance, or tried to raise SIR issue. Kalita said nothing would go on record and moved to the next speaker.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store