logo
Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:PHAT): Are Analysts Optimistic?

Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:PHAT): Are Analysts Optimistic?

Yahoo4 hours ago

Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. () is possibly approaching a major achievement in its business, so we would like to shine some light on the company. Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, focuses on developing and commercializing treatments for gastrointestinal diseases. The company's loss has recently broadened since it announced a US$334m loss in the full financial year, compared to the latest trailing-twelve-month loss of US$346m, moving it further away from breakeven. Many investors are wondering about the rate at which Phathom Pharmaceuticals will turn a profit, with the big question being 'when will the company breakeven?' We've put together a brief outline of industry analyst expectations for the company, its year of breakeven and its implied growth rate.
AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early.
Consensus from 8 of the American Pharmaceuticals analysts is that Phathom Pharmaceuticals is on the verge of breakeven. They expect the company to post a final loss in 2026, before turning a profit of US$95m in 2027. Therefore, the company is expected to breakeven roughly 2 years from today. What rate will the company have to grow year-on-year in order to breakeven on this date? Using a line of best fit, we calculated an average annual growth rate of 68%, which is extremely buoyant. If this rate turns out to be too aggressive, the company may become profitable much later than analysts predict.
We're not going to go through company-specific developments for Phathom Pharmaceuticals given that this is a high-level summary, however, take into account that generally pharmaceuticals, depending on the stage of product development, have irregular periods of cash flow. So, a high growth rate is not out of the ordinary, particularly when a company is in a period of investment.
View our latest analysis for Phathom Pharmaceuticals
Before we wrap up, there's one issue worth mentioning. Phathom Pharmaceuticals currently has negative equity on its balance sheet. This can sometimes arise from accounting methods used to deal with accumulated losses from prior years, which are viewed as liabilities carried forward until it cancels out in the future. Oftentimes, losses exist only on paper but other times, it can be a red flag.
There are key fundamentals of Phathom Pharmaceuticals which are not covered in this article, but we must stress again that this is merely a basic overview. For a more comprehensive look at Phathom Pharmaceuticals, take a look at Phathom Pharmaceuticals' company page on Simply Wall St. We've also compiled a list of pertinent factors you should further examine:
Valuation: What is Phathom Pharmaceuticals worth today? Has the future growth potential already been factored into the price? The intrinsic value infographic in our free research report helps visualize whether Phathom Pharmaceuticals is currently mispriced by the market.
Management Team: An experienced management team on the helm increases our confidence in the business – take a look at who sits on Phathom Pharmaceuticals's board and the CEO's background.
Other High-Performing Stocks: Are there other stocks that provide better prospects with proven track records? Explore our free list of these great stocks here.

Investing narratives with Fair Values
A case for TSXV:USA to reach USD $5.00 - $9.00 (CAD $7.30–$12.29) by 2029. By Agricola – Community Contributor
Fair Value Estimated: CA$12.29 · 0.9% Overvalued
DLocal's Future Growth Fueled by 35% Revenue and Profit Margin Boosts By WynnLevi – Community Contributor
Fair Value Estimated: $195.39 · 0.9% Overvalued
Historically Cheap, but the Margin of Safety Is Still Thin By Mandelman – Community Contributor
Fair Value Estimated: SEK232.58 · 0.1% Overvalued
View more featured narratives

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

5 Cars With Trade-In Values So Low That They're Not Worth Selling
5 Cars With Trade-In Values So Low That They're Not Worth Selling

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

5 Cars With Trade-In Values So Low That They're Not Worth Selling

Trading in a car can seem like the easiest way to upgrade your ride, but for some models, the dealer's offer will feel like an insult. In 2025, several vehicles are facing such steep depreciation and low demand that their trade-in values are shockingly low. Lauren Fix, automotive expert at Car Coach Reports, explained that high depreciation, oversupply and expensive maintenance are the main reasons these cars are so undervalued. Find Out: Read Next: Dealers also factor in brand perception and the cost of reconditioning, which can slash offers even further. For many owners, the trade-in value might be lower than what they could get from a private sale or even scrapping the car. Here are five cars with trade-in values so low that selling them to a dealer just does not make financial sense for most owners. Also consider these five cars are worth trading in for a newer model. The Jaguar I-PACE, an electric SUV launched with high hopes, now leads the pack in five-year depreciation, losing about 72.2% of its value, according to iSeeCars. Originally priced around $75,000, a 2020 model in average condition might only fetch $20,000 to $25,000 as a trade-in. Fix said this is due to rapid electric vehicle (EV) depreciation and low demand for Jaguar's aging design. Dealers hesitate to offer more because of high battery replacement costs and the brand's reputation for reliability issues. With a saturated used EV market and newer, more advanced electric models, the I-PACE's trade-in value is so low that owners should explore private sales or tax-deductible donations. Trending Now: The Maserati Levante, a luxury SUV, suffers from one of the highest depreciation rates in its class. According to CarEdge, it lost about 74% of its value after five years. Dealers are wary of the Levante's expensive maintenance and repairs, as well as Maserati's spotty reliability record, which further depresses its resale value. Fix said a 2019 Levante with an MSRP of $80,000 may only sell for $25,000 to $30,000, especially if it has considerable miles. For most owners, the trade-in offer will feel like a fraction of what the car once cost, making private sale, donation or keeping the car for personal use a smarter choice. The Nissan Leaf, once a pioneer in the electric vehicle market, now faces rapid depreciation due to outdated battery technology and limited range. According to CarEdge, the Nissan Leaf will 'depreciate 62% after 5 years' and have a '5-year resale value of $13,308.' The market for used Leafs is crowded, and dealers know that buyers prefer newer EVs with longer ranges, so they offer less to minimize their risk. For example, Fix said a 2020 model, initially $35,000, may only receive $10,000 to $12,000 in trade-in, a 60% loss in five years. Owners may find that selling privately or donating the car for a tax deduction will yield better value than accepting a dealer's lowball offer. The Chrysler 300, a full-size sedan once popular for its bold styling, now suffers from low demand and a poor resale reputation. According to iSeeCars, a new Chrysler 300 depreciates 52.1% after five years, resulting in a typical resale value of $16,422. Fix said excessive mileage (over 100,000 miles) or accident history can further reduce trade-in bids by 10 to 20%, frequently below private sale or trash value. Dealers are reluctant to pay more for a car that is difficult to resell, especially when factoring in reconditioning costs and the risk of sitting on unsold inventory. For many Chrysler 300 owners, trading in will not make sense financially, and exploring private sale options or keeping the car longer may be wiser. Auto mechanic and JustAnswer expert Chris Pyle suggests keeping the car if you need a spare or sell it online or from your front yard, rather than going to the dealership. According to Fix, Dodge Hornet was the slowest-selling new automobile, with a 299-day supply on dealer lots as of late 2024. She explains that an oversupply of slow-selling models, forces dealers to offer low trade-in values to clear lots. Moreover, CarEdge projects a Dodge Hornet will depreciate 65% after five years, with a three-year resale value of about $15,600, confirming the steep loss in value. Recent trade-in offers on CarMax show 2023 Dodge Hornets ranging from $21,000 to $24,000 for low-mileage vehicles. This means for higher-mileage or less desirable trims, trade-in values of $12,000 to $14,000 for a three-year-old model are realistic. Owners looking to maximize value should consider selling privately, donating for a tax deduction or holding onto the car until market conditions improve. Editor's note: Photos are for representational purposes only. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 4 Housing Markets That Have Plummeted in Value Over the Past 5 Years 6 Hybrid Vehicles To Stay Away From in Retirement This article originally appeared on 5 Cars With Trade-In Values So Low That They're Not Worth Selling

Vistra's Nuclear AI Option, Renewables Draw Inflows
Vistra's Nuclear AI Option, Renewables Draw Inflows

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Vistra's Nuclear AI Option, Renewables Draw Inflows

VST is a power generation and distribution company offering electricity, natural gas, nuclear, and other forms of energy to commercial and residential customers. Recent partnerships with hyperscalers Amazon and Microsoft added more than 600 megawatts of renewable capacity to its portfolio. Financially, VST's first-quarter fiscal 2025 report showed strong adjusted EBITDA growth of 53% ($1.24 billion) amid the company's continuing transition to renewable energy projects. VST also increased adjusted EBITDA guidance to a high end of $6.1 billion, continued repurchasing its shares (163 million since November 2021), and has increased its dividend by 49% since 2021. No wonder VST shares are up 38% so far this year – and they could rise more. MoneyFlows data shows how Big Money investors are again betting heavily on the stock. Institutional volumes reveal plenty. In the last year, VST has enjoyed strong investor demand, which we believe to be institutional support. Each green bar signals unusually large volumes in VST shares. They reflect our proprietary inflow signal, pushing the stock higher: Plenty of utilities names are under accumulation right now. But there's a powerful fundamental story happening with Vistra. Institutional support and a healthy fundamental backdrop make this company worth investigating. As you can see, VST has had strong sales and earnings growth: 3-year sales growth rate (+15.6%) 3-year EPS growth rate (+37.8%) Source: FactSet Also, EPS is estimated to ramp higher this year by +40.4%. Now it makes sense why the stock has been generating Big Money interest. VST has a track record of strong financial performance. Marrying great fundamentals with MoneyFlows software has found some big winning stocks over the long term. Vistra has been a top-rated stock at MoneyFlows. That means the stock has unusual buy pressure and growing fundamentals. We have a ranking process that showcases stocks like this on a weekly basis. It made the rare Outlier 20 report multiple times recently. The blue bars below show when VST was a top pick…powered by Big Money: Tracking unusual volumes reveals the power of money flows. This is a trait that most outlier stocks exhibit…the best of the best. Big Money demand drives stocks upward. The VST action isn't new at all. Big Money buying in the shares is signaling to take notice. Given the historical gains in share price and strong fundamentals, this stock could be worth a spot in a diversified portfolio. Disclosure: the author holds no position in VST at the time of publication. If you are a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA) or are a serious investor, take your investing to the next level and follow our free weekly MoneyFlows insights. This article was originally posted on FX Empire REV Group Shares Up 77% In a Year Thanks to Big Money Core & Main Flashes Bullish Outlier Signals Rare Bullish Inflow Signals Cause IMAX to Nearly Double Earnings and Inflows Push Heico Shares Up 34% Credo's Revenue Soars, Attracts Big Money Inflows Big Money Lifts Disney 1,427% Since First Outlier Buy Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

‘No one' excited about Kamala Harris' potential gubernatorial run, say California donors
‘No one' excited about Kamala Harris' potential gubernatorial run, say California donors

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘No one' excited about Kamala Harris' potential gubernatorial run, say California donors

Former Vice President Kamala Harris' prospective gubernatorial bid is not striking up much excitement among Democratic fundraisers in California, Politico reported Friday. The outlet spoke to multiple Democratic Party donors in California to see how they felt about Harris possibly running for governor. So far, her interest in exploring a gubernatorial run in the state following her 2024 presidential election loss hasn't enthused many. "She still would probably lead, but honestly, no one is incredibly pumped," one Southern California fundraiser told Politico. Republicans Use Mamdani Bombshell Victory Over Cuomo As Ammunition To Blast Democrats As Extremists Harris, who lost November's election to President Donald Trump, is seriously considering a 2026 bid to succeed term-limited Gov. Gavin Newsom, D-Calif. A source close to Harris told Fox News Digital in March that she has told allies she will decide by the end of summer on whether to launch a gubernatorial campaign. The two potential options for Harris are launching a gubernatorial run next year in her home state or seeking the presidency again in 2028. Extremely early polls in the next Democratic Party presidential nomination race — which are heavily reliant on name recognition at this point — indicate that the former vice president holds a significant lead over other potential White House contenders. Read On The Fox News App "In interviews, several major donors in the state told POLITICO they fear her reemergence as a candidate would re-open still-fresh wounds from her defeat in 2024," the outlet reported. "Some harbor lingering frustration about how her billion-dollar campaign juggernaut ended in debt and want assurances she would have a clear plan to win the governor's mansion." Top Trump Ally Teases Bid For California Governor If Harris Runs Mather Martin, a party fundraiser from San Francisco who worked for multiple Harris campaigns, told Politico, "There was more enthusiasm at first" for Harris' run. However, he added, "I think it waned a bit." Another donor who gave a six-figure donation to Harris' presidential campaign last year told the outlet they had found the implosion of her White House bid "traumatizing" and seemed reluctant to support her in the state. "Kamala just reminds you we are in this complete s--- storm. With Biden, we got bamboozled… I think she did the best she could in that situation, but obviously she knew about the cognitive decline too. I've written so many checks because I knew the Trump administration would be horrible, but we're living in a nightmare because of the Democrats. I'm furious at them, truly." The donor who declared that "no one is incredibly pumped" about Harris' run also shared that donors "realize it's just going to bring up the whole pathetic last presidential, which no one wants to hear about again. And then it's the whole 'Did you know Joe Biden?' thing." Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture Scott Drexel, a donor-adviser based in the San Francisco Bay Area, noted, "It's very fair to say there's not an overwhelming clamor" for Harris' gubernatorial run. He also pointed out, "It's very hard for there to be one if it's not 100 percent clear if she really wants to do it." "She's going to have to work for the nomination. Every day that passes, there's less of a sense of inevitability about her candidacy," Drexel said. Democratic donor and San Francisco trial lawyer Joe Cotchett told Politico, "She is talking to people around the state about whether she is going to run. If she does, she's going to have very difficult problems." Harris' team did not immediately reply to Fox News Digital's request for comment. Fox News Digital's Paul Steinhauser contributed to this article source: 'No one' excited about Kamala Harris' potential gubernatorial run, say California donors

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store