Why Iran named its cruise missile that hit Tel Aviv Khaybar-Breaker
Though the place is spelt as Khaybar, the name of Iran's missile is Kheibar.When the missile was first manufactured in 2022, Iran's media did not directly link it to the "anti-Jewish battle", reported The Jerusalem Post.However, references to the Khaybar massacre of Jews have reportedly been used in the region as a battle cry against Israel and the Jewish people.WHAT IS THE SIGNIFICANCE OF KHAYBAR IN ISLAM?Professor Ali Nadeem Rezavi of Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) said, "The Battle of Khaybar was fought in 629 AH, between the army of the Prophet and the Jews of Khaybar."According to the Encyclopaedia Britannica, the Battle of Khaybar occurred during a period of complex interactions between early Muslims and Jewish tribes in the Arabian Peninsula.advertisementAfter Prophet Muhammad's migration to Medina in 622 CE, he sought to establish alliances with local Jewish tribes. However, tensions arose due to political rivalries, broken agreements, and alliances formed by some Jewish tribes with the Quraysh tribe of Mecca against the Muslims."From the Prophet's side, Imam Ali was sent to conquer the fort. In the battle, not only was a famous Jewish commander, Marhab, killed by the sword (named Zulfiqar) of Ali, but the fort was also captured. Ali is said to have lifted both doors of the fortress from their hinges, climbed into the moat, and held them up to create a bridge, allowing the attackers to gain access to the redoubt," Rezavi, from AMU's history department, told India Today Digital.After the Islamic victory, "The Jews", said Rezavi, "were made to pay tribute to the victors and were allowed to emigrate from there. Jewish tribes like Banu Ghatafan and Banu Quraiza were all humiliated. Despite forces consisting of 10,000–20,000 Jews versus 1,400 Muslims, deaths were remarkably low, with 93 Jews and 18 Muslims killed, and 50 injured between both parties.""The battle is considered the greatest victory of Islam over Jewish people," he added.MENTIONS OF KHAYBAR IN ANTI-JEWISH PROTESTSadvertisementThe chant "Khaybar, Khaybar ya yahud" is often used in anti-Israel and anti-Jewish protests in the Middle East, according to The Jerusalem Post.The chant is considered anti-Semitic.The American Jewish Committee (AJC) noted that chants of this nature were used in the anti-Semitic protests that swept Europe and the US in May 2022 against the backdrop of the conflict between Israel and Hamas."Anti-Semitic protesters in Brussels chanted 'Khaybar, Khaybar, ya yahud! Jaysh Muhammad sa-ya'ud,' or, "Remember Khaybar, Oh you Jews, Muhammad's army will come back to you'," the AJC report said.KHAMENEI USED KHAYBAR BATTLE IMAGERY TO WARN ISRAELEven Ayatollah Ali Khamenei invoked the imagery of Imam Ali with his sword Zulfiqar, brandishing it in front of a Jewish fort in the Battle of Khaybar, in a post on X on the fifth day of the Iran-Israel conflict.While the 20th wave of missiles included other missiles besides Kheibar Shekan, nine buildings were reportedly destroyed in the Ramat Gan district of Tel Aviv, and explosions were reported in Haifa too. Reports suggest this damage was mainly caused by Kheiber Shekan missiles.Grounded in ideological legacy, the missile, built for speed, stealth, and accuracy, is proving to be a key weapon for Iran against Israel.- End
advertisement
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
35 minutes ago
- News18
George Washington University Joins List Of Schools Facing DOJ Action Over Antisemitism
Last Updated: The action marks a widening federal scrutiny of American higher education institutions under President Donald Trump's second term. The Trump administration has launched a civil rights enforcement action against George Washington University (GWU), accusing the Washington, DC-based institution of violating federal civil rights law. In a press statement released on Tuesday, the US Department of Justice (DoJ) alleged that the university had been 'deliberately indifferent to the hostile educational environment for Jewish, American-Israeli, and Israeli students and faculty." The action marks a widening federal scrutiny of American higher education institutions under President Donald Trump's second term. It follows a series of warnings and investigations into alleged antisemitism and transparency issues at major universities. Just a few days earlier, the administration threatened Harvard University over disclosure of its patents. Other elite institutions, including the University of Pennsylvania, Columbia University, and Brown University, have also come under investigation since Trump returned to office in January 2025. The charges against GWU stem from incidents during pro-Palestinian campus protests in April and May 2024. The DOJ alleges the university failed to act in response to antisemitic conduct during those events, thus violating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination based on race, colour, or national origin in federally funded programmes. The DOJ asserts that university officials did not take appropriate steps to address the fears expressed by affected students. 'Every student has the right to equal educational opportunities without fear of harassment or abuse," Dhillon said. The university now faces possible legal consequences. However, the DOJ has offered GWU the opportunity to enter a voluntary resolution agreement. According to the letter, the university has until August 22 to reply. Responding to the developments, GWU spokesperson Shannon McClendon confirmed receipt of the DOJ letter and said the university is currently reviewing it. 'GW condemns antisemitism, which has absolutely no place on our campuses or in a civil and humane society," she stated. view comments First Published: August 13, 2025, 06:56 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
When Jayalalithaa insisted on retaining the casteist term ‘pappathi' in Tamil Nadu Assembly records
Former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister J. Jayalalithaa's caste has become a subject matter of discussion, almost nine years after her passing. Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK) leader Thol. Thirumavalavan recently triggered a row by alluding that All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) founder M.G. Ramachandran (MGR) was instrumental in facilitating the 'intrusion' of a Brahmin (Jayalalithaa) into the Dravidian movement and laid the path for her leadership of a Dravidian party. In her early years of heading the AIADMK after MGR's death and later becoming the Chief Minister in 1991, Jayalalitha (as she spelt her name then) had endured strong criticism from her political opponents, notably the DMK, on account of her upper caste origins. Responding to taunts on her Brahmin roots, she once declared in the Legislative Assembly, 'Naan pappathi thaan (I am a Brahmin woman).' This was sometime in 1991. However, records indicating when and in what context she made this statement are not readily available. Nonetheless, a perusal of The Hindu's archives show that in September 1991, political discourse in Tamil Nadu was dominated by what was perceived an anti-Brahmin campaign by the DMK. Under former Chief Minister M. Karunanidhi's leadership, the DMK had announced its intention to expose the 'group' in power then. Karunanidhi had clarified his statement (on the 'group') should not be misconstrued to mean another anti-Brahmin movement would be launched. Notwithstanding his claim, on September 23, 1991, several members in the Assembly condemned the 'anti-Brahmin campaign unleashed by the DMK recently.' Law Minister K.A. Krishnaswami referred to one such campaign in the DMK mouthpiece Murasoli and asked was it not an attack on a particular community and would it not amount to inciting violence. 'The anti-Brahmin attitude prevalent now is only followed by the DMK, which is a casteist organisation,' he charged. Labour Minister C. Aranganayagam contended the AIADMK was following DMK founder C.N. Annadurai's policy of not discriminating against any community. But, it was the DMK, which professed to follow the path shown by Annadurai, that was following a wrong policy. 'Buttressing the AIADMK stand, the Law Minister argued that there was a question whether the DMK, at the time of its formation, should be an organisation of Dravidians or for the welfare of Dravidians. It was Annadurai who decided that persons belonging to any single community should not be discriminated against because of their birth and said anyone could become a member of the organisation,' a report in The Hindu said. Congress (I) MLA S. Peter Alphonse had then charged that a sustained and planned anti-Brahmin campaign had been going on for the last 15 days. It was undertaken to threaten the Chief Minister, frighten her and unseat her at a time she embarked on a programme of wiping out anti-national forces. It was aimed at creating an atmosphere of hatred in the State, he said, adding raising the issue in the House that day was the next stage of the campaign. Interestingly, the then Finance Minister V.R. Nedunchezhian said five or six Brahmins were working in Murasoli but what the DMK was now indulging in was for 'political reasons.' The issue dominated the proceedings in the Assembly on the following day too. Chief Minister Jayalalitha said, 'The anti-Brahmin campaign of the DMK deserves to be dismissed with contempt.' She said the members need not have any apprehension that the DMK would succeed in its designs to whip up communal passions for unseating the government. She charged the DMK had 'miserably failed' when it sought to brand MGR a Malayali. 'None would have forgotten the vicious campaign unleashed by the DMK and how people rejected it with scorn. Such intimidation tactics did not affect the MGR Government,' The Hindu reported on her speech. 'In her case too, the DMK had adopted a similar strategy of labelling her as Brahmin in the hope of turning the rest of the communities against her. Ms. Jayalalitha said that right from the day she entered active politics in 1982, the DMK had been deriding her as a Brahmin woman. This cut no ice. The DMK attacked her in the same vein, at meeting after meeting, when she contested the election to the Assembly from Bodinaickanur in 1989. But the people returned her with a massive margin,' the report said. She asserted the caste factor had become irrelevant in politics. During the proceedings, Mr. Alphonse, had urged that the word 'pappathi' be expunged from the Assembly records as it might be considered derogatory and hurt the feelings of a community. However, Jayalalitha did not agree with him. 'It should very much be on record so that posterity will know to what extent a particular community has been ridiculed,' she said. In a report 'Jayalalitha's 100 days: A positive balance-sheet', published on October 6, 1991, The Hindu correspondent wrote: 'The DMK which had given six months to the AIADMK Government to demonstrate its worth appears already in jitters. It has made Ms. Jayalalitha its prime target and started a sustained campaign portraying her as 'papathi' (Brahmin woman) and a symbol of Aryan domination over the Dravidian Tamils, thereby taking politics back to the pre-lndependence days. All that, however, has not deterred Ms. Jayalalitha from going ahead with her programmes with the AIADMK solidly behind her.'
Deccan Herald
3 hours ago
- Deccan Herald
Kishanganj Muslims scramble for residence proofs, worry over NRC
People whose names have either been deleted from the voter list or who have been asked to submit additional proof are having to scramble to get the required documents such as residence proof certificates. The hardest hit are Muslims.
