'Fantastic Four: First Steps' debuts with higher Rotten Tomatoes score than 'Superman'
With the upcoming release of 'The Fantastic Four: First Steps' on July 25, that might just be the spark the franchise (and I) need.
That judgement is based on the reviews alone. 'The Fantastic Four: First Steps' has already achieved a rare feat: its debut Rotten Tomatoes rating stands at a solid 86%, making it the first 'Fantastic Four' movie ever to earn a 'fresh' status. That score even nudges out the new 'Superman' reboot, which currently sits at 83% on the Tomatometer.
Taking place amid a colorful, retro-futuristic vision of the 1960s, "First Steps' brings Marvel's iconic first family back to the big screen: Reed Richards (Pedro Pascal), Sue Storm (Vanessa Kirby), Johnny Storm (Joseph Quinn), and Ben Grimm (Ebon Moss-Bachrach). The story balances their evolving family dynamics with the looming threat of cosmic villains like Galactus and the Silver Surfer.
Early reactions have been largely positive, with critics praising the movie's charm, chemistry, and nostalgic yet fresh style. Polygon called it 'one of the better outings for the modern MCU,' while Seattle Times described it as 'heartfelt, action-packed and just plain fun.' That said, it's worth remembering that early reviews often lean positive, and scores tend to shift once the movie is released.
So, if you're wondering whether to head to the theater for 'The Fantastic Four: First Steps,' here's what critics are saying on Rotten Tomatoes.
As mentioned earlier, it's important to keep your expectations in check and take early positive reactions with a grain of salt since these initial scores often shift once a wider audience weighs in. That said, there's hope 'Fantastic Four: First Steps' can maintain its strong Rotten Tomatoes score, much like 'Superman' has, and even build a strong viewer rating as more fans see the movie.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
Clearly though, 'First Steps' has made a strong first impression. There are currently 130 reviews on Rotten Tomatoes, with most of them offering glowing opinions.
Nell Minow from Movie Mom said: 'After three unsatisfactory tries Marvel Studios got it right, gorgeously produced, well cast, dazzling visuals, gracefully relegating the origin story to a few 'archival' clips, and putting our quartet and us right in the middle of the action.'
Meanwhile, The Independent's Clarisse Loughrey stated it 'the ingredients are perfectly lined up, and, in the right combinations, and with the pure wonderment of Michael Giacchino's score, The Fantastic Four: First Steps does shimmer with a kind of wide-eyed idealism. And that's lovely.'
Liz Shannon Miller from Consequence wrote a very hopeful review that has me even more intrigued: 'A solid comic book adventure that's not embarrassed by being a comic book adventure — in fact it finds real power in its love for its roots. Hopefully, that's an energy the MCU can carry forward with it.'
The same goes for TheWrap's William Bibbiani, who said: 'Matt Shakman has done something Marvel Studios doesn't do very well anymore. He's made a superhero movie that embraces the 'super' part. And the 'hero' part. And the 'movie' part.'
Sure, there are more good reviews than bad, but there's a reason it's not sitting at 100%. Some critics weren't quite as impressed.
Katie Walsh from Tribune News Service said: 'Perhaps it would have been best relegated to the small screen then, because the biggest one isn't doing this movie any favors. A message this urgent shouldn't be rendered in such a forgettable fashion.'
Boston Globe's Odie Henderson was a bit more savage: 'Unfortunately, neither a timeframe change nor the work of four screenwriters (Josh Friedman, Eric Pearson, Jeff Kaplan, Ian Springer) can fix the central problem with Fantastic Four movies: With one exception, the team members are colossal bores.'
Esther Zuckerman from Bloomberg News even compared it to 'Superman,' saying: 'While Superman felt bracingly modern with the political sentiments to boot, The Fantastic Four has a halo of cobwebs it can't quite shake off.'
'Fantastic Four: First Steps' is clearly off to a strong start, with critics largely praising its charm, visuals, and return to classic comic book storytelling. It's being hailed as the best take on Marvel's first family yet, though everyone is fully convinced. While some find it refreshing and heartfelt, others feel it falls short of greatness. Still, if early reactions are anything to go by, this could mark a much-needed turning point for the franchise.
If you're still on the fence about heading to the theaters for 'The Fantastic Four: First Steps,' it's worth remembering that some movies are just made for the big screen, and this is one of them.
While it might hit streaming in a few months, the scale and visual ambition of 'First Steps' are probably best experienced in a dark theater, not your living room.
Between the sweeping shots, retro-futuristic design, and Michael Giacchino's soaring score, the movie seems to lean into a sense of wonder that benefits from the immersive setting of the theater.
Even if you're not fully sold on the Fantastic Four as a team, the spectacle alone gives it an edge that might be lost when viewed at home. So if you're even a little curious, this might be one to catch while it's still on the big screen. My ticket is booked, and I'm ready to see it on July 25.
Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
34 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
All 5 Fantastic Four movies, ranked — including the one Marvel doesn't want you to see
It's proven remarkably difficult for Marvel to make a good movie about the Fantastic Four, considering that it's the company's flagship superhero property and the series that kicked off Marvel's comic-book Silver Age resurgence in 1961. The superhero family of Mister Fantastic, the Invisible Woman, the Human Torch and the Thing has a spotty history at the movies, beginning with a low-budget 1994 feature film that was never officially released (but is available online if you know where to look). The later, larger-scale adaptations haven't fared much better, from a pair of Tim Story-directed movies in the pre-MCU '00s to 'Chronicle' director Josh Trank's misbegotten 2015 reboot. Comics readers have very particular standards — I first saw the 1994 movie at an unauthorized screening full of fans yelling out their negative comments — and now that the team has entered the Marvel Cinematic Universe, 'The Fantastic Four: First Steps' has the chance to finally get things right. Here's my take on how all five Fantastic Four movies stack up. A notoriously troubled production that was extensively altered during reshoots, Trank's franchise reimagining could be regarded as a missed opportunity. But I can't see how Trank's initial approach would have ever made sense for these characters, who are defined by their heroic optimism and solidarity. Trank turns the team's origin story into dark body horror, making their powers into curses. Trank and the various screenwriters give the characters absurdly grim backstories, even making The Thing's 'It's clobberin' time' catch phrase into a motto of abuse. Stars Miles Teller, Kate Mara, Michael B. Jordan and Jamie Bell all seem completely lost, and there's no sense of camaraderie or even cooperation among the characters. The horribly paced story takes place almost exclusively in dimly lit science and military facilities, barely getting around to a half-hearted battle in its final moments. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Watch on Disney Plus As detailed in the documentary 'Doomed! The Untold Story of Roger Corman's The Fantastic Four,' this 1994 movie was put into production solely so that Constantin Film could retain the film rights to the characters. B-movie legend Corman engaged his famous resourcefulness to produce a low-budget film that mimics an epic scale, with mostly underwhelming results. Still, director Oley Sassone and stars Alex Hyde-White, Rebecca Staab, Jay Underwood and Michael Bailey Smith put their full effort into the cheesy, Saturday morning-style adventure, and Joseph Culp is easily the best onscreen Doctor Doom. Culp brings grandiose Shakespearean villainy to the Fantastic Four's arch-nemesis, despite being surrounded by chintzy sets and costumes, and even worse special effects. The story is dull and takes way too long to give the characters their powers, but the movie is a semi-endearing reminder of the era when superhero movies were underfunded underdogs. Watch 'Doomed! The Untold Story of Roger Corman's The Fantastic Four' on Prime Video The second movie starring Ioan Gruffudd, Jessica Alba, Chris Evans and Michael Chiklis gets a few things right, including a goofy, upbeat tone and an eerie take on the Silver Surfer (played physically by Doug Jones and voiced by Laurence Fishburne). Its version of the planet-devouring villain Galactus is a bust, though, opting to depict the distinctively designed comic-book character as an amorphous cloud of space dust. Julian McMahon's return as Doctor Doom goes nowhere, and there's an equally pointless power-switching gimmick among the main four superheroes. The focus on the impending marriage of Gruffudd's Reed Richards and Alba's Sue Storm results in some painful sitcom-style hijinks, and the rushed storytelling never convincingly conveys the world-ending stakes of Galactus' impending arrival. The only thing more horrific than the threat of Galactus is the horrendous wig that Alba is forced to wear, which is emblematic of the movie's slapdash approach. Watch on Disney Plus The first adventure for the team's '00s incarnation is marginally better, thanks to the real sense of menace that McMahon brings to Doctor Doom. He's not as bombastic as Joseph Culp, but he's more insidiously dangerous, reimagined as a tech mogul rather than a foreign monarch. The team's oft-retold origin story is a mess, though, and including Doom as part of it only undermines his authority and influence. By the time he emerges as a genuine villain, the plot has lost most of its momentum. The bickering between Evans' Johnny Storm and Chiklis' Ben Grimm is more mean-spirited than charming, and Evans' version of Johnny as an extreme sports-obsessed jerk is barely distinguishable from the character's foul-mouthed resurrection in 'Deadpool & Wolverine.' The dated pop-culture references don't help, although they can be amusingly quaint, much like the movie itself. Watch on Disney Plus I might make the argument that being the best Fantastic Four movie is a fairly low standard to reach, but 'First Steps' is an entertaining movie on its own, and the only Fantastic Four movie to capture the whiz-bang wonder of the best Fantastic Four comic books. It also benefits from the substantial resources of the Marvel Cinematic Universe to deliver a sci-fi saga that lives up to the team's adventures on the page. Pedro Pascal, Vanessa Kirby, Joseph Quinn and Ebon Moss-Bachrach are the first Fantastic Four to truly come off like a family, and that makes the emotions at the heart of the story more meaningful. The alternate retro-futuristic setting lets the story unfold on its own terms, away from the clutter of the MCU. Maybe there still hasn't been a great Fantastic Four movie, but at least now there's a good one.
CNBC
35 minutes ago
- CNBC
CBS canceling Colbert begs the question: Are more late night shows next?
There are two schools of thought around CBS' decision to end "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert." The first says the cancellation is a one-off exit from the storied time slot — that Paramount was trying to push through the red tape to finally merge with Skydance Media, a deal that was approved by the Federal Communications Commission Thursday after more than a year in limbo. The other says it signals the beginning of the end of late night TV. The entertainment industry will have a better sense of where the truth lies next year when Disney decides the fate of Jimmy Kimmel's late night show, "Jimmy Kimmel Live." While NBC recently extended the contracts of its two late night hosts, Jimmy Fallon and Seth Meyers, into 2028, Kimmel's contract is set to lapse in 2026. "Jimmy Kimmel Live" has been a late night staple since 2003, acting not only as a typical talk show on the circuit, but as a valuable marketing hub for Disney's slate of theatrical and television content. In addition to traditional one-on-one interviews, Kimmel will also frequently host several stars from the same project, often for blockbuster titles from Marvel, Star Wars and the company's animated franchises. Clips from these chats are fed onto Kimmel's YouTube channel, which has more than 20 million subscribers, and across social media, helping to generate buzz for upcoming Disney projects. For comparison, Fallon's show account has around 32 million subscribers, while Colbert's stands at 10 million and Meyers' at just over 5 million. Kimmel is also a frequent host of the Academy Awards, which airs on Disney's ABC, and is currently the host of ABC's celebrity edition of "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire." These ancillary assignments, as well as his annual job closing out Disney's Upfronts presentation for advertisers, may make Kimmel more important to Disney's long-term future than Colbert was for Paramount or CBS. Still, while the next test of media's commitment to late night is months off, the end of "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert" is calling attention to the mounting pressures on traditional TV and raising questions about the whether the time slot can survive the evolving viewing landscape. The cost of producing late night programs has risen as the media industry has been upended by streaming and shifting consumer habits. The traditional pay TV bundle has lost millions of customers in recent years, and as they've disappeared, so too have advertising dollars. The shifting equation has forced media companies to rebalance. At a large scale, companies like Comcast's NBCUniversal and Warner Bros. Discovery have opted to split off their cable TV networks into separate corporate entities. At the programming level, big shows are increasingly greenlit for release on streaming services rather than traditional networks. Salaries of highly paid news anchors have moderated, with some stepping away from traditional networks entirely and starting out their own ventures. And much of the money spent on bulking up both linear TV networks and streaming services is earmarked for live sports. That leaves familiar titles in flux. "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert" employed around 200 people and recorded annual losses of around $40 million, according to a person familiar with the matter, who declined to be named speaking about nonpublic matters. "Jimmy Kimmel Live" employs around 250 people and loses roughly the same amount, according to a person familiar with that show's finances. While the pay-TV bundle still rakes in the highest share of profits for legacy media companies – much of which stems from the fees that pay-TV distributors hand over to the networks to be included in the bundle – that figure is in decline. Linear TV advertising revenue has also been on a steady downward slope. Industry analysts and experts expected the ad market to stabilize in 2025 after tumultuous streaming-centric years, but macroeconomic uncertainty has hampered the recovery. In quarterly earnings that were reported in May, Paramount, NBCUniversal and Disney each reported lower ad sales on a year-over-year basis. Paramount reported in May that its first-quarter TV advertising revenue was down 21% to $2.04 billion, mainly due to comparisons to the prior-year period when the company had the Super Bowl. That championship beckons the most ad dollars of any live event on TV. Without the Super Bowl, ad revenue would have been flat, the company said. Overall revenue for Paramount's TV segment was down 13%. Of the traditional TV ad spend that does remain, the biggest share has gravitated to live sports, which draw the biggest audiences. NBCUniversal recently touted its record ad sales volume during the most recent Upfront cycle due to an upcoming slate of NBA, the Super Bowl, Winter Olympics and other sports. Disney reported in May that quarterly revenue for its domestic linear networks was down 3% to $2.2 billion, attributing the decline to lower ad revenue. Still, Disney noted ad revenue for ESPN and sports in general saw an increase in ad revenue. These headwinds help legitimize Paramount's decision to cancel "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert," but the timing of the program's end has raised suspicions. The announcement that Colbert's show would take its final bow in May 2026 came just days after the tenured host publicly called out Paramount for its $16 million settlement with President Donald Trump over the editing of a "60 Minutes" interview with former Vice President Kamala Harris. Colbert called the settlement a "big fat bribe" during one of his show-opening monologues, referencing the then-pending merger between Paramount and Skydance Media, which required the approval of the Trump administration to proceed. Paramount and CBS executives released a statement last week saying the cancellation was "purely a financial decision against the challenging backdrop in late night." "It is not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount," the company continued. While ratings for Colbert's show have declined over the last decade, the program has consistently achieved the highest views of any show in the 11:35 p.m. hour, outdrawing ABC's "Jimmy Kimmel Live" and NBC's "The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon," according to Nielsen. Still, Colbert's ratings have been declining each season. For the most recent September-to-May time period, Colbert averaged roughly 1.9 million viewers, with the majority of viewership coming in the age demographic of over 65, according to Nielsen — a telling data point about the state of TV viewership. Kimmel's viewership paints a similar picture, with viewership dropping from the September-to-May time period in 2019-2020 to the most recent in 2024-2025, when the average was nearly 1.6 million viewers, according to Nielsen. When Paramount listed its slate of highly rated TV shows during its last earnings report, including "Tracker," the top rated series and "Matlock," the highest rated new series, it also listed Colbert's "The Late Show" as the highest rated broadcast late night show. "The Daily Show," also from Paramount, was the top late night show on cable TV. Some industry experts have questioned whether CBS could have explored other ways to save money — or save late night — besides outright canceling "The Late Show." NBC cut costs by eliminating the band on Meyers' late night show and shifting Fallon to four nights a week instead of five. CBS tried to bring a younger demographic into the hour with "After Midnight," a late night show that ran after Colbert. The show was hosted by comedian Taylor Tomlinson and was centered on viral internet phenomena. Though CBS intended to renew the show after its first two seasons, Tomlinson decided not to extend her contract, and the show was canceled.
Buzz Feed
an hour ago
- Buzz Feed
The Fantastic Four: First Steps Reviews: What Do Critics Say About The Marvel Reboot?
The reviews have landed for Marvel's fourth go at , – and could it be that director Matt Shakman has finally given the superhero quartet the movie they deserve? First, we had 2005′s edition (and subsequent 2007 sequel, Rise of the Silver Surfer), which starred Chris Evans (who recently reprised the role of Johnny Storm in Deadpool vs Wolverine) and Jessica Alba. A perfectly fine offering... but truly fine at best. Then we got the moody 2015 reboot. It's somewhat long-forgotten amongst other Marvel films of the time, despite starring Miles Teller and Michael B. Jordan – which is maybe for the best given its 9% Rotten Tomatoes scoring. Now, with a super fun press tour to boot, we've been given a brand new set of superheroes (and Pedro Pascal's entrance to the Marvel cinematic universe at last) alongside new storyline (no origin stories here this time!) – but what do critics make of the latest iteration? Some have called it 'the best Marvel film yet', while others have labelled it 'not quite the confident strides fans were hoping for' – but if there's one thing they can all agree on, it's that the film heralds a much-needed new era for Marvel. Check out a selection of the reviews for yourself below… The Guardian (3/5) 'The result hangs together as an entertaining spectacle in its own innocent self-enclosed universe of fantasy wackiness, where real people actually read the comic books that have made mythic legends of the real Four. I have expressed my dissatisfaction recently with superhero films... but at least this finale emerges from the established story premise, and works well with the tone of uncomplicated fun.' 'If the script doesn't hit quite so many comedic high notes as some other Marvels, it at least brims with sincerity, presenting a heroic squad committed to protecting the Earth, while encouraging the whole world to link arms and do its bit, too. Those are the kind of heroes, it feels, that we need right now. 'This is the best Fantastic Four yet. And if that bar's too low for you, then it's also the best Marvel movie in years.' Games Radar (3.5/5) 'Fantastic? We'll settle for merely good. Fantastic Four may not be the confident stride Marvel fans were hoping for but, at the very least, it's a solid first step.' IGN 'These First Steps might not be the great strides I was hoping for, but they are sure footing for the Fantastic Four to officially leap into the MCU.' The Telegraph (4/5) 'After spending the best part of a decade since Iron Man 3 blundering into the furniture, Marvel has finally learned how to put one foot in front of the other again – and in doing so, arrived at the studio's funniest, most exciting, moving and complete film in more than 10 years.' BBC 'This film feels like a warm-up, introducing characters who will become major parts of the MCU. These characters are strong enough to stand out amidst the other superheroes, but you can already hear Wikipedia calling.' The Hollywood Reporter 'All four leads bring something special to their respective roles and to the superbly gauged balance of personalities that makes each of them essential to the group... It's fun but never campy.' ' First Steps is no disaster – but it's no Superman, either. Angst isn't on the cards for Marvel as of now. And it's nice, admittedly, to see the genre embrace wonder once again.' Variety 'True to its subtitle, the film feels like a fresh start. And like this summer's blockbuster 'Superman' reboot over at DC, that could be just what it takes to win back audiences suffering from superhero exhaustion.'
