2 Government Initiatives That Could Propel Quantum Computing Stocks Like D-Wave Quantum, Rigetti Computing, and IonQ Higher
Investors see quantum computing as a potential game changer, similar to artificial intelligence.
Many companies are still working to perfect the technology.
Government programs and bills in Congress could unlock funding and lift the sector.
10 stocks we like better than Rigetti Computing ›
Other than artificial intelligence (AI), few sectors have seen a more meteoric rise over the past year than quantum computing. Quantum computers are expected to be a significant advancement from the traditional computer, with much more complex technology. Instead of using bits, the smallest form of digital data, quantum computers rely on qubits, which can house much more data than bits and have much higher computing power.
Researchers believe quantum computers have the potential to solve some of the world's biggest issues. That's why quantum computing companies like D-Wave Quantum (NYSE: QBTS), Rigetti Computing (NASDAQ: RGTI), and IonQ (NYSE: IONQ) have seen their stocks fly, as they continue to make advancements on the technology. D-Wave and Rigetti are up over 1,800% over the past year, while IonQ is up over 500%.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue »
These stocks are still not generating significant revenue and are still losing money, while trading at multibillion-dollar market caps, so I think they will continue to be volatile and investors should keep positions smaller and more speculative for the time being. But here are two government initiatives that could propel the group higher.
The Quantum Benchmarking Initiative (QBI)
The Quantum Benchmarking Initiative (QBI) is being spearheaded by an independent U.S. Department of Defense agency called The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), whose goal is to make sure the U.S. is prepared for technological challenges that might arise. The unit launched in 1957 after Sputnik, which marked the beginning of the space race between the U.S. and the Soviet Union.
QBI's goal is essentially to determine if a quantum computer can be built to deliver a "utility-scale operation" in which its benefits exceed its cost. QBI hopes to do this by the year 2033. Companies can apply to go through a rigorous three-stage process. In the government's words:
Stage A: Describe a utility-scale quantum computer concept that has a plausible path to realization in the near term.
Stage B: Describe a Research and Development Plan capable of realizing the utility-scale quantum computer, the risks associated with that plan and the planned risk mitigation steps, and the prototypes needed to burn down these risks.
Stage C: Work with the Government to Verify and Validate that their utility-scale quantum computer concept can be constructed as designed and operated as intended.
In early April, DARPA selected 20 quantum computing companies for Stage A, which the agency described as a six-month sprint. Rigetti and IonQ were among those selected for Stage A. D-Wave was not selected because it is not focused on gate model quantum computing, but analysts at Needham believe industry momentum would certainly benefit the company, and I agree. Stage A should be completed some time in October based on the six-month timeline.
Department of Energy Quantum Leadership Act of 2025
U.S. Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., introduced the Department of Energy Leadership Act of 2025 into the Senate in February of this year, and the bill has been referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
According to Quantum Insider, the bill would increase research and development (R&D) for quantum information purposes including quantum computing. The bill could authorize as much as $2.5 billion in funding over five years, which would pair nicely with what DARPA is doing, and could further spur the quantum computing movement. The bill also seeks to establish regulations for working with other countries like China on quantum computing, clarify who can receive funding, and provide new goals and priorities for quantum technologies.
Stocks like Rigetti, D-Wave, and IonQ would benefit from passage of this law if investors believe interest is increasing. If the U.S. government views quantum computing as necessary for national defense and solving core problems that impact all of mankind, investors are likely to get more interested.
The bill also appears to have bipartisan support, with co-sponsors from both parties. A similar version of this bill failed to pass Congress in 2024, but now with the support of Schumer, bipartisan support, and the apparent interest from the Trump administration, given that it earmarked $250 million of funding in the "one big, beautiful bill" for quantum tech, the bill may drum up more support this time around.
Should you invest $1,000 in Rigetti Computing right now?
Before you buy stock in Rigetti Computing, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Rigetti Computing wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Social Security Gets a Shake-Up in 2026, and 3 Changes May Surprise Retirees
Key Points The maximum taxable earnings limit will increase in 2026, so some workers will have more pay withheld to cover Social Security taxes. Social Security's full retirement age (FRA) will increase in 2026, so workers born in 1959 will reach FRA at 66 years and 10 months. Social Security beneficiaries will receive a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) in 2026; the trustees estimate benefits will increase 2.7%. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook › Social Security benefits are often the most important source of income for retired workers. However, many Americans misunderstand aspects of the program, and knowledge gaps can lead to poor financial decisions. For instance, surveys from DepositAccounts and the Nationwide Retirement Institute suggest most people aged 45 to 60 think Social Security will run out of funding in their lifetimes. But the program is primarily funded by payroll taxes, so it can't run out of funding unless all Americans stopped working. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » Nevertheless, hundreds of thousands of workers claim retirement benefits as soon as possible (i.e., age 62) each year. Some choose this because they mistakenly believe Social Security is headed for bankruptcy. However, that strategy generally backfires because starting Social Security at the earliest claiming age will result in a permanently reduced benefit. Changes are made to Social Security each year to keep benefits aligned with inflation and wages. Here are three changes coming in 2026 that may surprise some retirees. 1. Some workers will pay more in Social Security taxes in 2026 Nationwide Retirement Institute reports 74% of surveyed adults incorrectly marked the following statement false: "Workers pay Social Security taxes on all of their income." That is a common misconception. While the program receives most revenue (more than 90%) from a payroll tax deduction, the amount of income subject to that tax is limited by law. Importantly, the maximum taxable earnings limit generally increases each year to account for increases in the average wage. For instance, the payroll tax applies to $176,100 in 2025, which is up from $168,000 in 2024. Workers generally owe 6.2% of earnings below the maximum, but any income above the limit isn't taxed. Someone who makes $200,000 this year will owe the same amount as someone who makes $2 million. The Social Security Board of Trustees estimates the maximum taxable earnings limit will be $183,600 in 2026, in which case, the maximum amount someone could owe in taxes would be $11,383.20, up from $10,918.20 in 2025. Consequently, anyone with earnings above the taxable maximum in both years will owe an extra $465 next year. 2. Social Security's full retirement age will increase in 2026 MassMutual reports that 45% of adults nearing retirement do not know their full retirement age (FRA), which is the age at which workers receive their full Social Security benefit amount (also called the primary insurance amount). Workers who claim Social Security before FRA will get a smaller benefit, and those who claim after FRA (but no later than age 70) will get a bigger benefit. In 1983, Congress passed a series of amendments to keep the Social Security Trust Funds solvent, one of which gradually raised the FRA from 65 to 67 over a 22-year period, which started with workers who turned 62 in 2000. The impact of that change is still rippling through the population today. For instance, workers born in 1959 will reach FRA at 66 years and 10 months next year. And workers born in 1960 will reach FRA at 67 in 2027. 3. Social Security benefits will get a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) in 2026 Nationwide Retirement Institute reports 66% of surveyed adults incorrectly marked the following statement false: "Social Security is not protected against inflation." But benefits are indeed protected from inflation by cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) that have been paid out annually since 1975. The Social Security Board of Trustees estimates retired workers will receive a 2.7% COLA in 2026. In that scenario, the average monthly benefit would increase from about $2,007 in July 2025 to $2,061 in January 2026. That means the average retired worker would receive an additional $54 per month, or $648 for the full year. COLAs are based on how the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W)) changes in the third quarter of the previous year. For instance, CPI-W inflation measured 2.5% in the third quarter of 2024, so Social Security benefits increased 2.5% in 2025. The third quarter ends in September, so the Social Security Administration won't announce the official COLA for 2026 (or finalize any other change I've discussed) until mid-October. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these strategies.
CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
How doctors are using AI in the exam room — and why it could become the norm
The Quebec government says it's launching a pilot project involving artificial intelligence transcription tools for health-care professionals, with an increasing number saying they cut down the time they spend filling paperwork.
CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
Chatbots learned to write from us. Can AI now change the way we think?
Social Sharing As AI saturates the internet, researchers say it's changing the way we write — and, potentially, the way we think. A recent report from online security platform Imperva found automated traffic surpassed human-generated activity online for the first time in 2024. While experts told CBC News it's impossible to say definitively whether that's accurate, they do note there's more AI online than ever before. And as people increasingly turn to AI-powered chatbots in their everyday lives, experts suggest they're mimicking the language chatbots tend to use. Some worry this is creating a feedback loop that could shrink human creativity and potentially alter our thought processes. "I do worry about the homogenization of language being the canary in the coal mine for the homogenization of thought, to where AI starts to really influence not just what we say, but how we think," said Canadian futurist Sinead Bovell, who founded the tech education company WAYE that advises organizations on emerging technologies. She says more than half of text online is now likely generated in full or in part by AI. Bovell says she's noticed a uniformity in the way people write on social media platforms like X and LinkedIn, as well as sites like Substack, the blogging and newsletter platform. Several experts told CBC News that this growing homogeneity of language online is also making it increasingly difficult to parse what is and isn't written by humans. Bovell says some of the hallmarks of AI writing include symmetrical clauses such as, "It's not just X, but Y," words like "moreover," the use of lists and bullet points, metaphors that often don't make sense and a generally bland, neutral tone. AI also impacts human thought, reasoning Morteza Dehghani, director of the University of Southern California's Center for Computational Language Sciences, says his research bolsters his concern about the homogenization of language and thought. "We're losing the variance and perspective that we see in human societies. And this is going to affect our reasoning as well," Dehghani said. In a February study, Dehghani and a team of USC researchers analyzed language found in Reddit posts, scientific papers and American community newspapers from 2018 to 2025. They found a spike in AI-generated text in late 2022, which they note corresponded with the release of OpenAI's ChatGPT chatbot. They also found a drop in the variance and complexity of written text since that spike. Dehghani says this indicates that even writers who aren't directly using large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT seem to be trying to adapt to the writing structures they see in an online world increasingly overrun by AI. "You want to write in the same fashion that your readers are exposed to, or are used to," he said. "We're just getting into this loop of homogenization." In a separate paper published this month, Dehghani and other USC researchers argue that these homogenizing effects of LLMs on writing are carrying into human expression and thought, noting that the LLMs "reflect and reinforce" dominant styles of writing while also "marginalizing alternative voices and reasoning strategies." Bovell, the futurist, says because data used to train AI comes from the internet, it tends to reflect the loudest and most dominant online voices, meaning groups and cultures that are historically marginalized typically aren't used in that training data, which adds to the homogenization. This problem is compounded, she said, by the fact that most AI we use comes from a handful of American companies. "At the end of the day," she said, these companies are "building the foundation of the future, and that's something that we all need to really think about." AI increasingly training on its own content John Licato, associate professor in Computer Science and Engineering and director of the Advancing Machine and Human Reasoning Lab at the University of South Florida, says the amount of AI and bot-generated content we're consuming is much higher than it's ever been, and will probably continue to increase. He says that determining the exact level of automated content versus human content is especially hard because humans amplify posts made by social media bots, and vice versa. WATCH | Your next job interview could be with AI: Are AI bots the future of job interviews? 2 months ago Have you done an interview with an AI bot? While the technology is still in its early stages, some say it frees up humans from tedious tasks while others say there are concerns about HR job losses. CBC's Ashley Fraser unpacks what the process is like. He says the internet has reached a point where it could continue to function in an imaginary scenario where humans stopped using it. That leads to another problem with machine learning, where generative AI systems trained on their own content produce increasingly worse and more biased results. This is something Licato says is already happening. "When you have AI that's continually trained on its own data, things like biases get worse after multiple generations. Mistakes get worse after every generation," he said. "That is the kind of thing that we would expect to happen if humans just dropped off the internet." The push to preserve diversity Those who study AI and language suggest there's still a lot to learn about this homogeneity and how to address it. In the USC paper published in August, the researchers concluded that "preserving and enhancing meaningful human diversity" has to be central to the design and development of AI. If we don't pay deliberate attention to that diversity, they warn, we won't be able to harness the full potential of the technology "without sacrificing the very diversity that defines human society." To push back against homogenization in LLMs and make them work in the public interest, Bovell says we have to figure out how to mould data in a way that's more diverse, something that's not always a priority for private companies. It's also important to have open-source models that allow anyone to modify them, Bovell says, as opposed to proprietary models like ChatGPT that don't make code and other details available to the public. She's encouraged that countries like Sweden have begun working on " sovereign AI" models to reflect their local cultures. Bovell says that if AI is going to impact and shape languages that are the shared fabric allowing society to reach consensus and move forward, "you want to make sure that these tools are reflective of the people in your population and the breadth and depth of the diversity there."
