Clintons subpoenaed in House Oversight's Jeffrey Epstein probe
In late July, a House Oversight subcommittee voted to subpoena the Clintons, among others, for depositions over their alleged ties to Jeffrey Epstein and accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell.
Other high-profile figures subpoenaed by committee chair Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., include former FBI directors James Comey and Robert Mueller, as well as former attorneys general Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder, Jeff Sessions, William Barr and Alberto Gonzales, Fox News first reported.
Here are the Texas House Democrats who broke quorum
When the Trump administration released more than 900 pages of court documents regarding Epstein's crimes in February, Bill Clinton — and President Donald Trump, Michael Jackson, Cameron Diaz and more — were named.
Last week, Trump said he 'never had the privilege' of going to Epstein's private island, but claimed Bill Clinton went there 28 times. A spokesman for Clinton in 2019 acknowledged Clinton had been on Epstein's plane but maintained he'd never been to the island.
Marjorie Taylor Greene urges Trump to commute George Santos' sentence
The committee also previously subpoenaed Maxwell, who spoke with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche last week for more than nine hours over two days.
Maxwell is currently serving a 20-year sentence for conspiring with Epstein for the sexual abuse of minors. She will not face a congressional deposition until after the U.S. Supreme Court considers her appeal, Comer announced.
The DOJ and FBI's page-and-a-half memo saying Epstein committed suicide and was not killed, and that there was no 'list' of co-conspirators, has spurred a renewed interest in the release of the so-called 'Epstein files.'
NewsNation's Diana Falzone, Marty Hobe contributed to this report.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
22 minutes ago
- UPI
Texas AG to investigate O'Rourke-linked group amid map row
Texas has launched an investigation into Beto O'Rourke's Powered by People group in connection to Democrats who fled the state over the weekend. File Photo by Kevin Dietsch/UPI | License Photo Aug. 6 (UPI) -- Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton on Wednesday launched an investigation into potential Democratic presidential candidate Beto O'Rourke over allegations that he "bribed" Democratic state lawmakers who fled the Lone Star State to prevent Republicans from passing GOP-favorable congressional maps that critics say strip power from voters of color. Paxton announced the investigation amid a deepening row between the state's Democrats and Republicans. The state's minority Democrats fled Texas over the weekend to deny Republicans the quorum needed to certify the controversial maps. The state's Republican leadership has responded with threats of arrest and to vacate their congressional seats if they don't return by Friday, as well as investigations into anyone who solicits funds to support their effort. Paxton said Wednesday that he is investigating the O'Rourke-led Powered by People, which is reportedly covering the costs of Texas Democrats who fled the state. He also said the Powered by People group may have violated bribery laws and state laws, such as those governing campaign or officeholder contributions and expenditures, coercion of a public servant and abuse of office. "Any Democrat coward breaking the law by taking a Beto Bribe will be held accountable," Paxton said in a statement announcing the investigation. "These jet-setting runaways have already lost public trust by abandoning our state, and Texans deserve to know if they received illegal bribes to do it." The new maps, if certified, are expected to give Republicans five additional seats in the U.S. House of Representatives ahead of next year's midterm elections. Critics and Democrats argue that the maps draw lines that dilute the voting power of Latino and Black people, while serving as a power grab by President Donald Trump through rigging the GOP representation in the House. Democrats have widely supported their Texan colleagues' actions to prevent quorum. Republicans have viewed the move as a shirking from their responsibilities. O'Rourke has been traveling throughout several swing states, including Missouri, Wisconsin, Indianapolis, Nebraska and others, trying to generate grassroots support for the Texas Democrats. In response to the investigation, O'Rourke accused Paxton of hypocrisy. "The guy impeached for bribery is going after the folks trying to stop the theft of five congressional seats," he said on X. Paxton was impeached by the state House but was acquitted of all corruption charges by the Senate. The Republican attorney general has vowed that he will seek "aggressive legal action" against any Democrat who is not present at the House on Friday, while Abbott has called for their arrests.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bitter partisanship threatens to engulf Senate as critical deadlines loom
The battle over nominations is spelling trouble for the Senate in other areas, as lawmakers on both sides of the aisle feel the pressure to ratchet up the partisanship in an extended tit for tat with no obvious off-ramp in sight. The Senate adjourned Saturday until next month after protracted talks to expedite the confirmation of dozens of President Trump's lower-level nominees in the face of Democratic resistance went belly up. This left Republicans fuming and increasingly likely to 'go nuclear' by changing the chamber's rules to quicken the confirmation process. At the same time, Democrats are under pressure to oppose Trump at every turn, with the confirmation process and the looming government funding fight being the most immediate examples. It's all leading much of Washington to wonder if the bipartisanship train can get back on the tracks — and at a crucial time. 'I think it is a complete breakdown of the Senate and just absolutely destructive that there can't be a deal reached on nominations, appropriations, confirmations,' said Jon Kott, a longtime top aide to former Sen. Joe Manchin ( 'The Senate used to work pretty easily in a bipartisan way on those three issues,' Kott continued. 'And when you break down on those three, you're really close to breaking the Senate and turning it into the House.' While the Senate hasn't had a sea change moment along the lines of eliminating the filibuster, the chamber could be on the precipice of a major overhaul starting next month. Chief among them are potential rule changes eyed by Senate Republicans, who were outwardly exasperated toward the final days before August recess over the Democratic blockade of Trump nominees. Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) told reporters Tuesday that talks have centered on chopping down the amount of time between cloture and confirmation votes. Other members have raised the idea of eliminating a cloture vote altogether, or the possibility of working through multiple nominees at the same time. The South Dakota Republican also said that if he had his druthers, members would change the law to shift one-quarter to one-third of the roughly 1,200 jobs that currently require Senate approval to just need a presidential appointment. 'That's too many,' Rounds said. 'Most members of the Senate will tell you that they don't believe it is necessary to go that deep into government to have Senate approval on them.' Under regular order, Senate rule changes require 67 votes. But Republicans could use a shortcut that requires only 51 votes, giving them the ability to bypass Democratic opposition. That rarely used shortcut, which more and more Republicans are floating, is known as the 'nuclear option' because it is viewed as a major escalation of partisanship. Going that route could have major ramifications for Senate work coming down the rails, and not just on nominations. Congress faces a Sept. 30 shutdown deadline, and while the Senate passed its first three-bill government funding package prior to breaking for recess, that lone bit of bipartisan work could be overtaken by the one-two punch of a rule change or a second bill to claw back already appropriated funding. Democrats were already outraged last month when Congress passed a first package with only GOP votes to claw back funds that had been previously appropriated through a bipartisan process. They warned a second such bill would only poison the well further — as a rule change without Democratic buy-in would also likely do. 'One of these days, Trump is going to have to learn that he needs to work with Democrats to help the American people,' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) told reporters Saturday. 'The Trump-Republican 'go-it-alone' strategy ain't working, and the American people aren't happy.' Complicating the state of play is the pressure both leaders are facing. Schumer, in particular, in a tricky bind as he attempts to manage a conference that wants to take on Trump at every juncture, but faces a government funding deadline next month. He came under heavy fire for marshaling Democrats to help pass a GOP spending bill in March, and lawmakers in his party are already warning him against doing so again. In addition, the Democratic leader will have to balance home-state politics, where the New York City mayoral race is among the preeminent races this fall, with progressives and Democrats siding with Zohran Mamdani over former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) in the primary. According to a recent survey, Schumer is underwater by 18 percentage points with the electorate in his backyard, with 70 percent of respondents also saying they are dissatisfied with the direction of the city. Fifty-one percent also said that they want the next mayor to 'stand up' to the president rather than work with him to secure federal funding. Across the aisle, Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) has gotten high marks for his opening months atop the conference, having helped shepherd members through the passage of Trump's mammoth tax package and the rescissions bill, as well as the confirmation of a number of high-stakes nominees. But balancing a potential rule change with the government funding process and maintaining as much harmony as possible will be a difficult task. In the background are his past calls to uphold the filibuster, which he maintained during his leadership bid that he will not weaken. 'I do think they see the value in the Senate's role as the cooling saucer for the hot cup of tea. I think that you can still say that with a straight face,' one former Senate GOP leadership aide said. 'I don't think it's in anyone's interest, and I don't think Republicans want to do it first,' the former aide continued. 'But I do think all the pressure building up on the noms [nominations] side needs a valve, and it probably will get and needs the valve on the personnel side.' Over the last 15 years, the filibuster has remained despite a number of attempts to chip away at it. Former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's (D-Nev.) decision to change the threshold for lower-court judicial nominees from 60 votes to 51 votes creaked open the door, which was finally blasted open by Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) when he extended that threshold to Supreme Court nominees. Senate Democrats twice during former President Biden's tenure also pushed to overturn the legislative filibuster, but were thwarted by Manchin and former Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I-Ariz.). Whether there is a way out of this tumult remains to be seen. Rounds believes the government funding exercise coupled with the upcoming work on the annual National Defense Authorization Act is a prime chance to steer in a bipartisan direction. But the rules change for nominees and a second rescissions bill looms, potentially dashing those hopes. 'If you turn [the Senate] into the House, you're going to lose a lot of the top people who want to be in the Senate, who want to actually get huge legislative wins done for the country,' Kott warned. 'And that … will be the death knell for Congress if that happens.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Thune's bid to change rules for nominees faces GOP opposition
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) faces a difficult test in rallying GOP colleagues to change the Senate's rules to speed up the confirmation of approximately 140 Trump nominees. Changing the Senate's procedural rules with a simple-majority vote is sometimes called the 'nuclear option' because it's viewed as an extreme tactic. In this case, many Republicans are ready to go 'nuclear' because they think Democrats are unfairly holding up a number of lower-level, noncontroversial nominees. Democrats have refused to confirm a single civilian Trump appointee by voice vote or unanimous consent during his first six-and-a-half months in office. But Thune still needs to sell a handful of members on the change, including Sens. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Susan Collins (R-Maine), who aren't yet on board with a proposal to weaken individual senators' ability to hold up nominees. A senior Senate Republican strategist said senators are going to be reluctant to give up their power to place holds on executive branch nominees, a power that GOP senators employed to gain leverage over the Biden administration. 'There's a core group of people that are wary of setting new precedents or changing anything that's going to affect them when the shoe's on the other foot. I don't think it's a slam dunk,' the strategist said of Republican senators who are worried about diminishing their own authority if they return to minority-party status. 'Anytime you make these changes, it can have lasting impact on how the Senate operates moving forward,' the source added. Then-Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) placed a hold on all of former President Biden's Justice Department nominees in 2023 to protest the Biden administration's indictment of President Trump on criminal charges. Alabama Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R) put a sweeping hold on all of Biden's military promotions to protest the use of taxpayer dollars at the Defense Department to pay for service members' travel across state lines to receive medical services, including abortion services. Thune can only afford three defections from within his conference. Tillis last week ruled out going 'nuclear' over the stalled nominees. 'I just generally don't go nuclear,' he said. 'We can do the work. We've come up with some bipartisan strategies for changing the rules,' he added, arguing Republicans and Democrats could work together to make the Senate more efficient at confirming nominees without trampling on the rights of the minority party. 'If we do this, then that means the new bar for rules is a simple majority,' he said of the prospect of Senate Republicans changing the rules with 51 votes instead of the 67 votes required under regular order to change the chamber's rules. Tillis also poured cold water on the idea of allowing Trump to make recess appointments, something Senate conservatives have floated as an option to clear the backlog of stalled nominees. Tillis, who opposed Ed Martin, Trump's initial nominee to serve as U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, said he would want to put guardrails on recent appointments. Asked whether he could support opening the door to recess appointments, Tillis replied: 'Not if it lays the groundwork for an Ed Martin.' Republican senators left town pledging to take up rules reform when they return to Washington after Labor Day. 'We're trying to break the logjam,' Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) said on Fox News's 'Sunday Morning Futures' with Maria Bartiromo. 'We put them on notice and said, 'We're not going to play games with you anymore. Now you're forcing us to change Senate rules,'' said Mullin, a deputy Senate GOP whip. 'So, soon as we get back from August, we're going to be working on rules change. When we get back, we're going to have to implement that rules change.' Thune and his leadership team will need to focus on Tillis, Collins and Murkowski, along with other potential wild cards such as former Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.). McConnell earlier this year voted against some of Trump's controversial nominees, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. Collins told reporters she wants to review precisely what rule changes the Senate GOP leadership team has in mind. 'We clearly have a huge problem with bipartisan nominees requiring roll call votes, but I want to see what the exact proposals are,' she said. Murkowski has favored preserving senators' rights and prerogatives from the ever-expanding powers of the White House and executive branch. The Alaska senator has voiced her frustration about spending hours of Senate floor time churning through lower-level nominees. But she's drawn a line at allowing Trump to make recess appointments. 'No, we do our job here. We've got plenty of time to address it, we're working through it,' she said of the backlog of Trump nominees. Asked about changing the Senate rules with a simple-majority vote, Murkowski expressed her desire to instead find a bipartisan solution that would not blow up relations with Democrats. 'There's a good conversation that's going on, it's actually a bipartisan conversation, about how we can be more efficient,' she said. 'We just voted on the general counsel … of the Department of [Agriculture]. There's a better way to do this.' Murkowski, a senior appropriator, wants to work with Democrats to pass the regular spending bills for fiscal 2026, bills that need 60 votes to pass on the Senate floor. Triggering the nuclear option to fast-track lower-level, noncontroversial nominees would likely scuttle the chances of reaching a bipartisan spending deal before the Sept. 30 deadline. A Senate Republican aide said GOP senators are still in the discussion phase of a potential rules change. 'No one's presented a clear option. Right now, they're still discussing a suite of options,' the source said. GOP senators have discussed a rules change that would allow Thune to advance lower-level nominees in groups, perhaps in blocs of three or five or more. Another option would be to eliminate the time-consuming cloture vote, which takes place to limit debate before proceeding to a final confirmation vote. A third option would be to collapse the mandatory two hours of debate time that must take place between the procedural vote to invoke cloture and the final confirmation vote. That could save two hours of floor time per district court-level and sub-Cabinet-level nominees. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
