logo
Morni Hills: HC mandates forest demarcation, settlement of people's rights by year-end

Morni Hills: HC mandates forest demarcation, settlement of people's rights by year-end

Time of India21-06-2025
Chandigarh: The Punjab and Haryana high court has ordered complete demarcation of the boundary of the forest and settlement of the rights of the people in the Morni Hills area by Dec 31.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
In its detailed order, the HC has empowered the forest settlement officer (FSO) to, forthwith, take requisite steps to ensure expeditious submission of his report. Thereafter the state shall issue notification under Section 20 of Indian Forest Act 1927 of the scheduled land as a reserved forest latest by Dec 31.
"The FSO shall be handed over all the documents qua demarcation and survey which are presently in possession of the revenue authorities, forest authorities and Survey of India and the FSO shall be provided, forthwith, with all requisite facilities/infrastructure to enable him to discharge his duties contemplated in Chapter II of 1927 Act including making inquiry, entry, survey, demarcation, preparing map, acquiring land and exercising powers of a civil court, etc," the HC has clarified in its detailed order released on Friday.
The court has also clarified that there will be complete ban on all non-forest activities in the Morni Hills area till the completion of the process.
The secretary of the Haryana forest department has been asked to file a compliance affidavit, in terms of the directions made hereinabove, within seven months from, failure wherein may invite punitive consequences.
Division bench comprising Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Sumeet Goel has passed these orders while disposing of a petition filed by a local activist Vijay Bansal.
He had sought directions to conduct the settlement, in terms of Punjab Land Revenue Act 1887 and Punjab Settlement Manual, of Morni Hills area and incidental directions.
Counsel for the petitioner, advocate Ravi Sharma submitted that the residents of Morni Hills area come within the definition of traditional forest dwellers for all intents and purposes, but no efforts have been made to treat them as such.
The prime issue before the HC was as to whether the settlement of the Morni Hills area, including the process of demarcation, is required to be carried out entirely by the FSO alone, and expeditiously or not.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The state government had raised the objection, that FSO has no jurisdiction to conduct demarcation & survey of the area proposed to be proclaimed as reserved forest, and the said power lies within the exclusive domain of the revenue authorities, it would be apt to deal with this objection.
Rejecting the state's stand, the bench observed that once a special law i.e. Indian Forest Act 1927 is enacted covering the entire subject matter of Reserved Forest, the FSO assumes exclusive jurisdiction for performing all substantive and ancillary functions including demarcation and survey.
"The entire exercise of survey and demarcation being done by Revenue Authorities is required to be handed over to the FSO already appointed, who shall henceforth conduct & conclude the survey, demarcation, preparation of maps and discharging all functions under Chapter II of 1927 Act," held the bench.
Expressing shock over the delay on the part of the officers of the state government officials for delay in completing the process, the HC observed that such inaction on the part of such officers, particularly in a matter of such profound public importance, merits the unequivocal condemnation of this court.
"The State, as the ultimate custodian and protector of its citizens' rights, is endowed with a solemn responsibility to act with dispatch and diligence, especially when confronted with issues of pressing environmental concern. The prolonged failure to finalize the process initiated by the December 18, 1987 notification, undermines the very spirit of the 1927 Act and betrays a shocking lack of urgency," the HC has observed.
Lungs of Tricity
"The Morni Hills are serving as the prime green cover acting as lungs for the Tricity of Chandigarh-Panchkula-Mohali. Indubitably, the authorities are required to take a decision, one way or the other, regarding completion of the process which begins with issuance of notification under Section 4(1) of the 1927 Act and culminates upon a notification issued under Section 20 of the 1927 Act," HC said.
The delay
Nov 1966 | Haryana came into being. The hilly area of Morni block was included in the then Ambala district though the area was akin to the semi area of the Himachal Pradesh, as their problems are also of similar nature, one of them being the problem of "Nau-Taur". The state of Himachal Pradesh has solved the problem of "NauTaur" land and rights of its people long ago. Nau-Taur means the right to utilise with the sanction of the competent authority, waste land owned by the government outside the towns.
Oct 15, 1980 | The then Haryana CM made a declaration regarding the rights of "Nau-Taur" to be given to the people of Morni area on the public demand.
1987-88 | A committee headed by then commissioner Ambala division submitted a detailed report regarding the rights of people of Morni Area which is known as T D Jogpal report and recommended the immediate fresh settlement.
Nov 30, 1987 | The revenue department appointed then sub-divisional officer (civil) Kalka as settlement officer Morni Hills in addition to his duties. However, the process has not been completed till date in spite of spending crores of rupees on salary and allowances. After SDM Kalka, one M P Sharma, a retired Indian Forest Services (IFS) officer was appointed by the government as an 'FSO'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

5 U'khand Cong zila panchayat men 'abducted', HC seeks report
5 U'khand Cong zila panchayat men 'abducted', HC seeks report

Time of India

time4 hours ago

  • Time of India

5 U'khand Cong zila panchayat men 'abducted', HC seeks report

NAINITAL/DEHRADUN: Uttarakhand HC sought a detailed report from Nainital district magistrate and SSP after five Congress zila panchayat members allegedly went missing during polling for chairperson election Friday in Nainital. High court listed the matter for hearing Monday and said it was "shocking" that armed police were seen turning away while one member was being dragged away. Congress zila panchayat president candidate Pushpa Negi reached HC with 10 other members and party functionaries, alleging five members were stopped from reaching the booth. Their counsel played a video in court, showing one member being dragged away by unidentified men. SSP PN Meena and DM Vandana Singh told HC they had not yet seen the video. SP Jagdish Chandra said a case was registered against unknown persons under sections BNS sections 140(3) (wrongful restraint with common intention), 174 (non-attendance in obedience to an order from a public servant), 221 (intentional omission to apprehend by a public servant bound to apprehend), and 223 (escape from lawful custody). He said police were actively searching for the five members.

Kerala high court to examine ART practices
Kerala high court to examine ART practices

Time of India

timea day ago

  • Time of India

Kerala high court to examine ART practices

Kochi: The high court (HC) will examine the practice of bringing women from other states to Kerala for assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures. The court noted that such activities are classic cases of 'daunting and inter-state human trafficking', involving transactions worth several lakh rupees. The bench of Justices Devan Ramachandran and M B Snehalatha had recently interacted with the additional secretary of health services, who is the designated authority under the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, regarding malpractices in the field. The court was hearing a petition from a private ART bank in Ernakulam seeking release of seven women brought from other states to Kerala for surrogacy. Police had detained the women after a raid conducted with authorities under the ART Act. During the hearing, the petitioners said the women came to Kerala in response to a newspaper advertisement. HC called it a 'startling submission' and asked for a copy of the ad. Petitioners produced one that appeared on social media. The court orally observed: "People are there in other states getting ladies and bringing them. Absolutely, it is inter-border trafficking." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The 5 Books Warren Buffett Recommends You To Read in 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo The court decided to examine the process of bringing women from other states for ART and surrogacy. The petitioners claimed seven women were detained. But state govt told the court there were only six women—five from WB and one from TN—and a child. One woman had already donated an oocyte (a cell in an ovary) in Hyderabad, though the Act allows such donation only once in a lifetime. While the petitioners named a seventh woman, the state denied this and said she was not present at the clinic during the raid. Govt also opposed the claim that the women responded to the petitioners' ad. It said the claim was implausible as the women spoke only their native languages and the ad was found on social media. The govt pleader said a probe is needed to find out how the women reached the clinic after seeing the ad. Police protection for 'detained women' Counsel for the shelter home where the women are housed told the court that many people were trying to gain access by claiming the women were detained illegally or needed to sign vakalaths or other contracts. She said this was causing a law-and-order issue. HC directed the SHO of Kalamassery station to maintain a beat around the shelter and respond quickly to any request for help. Hurdles faced by authorities Kerala has 110 ART clinics, 25 ART banks and 23 surrogacy clinics. Ernakulam alone has eight such clinics. ART clinics are classified into Level 1 (which perform intrauterine insemination) and Level 2 (which offer advanced treatments like IVF, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, surgical retrieval of gametes, embryo transfer and storage). The state has only one designated authority, headed by an additional secretary of the health and family welfare department. This authority issues licences, inspects clinics and acts against violations under ART and surrogacy laws. But limited staff and resources make it hard to ensure compliance. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Happy Krishna Janmashtami Wishes ,, messages , and quotes !

High stakes meeting between Putin and Trump today in Alaska; unprecedented security in place, if talks fail...
High stakes meeting between Putin and Trump today in Alaska; unprecedented security in place, if talks fail...

India.com

time2 days ago

  • India.com

High stakes meeting between Putin and Trump today in Alaska; unprecedented security in place, if talks fail...

New Delhi: As the Russia-Ukraine war rages on, and the USA and Russia have been engaged in a vitriolic rhetoric, the presidents of both countries, Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, will meet in Alaska, USA, on August 15. The big agenda of this meeting is to stop the Russia-Ukraine war that has escalated since February 2022, when Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Notably, the two leaders are meeting after seven years. Where is the Trump-Putin meeting being held? The much-awaited and important meeting will be held at the Elmendorf-Richardson Military Base in Anchorage, Alaska's largest city, with only one translator between them. The details of the discussions between the two leaders will not be shared, as both leaders will hold a press conference after the meeting. What are the security and protocol preparations for the meeting? Before Putin's arrival in Alaska, his armoured limousine Aurus Senate had already reached the base by a Russian cargo plane. The water bottles and cups used in the meeting will also be sealed by Putin's team, while Russian fighter jets have been deployed in Anadyr, 88 km from Alaska. The Russian President will be accompanied by his FSO (Federal Protective Service) unit. Moreover, 32 thousand American soldiers are already deployed at this military base, also called the Ice Fortress. According to Trump's security protocol, Keyhole (KH-11) recon satellites will also be active. At the same time, the entire network of the base will be air-gapped (cut off from the internet) for cybersecurity. A no-fly zone will be enforced in the entire area up to a radius of 300 km. There will be double-layer security inside and outside the base. The first will be military police and National Guard, the second will be Special Forces and Secret Service's counter-assault team. Trump's Air Force One plane will be under full-time military guard as soon as it lands. Why have the two presidents chosen Alaska only for their meeting? According to the BBC, the biggest reason for Trump and Putin meeting in Alaska is security. The nearest part of Alaska's mainland is just 90 km away from Russia's Chukotka. Putin can reach there without flying over any 'enemy' country. There are some Russian air force bases and military monitoring stations in this area, where there may also be nuclear weapons. Putin's meeting here will be more secure. The second reason is distance. Alaska is very far from Ukraine and Europe. Alaska is the only US state with territory in the Arctic. Its proximity to Russia, with only about 88 km (55 miles) across the Bering Strait separating the two, gives Alaska significant strategic importance in US defence and Arctic policy. Alaska's closeness to Russia makes it a practical location for high-level discussions on global security, commerce, and environmental concerns. What are the risk factors for Putin in Alaska? This meeting is taking place at the initiative of US President Trump, and hence America will take any risk regarding Putin's security in Alaska, USA. This can be dangerous not only for the future of US-Russia relations, but also for the Russia-Ukraine war. On its part, Russia will be on highest alert to keep the president safe. What will happen if the talks fail? In the event of the failure of the talks between the US and Russian presidents, the United States will impose extra tariffs on India. This was announced by US Finance Minister Scott Besant. Talking to Bloomberg, he said, 'This tariff will depend on the outcome of the meeting between US President Trump and Russian President Putin in Alaska on Friday.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store