Trump Organization eyes multi-billion-dollar projects in Vietnam amid tariff risks
Summary
Companies
Trump Org, partner plan up to four Vietnam golf, hotel projects
First $1.5 bln project to break ground in May, spokesman says
Second project could be announced by year's end, spokesman says
Hanoi has big trade surplus, vowed measures to avoid US duties
HANOI, March 28 (Reuters) - The Trump Organization and its partner in Vietnam are working on multiple investments worth billions of dollars in golf courses, hotels and real estate projects in the Southeast Asian country, a spokesman for the consortium told Reuters.
The plans by the family business of U.S. President Donald Trump are proceeding amid risks of U.S. tariffs on Vietnam, which has one of the world's largest trade surpluses with Washington and last year exported goods worth 30% of its GDP to the United States.
To rebalance the trade gap and avoid tariffs, Vietnam has pledged to increase imports from the U.S., cut duties and non-tariff barriers, and is also allowing Elon Musk's Starlink to offer its satellite internet services in the country while retaining full control of its Vietnamese subsidiary under a pilot scheme that circumvents strict limits on foreign ownership.
"The Trump Organization with its partner plans multi-billion-dollar investments in Vietnam," the spokesman said, noting the first project will break ground in May, just months after the deal was sealed, and a second one could be announced this year.
The groundbreaking for the first project, worth $1.5 billion and close to Vietnam's capital Hanoi, would take place just weeks after the Trump administration's highly anticipated decision scheduled on April 2 for "reciprocal tariffs" on unspecified countries with trade imbalances.
The spokesman said the project, which includes three 18-hole golf courses and a residential complex, is the largest in East Asia for the Trump Organization. The first two courses are expected to be operational by mid-2027, he said. The group is also involved in two golf clubs in Indonesia, one of which is under construction.
The project was announced in October by the Trump Organization's Vietnamese partner, the real estate developer Kinhbac City (KBC.HM), opens new tab, but its timing had not been previously reported.
The Trump Organization did not respond to a request for comment.
Representatives for the consortium met Vietnam's Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh last week, according to a report on the government portal.
GOLF CASH
A Reuters analysis last year found the golf course and resort business, thanks to multiple facilities in the United States, was the biggest driver of cash flow for the Trump Organization.
Sites for another golf or hotel project close to Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam's southern business hub, have been shortlisted with a deal expected to be announced by the end of this year, the spokesman added, noting it was too early to indicate the size of the possible investment.
He added the consortium was considering investments in three or four projects in Vietnam in total.
The spokesman declined to quantify the stake of the Trump Organization in the consortium, but said the group run by Trump's son Eric would operate the facilities.
Vietnam, with a population of 100 million, has around 70 golf courses and 100,000 local golfers, according to the Vietnam Golf Association.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Starmer warns of ‘real risk' in Middle East as Trump mulls bombing Iran
Sir Keir Starmer has urged Donald Trump to step back from military action against Iran which could deepen the crisis in the Middle East. The Prime Minister said there is a 'real risk of escalation' in the conflict as he urged all sides to seek a diplomatic outcome. He said there had previously been 'several rounds of discussions with the US' and 'that, to me, is the way to resolve this issue'. His comments came as Foreign Secretary David Lammy is taking the UK's plea for de-escalation to Washington, where he will meet Mr Trump's top diplomat Marco Rubio. Mr Lammy and US Secretary of State Mr Rubio will discuss the situation in the Middle East on Thursday evening. Iran and Israel continued striking each other's territory overnight as the crisis deepens. A hospital in southern Israel was hit by a missile, while a heavy water facility in Iran was targeted in the latest blow against Tehran's nuclear programme. The hospital attack led defence minister Israel Katz to say Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei 'absolutely should not continue to exist' – in a sign that plans to kill him could be revived after previously being vetoed by Mr Trump. Mr Lammy's meeting in Washington comes amid speculation US involvement could require using the UK-controlled Diego Garcia base in the Chagos Islands. The B-2 stealth bombers based there are capable of carrying specialised 'bunker buster' bombs which could be used against Iran's underground nuclear facility at Fordo. UK Attorney General Lord Hermer is reported to have raised legal concerns about any potential British involvement in the conflict beyond defending its allies, something which could limit the extent of any support for the US if Mr Trump decides to act militarily. Sir Keir said: 'There's a real risk of escalation here that will impact the region, possibly beyond the region, akin to Gaza, and obviously it's already having an impact on the economy.' In relation to Lord Hermer, the Prime Minister said: 'The Attorney's advice is never disclosed by any government, but I can tell you the principle, the driving intent, which is that de-escalation. 'It's very clear: yes, we need to deal with the nuclear programme, there's no doubt about that in my mind, but it is better dealt with as a negotiated outcome. 'De-escalate and get to that point. 'There have been several rounds of discussions with the US. That, to me, is the way to resolve this issue.' Mr Lammy will be taking that message to Washington but UK officials do not know which way the unpredictable US president will go. Reports have suggested he has already approved a plan for an attack but has so far not decided whether to launch it. Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey called on the Government to publish Lord Hermer's advice, saying: 'The last thing we need is for the UK to be dragged into another illegal war in the Middle East by the US.' Shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel said: 'I don't think we can hide behind legal advice at a time of crisis and national security when we have to work alongside our biggest ally in the world, the United States, when they look to us for potentially… setting out operational activities through our own military bases.' She said the Conservative Party would support British involvement in military action against Iran if it was deemed necessary. Iran has insisted its nuclear programme is peaceful, but it is the only non-nuclear-armed state to enrich uranium up to 60%, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90% and far in excess of the levels required for power stations. A No 10 spokesman said: 'We have been very clear that Iran's nuclear programme has never been as advanced as it is today, it is a clear threat to international security. 'But we are urging all parties to show restraint and return to diplomacy. We are clear that Iran must not develop a nuclear weapon and we will use all diplomatic means available to deliver this.' The Government is also under pressure to step-up support for Britons stranded in Israel after the airspace was closed, a measure Benjamin Netanyahu's administration is under pressure to lift from countries eager to get their citizens home. The Foreign Office has evacuated family members of embassy staff from Israel based on a specific assessment of the risks they face, but has not provided similar transport out of Israel to other Britons. Britons have already been advised against all travel to Israel and those already in the country have been urged to register their presence with the embassy. US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee said officials are working to get 'military, commercial, charter flights and cruise ships' for an evacuation of Americans. Asked about the difference between the US support and the UK approach, the No 10 spokesman said: 'There's a huge amount of work being done in the background on contingency planning. It is a fast-moving situation and we keep all our advice and planning under constant review.'
Reuters
31 minutes ago
- Reuters
Powell signals hawkish Fed is flying blind
ORLANDO, Florida, June 19 (Reuters) - The Federal Reserve took a slightly hawkish turn on Wednesday, indicating it is worried more about rising inflation than slowing growth. But Chair Jerome Powell suggested this outlook should be taken with a large grain of salt. The Fed's revised economic projections show that officials expect U.S. unemployment and inflation to rise and growth to slow in the coming quarters. 'Stagflationary' risks are rising. Yet unlike most other G10 central banks, the Fed is refusing to cut rates preemptively, opting instead to wait for more clarity about the tariff-fueled inflation outlook before deciding on its next step. This is understandable. The full effects of President Donald Trump's tariffs on prices and economic activity will only be felt after July 9, when the current pause on so-called "reciprocal" tariffs ends. Meanwhile, new geopolitical risks are rising as the escalating war between Israel and Iran pushes oil prices higher. Given this backdrop, keeping policy "modestly" restrictive, as Powell described the Fed's current stance, is reasonable. But even though the economy and labor market are still "solid" in his opinion, the growth outlook is deteriorating just as rapidly as the inflation outlook. Fed officials' projections anticipate that cumulative GDP growth over 2025-2027 will be around 1.25 percentage points lower than forecast in December, and cumulative inflation will be roughly a percentage point higher. If growth and inflation risks are roughly balanced, why did officials trim their interest rate cut projections for the next two years by a quarter point, or put another way, why do they envisage a higher "terminal" rate? This hawkish tilt may primarily be about controlling sentiment. A central bank's number one job is keeping inflation expectations anchored, and some recent surveys show consumers' expectations for price increases have soared to the highest level in decades. However, there may be other possible motivations for maintaining this hawkish stance. First, the Fed missed the inflation surge of 2021-22, stating infamously that price increases would be "transitory". Policymakers were stung by the criticism that followed. Whether those critiques were warranted is debatable, as no major central bank got this call right, but, regardless, the Fed won't want to risk repeating that mistake. Then there are America's ballooning fiscal and institutional risks. The combination of persistent budget deficits, a rising debt load, a budget-busting tax and spending bill and ebbing global faith in the dollar and U.S. assets is keeping long-term Treasury yields elevated. This may warrant a higher long-term policy rate too. And finally, there are Trump's repeated verbal attacks on the Fed, and Powell in particular, for not lowering rates. This public criticism could actually be backfiring by prompting an equally public display of independence by the Fed to dispel any question of political interference. Powell would almost certainly play down these motivations or dismiss them outright, but they will nonetheless continue to affect how investors interpret the Fed's actions. Ultimately, the most important factor influencing the Fed right now is likely the simple fact that it has no idea what is coming down the pike. "The level of uncertainty around economic policymaking right now is sky-high. Other countries aren't experiencing this in the same way. The U.S. is very unique," says Mike Konczal of Economic Security Project. Powell simply wants to wait and see how the landscape looks once Trump's tariffs are settled and implemented. Erring on the side of inaction in this environment – especially when the economy still appears reasonably healthy – makes some sense. But this also raises questions about the usefulness of the Fed's "dot plot", a visual representation of all 19 Fed officials' year-end rate projections. For example, what is an investor to make of the fact that the median forecast for 50 basis points of easing this year was unchanged but seven officials voted for no cuts at all? "No one holds these rate paths with a great deal of conviction," Powell told reporters on Wednesday. "Think of it as the least unlikely path in a situation like this where uncertainty is very high." That appears to be Fed-speak for "We have no idea what's happening. Check back in with us in a few months." The Fed next revises its economic projections in September, by which time there should be more visibility around tariffs, Middle East tensions and the U.S. fiscal outlook. Until then, Powell and company will have to sit tight and watch as everything plays out – just like the rest of us. (The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters) Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X.
Daily Mirror
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Inside Iran's secret nuclear bunker that's 260ft deep underground
The heavily guarded mysterious Fordow bunker is built into the side of a mountain near the city of Qom, around 60 miles of Tehran. It was first made public in 2009, according to officials The world is nervously awaiting Donald Trump's decision whether to strike Iran's secretive nuclear bunker hidden in the mountains. The heavily guarded mysterious Fordow bunker is built into the side of a mountain near the city of Qom, around 60 miles of Tehran. It is believed to have started around 2006, but was first made public in 2009, according to officials. It is a staggering 260ft under rock and soil, with the site said to be protected by Iranian and Russian surface-to-air missile systems. However, those air defences have likely already been struck by Israel during the conflict. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said the goal of attacking Iran was to eliminate its missile and nuclear program, which he described as an existential threat to Israel, and officials have said Fordow was part of that plan. 'This entire operation ... really has to be completed with the elimination of Fordo,' Yechiel Leiter, Israel's ambassador to the US, said last Friday. Why is the Fordow nuclear bunker being targeted? Fordow is Iran's second nuclear enrichment facility after Natanz, its main facility, which has already been targeted by Israeli airstrikes. The International Atomic Energy Agency believes the strikes have had 'direct impacts' on the facility's underground centrifuge halls. Fordo is smaller than Natanz, and is built into the side of a mountain near the city of Qom. Construction is believed to have started around 2006 and it became first operational in 2009 — the same year Tehran publicly acknowledged its existence. In addition to being an estimated 260 feet under rock and soil, the site is reportedly protected by Iranian and Russian surface-to-air missile systems. Those air defences, however, likely have already been struck in the Israeli campaign. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said the goal of attacking Iran was to eliminate its missile and nuclear program, which he described as an existential threat to Israel, and officials have said Fordo was part of that plan. Why is Donald Trump waiting? Reports claim Donald Trump has approved plans for a US attack on nuclear sites in Iran. However, the president is holding off on plans for now in case Iran agrees to give up its nuclear programme, which it claims it is maintained for peaceful purposes. Despite this, Iran also enriches uranium up to 60%, a short step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%. Iran is the only non-nuclear-weapon state to enrich at that level. Israel is the only nuclear-armed state in the Middle East but does not acknowledge having such weapons. US officials said this week that President Donald Trump had rejected an Israeli plan to kill Khamenei. Trump later said there were no plans to kill him 'at least not for now.' The strikes came a day after Iran's supreme leader rejected US calls for surrender and warned that any military involvement by the Americans would cause 'irreparable damage to them.' Does the US need to be involved? At the moment, only the US has configured and programmed its B-2 Spirit stealth bomber to deliver the bomb, according to the Air Force. The B-2 is only flown by the Air Force, and is produced by Northrop Grumman. According to the manufacturer, the B-2 can carry a payload of 40,000 pounds but the US Air Force has said it has successfully tested the B-2 loaded with two GBU-57 A/B bunker busters — a total weight of some 60,000 pounds. The strategic long-range heavy bomber has a range of about 7,000 miles without refueling and 11,500 miles with one refueling, and can reach any point in the world within hours, according to Northrop Grumman.
