50,000 migrants have crossed Channel on small boats since Labour took power
Labour former home secretary Baroness Smith of Malvern had said earlier on Tuesday that reaching the milestone is 'unacceptable'.
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said Labour's promise to 'smash the criminal boat gangs' in its manifesto last year was 'just a slogan', with crossings now 'so much worse' than they were before the vote.
There have been 27,029 arrivals so far this year, which is 47% higher than at the same point of 2024 when the figure stood at 18,342, and 67% higher than at the same time in 2023 (16,170).
Baroness Smith, who is now an education and women and equalities minister, warned: 'Criminal gangs have got an absolute foothold in the tragic trafficking of people across the Channel.'
She told BBC Breakfast: 'It is an unacceptable number of people.'
The minister also told Times Radio: 'We have taken a lot of important action already, but what we're facing is a criminal endeavour which has got long roots into the ground, I'm afraid, because it hasn't been tackled by the last government over recent years.
'That's why we need the action we've already taken to increase the speed with which we make asylum decisions, to remove more people from this country, the groundbreaking deal that we now have with the French, and we've already detained people who've come to the country.'
Earlier this month, the Government began detaining migrants under a new 'one in, one out' deal with France.
UK officials aim to make referrals for returns to France within three days of a migrant's arrival by small boat, while French authorities will respond within 14 days.
An approved asylum seeker in France will be brought to the UK under a safe route as part of the exchange.
Speaking on the Isle of Wight, Mrs Badenoch said: 'Labour's plan to smash the gangs was just a slogan. Things are so much worse since Labour came into office, they have no plans.
'Their one in, one out scheme isn't going to work, and what we're seeing is a lot of local communities having to pay the price and bear the brunt of the Government's incompetence.'
Asked if the Conservatives could reduce the number of crossings from five figures to zero, Mrs Badenoch replied that 'it wouldn't happen straight away, but it would happen quickly'.
Mrs Badenoch said: 'My team are now looking at what we can do in terms of detention centres, but stopping people from coming here in the first place – if they think they're going to be sent to Rwanda and not get here, get a free hotel, get benefits, then they won't come here.'
Reacting to the milestone being reached, Conservative shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: 'Labour has surrendered our borders, and the consequences are being felt in our communities, from rising crime to shocking cases of rape and sexual assault by recent arrivals.'
He accused the Government of having 'scrapped Conservative deterrents and created the conditions for chaos' and added: 'This is an invasion Labour are too cowardly to confront.'
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer entered No 10 on July 5 last year, having secured a Labour victory with 412 Commons seats, ending 14 years in government for the Conservatives, who won 121.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
Live facial recognition to be expanded across the UK with more police forces using the technology
Live facial recognition (LFR) will be expanded across the UK as part of a government remodel of neighbourhood policing. The government says this technology will be introduced to catch 'high-harm' offenders, with new rules set to be drawn up this autumn to ensure 'safeguards and oversight," while balancing public and experts' views on how this tech should be used. The technology is already in use in some areas of the country but Wednesday's announcement will see a further ten vans equipped with cameras rolled out across seven police forces, Greater Manchester, West Yorkshire, Bedfordshire, Surrey, Sussex, Thames Valley and Hampshire, over the coming weeks. Currently, the rules say LFR can only be used to check against a police watchlist of wanted criminals, suspects and those subject to bail or court order conditions, such as sex offenders. Police compiled this list before a deployment of LFR technology and say it is intelligence-led and targeted to the specific area in which they are working. Signs are positioned to alert the public that LFR is being used, and the cameras scan the faces of every individual who walks by. These scans are compared against the criminal watchlist and if there's no match, are automatically deleted. When the technology thinks a person matches someone on the list, it alerts a team of officers, showing them a comparison of the photos in order for them to decide whether to stop them. The home secretary, Yvette Cooper, said they would be focused on identifying sex offenders or 'people wanted for the most serious crimes who the police have not been able to find.' Addressing specific concerns over its accuracy and use, the Home Office added: 'The algorithm being used in the vans has been independently tested and will only be operated in specific circumstances and with robust oversight.' Privacy campaigners have previously voiced concerns about a potential lack of regulation and transparency over the expansion of the technology. There have also been concerns raised over racial bias in the system and the accuracy with which it operated under certain conditions. The technology was tested by the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) who looked at whether the algorithm had any racial bias. The NPL concluded that the threshold, which can be set by police forces, at which the machine alerts officers to a match does include a racial bias at certain low levels of confidence. Above a certain level however, their research showed no racial bias was present. Police forces insist the technology is now never operated below this level of confidence in a match and all data on deployments, including the threshold at which the technology was operating that day, is publicly available online. Forces already deploying live facial recognition have used it to arrest rape, domestic abuse, knife crime and robbery suspects as well as sex offenders breaching their conditions. Lindsey Chiswick, National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) lead for facial recognition, said it had already been used 'to great success, locating thousands of wanted offenders, or others breaching their bail conditions. She added: 'I am confident that the increased use of this technology will continue to support the safety of communities across the country moving forward." South Wales Police, who have been using the technology for some years and are co-ordinating this national rollout said they understood the public's concerns. They highlighted however that in their own force, the use of LFR had "never resulted in a wrongful arrest" and there had "been no false alerts for several years as the technology and our understanding has evolved.' As well as concerns of bias, campaign group Big Brother Watch are worried about what the wider rollout of this technology means for privacy. Interim Director, Rebecca Vincent told ITV News the timing of this rollout was concerning. "We don't yet have any legislation or framework to govern the use of this. The Home Secrtary has said that's coming, but why the rush to get more vans on the street when we don't yet have that oversight and accountability." She added: "Sometimes critics of groups like ours say 'nothing to hide, nothing to fear.' "That's not quite right - we have the presumption of innocence in this country. "What live facial recognition does is reverse that. It treats us as a nation of suspects until proven otherwise."
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Is Keir Starmer just one crisis away from a Labour coup?
On the Whitehall grapevine, Wes Streeting is seen as a rare success story for the government: a good communicator who is starting to deliver the change Keir Starmer promised. The chatter in Streeting's health department predicts his next stop will be 10 Downing Street. However, the health secretary might face an uphill battle to win over the Labour grassroots in the 'one member, one vote' ballot that chooses the party's leader. Even some of his admirers suspect he might be too right-wing, or 'Blairite', for many of them. Whitehall officials are less flattering about other cabinet ministers. Rachel Reeves 's autumn Budget is described by some as her 'last shot'. In other words, if she can't break out of the doom loop of 'one-off' tax rises to meet her fiscal rules, followed by exactly the same medicine in her next Budget, Starmer might be looking for a new chancellor next year. The prime minister is not immune to speculation about his future. Even his allies admit he cannot afford a repeat of his bad first year on the domestic front. 'Another crisis like the welfare climbdown and it would surely be curtains,' one Labour MP told me. Angela Rayner told last month's meeting of Labour's national executive committee that 'announcements are not enough: people have to see real improvements in their lives, soon.' Significantly, the deputy prime minister added: 'The next 12 months will decide whether Labour wins a second term.' She wasn't talking behind Keir Starmer's back; he was in the room. Few ministers would disagree with her 'one more year' theory. Starmer's problem is that first impressions of a government, prime minister or party leader usually stick, and Labour and his party's dire ratings are getting worse. Although Rayner didn't say it, the logical consequence of her statement is that if Starmer hasn't turned things round by next summer, the question of whether he should lead the party into the next general election will become a live one. The spark might be poor results in next May's mid-term elections, when Labour could lose out to the SNP in the Scottish Parliament, to Reform UK in the Welsh Parliament, and to the Greens and Jeremy Corbyn's new socialist party in English local authorities. Indeed, there's already gossip in Labour land about Starmer's future, which is fully in line with Labour's traditions. The party doesn't kill its leaders like the Conservatives, but makes up for that by debating endlessly in private who would take over if their leader fell under a Number 12 bus in Whitehall. Labour has more in common with the TV series Succession than it would admit. Despite Streeting's Whitehall fan club, the current strong favourite to succeed Starmer is Rayner. Although she insists she doesn't want the top job, it would be very hard to stick to that if it were likely to land in her lap. Rayner is performing a delicate balancing act well. She has carved out a position slightly to the left of Starmer, which is where Labour's heart beats. At the same time, she is publicly loyal to the PM; rocking the boat could damage her succession prospects. In theory, jittery Labour backbenchers, fearing they will lose their seats, could mount a coup against Starmer. In practice, they would need cabinet-level support. How loyal would the cabinet be if the PM came under real pressure? One largely forgotten factor is that only eight of today's 22-strong cabinet nominated Starmer in the 2020 Labour leadership contest – in other words, he was their first choice. They were: Hilary Benn, Yvette Cooper, John Healey, David Lammy, Ed Miliband, Bridget Phillipson, Steve Reed and Jonathan Reynolds. That doesn't mean other ministers would dump Starmer in the event of a leadership crisis. When a leader is in real trouble, any politician is bound to consider self-interest. If Rayner still looked a shoo-in, it would suit those who don't want her to succeed Starmer to rally behind him rather than pull the rug. 'Wes [Streeting], Yvette [Cooper] and other big beasts would bolster Keir rather than let Angie [Rayner] take over,' one Labour insider told me. Despite that, it is no longer certain that Starmer will lead his party into the next election. Starmer will soon reflect on his planned fightback during a much-needed holiday, which, knowing his wretched luck when it comes to taking a break, will probably be interrupted by the need to talk to other world leaders about Ukraine and Gaza. The first test of whether Starmer can turn the domestic tide will come in what is becoming an increasingly important speech to the Labour conference in Liverpool next month. 'It's going to be a hard slog from now on,' one close ally admitted.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Tulip Siddiq's anti-corruption trial formally begins in Bangladesh
Tulip Siddiq 's trial formally began in Bangladesh on Wednesday with testimonies of anti-corruption officials against the former British minister. The Labour Party member is facing charges for allegedly using her familial connection to the ousted prime minister, Sheikh Hasina, to obtain state-owned land plots in the South Asian country. Ms Siddiq, who is Hasina's niece, resigned from her post as an anti-corruption minister in Keir Starmer 's government in January following reports that she lived in London properties linked to her aunt and was named in an anti-corruption investigation in Bangladesh. She said she had been cleared of wrongdoing but that the issue was becoming 'a distraction from the work of the government'. Ms Siddiq told The Guardian over the weekend that she was 'collateral damage' in the feud between her aunt and Muhammad Yunus – the Nobel laureate appointed as the leader of Bangladesh in the absence of an elected prime minister. 'These are wider forces that I'm battling against … There's no doubt people have done wrong things in Bangladesh, and they should be punished for it. It's just I'm not one of them.' The trial at the Dhaka Special Judge Court-4 began with testimonies by two officials of the country's Anti-Corruption Commission. A third official is expected to testify later in the day, said Muhammad Tariqul Islam, a public prosecutor. Ms Siddiq is being tried together with her mother, Sheikh Rehana, brother, Radwan Mujib, and sister, Azmina. She has been charged with facilitating their receipt of state land in a township project near the capital, Dhaka. The four were indicted earlier and asked to appear in court, however, the prosecution said they absconded and would be tried in absentia. The Bangladesh court had issued an arrest warrant for Ms Siddiq in April. She was indicted in July. Her lawyers had previously called the charges baseless and politically motivated. Separately, the anti-corruption investigation has also alleged that Siddiq's family was involved in brokering a 2013 deal with Russia for a nuclear power plant in Bangladesh in which large sums of money were said to have been embezzled. Siddiq represents the north London district of Hampstead and Highgate in parliament, served in the Labour Party government as economic secretary to the Treasury – the minister responsible for tackling financial corruption. Ms Hasina was ousted after a 15-year rule in a student-led mass uprising in August last year. She fled to India and has been in exile ever since. Hundreds of protesters were killed during the uprising and Ms Hasina now faces charges, including crimes against humanity.
