logo
The world according to Bono

The world according to Bono

Bono is telling all in a new documentary, to put the past behind him, he tells Sean O'Hagan.
The new film Bono: Stories of Surrender begins with the U2 singer re-enacting the moment his life almost ended: December 2016, an operating theatre in Mount Sinai hospital, New York. As the camera circles him on a minimal, starkly lit set, he climbs on to a table and mimes the actions of the cardiac surgeon who sawed through his chest bone with "the combined forces of science and butchery".
The eight-hour emergency operation on what he calls his "'eccentric heart" was a success, but soon afterwards, a complication left him struggling to breathe for several long, life-threatening minutes.
Given all that, I ask him, is he taking things even a little bit slower these days?
He nods, smiling. "It was Edge [U2's guitarist] who once said I treated my body as an inconvenience, but I'm definitely trying to be more respectful of my physical self after what happened. I think I'm getting a bit better at it."
Dressed in a vintage khaki green US army jacket, black T-shirt and jeans, his eyes framed by round, rose-tinted spectacles, Bono looks relaxed, if battle-worn. We are sitting on a terrace in the expansive garden of his house in Killiney, County Dublin, on the first tentatively warm day of the summer.
Below us, through tall trees, the full expanse of Dublin Bay is visible and, from time to time, the shouts and laughter of bathers braving the waters drifts upwards on the breeze. "You should be able to see the sun glinting off the glass roof of the Martello tower we used to have," he says, signalling in the direction of Bray, a seaside town a few miles up the coast, where he and his wife, Ali Hewson, lived in the early 1980s, when, driven by his unbounded ambition, U2's ascendancy was just beginning.
I first crossed paths with Bono at a pivotal moment in that journey in May 1987, when I travelled to Rome to interview him for the NME . The occasion was the first date of the European leg of The Joshua Tree world tour and, with hindsight, the devotion of the thousands of Italian fans in the outdoor Stadio Flaminio amphitheatre was a signal of what was to come.
All that seems a long time ago. Next year will mark 50 years of U2's existence; at least one celebratory documentary is in the offing, as well as — intriguingly — a Netflix drama series produced by JJ Abrams ( Star Trek, Mission: Impossible III , Lost ) and scripted by Anthony McCarten, who wrote the screenplay for the Queen biopic Bohemian Rhapsody .
Bono's Stories of Surrender is drawn from his 2022 memoir and subsequent one-man stage show. Directed by Andrew Dominik, it prefigures that celebratory reappraisal of U2's career and, as our conversation attests, it arrives at a moment of serious self-reflection. The singer recently turned 65. From here on, it seems, his focus will be on making music rather than campaigning, a decision underpinned in part by a newfound understanding of his own mortality.
"I will have to stop doing some of what I have been doing elsewhere in order to do this thing that I have been given since I was 16 or 17," he says.
In the film, vignettes from his suburban childhood and fractured adolescence — his mother, Iris, died when he was 14 — rub against anecdotes about his activist encounters with some of the most influential people on the planet, including Bill Gates, George Soros, George W. Bush and Nelson Mandela.
Bono is on camera throughout, playing several versions of himself — rock star, dogged campaigner, but also plaintive son in search of his father's blessing and driven teenager wired on punk — as well as deftly impersonating a passing parade of characters, including his father, the three other members of U2 and even the great Italian tenor Luciano Pavarotti. "It is", he quips at one point, "the world according to me". As such, it will be manna for the faithful and anathema to those for whom very little of Bono goes a long way. Same as it ever was.
The performance is revealing to a degree. "The mask reveals the man," as Bono says knowingly at one point.
How does he feel about that John Updike quote: "Celebrity is a mask that eats into the face?"
He smiles. "I'd say it's about your choice of mask that is sometimes more revealing. I have a particular thing about what I could call 'bogus authenticity'. I remember the first time I saw us on the telly, thinking: 'That's someone who is trying to look how he thinks you should be on the telly, but he doesn't know the first thing about it'."
Having known Bono for a time and enjoyed his company, I've always been intrigued by the disjuncture between his private and public self, the latter tending to be less mischievous and, at times, altogether more earnest-sounding. When I mention this, he replies: "Yes. Yes. And you were right."
And is he still like that? "Yes."
Bono, the consummate performer, takes centre stage for much of the film, but for me, the picture is most revealing when he speaks of the people and places that shaped him: his father, with whom he had an often thorny relationship; the mother he lost; the enduring friendships that began his almost ordinary childhood and adolescence on Cedarwood Rd in north Dublin and later at Mount Temple school, where, in the same fateful week in September 1976, he met Alison Stewart, his future wife, and the three fellow pupils with whom he would form U2.
It turns out that my Observer colleague Killian Fox's father, Tony, taught Bono biology in the late 1960s and early 70s. Tony tells me he remembers "parking up at school one day and hearing a rumpus coming from the music room, all this crashing and banging. It turned out to be Bono and his gang when they were just getting going". What was the young Paul Hewson like as a pupil? "He was a character, and I respected him for that. He wasn't disruptive in any way, but he was, how shall I put it, noisy."
As Bono tells me, the education that really mattered to him came from elsewhere. "Those nights as teenagers, when we'd meet up at Gavin Friday's house up the road and sit in the 'good room' and talk about Picasso and Brecht and listen to Bowie. It was all about art, trying to find yourself through art. Back then, it was almost a matter of life and death for people like us. It was that serious."
At one point in the film, Bono says of his childhood self: "I was born with my fists up." Was he combative even before he lost his mother?
He pauses. "I went to a primary school called the Ink Bottle school when I was just 3 years old and I remember on the second day, there was a scrap. At 3! There were a few early scraps at Mount Temple, too, so maybe my fists were up because that was just the nature of the beast back then. But things definitely went south on me when my mother died. I started to feel abandoned, and that was a different thing altogether."
The previous evening we had attended together a live home-town performance by his close friend Friday, where, in between songs, the artist regaled the audience with anecdotes about his childhood and family life, referencing those shared formative years on Cedarwood Rd more than once.
When I speak to Friday a few days later, I ask him about that time. "I was just getting to know Bono when [his mother died]. It's maybe a strange thing to say, but I think her death created him in a way. For me, the lines he speaks about her are the most powerful and the most revealing. When he says that the family 'disappeared' after she died, there's a real brutal honesty to that."
In the film, Bono describes how, in the wake of his mother's death, he suddenly found himself in "a house of rage and melancholy" in which she was never spoken of. His life became, for a time, "a river of silence" that someone less strong-willed might have drowned in.
Like other musicians who lost their mothers when they were young — John Lennon and Paul McCartney being the most obvious — Bono's sense of deep loss seems to have transmuted into a desire to remake himself anew. "There was something about him, even then, that was different," says Friday. "I was very shy as a kid and I remember being almost bewildered by the extraordinary confidence he had. At the time, I thought it was a Protestant thing."
As the film makes clear, Bono's late father, Brendan "Bob" Hewson, was a man for whom paternal encouragement did not come easily. Their relationship is acutely evoked on screen in scenes in which Bono sits at a table on the semi-darkened stage and relives the stilted, but often darkly humorous conversations they had over pints of Guinness in Finnegan's pub in Dalkey. It was a fraught bonding ritual familiar to Irishmen of a certain generation. In his memoir, Bono writes: "We stare at each other. Talk around each other. Occasionally, we talk to each other."
By the time he developed the cancer that ended his life in 2001, Bob Hewson had finally, as Bono wryly puts it, "become comfortable with his son being loved and loathed, which is the price of popularity in Ireland".
Having written the book and evoked his father on stage and on screen, is he any closer to understanding him?
"I'm only starting to realise now, after playing my father night after night on stage," he says, "that he might have been a lot more likeable than I was. And funny. And charming. It would have been easy to caricature him, but that would have misrepresented his complexity."
In May 2023, I watched Bono play the final date of that one-man stage show, at the Teatro di San Carlo in Naples, the oldest opera house in the world. As the show drew to a close, he sang one of his late father's favourite songs, Torna a Surriento . It was a characteristic move, if a risky one given the setting, but the Italian audience lapped it up, rising to their feet with shouts of: "Bravo, maestro!".
It seemed like there was a tear in his eye at the end ...
"Yes," he says, "and it was OK. It's a sad song to sing even if you are not thinking about your father."
He pauses. "In one sense, my dad could not have been less ambitious, and I've sometimes thought [recently] that maybe he was right to make his life and friends the priority rather than ideas. He certainly made the family a priority."
In terms of his own family, his daughter, Eve, is a successful actor and his son, Elijah, fronts an acclaimed rock band, Inhaler. How did he feel when Elijah followed in his footsteps?
"In a way, the last thing you want anybody you love to do is to put themselves out there," he says. "For me, that always brought a lot of judgement and unpleasantness and, even though I pretended it was just water off a duck's back — and to some degree it is — it hurt. I'm much thicker-skinned now but, when I was younger, the armour wasn't on properly. That's what I don't want for my kids. And, by the way, they don't suffer from it. Elijah is close to understanding who he is now, but, for me, art was always an attempt to identify myself."
One consequence of his recent reflections, it seems, is that the singer has recently stepped away from what seemed like an integral part of his life's work — the efforts to marshal western politicians to engage with structural global inequality to prevent avoidable deaths in sub-Saharan Africa.
At the end of 2023, without fanfare, Bono stepped down from the board of the One, the campaigning organisation he co-founded in 2004. It seemed an acknowledgment not just of his age, but of a decision he had made to reset his own priorities towards his family and his band.
There have been times when he recognised the contradiction between his two callings. When I spoke to him in 2009, Bono had acknowledged that his relentless campaigning had caused friction with his other band members: "They thought that it would distract me. And more than that, they were just not into it at all."
When I remind him, he nods and says: "Yep, I could have lost the band."
And yet he continued to somehow juggle two jobs, both of which were all-consuming. How hard was that?
"Let me put it this way: I won't go to my grave thinking I wasted my time in terms of my activism. I might, however, go to my grave thinking there was that one U2 song I let go of, when it was so close and I went out the back door before it was finished."
Over four decades, Bono's pragmatic approach to activism for African debt relief and the provision of retroviral medicines to treat HIV/Aids has seen him justifiably lauded — but also criticised for, among other things, having a white saviour complex, being hypocritical about his tax affairs, and cosying up to rightwing Republicans and the world's elites, whose vast wealth, his critics argue, remains an essential part of the problem he is attempting to solve.
Against this, he has always insisted that he deals in "real politics and realpolitik", in the dogged pursuit of outcomes rather than the voicing of outrage.
Jamie Drummond, another co-founder of One, describes Bono to me as "a factivist, an evidence-based activist, who's spent years learning these subjects in detail, which is also helpful when you're trying to get someone to invest billions of dollars in a country they may have never been to".
In 2003, after determined pressure from Bono, then US president George W. Bush created Pepfar (president's emergency plan for Aids relief), which set in motion the largest commitment by any nation in history to address a single virus. (He and Bush have since become friends.)
To date, successive US administrations have committed more than $120 billion (NZ$202 billion) to that cause, which has helped save an estimated 26 million lives. Despite the deep reservations of lefties about the company he was keeping, the results — while not creating the systemic change his critics insist is needed — do undoubtedly speak for themselves.
His approach was, until now, predicated on what he often refers to as his single useful idea: you don't have to agree with people on everything if the one thing you do agree on is important enough. I ask him if that philosophy is still tenable in the face of Donald Trump's brutal "America first" ideology?
"I don't think so," he says, wearily, "I can't do it. The organisations I helped create and sustain can't carry the anger that I have at the vandalism, not just of USAID, but of people's lives — the people that worked on it and the people whose lives depended on it."
There is a sense of deep personal betrayal evident in his voice. "I think what [Trump's government is] doing now is so shortsighted and frankly dumb. Then there is the delight, the — dare I say it — glee of these people, as they pull life-support systems out of the wall with no warning. That means a haemorrhaging of human life. It's hard to measure the enormity of it now."
Aren't many of the people who are behind this vandalism, as he calls it, the same Republicans and Christian evangelists he had worked with previously?
He accepts that some of them are. "I'm sure that, when their constituencies find out, they will take their support for this administration away. Whether it's millions or hundreds of thousands of lives at risk, how in any way can you justify that as a Christian or religious person?"
Given all that, where does this leave him?
"Out of a job. I don't think you can turn off being an activist, but I'm not sure the conversations I enjoy between opposite points of view are ones I can referee at this present moment. But there are other people who can take up that torch. We are into new territory and it's incredibly disturbing. I don't recognise the GOP [Grand Old party]. There are some people I know who I imagine still care and have kindness in them. And it's worth dwelling on the word kindness. In terms of the evisceration of USAID and Pepfar, unkind is not the word to describe it — it's murderous."
He falls silent for a while. "In our lifetimes, yours and mine, we had the sense that the world was evolving in the direction of freedom ... but, the thing is, there is no sound historical backing for that belief. Our lives are a tiny fragment of time; the bigger moral arc of the universe does not bend towards justice. It has to be bent towards justice."
Which brings us to Gaza. In January, Bono provoked a storm of online criticism for accepting a presidential medal of freedom from Joe Biden, who had just committed another $8 billion (NZ$13.5 billion) of hi-tech weaponry to Israel. In Ireland, where support for Palestine is such that Israel closed its embassy in Dublin at the end of last year, U2, like many established rock groups, have been regularly condemned on social media for their silence.
He once famously said, I remind him: "Where you live should not determine whether you live." Surely that also applies to Gaza ...
"Yes."
Was he surprised, then, that many people were outraged at him taking the medal from Biden? He takes a deep breath. "I've worked with Joe Biden, and his friends and foes, for 25 years, and he has fought for debt cancellation and supported our campaigns, which have saved 26 million lives — so of course I was going to take the medal. I was also accepting it on behalf of all the activists who spent 25 years of their lives on this."
What, though, about the huge number of civilian lives lost in Gaza and the current withholding of aid — maybe people think that he should be consistent in terms of speaking out?
"As it happened, I did sound off about Gaza on the very day I received the medal of freedom. I spoke about the void of freedom in the lives of Palestinian people in the Irish Times and the Atlantic. So, with respect, I reject your central argument that I haven't spoken out. But, also, I think it's daft to accept the notion that people's public pronouncements are the sum of them. I'm after outcomes — from my activism and, more importantly, for the activists often in U2's audience who work harder if there is a clear end in sight."
At the medal of freedom ceremony, he tells me, he was sitting near Jose Andres, founder of the food aid charity World Central Kitchen. "This is someone who has lost seven of his aid workers in Gaza, who were taken out by the IDF [Israel Defense Forces]. And he is there, blessing himself as he is given his medal by Joe Biden. That's why I had my hands clasped like that, for him. I was following his blessing and that's why I look like such a pious dick."
We go at it for a while longer, until his press officer arrives to tell us we have another 15 minutes. Somewhat reluctantly, he agrees to move the conversation to his other job.
I put it to him that U2 have been very nostalgic of late, revisiting 1987's The Joshua Tree album on stage in 2017 and the groundbreaking Achtung Baby for their marathon residency at the Sphere in Las Vegas last year.
Surprisingly, he concurs. "Yeah, we have been involved in some nostalgia. But I would say, you have to know where you came from in order to be more effective in the present and the future. That's the case in a different way with the book, the stage play and now the film. I have a record of it all, but now, I have to move back into the future, which is where U2 always lived."
The band, it turns out, have recently reconvened in a nearby studio with longtime collaborator Brian Eno to prepare the groundwork for what will be their 16th album. "We're busy writing another reason to exist as a band," Bono says. "I still find Brian an extraordinary inspiration and I'm sure he still finds me quite frustrating. But I know he will keep on defending our right to be ecstatic in our music."
Is it more difficult to do that as you grow older?
"Not in terms of the music. It does get harder particularly for men to move around each other's egos."
Has writing the memoir and adapting it for the stage and screen made him think differently about his role in the band?
"It certainly opened up more questions. Ultimately, our art is more interesting than us, and I think the disservice I've done to the band is distracting from their greatness. There is something that we own — a fingerprint, a genetic code — and I feel that I haven't served it enough, that it needs my full attention."
Before he departs for a band meeting, he tells me that one of the early titles for his memoir was The Pilgrim and His Lack of Progress . Reflecting one more time on the solo journey he has been on of late, he says.
"I think I've made a beautiful little opera of a film, and that it's OK to give vent to these outsize emotions if you do so with some humour and some humility. I hope I got the humour." He grins. "The humility's in the post." The film
• Bono: Stories of Surrender will be available globally on May 30 on Apple TV+. — The Observer

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Invasion of the red tide
Invasion of the red tide

Otago Daily Times

timea day ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Invasion of the red tide

As climate change is the big issue of the day, there is plenty of scope for Dr Octavia Cade's brand of science fiction writing. Rebecca Fox talks to this year's Robert Burns Fellow. A toxic algae bloom is creeping up Otago Harbour, smothering everything in its path. Do you race down to the harbour to see it for yourself or shrug it off as just one of those things? Kerikeri writer Dr Octavia Cade is fascinated by the ways people could react to the scenario and interact with the environment. "So there's this plethora of strange and fascinating possible reactions." So much so the scenario forms the basis for a science fiction novel and a research paper she is writing this year while the Robert Burns Fellow at the University of Otago. "They've all gone a bit barmy, my characters. But it's fun. If you're into science fiction as I am, and you've been reading New Zealand science fiction from when you were a kid, there's a surprising amount of it that really looks at what do we do with an invasive species once it gets to New Zealand." Algae blooms are becoming more common in New Zealand summers with warming waters and nitrate run-off impacting waterways. It makes the perfect villain for Cade's preferred "near-future" writing style. "There are some really strange and interesting side effects [from it]." Even Under the Mountain by Cade's favourite author from childhood, Maurice Gee, has its invasive species. "The invasive species there was obviously the Wilberforces. They horrified me as a child, but as I grew up, and I keep reading it, because I do read it on a fairly regular basis, the solution to it is pretty damn horrifying, if you think about it. The solution to ecological invasion in the Wilberforces is for children to commit genocide." Cade grew up in Nelson and used to live across the road from the botanical gardens where Gee's The World Around the Corner is set. "So I would run up, well, I would play on the mountain pretending to be Caroline, who was the hero of that book." Her love of science fiction developed in childhood thanks to her mother who made sure she and her sister watched Star Trek . "So we're both sci-fi fans from way back so when I started writing, it was going to be science ficition rather than anything else." But it took time before Cade embraced writing as she planned to be a scientist. She came to Dunedin to study botany but soon discovered she "really hated" the way scientists were trained to write and the language of scientific papers. "The idea behind this is that the writing is as efficient as possible and can be read by other scientists working in your field. The downside of that is that it blocks everyone else out." As she was finishing her scientific studies, the Centre for Scientific Communication was starting up and gave her hope of another way. "That was the genesis for the shift, the sheer disgust of the scientific paper. I think at the time I remember there was a bit of a kerfuffle, it was one of the national journals in sciences, and it was supposed to be revolutionary that they were moving in their methods from third person to first person. I thought, God, do I really want to be reading and writing this for the rest of my professional life?" The move to science communication (the programme has since been cut) was an excellent move for Cade who has since completed her PhD in science communication and discovered she could turn her "fun" short-story writing hobby into something more. Back then she was writing more generic science fiction featuring vampires and other more usual genre characters. "But I wasn't very good at writing them. It turned out what I was quite good at writing about was plants and animals and how people react with nature and how we talk about science. And so once I started writing, they say write what you know, and eventually I started listening." It turned out to be good advice and her stories began to do well. "So I started writing science fiction as a way to communicate science, basically. And it sort of took off from there. So yes, the scientific paper is responsible for my career writing novels about algal blooms." After helping her marine biologist father as a child she knew marine biology was not as glamorous as it sounded. "It was standing in freezing cold warehouses holding clipboards while he dissected fish. And so I thought, I don't want anything to do with marine biology on any level." But a compulsory marine botany paper turned out to be more interesting than she expected. And down the line it has ended up producing a story about algae blooms. She has discovered a real fascination for the blooms, imagining a bright red harbour and people going slowly "doolally" around it after injesting food affected by it. "With algae, the colour and how toxic it is, how poisonous, how it smothers everything in the harbour. I mean, imagine an albatross trying to float in that or a seal. It sort of kills everything and you can't go swimming. It affects all the water sources, it sort of spreads. It's like this little contagion. "And the fascinating thing about algae blooms is really we have a decent idea how to stop them. You know, we've got to control runoff and all sorts of things, but we often don't." So while she no longer writes purely scientific papers, she continues to read a lot of them — for inspiration. "When I see something particularly weird or disgusting happening in the animal world, I "favourite" the page and then shove it in my story ideas file." Her first novel The Stone Wētā , published in 2020 and expanded from a short story written in 2016, came about after she read how scientists during Donald Trump's first term as United States president were working across borders to store climate data and information as they were concerned about censorship. The short story had been picked up by one of the top international science fiction publications Clarkesworld Magazine . "I was thinking, well, this sounds like something people should be talking about more than they are. And so that's where a lot of my stories come from, actual interesting bits of science. And I was able to include a lot of weird stuff in that book." Still really liking the concept, Cade developed it into an adult novel and it won the Sir Julius Vogel Award for best novel. Another news article she has bookmarked is of the fishscale gecko, which sheds its scales and "skitters off looking like raw chicken breast". "The pictures of this thing are revolting and fascinating. And I just love that anything weird and disgusting that can be used as colour." Cade believes each writer has their own natural length. Hers is short stories — she has had about 70 published to date around the world — so writing a novel is more of a challenge. "It's one of the advantages of the Burns. You get space to upskill in your creative practice." She sees her short stories as being part of a long historical and cultural tradition of short story writing in New Zealand with New Zealand children growing up on authors like Katherine Mansfield, Janet Frame, Patricia Grace and Owen Marshall's work. "I just love them. I love how short stories require different things from readers and writers. You cannot, because you've got such a limited word count, you can't go explaining everything. You can't really go down sidetracks and wander. You've got to be very economical with your storytelling. And you have to trust that the reader can follow along. And I quite like that. "Whenever I try to write a novel, I often feel like I'm putting in all this waffle. But you can't write a novel like you're writing a short story." Cade remembers her first day in the Robert Burns fellow's office sitting staring at her computer. "For nearly the entire day, I stared sort of frozen in terror at this blank screen because they'd given me the opportunity and I'd been expected to produce something, something good." She gave herself a good talking to that night and the next day began to write. But she still feels slightly intimiated by the list of top New Zealand writers that have gone before her. "I have a bucket list, you see, of writing opportunities that I would like to apply for. And I've been quite lucky in getting them, but it is a luck that has been very much underpinned by a lot of hard work." She has applied for the Burns fellowship and others many times before, seeing each application as practise developing her application skills and learning from the rejections and comments she receives. "I mean, if you are in the creative sector, you have to have a very thick skin when it comes to rejection. A lot of it is luck, but a lot of it is hard work and not taking yourself too seriously. It's never nice having a story rejection or a novel rejection or a residency rejection. But if you are going to work in this industry, you need to learn to suck it up. And it's all part of the learning process, I suppose, in the end." These days her other "hobby", academic writing, has also become more of a focus as she became aware that it is an advantage to have a list of academic papers to her name when applying for residencies. "I don't get paid for academic writing but there is a cachet there and it is an investment." But it is also an excuse for her to indulge some of her passions such as a love of horror movies — a side effect of growing up on science fiction and her love of Under the Mountain . "The terror I spent lying awake at night thinking about the Wilberforces, you know, sludging at the window the way they did to the twins. There was something fascinating about that. So that was my gateway drug for horror." So writing papers about something she has seen in a horror film gives her an excuse to watch more of them. One of the papers she is working on is an academic collection coming out called "Sharksploitation, Shark Horror Films in the 21st Century". She is writing a chapter looking at urban shark films, things like "Under Paris" and "Bait", when sharks come into the cities. She finds urban ecology very interesting, especially the way people react to it when they see wildlife in places they do not expect to see it. "Because these are issues that are happening all around the world. I mean, in Colorado, I've written papers before on animal horror films, you know, giant sharks and crocodiles and so on. And they're kind of problems in wildlife management. "I think there's something very interesting that horror films are contributing to this sort of ongoing discussion. Because they remind us that, you know, we're not just existing outside of a food web." Cade is enjoying being back in Dunedin and revisiting all the places she remembers from her university days. "It's a great place if you want to write books or learn about nature, because you have the albatross and the sea lions and the penguins and Orokonui's just over there. There's so much scope for creativity." She was gutted to learn recently that the Frances Hodgkins and Mozart fellowships had been put on hold for a year given the benefits the fellowships have for creatives of all types.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store