Special court rejects plea by Narayan Rane questioning summons in defamation case filed by Sanjay Raut
The detailed order of the special court designated for trials of criminal cases involving MPs and MLAs is yet to be made available.
The case is related to comments allegedly made by Rane at the Konkan festival in Bhandup area of Mumbai on January 15, 2023. Raut had filed a complaint stating that the comments about his political career were defamatory. On April 23, 2025, a magistrate court issued summons against Rane, stating that there is a prima facie case showing that the comments which were published in the media had caused harm to the reputation of Raut.
Challenging this order, Rane had argued that the magistrate court order was illegal and passed without application of judicial mind. It said the allegations against him are vague and no proof was given about any damage caused by his alleged statements. It was also submitted that no evidence is present to show that he intended to defame Raut.
He further said the two are well-known political personalities, with a long-standing political rivalry, having publicly criticised each other on multiple occasions in the past. He further said the remarks were part of an ongoing political discourse and were made in good faith. Mere hurt feelings or political criticism or personal annoyance are not sufficient in law, Rane's plea seeking dismissal of the case, said.
Raut through his lawyers Prakash Shetty and Sarthak Shetty had submitted that there was proof that the remarks were defamatory and the magistrate court order had considered it while passing the order.
Special Judge S R Navander dismissed the plea.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
22 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
No plan to remove ‘secular', ‘socialist' from Preamble: Centre
The Union government has no plans or intention to remove the words 'secular' and 'socialist' from the Preamble to the Constitution, Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal told Parliament on Thursday. Meghwal acknowledged that 'certain groups' were seeking the removal of the two words from the Preamble. 'Any discussions regarding amendments to the Preamble would require thorough deliberation and broad consensus, but as of now, the government has not initiated any formal process to change these provisions,' Meghwal told Rajya Sabha. The words 'socialist' and 'secular' were not part of the Constitution adopted in 1950 and were added in 1976 through the 42nd constitutional amendment. In November, the Supreme Court dismissed petitions filed by Bharatiya Janata Party leaders Subramanian Swamy and Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, in addition to a separate plea by a man named Balram Singh, challenging the 1976 amendment. Citing this ruling, the Union law minister said: 'The court clarified that 'socialism' in the Indian context signifies a welfare state and does not impede private sector growth, while 'secularism' is integral to the Constitution's basic structure.' The court had said in its order that there was no legitimate justification for challenging the constitutional amendment several decades later. The minister's response to Samajwadi Party MP Ramji Lal Suman's questions in the Rajya Sabha came about a month after a political row erupted about the inclusion of the words in the Constitution. The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh in June called for a review of the two terms. The RSS is the parent organisation of the ruling BJP. A day after the comment by RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale, Jagdeep Dhankhar, the vice president at the time, had said that the addition of the words 'secular' and 'socialist' to the Preamble of the Constitution during the Emergency was a ' sacrilege to the spirit of sanatana '. Sanatana dharma is a term some people use as a synonym for Hinduism. Union ministers Shivraj Singh Chouhan and Jitendra Singh had also voiced their support for a review. Chouhan had claimed that the words 'secular' and 'socialist' are not core to Indian culture and called for a discussion on their removal from the Constitution. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi had criticised the RSS for seeking a review of the two words in the Preamble, saying that the Hindutva organisation's ' mask had come off again '. In 2015, a controversy erupted after the BJP-led Union government's newspaper advertisements on Republic Day featured a Preamble with the two words omitted. In September 2023, Congress leader Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury claimed that the two words were missing from the Preamble
Hans India
22 minutes ago
- Hans India
Roundtable calls for agitation against smart power meters
Vijayawada: Secretary of the CPM NTR District Committee DV Krishna criticised the implementation of Adani's smart electricity meters, labelling them 'smart bombs' for consumers. He alleged that these actions are being carried out at the behest of both Central and State governments. During a roundtable conference held here on Thursday at Balotsava Bhavan in Governorpet, Krishna expressed grave concern that smart meters would significantly increase the burden of electricity charges on consumers. He warned the government to remember that the previous TDP government collapsed under the weight of excessive electricity charges in the undivided state, predicting that 'the TDP government will inevitably fall once again due to electricity smart meters.' Krishna pointed out that people in BJP-ruled Rajasthan have rejected Maruti meters, and a similar situation has arisen in Bengal. He highlighted instances in Andhra Pradesh, specifically in Anantapuram, Gudivada, Vijayawada, and Srikakulam, where consumers have already vandalised smart meters. He condemned the authorities for proceeding with meter installation despite widespread public opposition. G Koteswara Rao, City Secretary of CPI, echoed these concerns, stating that smart meters would impose massive burdens on the public. He explained that not only would charges increase, but consumers would also have to bear the monthly cost of the smart meters themselves. Koteswara Rao ridiculed the smart meters as an experiment designed to break the backs of consumers, through additional charges beyond unit consumption, such as fuel charges, duties, 'true up' charges, and maintenance charges. Padma, a city leader of New Democracy, called for strong opposition to smart meters, urging women, as household consumers, to lead this movement. Maridu Prasad Babu, a Red Flag leader, warned that another electricity agitation is inevitable, placing the blame squarely on the TDP government. He announced that the electricity movement would intensify on August 5. The roundtable conference concluded with several key decisions including to escalate the protest by conducting meetings in mandals and towns, distribute pamphlets, collect signatures, and conduct door-to-door campaigns until July 29, organise meetings, Padayatras, promotional activities, and Prabhat Pheris (morning rallies) from July 30 to August 4 and to stage protests and demonstrations at electricity sub-stations and government offices on August 5. A Venkateswara Rao (CITU District President), NCH Srinivasa Rao (CITU General Secretary), M Srinivas (Treasurer), NCH Supraja (Anganwadi Workers Union District General Secretary), and leaders including N Nageswara Rao, Y Subbarao, KR Anjaneyulu (AITUC City President), M Sambasiva Rao (AITUC General Secretary), KV Ramana (IFTU), M Muni Shankar (IFTU), Govindarajulu (AIYF), Durga (POW), and Durgamba (AIFW) participated.
Scroll.in
22 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Over 2.06 lakh Indians gave up their citizenship in 2024, says Centre
More than 2.06 lakh persons relinquished their Indian citizenship in 2024, the Union government told Parliament on Thursday. Kirti Vardhan Singh, the minister of state for external affairs, told Rajya Sabha that 2.16 lakh Indians had given up their citizenship in 2023. In 2022, more than 2.25 lakh Indians had given up their citizenship. The number was 1.6 lakh in 2021, 85,256 in 2020 and 1.4 lakh in 2019. The minister provided the data in response to a question by Congress MP Anil Kumar Yadav Mandadi, who had sought to know if the Union government undertakes a 'thorough checkup/survey/inspection before acceding to the request of relinquishment of Indian Citizenship'. Singh said that a person looking to renounce their Indian citizenship is required to apply online, following which, either a district collector or a consular officer verifies the original passport. Documents are uploaded and made available to all government departments for their inputs that are to be provided within 30 days, said the minister, adding that a renunciation certificate is issued after this period. In March, the Union government told Parliament that the number of Indians who gave up their citizenship stood at 1.34 lakh in 2018 and 1.33 lakh in 2017. 'The reasons for renouncing Indian citizenship or taking foreign citizenship are personal and known only to the individual,' the Union government had said. It added that it recognised the 'potential of the global workplace in an era of knowledge economy', which had brought about a 'transformational change in its engagement with Indian diaspora'. 'A successful, prosperous, and influential diaspora is an asset for India,' said the government. 'India stands to gain a lot from tapping its diaspora networks and productive utilisation of the soft power that comes from having such a flourishing diaspora.'
