Google-parent Alphabet Earnings Shine with Help of AI
Alphabet's second-quarter profit of $28.2 billion -- on $96.4 billion in revenue -- came with word that the tech giant will spend $10 billion more than it previously planned this year on capital expenditures, as it invests to meet growing demand for cloud services.
"We had a standout quarter, with robust growth across the company," said Alphabet chief executive Sundar Pichai.
"AI is positively impacting every part of the business, driving strong momentum."
Revenue from search grew double digits in the quarter, with features such as AI Overviews and the recently launched AI mode "performing well," according to Pichai.
Ad revenue at YouTube continues to grow along with the video platform's subscription services, Alphabet reported.
Alphabet's cloud computing business is on pace to bring in $50 billion over the course of the year, according to the company.
"With this strong and growing demand for our cloud products and services, we are increasing our investment in capital expenditures in 2025 to approximately $85 billion and are excited by the opportunity ahead," Pichai said.
Alphabet shares were up nearly 2 percent in after-market trades that followed the release of the earnings figures.
Investors have been watching closely to see whether the tech giant may be pouring too much money into artificial intelligence and whether AI-generated summaries of search results will translate into fewer opportunities to serve up money-making ads.
The internet giant is dabbling with ads in its new AI Mode for online search, a strategic move to fend off competition from ChatGPT while adapting its advertising business for an AI age.
The integration of advertising has been a key question accompanying the rise of generative AI chatbots, which have largely avoided interrupting the user experience with marketing messages.
However, advertising remains Google's financial bedrock.
"Google is doing well despite tariff headwinds and rising AI competition in search," said eMarketer principal analyst Yory Wurmser.
"It's also successfully monetizing AI Overviews and AI Mode, a good sign for the future."
Google and rivals are spending billions of dollars on data centers and more for AI, while the rise of lower-cost model DeepSeek from China raises questions about how much needs to be spent.
Antitrust battles
Meanwhile the online ad business that generates the cash Google invests in its future could be neutered due to a defeat in a US antitrust case.
During the summer of 2024, Google was found guilty of illegal practices to establish and maintain its monopoly in online search by a federal judge in Washington.
The Justice Department is now demanding remedies that could transform the digital landscape: Google's divestiture from its Chrome browser and a ban on entering exclusivity agreements with smartphone manufacturers to install the search engine by default.
District Judge Amit Mehta is considering "remedies" in a decision expected in the coming days or weeks.
In another legal battle, a different US judge ruled this year that Google wielded monopoly power in the online ad technology market, another legal blow that could rattle the tech giant's revenue engine.
District Court Judge Leonie Brinkema ruled that Google built an illegal monopoly over ad software and tools used by publishers.
Combined, the courtroom defeats have the potential to leave Google split up and its influence curbed.
Google said it is appealing both rulings.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
3 days ago
- Arab News
Australia bans YouTube accounts for children under 16 in reversal of previous stance
MELBOURNE: The Australian government announced YouTube will be among the social media platforms that must ensure account holders are at least 16-years-old from December, reversing a position taken months ago on the popular video-sharing service. YouTube was listed as an exemption in November last year when the Parliament passed world-first laws that will ban Australian children younger than 16 from platforms including Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok and X. Communications Minister Anika Wells released rules Wednesday that decide which online services are defined as 'age-restricted social media platforms' and which avoid the age limit. The age restrictions take effect Dec. 10 and platforms will face fines of up to 50 million Australian dollars ($33 million) for 'failing to take responsible steps' to exclude underage account holders, a government statement said. The steps are not defined. Wells defended applying the restrictions to YouTube and said the government would not be intimidated by threats of legal action from the platform's US owner, Alphabet Inc. 'The evidence cannot be ignored that four out of 10 Australian kids report that their most recent harm was on YouTube,' Wells told reporters, referring to government research. 'We will not be intimidated by legal threats when this is a genuine fight for the wellbeing of Australian kids.' Children will be able to access YouTube but will not be allowed to have their own YouTube accounts. YouTube said the government's decision 'reverses a clear, public commitment to exclude YouTube from this ban.' 'We share the government's goal of addressing and reducing online harms. Our position remains clear: YouTube is a video sharing platform with a library of free, high-quality content, increasingly viewed on TV screens. It's not social media,' a YouTube statement said, noting it will consider next steps and engage with the government. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Australia would campaign at a United Nations forum in New York in September for international support for banning children from social media. 'I know from the discussions I've had with other leaders that they are looking at this and they are considering what impact social media is having on young people in their respective nations,' Albanese said. 'It is a common experience. This is not an Australian experience.' Last year, the government commissioned an evaluation of age assurance technologies that was to report last month on how young children could be excluded from social media. The government had yet to receive that evaluation's final recommendations, Wells said. But she added the platform users won't have to upload documents such as passports and driver's licenses to prove their age. 'Platforms have to provide an alternative to providing your own personal identification documents to satisfy themselves of age,' Wells said. 'These platforms know with deadly accuracy who we are, what we do and when we do it. And they know that you've had a Facebook account since 2009, so they know that you are over 16.' Exempt services include online gaming, messaging, education and health apps. They are excluded because they are considered less harmful to children. The minimum age is intended to address harmful impacts on children including addictive behaviors caused by persuasive or manipulative platform design features, social isolation, sleep interference, poor mental and physical health, low life-satisfaction and exposure to inappropriate and harmful content, government documents say.
ArabGT
3 days ago
- ArabGT
GM's New Cadillacs Delight Overseas, Disappoint Americans
General Motors is stirring frustration among its most loyal customers after confirming that Apple CarPlay and Android Auto will be available in its new Cadillac EVs—but only outside the U.S. In markets like Australia and New Zealand, Cadillac drivers will enjoy full smartphone integration, while American buyers—ironically, in GM's own backyard—are left out. Cadillac EVs Go Fully Connected—But Only Abroad Cadillac's electric future is rolling out globally with models like the Lyriq, Festiq, and Optiq heading to Australia and New Zealand equipped with wireless CarPlay, Android Auto, and the Cadillac Connected Services suite. That means over-the-air updates, customizable screens, and a polished user experience—all powered by the smartphones people already rely on. But in the U.S., the very same vehicles will ship without these popular features. GM is holding the line on a controversial decision it made last year: dropping Apple and Google smartphone mirroring in favor of its own native interface, 'Ultifi.' Ultifi or Bust? Customers Aren't Convinced GM has framed Ultifi as the future—an in-house infotainment system integrated with Google services, designed to be faster, smarter, and more seamless. But many drivers don't see it that way. For them, removing CarPlay and Android Auto isn't progress—it's a downgrade. People want their apps, their maps, their playlists, their familiar interface. They don't want to relearn a new system or lose the personalization and ease they've come to expect. So Why the Divide? GM hasn't given a clear answer. Some speculate that regional differences are driving the decision. Australia, for instance, doesn't offer Super Cruise—GM's hands-free driving system—so full smartphone integration is a must. In the U.S., the company might be pushing drivers toward Ultifi to control the digital ecosystem and eventually monetize it through subscriptions. Backlash From the Home Crowd American buyers aren't happy. Social media and forums lit up with complaints from frustrated drivers asking why someone in Melbourne gets a more connected driving experience than someone in Manhattan or Michigan. Some called it 'digital discrimination,' others saw it as GM putting profits ahead of user experience. In an era where cars are as much about software as they are about steel, these decisions matter—and so does the message they send. For GM, the risk is clear: alienating its most important market while offering better features abroad could cost them more than just good will.
Arab News
3 days ago
- Arab News
Australia adds YouTube to social media ban for children
SYDNEY: Australia said on Wednesday it will include Alphabet-owned YouTube in its world-first ban on social media for teenagers, reversing an earlier decision to exempt the video-sharing platform. Australia's Internet watchdog last month urged the government to overturn the proposed exemption for YouTube after its research found 37 percent of children aged 10 to 15 reported seeing harmful content on the platform, the most of any social media site. Other social media companies such as Meta's Facebook and Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok had argued an exemption for YouTube would be unfair. 'Social media has a social responsibility and there is no doubt that Australian kids are being negatively impacted by online platforms so I'm calling time on it,' Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said in a statement. 'Social media is doing social harm to our children, and I want Australian parents to know that we have their backs.' Social media firms will be fined up to A$49.5 million ($32.2 million) from December if they break the law, which passed through parliament in November. A YouTube spokesperson said the company would consider next steps and would continue to engage with the government. 'We share the government's goal of addressing and reducing online harms. Our position remains clear: YouTube is a video sharing platform with a library of free, high-quality content, increasingly viewed on TV screens. It's not social media,' the spokesperson said by email. Online gaming, messaging apps, and health and education sites will be excluded from the center-left government's minimum age rules as they pose fewer social media harms to teens under 16, or are regulated under different laws, Communications Minister Anika Wells said. 'The rules are not a set and forget, they are a set and support,' Wells said.
