logo
Trump's 50% Tariff Threatens India's Manufacturing Ambitions

Trump's 50% Tariff Threatens India's Manufacturing Ambitions

Yahoo2 days ago
(Bloomberg) -- India's largest shoemaker Farida Group had already staked out the land — a 150-acre plot in southern Tamil Nadu — for a sprawling new export facility. Then came the blow from Washington: President Donald Trump announced he was doubling tariffs on Indian exports to 50%.
For Farida, which supplies brands like Cole Haan and Clarks and depends on the US for about 60% of its business, the impact was immediate. New orders stopped. The 10 billion rupee ($114 million) project froze.
The US-Canadian Road Safety Gap Is Getting Wider
Sunseeking Germans Face Swiss Backlash Over Alpine Holiday Congestion
To Head Off Severe Storm Surges, Nova Scotia Invests in 'Living Shorelines'
Five Years After Black Lives Matter, Brussels' Colonial Statues Remain
For Homeless Cyclists, Bikes Bring an Escape From the Streets
'With 25% tariffs, you can still work, you can give some discount, negotiate with the buyer and make some adjustments in your profits,' Rafeeque Ahmed, the company's chairman, said in an interview. 'At 50%, you don't have anything.'
Farida is hardly alone. Trump's move would give India the highest tariff rate in Asia, threatening a manufacturing sector that Prime Minister Narendra Modi has spent a decade trying to build to take on the likes of China. The 'Make in India' campaign was supposed to lift manufacturing to 25% of the economy. Last year, it stood at just 13% — lower than the 16% in 2015, according to World Bank data.
The last few years did offer glimmers of the future Modi had envisioned. Apple Inc. scaled up iPhone assembly in India, making the country the second-largest smartphone producer after China. Pharmaceuticals and green tech have also gained ground. The US — whose policies and actions accelerated companies' adoption of a 'China Plus One' strategy to diversify supply chains — is now India's biggest export market and one of its top sources of foreign investment.
That progress is suddenly vulnerable. While the tariff hike spares smartphones and pharmaceuticals for now, it puts the rest of India's $87 billion in US-bound exports on the line.
'Forget China Plus One right now. Companies are thinking India Plus One,' Ahmed said. 'They are making plans to move out of India.'
India's Ministry of Commerce and Industry didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
Trump says the tariff hike is punishment for India's purchase of discounted oil from Russia, which he argues helps fund President Vladimir Putin's war on Ukraine. But India was the only major economy to be hit with such 'secondary tariffs,' even though China is the largest overall buyer of Moscow's crude.
If the 50% rate holds, Bloomberg Economics estimates US-bound exports from India could fall by 60% and put nearly 1% of gross domestic product at risk. Without exemptions for pharmaceuticals and electronics, the decline could reach 80%. Even the earlier 25% rate — already higher than in Vietnam, Malaysia or Bangladesh, was enough to threaten a 30% drop in exports. For comparison, Chinese goods face about a 30% US tariff.
'In addition to the economic challenge, politically it's difficult for Prime Minister Modi that India now pays a higher blanket rate than China,' said Alexander Slater, head of the India practice at consulting firm Capstone.
China is pressing on other fronts as well. Beijing wants to limit tech transfers and equipment exports to India and Southeast Asia, aiming to deter companies from relocating production, Bloomberg previously reported. China's rare earth curbs also hit Indian automakers earlier this year.
At the same time, Trump's tariffs have opened the door for closer India-China ties. Direct flights may resume as soon as next month, and Beijing has eased restrictions on urea exports to India. The two sides are discussing resuming border trade of locally made goods after more than five years, Bloomberg reported on Thursday.
What Bloomberg Economics Says...
'In a no-deal scenario, we estimate a drag of up to 1.5 percentage points on long-term potential GDP growth, relative to our optimistic outlook of 9% by 2030. The impact is likely to stem from weaker sentiment, lower investments, falling exports and a setback to India's manufacturing ambitions.'
— Chetna Kumar. For the full analysis, click here.
On the factory floor, anxiety over the US tariff is palpable. Ajay Sahai, chief executive officer of the Federation of Indian Export Organisations, said exporters could see demand fall 20% in the short term. The timing couldn't be worse: summer 2026 orders are being placed right now, but with tariffs sitting at 50%, buyers are balking.
'I've been getting 80 to 90 calls every day concerning these issues from exporters seeking solutions and ways out,' he said. 'It's difficult to do business in such a tariff environment.'
Some factories are slashing prices to hold on to customers. The only way to retain buyers is by giving huge discounts, said Sudhir Sekhri, managing director at apparel maker Trend Setters Group. Spring and summer orders account for roughly 65% of his firm's revenue.
In Mumbai, Sharad Kumar Saraf, managing director of Technocraft Group, which produces scaffolding, textiles and other goods, is running the numbers to reduce costs for buyers. About a third of its sales are headed for the US. 'Additional tariffs is unwarranted and uncalled for and will impact our trade severely,' he said.
There's still the possibility for a reprieve. US and Indian officials are continuing trade talks, with the hopes of landing the first tranche of a bilateral trade deal this fall that could dial back tariffs. Trump will also meet Putin in Alaska this week to discuss Ukraine — any breakthrough there could strengthen the case for dropping America's oil-related levies.
But time is not on India's side. The longer the uncertainty drags on, the more companies will start looking elsewhere. India's share in many of these product categories is small and US brands can shift their supply chains quickly if they decide to, said P Senthilkumar, partner at Vector Consulting Group.
The tariff threat feels personal for Farida Group, whose shoe plants employ about 23,000 people, with over half producing for the US. Every paused shipment or canceled order brings painful choices — whether to halt or slow production, or let go of staff who have spent years honing their craft.
'You can't take business decisions in such uncertainty,' said Ahmed. 'What will happen to workers? Shall I send them back? They have been with me for years, they are skilled workers, I can't just send them back.'
'Workers would be one of the biggest sufferers,' he added.
--With assistance from Yasufumi Saito.
(Updates with details of India-China talks in 13th paragraph)
Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates
Dubai's Housing Boom Is Stoking Fears of Another Crash
Why It's Actually a Good Time to Buy a House, According to a Zillow Economist
Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan
The Electric Pickup Truck Boom Turned Into a Big Bust
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Shopee Owner Sea Tops $100 Billion in Market Value as Stock Surges
Shopee Owner Sea Tops $100 Billion in Market Value as Stock Surges

Bloomberg

time21 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Shopee Owner Sea Tops $100 Billion in Market Value as Stock Surges

By , Filipe Pacheco, and Low De Wei Save Each week we'll bring you insights into one of Asia's most dynamic economies. If you haven't yet, please sign up here. Shopee owner Sea is inching closer to becoming Southeast Asia's most valuable company, Olivia Poh reports. Sticking with retail (sort of), Filipe Pacheco and Low De Wei report on Singapore preparing to sell hundreds of confiscated luxury items, and Katrina Nicholas gives us the lowdown on Australian eatery Club Street Laundry.

Smithsonian ignores Hiroshima, Nagasaki bombings on 80th anniversary
Smithsonian ignores Hiroshima, Nagasaki bombings on 80th anniversary

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Smithsonian ignores Hiroshima, Nagasaki bombings on 80th anniversary

Eighty years ago, the world entered the nuclear age when Enola Gay, a modified U.S. Army Air Corps B-29 Superfortress, dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. Three days later, on Aug. 9, 1945, a second atomic strike hit Nagasaki. The Smithsonian's National Air and Space Museum, despite holding the Enola Gay in its collections, is not hosting any events or special exhibits to mark the anniversary on Aug. 6, a spokesperson confirmed to USA TODAY. The museum will instead share information and existing web content about the bombings on social media. The otherwise unmarked anniversary comes as the nation's museums stand at a crossroads after President Donald Trump's March executive order aiming to restore what he called 'truth and sanity' to museums and history education. More: Trump sets sights on national African American history museum Trump's executive order is but the most recent offensive in long-running wars over America's past, including the mid-1990s when a planned exhibit of Enola Gay for the bombings' 50th anniversary sparked a major clash between the Smithsonian, politicians, and veterans' organizations. Trump White House officials blasted Lonnie Bunch III, secretary of the Smithsonian and founding director of the institution's National Museum of African American History and Culture, as 'a Democrat donor and rabid partisan' in April comments to the New York Times. (The White House did not comment for this story.) In June, the Smithsonian, in response to Trump's order, initiated a content review for its 19 museums. The National Museum of American History recently removed references to Trump's impeachments from an exhibit on the presidency but said it will soon restore them. More: Trump fires director of Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery for allegedly promoting DEI A 'duty' to history Two nuclear disarmament advocates with personal connections to the atomic bombings told USA TODAY that they would've liked to see the Smithsonian tackle the anniversary − likely one of the final major anniversaries where a significant number of Hiroshima and Nagasaki survivors remain alive − in a more prominent and even-handed manner. Ari Beser, a multimedia storyteller and author, is the grandson of 1st Lt. Jacob Beser, an Army Air Corps radar specialist who was the only person to fly on both the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombing missions. 'I think that the Smithsonian has a duty to memorialize history from every angle,' said Beser, a member of the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons. 'It's really important to understand the historical context in which these decisions are made, but that doesn't mean we can't learn from the negative consequences of what they did.' More: Trump targets the Smithsonian. Why? He's afraid and insecure about US history. | Opinion North Carolina author Kathleen Burkinshaw, whose Japanese mother survived the Hiroshima strike before immigrating to America with her Air Force father, lives today with chronic pain from reflex sympathetic dystrophy that she believes is related to her mother's radiation exposure. She expressed concern about potentially oversimplified narratives that focus on the war-winning nature of the bombs without acknowledging the human suffering they caused. 'They just hear that (the bomb) wins wars,' Burkinshaw said of the students to whom she speaks about her mother's experience. 'Well, at what cost?' The Enola Gay controversy But when the Smithsonian planned a special Air and Space Museum exhibition featuring the Enola Gay ahead of the bombing's 50th anniversary in 1995, attempts to broach the impact and legacy of the weapons set off a political firestorm. The proposed exhibit, initially entitled 'Crossroads' and later dubbed 'The Last Act,' was to include photos and artifacts from both Hiroshima and Nagasaki, as well as information about survivors' experiences. One proposed centerpiece: a dead 12-year-old Hiroshima girl's lunchbox, deformed by the heat of the blast, with charred rice and peas still inside. The draft exhibit would have asked visitors to consider historical debates over whether the bomb was necessary to end the war before a planned (and surely bloody) American invasion of Japan's home islands. Museum patrons also would have wrestled with the dawn of the nuclear age that began in August 1945. Air and Space Museum director Martin Harwit, a Czech-American astrophysicist, told USA TODAY that his 1950s stint in the U.S. Army as a technician monitoring massive thermonuclear weapons tests in the Pacific made a 'significant difference' to his approach at the Smithsonian. However, veterans groups – most notably the Air Force Association and American Legion – believed the exhibit script painted Imperial Japan as victims rather than as the initial aggressor in the Pacific War. Despite a committee review in early 1994, the revised script failed to satisfy both the veterans and members of Congress, who believed it still didn't focus enough on Japanese forces' brutality. Ultimately, the Smithsonian pulled the plug on the exhibit. Instead, the Enola Gay was displayed with very little contextual material; now the plane sits at the museum's off-site Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center near Dulles International Airport in northern Virginia. That did not satisfy the critics. More than 80 members of Congress, predominantly Republicans, publicly demanded Harwit's resignation, which he submitted just before Senate hearings weeks before the plane went on display. Tom Crouch, a key Smithsonian figure involved in producing the scuttled 1995 exhibit, declined comment when reached by USA TODAY. 'I am sure you understand the sensitivity of the topic, particularly now,' Crouch wrote via email. 'I would not feel comfortable commenting on the subject given the current pressures on the Secretary (of the Smithsonian). Sorry.' 'Greater calamities' Harwit, now 94, argued that Americans need more than just feel-good history about the war. He fears 'people have forgotten all about' the threat of nuclear war. 'As we celebrate the end of World War II, nobody will wish to be reminded that the very nuclear weapons which ended (the war) could someday lead to even greater calamities,' he said. Davis Winkie's role covering nuclear threats and national security at USA TODAY is supported by a partnership with Outrider Foundation and Journalism Funding Partners. Funders do not provide editorial input. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: 80 years after Hiroshima bombing, Smithsonian stays silent

Singapore Technologies Engineering First Half 2025 Earnings: EPS: S$0.13 (vs S$0.11 in 1H 2024)
Singapore Technologies Engineering First Half 2025 Earnings: EPS: S$0.13 (vs S$0.11 in 1H 2024)

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Singapore Technologies Engineering First Half 2025 Earnings: EPS: S$0.13 (vs S$0.11 in 1H 2024)

Singapore Technologies Engineering (SGX:S63) First Half 2025 Results Key Financial Results Revenue: S$5.92b (up 7.2% from 1H 2024). Net income: S$402.8m (up 20% from 1H 2024). Profit margin: 6.8% (up from 6.1% in 1H 2024). The increase in margin was driven by higher revenue. EPS: S$0.13 (up from S$0.11 in 1H 2024). Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Singapore Technologies Engineering Earnings Insights Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 6.9% p.a. on average during the next 3 years, compared to a 18% growth forecast for the Aerospace & Defense industry in Asia. Performance of the market in Singapore. The company's shares are down 2.6% from a week ago. Risk Analysis Before we wrap up, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Singapore Technologies Engineering that you should be aware of. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store