logo
Endangered salamander to get car-free spring migration routes in Burlington and York region

Endangered salamander to get car-free spring migration routes in Burlington and York region

CBC12-03-2025
Endangered salamanders threatened by sprawling suburbs will get car-free access to small stretches of the Greater Toronto Area this month as they emerge from their subterranean winter shelters and journey under the cover of night to their spring breeding ponds.
Burlington has closed a section of King Road every spring since 2012 to help Jefferson salamander who live along the Niagara Escarpment make the nocturnal trip to their vernal pools.
King Road is closed from North Service Road to Mountain Brow Road starting Wednesday, until April 9.
Meanwhile, York Region says from March 24 to May 2 drivers can expect intermittent overnight closures of Stouffville Road, between Bayview Avenue and Leslie Street, which runs through the Oak Ridges Moraine to help the migrating salamander.
David Lawrie, a research scientist with the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, told the CBC in 2023 that because they're small, slow and prefer to travel on dark, rainy nights with poor visibility, a high percentage of salamanders get squashed by vehicles en route.
The greyish, blue-speckled amphibian spends winter in abandoned rodent burrows, rock crevices or other moist pockets below the frost line until their spring emergence.
The salamanders, who live for up to 30 years, tend to capitalize on a warm rainy March or April night to make the journey to their breeding ponds, often the same one where they were born.
Environmentalists opposed to opening up protected Greenbelt lands for development have often cited the endangered salamander as one of the species most threatened by southern Ontario's urbanization.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

City data suggests 'stark decline' of waterfowl on Toronto beaches during summer, expert says
City data suggests 'stark decline' of waterfowl on Toronto beaches during summer, expert says

CBC

time2 days ago

  • CBC

City data suggests 'stark decline' of waterfowl on Toronto beaches during summer, expert says

Why there are fewer birds at Toronto's beaches 2 minutes ago Duration 2:48 This story is a collaboration between CBC Toronto and the Investigative Journalism Foundation (IJF). A new analysis of city data suggests a dramatic decline in birds on Toronto beaches over the past two decades. The public dataset shows 73 per cent fewer waterfowl counted on Toronto's beaches from 2008 to 2024, indicating its waterfronts have become less hospitable to the animals, according to experts, but also that the city's efforts to keep birds away from the beaches are working. The 11,488 counts were conducted by lifeguards, rather than scientists, and don't constitute a scientific survey, but make up one of the most widespread accounts of conditions for waterfowl in Toronto in the summer months, according to an expert who reviewed the data. The counts were completed at 10 Toronto beaches during the summer months during the 17-year span. According to the data, lifeguards counted an average of 51 waterfowl per count across all beaches in 2008, compared with 14 in 2024. The most affected beaches include Sunnyside Beach, which went from an average of 100 waterfowl counted in 2008 to 17 in 2024, and Centre Island Beach, which went from 92 in 2008 to 15 in 2024. A spokesperson for Toronto Public Health said the reduction in birds was expected as the city has been trying to discourage their presence when the beaches are open for swimming, to minimize droppings. This involves corralling and relocating birds, enacting bylaws against the feeding of waterfowl and the use of dogs to drive them away. Fewer birds mean fewer droppings and less chance of E. coli in beach waters. But one expert says the data raises important questions about wildlife habitat and whether the reduced presence of birds on beaches means they're making homes elsewhere or if their population might be declining due to human activity. Questions about long-term impact According to Marc Cadotte, a biology professor at the University of Toronto Scarborough who has independently reviewed the data, the counts show a "stark decline" in the number of birds on waterfronts. If the city's deterrents are successful, Cadotte wonders whether they result in a loss of habitat for the birds. "Are they moving to other places in the city, or do these deterrents impact populations in the long-term? Wild animals consistently lose habitat with urbanization, and if we further drive them out of usable habitat, we are magnifying our impacts," he said. "This is more of a case of classic human-wildlife conflict, and the usual outcome is that wildlife lose." Asked about the possibility of population decline, Mahesh Patel, manager of health protection at Toronto Public Health said measuring the number of birds in an area can be challenging given their constant movement and that the data should be taken as a snapshot in time. The city did not respond to questions about the possible environmental impact of its measure on bird populations overall. The population of the Greater Toronto Area rose from 5,530,588 in 2008 to 7,106,379 in 2024, according to Statistics Canada. "Cities are where we get multiple stressors together with humans, and so we kind of get a picture of what's going to happen in the future elsewhere," Cadotte said. Toronto Public Health says the data shouldn't be used to estimate the presence of waterfowl in Toronto generally. "Although the daily counts in the beach observation data are a rough estimate, the data collected are helpful to have as we know that a higher number of waterfowl may negatively impact water quality due to a potentially higher number of droppings," TPH said in an email. Better data needed, says one expert Toronto and Region Conservation Authority spokesperson Afiya Jilani said that some of the waterfowl population is impacted by city staff intentionally relocating geese away from humans and that it's hard to make conclusions about conditions for waterfowl overall. "While there may be fewer waterfowl observed on Toronto beaches, this could reflect improved habitat conditions elsewhere in the region," she wrote. Mark Peck, manager of the Schad Gallery of Biodiversity at the Royal Ontario Museum, said he is "heavily concerned" about relying on this specific dataset to understand bird population levels due to unknowns in the methodology, such as lifeguards having varying levels of aptitude or motivation to conduct the counts. Headed to the beach for a swim? Here's what you should know before you go He said other research points to Toronto still being a good place for waterfowl to migrate through during the winter and that counting them on beaches during the summer is not a good indicator of how they are doing. "The areas where there's going to be lifeguards probably aren't the best areas for waterfowl in Toronto anyway," Peck said. 'A sad side-effect' For Haroop Sandhu, a student living in Toronto and frequenter of Woodbine and Centre Island beaches, watching ducks is a main reason she goes to beaches. "I love wildlife, it's one of the most important parts of being at the beach," she said. "I feel like if [human activity] is the main reason then we can't really do anything about it because people are going to go to the beach, so it's a side-effect, but it's a sad side-effect." Bird watcher Vivian Li, who favours Sunnyside Beach, shared the same sentiment. "It's their home as well, and we need to share the space with them instead of chasing them off," she said. Cadotte says despite limitations to the data, it is still useful for describing conditions on beaches. "I would say that this type of data more than surpasses any questionable limits on the minimum amount of data. So I think that in terms of the number of observations, it's actually quite robust given comparable data sets," he said.

Moving to a more walkable city pays off for health, scientists find

time2 days ago

Moving to a more walkable city pays off for health, scientists find

People who moved to a walking friendly city walked more, and at the brisk pace favoured to improve health and prevent disease, a new natural experiment shows. Walkable cities allow you to access more amenities on foot for daily life, like going to school or work, buying ingredients to make dinner or heading to the park to play. But that's not available to everyone, given many cities and suburbs in Canada and the U.S. have been designed to emphasize transit by car, urban planners say. Teasing out cause from effect — whether walkable cities lead people to move more or if people who like to walk tend to live in more pedestrian-friendly cities — is important to nail down because it could help encourage more investment in safe sidewalks and zoning to encourage physical activity, medical researchers say. To find out, Tim Althoff, a computer science professor at the University of Washington in Seattle, used data from a step-tracking app to compare daily steps of more than 5,400 people who moved between major U.S. cities. In short, we found that your city can help make you healthier, Althoff said. The design of your city impacts how much you walk and as a result, your health. Paul Sharma of Peel Public Health says the region is working to improve the walkability of Mississauga and Brampton's sprawling neighbourhoods. Photo: CBC / Craig Chivers Althoff and his co-authors said in this week's issue of the journal Nature (new window) that moving from a less walkable city to a more walkable one adds about 1,100 steps a day on average. It's something the computer scientist has seen first-hand. I grew up in a rural area in Germany, Althoff said. I've lived in California and now in Seattle. Personally, I'm a really big fan of public transit, but I also, for instance, intentionally move to a neighborhood where it would be close to a bus stop. Canadian and international guidelines recommend adults get 150 minutes or more a week of moderate to vigorous physical activity a week. The researchers found people who lived in more walkable cities were about twice as likely to accumulate those steps. Dr. Laura Rosella, a professor of epidemiology at the Dalla Lana School of Public Health at the University of Toronto, said several high-quality Canadian (new window) studies point to decreased risk of Type 2 diabetes, heart disease and prediabetes as well as mental health benefits from more walkable cities. Enlarge image (new window) Pedestrians walking in Old Montreal on a sunny day. The city has slowly increased the walkability of the Plateau neighbourhood, an urban planner says. Photo: Radio-Canada / Charles Contant We spend lots of money on the health care system, Rosella. This [walkability] is something that literally we could make small tweaks that could have a huge difference. To apply the findings in Canada's climate, Rosella said, policy makers would also need to take into account safety considerations, like clearing snow and ice on sidewalks. Benefits of mixed density Ahmed El-Geneidy, a professor in urban planning at McGill University, said it takes about 15 years to gradually make changes to neighbourhoods and change the culture so people walk around cities more. The whole idea is that you need to build high density beside the single family homes, El-Geneidy said. That's how areas like Montreal's Plateau neighbourhood encouraged people to walk to more destinations, like grocery shops, he said. WATCH | Urban renewal for Edmonton residents: Paul Sharma, director of chronic disease and injury prevention at Peel Public Health, said Mississauga and Brampton's sprawling suburban neighbourhoods are sedentary places. Residents tend to have longer commutes compared to elsewhere in Ontario, according to the region's data. To design more walkable communities, Peel officials say they're working on factors like increasing density, proximity to services, and making wider sidewalks with better lighting and shade. This is where public health and local planners need to work closely together to improve the health of the residents, Sharma said. At a playground in Calgary's Crestmount residential neighbourhood, Jarek Soltys said the family chose the location to be close to the mountains and walking paths, where they get steps in for enjoyment, but not transportation for errands. When we moved here seven years ago there really wasn't anything here at all, not even a convenience store so we knew we would be driving places, Soltys said. That is the reality of the suburbs in a big city. Amina Zafar (new window) · CBC News · Journalist Amina Zafar covers medical sciences and health care for CBC. She contributes to CBC Health's Second Opinion, which won silver for best editorial newsletter at the 2024 Digital Publishing Awards. She holds an undergraduate degree in environmental science and a master's in journalism. With files from CBC's Alison Northcott and Melanie Glanz

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store