Without Musk, DOGE likely to fizzle out, says ex-staffer
Tesla TSLA.O CEO Musk announced on Wednesday evening that he was ending his time as a special government employee but vowed that DOGE would continue without him. DOGE has overseen job cuts at nearly every federal agency as part of U.S. President Donald Trump 's attempts to shake up the federal bureaucracy.
However, software engineer Sahil Lavingia, who spent almost two months working for the group of pro-Musk technologists, said he expects DOGE to quickly 'fizzle out.'
'It'll just die a whimper,' Lavingia, who was fired from DOGE earlier this month, told Reuters. 'So much of the appeal and allure was Elon.' He said he expected DOGE staffers to 'just stop showing up to work. It's like kids joining a startup that will go out of business in four months.'
That would cap a remarkable undoing for DOGE, which Musk initially vowed would cut $2 trillion in federal spending. Instead, DOGE estimates its efforts have saved around $175 billion so far and the group's tallies have been riddled with errors.
Lavingia, the 32-year-old founder and CEO of creator platform Gumroad, said he was recruited by DOGE through a personal contact and joined the team in March.
While he said he was proud of certain achievements at the Department of Veterans Affairs, including modernizing the agency's internal artificial-intelligence chatbot, he said he was often at a loss about what work he was expected to do.
'I got dropped into the VA with an HP laptop. What are we supposed to do? What is the road map?' Lavingia said he asked, to no avail. 'I felt like I was being pranked.'
The White House, the VA and Musk did not respond to requests for comment.
The White House has previously said that DOGE works at a fast pace to root out waste, fraud, and abuse, and generate savings for American taxpayers.
Lavingia said Steve Davis, the president of Musk's tunneling enterprise the Boring Company, ran day-to-day operations while Turkish-born venture capitalist Baris Akis helped with DOGE recruitment and DOGE logistics. Davis and Akis did not respond to requests for comment sent via the White House.
When instructions did come through, they were usually communicated through phone calls or small chats on the encrypted Signal messaging app that would typically auto-delete in one day, Lavingia said.
Lavingia said instructions included moving faster to increase mass layoffs at the VA, the federal government's second-largest agency.
The only time he met Musk, Lavingia said, was at an all-hands meeting in March with what he estimated was between 40 and 60 fellow DOGE staffers.
Lavingia said he asked to open-source, or make freely available, some of his computer code, which Musk approved.
He then asked if they could livestream DOGE meetings to increase transparency.
'Elon said: 'That's a great idea. We'll do it next week.' He then caught himself and said: 'Maybe we pre-record it because of security risks.''
Lavingia said he never heard back.
In early May, after he spoke to media outlet Fast Company about working at DOGE, Lavingia said his computer access was revoked in what amounted to a firing. He said Musk and team leaders never explicitly told him he should not talk to journalists.
'My DOGE days were over,' Lavingia wrote in a blog about his experience.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
4 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
EXCLUSIVE: Joel Burke, who wrote the book on Estonia's modern history, is American — that's not weird at all
Of course, Joel Burke asked for some context about the claims of white genocide in South Africa. He is, after all, an American. He is also a tech nerd, and, importantly for this information trade, the author of Rebooting a Nation: The Incredible Rise of Estonia, E-Government and the Startup Revolution – so Daily Maverick schooled him on SA history over lunch at the e-Governance Conference (and promised not to mention where he works). Question: Joel, who are you when you're not trying to reboot a nation — and what's this book about, really? Answer: I'm Joel Burke. I wrote Rebooting a Nation: The Incredible Rise of Estonia, E-Government and the Startup Revolution. It covers Estonia's digital transformation journey — from shedding Soviet shackles to becoming a digital powerhouse. Q: Rebooting a Nation sounds like a Silicon Valley pitch for regime change. What exactly does the book dig into? A: It's split into three parts: the economic upheaval that shaped modern Estonia; the nuts and bolts of e-government infrastructure (think digital ID and the X-Road); and finally, a look into Estonia's 'country-as-a-service' ambition — a concept that's both literal and slightly sci-fi. Q: There's this almost mythic quote floating around: 'This is what happens when you let engineers build a country.' You buy into that? A: It's apocryphal, but not inaccurate. Estonia, during the Soviet era, was a kind of bootcamp for engineers. That engineering mindset – pragmatic, systems-driven – has left fingerprints all over their digital governance approach. Q: Sure, having tech-heads in power helps. But what's the secret sauce beyond that? A: More than just having tech-minded people, I think it was also at least an elite or societal consensus that they were going to invest long-term in developing these e-government services. If you look at the timeline, while they did it quite fast, it didn't happen in just one administration, but over a series. This highlights the importance of building things with a long-term view and having collective buy-in. Q: Estonia doesn't have oil, rare earth minerals or much coastline. How does it sell itself to the world? A: Through conversations, I've observed a sense that because they don't have any natural resources, what they are selling to the world, and quite aggressively in Africa, is this idea of digitalisation. It's intangible, consisting of strategies and things they can build and implement independently. I often think of Estonia as analogous to places like Singapore or Israel in this way; without natural resources, they invest in their people and build up knowledge industries. Q: And does the government actually support those local tech businesses, or is it all just marketing brochures and startup memes? A: The Estonian government acts like a beta customer. It uses homegrown digital services and then those companies – like Nortal and Cybernetica – go global. It's a national proof-of-concept pipeline, not just flag-waving. Q: You drew an analogy between exporting digital infrastructure and the defence industry in your book. Can you explain that comparison? A: It's not a perfect analogy, but I compared it in my book. While Estonia is small, building and helping another country like South Africa or Namibia develop its e-government system is a way of forging a very deep, long-term relationship. It's not the same as selling F-35s, but helping build digital infrastructure to run a country is a pretty deep relationship. This is both an economic strategy for the companies and part of a long-term diplomatic strategy for Estonia. Being small, they want to maximise their number of friends. Q: Why the focus on exporting digitalisation, particularly to regions like Africa? A: I think there's a feeling that Estonia got to leapfrog much of the West when they gained independence. They jumped directly to modern systems; for instance, they never really used cheques in banking here. There is a feeling that Africa could potentially do this too. There's a belief that Africa could move much faster than some older nations with entrenched bureaucracy. It's seen as an exciting opportunity for many Estonians and companies. Q: How does Estonia position itself internationally, within organisations like the EU and Nato? A: I think there's always an element of Estonia trying to be the exemplar of all things, like Western values, the EU, and also America. For instance, regarding military defence spending in Nato, Estonia has always met its commitments and gone above and beyond. They are planning for a very high percentage next year. It shows the country is really trying to make a difference. Q: Besides its digital achievements, how else does Estonia try to stand out internationally? A: Estonia wants to stand out in a way that doesn't just bucket them as 'one of these poor post-Soviet countries'. They work very hard to differentiate themselves. They aim to be seen as more than just Nordic or part of a less developed group. They highlight achievements like super low corruption (tied with Iceland or something, ranked high globally), ease of doing business, digitalisation, and startups. In international relations, they try to be a model citizen and maintain strong alliances. It's about showing they are a strong democratic nation that has invented amazing things and that they matter. Q: Sounds slick. But under the hood, what are Estonia's unresolved issues? A: Inequality. For a tiny country, they're surprisingly far down the global equality rankings. The gap between Tallinn and everywhere else is wide, and there's also a lingering divide between Estonian and Russian-speaking populations. Q: Where do you see the main sources of this inequality? A: I break it up into two buckets. There's Tallinn and the rest of the country divide. Tallinn is where the startup ecosystem, conferences and wealth creation are happening. This is somewhat natural, collecting wealth in the city. The second bucket is the Estonian-speaking and Russian-speaking Estonian divide. This has been a long-term challenge regarding integration and human rights. If you only speak Russian in a country where Estonian or English is the lingua franca for business, you can end up with fewer job opportunities. This creates inequality. Q: How is Estonia trying to address this inequality, particularly the linguistic divide? A: The country has started transitioning to all-Estonian education after Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Education overall is good, with high Pisa scores. However, there's still a historical legacy from the time it was an occupied country, which was only 30 years ago and within people's lifetimes. Just like you can still see economic data differences between West and East Germany, Estonia struggles with this legacy. They are making serious efforts to correct it, but it takes time. Q: Can e-governance play a role in bridging these gaps and reducing inequality? A: I think so. Estonia identified tech and digital as areas where the country was on a level playing field with the rest of the world in the early 90s. Tech does have a great way of levelling the playing field. There are active entrepreneurs trying to bring more people into the system and integrate them, helping people get into the core tech industry, which is key. DM
Daily Maverick
7 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
SA farm exports to US rise 19% in Q1, a green sprout amid frosty diplomacy
An important point that emerges from this data is that if the fictional 'white genocide' and land seizures of Trump's imagination were actually unfolding, then South African commercial farmers – who are mostly white – would not be in a position to grow their exports to markets such as the US. South Africa's agricultural exports to the US increased 19% in the first quarter (Q1) of this year compared with the same period in 2024, according to data from Trade Map, which was crunched by the Agricultural Business Chamber (Agbiz) and released on Monday. It is an interesting trend that highlights several important points against the backdrop of a frosty diplomatic landscape amid US President Donald Trump's false claims about a 'white genocide' and the ruthless persecution of white farmers, which was on full display during his recent White House meeting with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa. For starters, as South Africa faces the prospect of exclusion from the Africa Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa) – which provides preferential treatment to the US market for eligible countries – it is clear that there is American demand for agricultural products grown or made here. Specifically, these products are mainly citrus, grapes, wine, and fruit juices – South African products that could surely grow in the massive US market. Some might see America as a fairly small market in the broader scheme of things, with the 19% year-on-year rise in Q1 only amounting to $202-million – 6% of all South African agricultural exports in that period, which grew 10% to $3.36-billion. But 6% is material: this slow-growth, high-unemployment economy needs to pluck any fruit it can – and this stuff is low-hanging. Americans love citrus and fruit juice, a point underscored by the fact that global prices for these products are heavily influenced by the New York-based OJ futures market. Another important point that emerges from this data is that if the fictional 'white genocide' and land seizures of Trump's imagination were actually unfolding, then South African commercial farmers – who are mostly white – would not be in a position to grow their exports to markets such as the US. What this means: South Africa's commercial agricultural sector is a budding rose among the thorns of this moribund economy. It needs continued access to markets such as the US to grow and create badly needed jobs and investment opportunities while bringing in export revenue to help support the rand. South African farmers can find other markets, but the US, as the world's largest economy, remains the big prize. This does not mean that South Africa's agricultural sector isn't facing a range of serious political, economic and environmental challenges. The Expropriation Act is a red flag for South Africa's commercial farmers and investors more widely. That there are still glaring disparities in ownership – with only about 25% of farmland now in the hands of black South Africans, according to Agbiz estimates – is largely a reflection of state failure and dithering, corruption and incompetence under the ANC. Still, even in the face of other challenges such as climate change, South Africa's agricultural sector is prospering, a narrative at odds with Trump's view that a Zimbabwe-style mass land grab is under way. Americans clearly want to drink South African wine and fruit juice, and farmers here can meet that demand. Instead, Trump's racist resentment threatens to reap a bitter harvest from what should be fields of hope. BM
TimesLIVE
11 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Tesla executives questioned Musk after he denied killing $25,000 EV project
Some senior Tesla executives were alarmed last year when Elon Musk denied a Reuters report that the company had killed a planned all-new $25,000 (R447,545) electric vehicle (EV) that investors had expected to drive explosive vehicle sales growth, according to people familiar with the matter. 'Reuters is lying,' Musk had posted on X, minutes after the story published on April 5, 2024, halting a 6% decline in Tesla's stock. Tesla shares recovered some of the loss after Musk's post, but the stock was down 3.6% at market close. The executives knew that Musk had, in fact, cancelled the low-cost vehicle, which many investors called the Model 2, and pivoted Tesla to focus on self-driving robotaxis, the people said. The company had told employees the project was over weeks earlier, Reuters reported, citing three sources and company documents. Musk's post was so confusing to some senior managers that they asked him whether he'd changed his mind. Musk rejected their concerns and said the project was still dead, according to the people with knowledge of the matter. The executives' concerns, which haven't been previously reported, shed light on the company's struggle to deliver a low-cost, mass-market EV, considered a core promise of the company. Some other Tesla executives were unconcerned about Musk's X post, said people familiar with the matter. The carmaker keeps its product plans flexible, one person said, to respond to market conditions.
