SA farm exports to US rise 19% in Q1, a green sprout amid frosty diplomacy
An important point that emerges from this data is that if the fictional 'white genocide' and land seizures of Trump's imagination were actually unfolding, then South African commercial farmers – who are mostly white – would not be in a position to grow their exports to markets such as the US.
South Africa's agricultural exports to the US increased 19% in the first quarter (Q1) of this year compared with the same period in 2024, according to data from Trade Map, which was crunched by the Agricultural Business Chamber (Agbiz) and released on Monday.
It is an interesting trend that highlights several important points against the backdrop of a frosty diplomatic landscape amid US President Donald Trump's false claims about a 'white genocide' and the ruthless persecution of white farmers, which was on full display during his recent White House meeting with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa.
For starters, as South Africa faces the prospect of exclusion from the Africa Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa) – which provides preferential treatment to the US market for eligible countries – it is clear that there is American demand for agricultural products grown or made here.
Specifically, these products are mainly citrus, grapes, wine, and fruit juices – South African products that could surely grow in the massive US market.
Some might see America as a fairly small market in the broader scheme of things, with the 19% year-on-year rise in Q1 only amounting to $202-million – 6% of all South African agricultural exports in that period, which grew 10% to $3.36-billion.
But 6% is material: this slow-growth, high-unemployment economy needs to pluck any fruit it can – and this stuff is low-hanging. Americans love citrus and fruit juice, a point underscored by the fact that global prices for these products are heavily influenced by the New York-based OJ futures market.
Another important point that emerges from this data is that if the fictional 'white genocide' and land seizures of Trump's imagination were actually unfolding, then South African commercial farmers – who are mostly white – would not be in a position to grow their exports to markets such as the US.
What this means:
South Africa's commercial agricultural sector is a budding rose among the thorns of this moribund economy. It needs continued access to markets such as the US to grow and create badly needed jobs and investment opportunities while bringing in export revenue to help support the rand. South African farmers can find other markets, but the US, as the world's largest economy, remains the big prize.
This does not mean that South Africa's agricultural sector isn't facing a range of serious political, economic and environmental challenges.
The Expropriation Act is a red flag for South Africa's commercial farmers and investors more widely.
That there are still glaring disparities in ownership – with only about 25% of farmland now in the hands of black South Africans, according to Agbiz estimates – is largely a reflection of state failure and dithering, corruption and incompetence under the ANC.
Still, even in the face of other challenges such as climate change, South Africa's agricultural sector is prospering, a narrative at odds with Trump's view that a Zimbabwe-style mass land grab is under way.
Americans clearly want to drink South African wine and fruit juice, and farmers here can meet that demand. Instead, Trump's racist resentment threatens to reap a bitter harvest from what should be fields of hope. BM
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
26 minutes ago
- TimesLIVE
Ngugi was simply ordinary — a man of the people
Ngugi wa Thiong'o, the Kenyan playwright, novelist and thinker, who died on May 28, has left a huge intellectual gap in Africa's cultural and political landscape. Instead of mourning him, I have chosen to celebrate the intellectual legacy of this generous and authoritative African sage I was privileged to have encountered during my undergraduate days at Nairobi University and much later as a scholar of Ngugi and African literature. When I arrived in South Africa in 1991, Ngugi was the most widely known African writer in the academy, in spite of apartheid. As early as 1981, the widely respected South African journal, English in Africa, had dedicated a special issue to his works. His most widely referenced text then, was Decolonising the Mind. Indeed, he is the most widely taught African writer in the global north and the global south, alongside Chinua Achebe — the man who published his award winning novel, Weep Not, Child under Heinemann African Writers Series. When the prestigious Cambridge University Press decided to publish worldwide series on 'Leading Writers in Context', again it is Achebe and Ngugi who featured from Africa, and I am deeply privileged to have been asked to serve as the editor of the volume on Ngugi in Context. His works have been widely translated in several languages across the globe: Japanese, German, Chinese and in many parts of Asia. I hope we will soon see his works getting translated into African languages across the continent. During his last days, he had embarked on translating his novels written in English into Gikuyu. It needs no emphasis that Ngugi remains one of the most influential African writers over the past few decades of Africa's independence, not only for his creative works but also for his wide-ranging contributions on Africa's cultural thought and political life. Indeed, the role of the writer in shaping the cultural and political life of his people is an enduring theme in all his works. He was concerned with the role of culture as a source of historical memory and as a weapon against all forms of oppressive regimes. But he was also interested in narrative, specifically imaginative literature, as an agent of history and self-definition, an instrument for taming and naming one's environment. He was concerned with literature's role in the restoration of African communities dislocated by colonialism and the repressive postcolonial states that followed. As early as 1972, Ngugi was already drawing attention to how the tyranny of the past exerts itself on his works. He wrote: 'The novelist is haunted by a sense of the past. His work is often an attempt to come to terms with 'the thing that has been,' a struggle as it were, to sensitively register his encounter with history, his people's history' (Homecoming, 39). For Ngugi then, the novel was an instrument that wills history into being and therefore, as a writer, he always located himself at the intersection of history and literary imagination. Ngugi always insisted that colonial subjects were detached from their mainstream history and therefore their identity was shaped by forces alien to their local universe Ngugi always insisted that colonial subjects were detached from their mainstream history and therefore their identity was shaped by forces alien to their local universe. For him, the search for Africa's identity therefore lay in a reconstructive project to reassert a radical form of Africa's historiography conceived from below. At the heart of his restorative project was also his call for a return to the source, which would also involve the privileging of African languages in the production and consumption of local cultures. For him, it was only African languages that had the capacity to recover those African cultures repressed by colonialism and to equally carry the weight of a national history and memory. Genuine national literature, Ngugi argued, can only flower in local indigenous languages because literature as a cultural institution works through images and language embodied in the collective experience of a people. Ngugi always positioned himself as a writer in politics. He was hounded at home by one Kenyan political regime after the other and eventually driven into exile in the eighties by the repressive Moi regime in Kenya in the 80s. Little wonder then, that themes of dislocation, abandonment and exile dominates his works, written against the backdrop of authoritarian structures of control and imprisonment. Ngugi's early works are heavily weighted towards fiction, and the later lean towards non-fiction. In the 1960s and 1970s, which saw the publication of four novels, two plays and a collection of short stories, Ngugi produced only one volume of essays, Homecoming. But after his last major work of fiction in English, Petals of Blood (1977), Ngugi wrote a total of five collections of essays as opposed to only three novels, Devil on the Cross (1981), Matigari (1986), and his latest novel, The Wizard of the Crow (Murogi wa Kagogo (2005), written first Gikuyu before translation. But it was the establishment of a community theatre in his home village of Kamiriithu, and the staging of the play, Ngaahika Ndeenda (I Will Marry When I Want), that really raised the ire of the Kenyan authorities, leading to the banning of the play, his arrest and detention without trial. It also marked a major turning point in Ngugi's life when in prison, he used the language of his incarceration to write his first Gikuyu novel: Caitaani Mutharabaini (Devil on the Cross), on rolls of toilet paper. Subsequently, it is only Ngugi's collection of essays that he would continue to write in English, obviously aimed at the academy, with whom he continued to wrestle with over a range of cultural and political issues. The joy of reading Ngugi's essays is that they serve as a theoretical elaboration of themes and topics akin to his narrative. If Writers in Politics (1981), and Barrel of a Pen (1983) essays seek to question the colonial traditions of English and Englishness inherited at independence, Decolonising the Mind (1986), and Moving the Centre (1993) push the debate to its limits by insisting that the roots to Africa's freedom lay in the articulation of a new idiom of nationalism that would liberate the African identities from the prison house of European languages and cultures. The project should not only involve the privileging of African languages in the making of African cultures, but also the struggle for the realignment of global forces such that societies, which have been confined to the margins will gradually move to the centre, to become not just consumers but producers of global culture. It is the denial of the cultural space by the postcolonial state tyranny and global imperialism that Ngugi elaborates on in Penpoints, Gunpoint, and Dreams. Here the culture of violence and silence that has come to define the postcolonial state; the state's desire to saturate the public space with its propaganda, is counterpoised against a radically redemptive art that seeks to erect a new regime of truth by reclaiming and colonising those spaces through the barrel of the pen. In his most eloquent collection of essays, symbolically entitled Moving the Centre, Ngugi draws attention to the effect of the colonial archive in arrogating what constitutes the real historical subject to the imperial centre. When Ngugi calls for moving of the centre, he is in essence trying to suggest that in terms of history and discursive knowledges, the West has always positioned itself as the true self — the centre — while the empire remains the Other and on the periphery. Indeed, one of the legacies of the colonial encounter is a notion of history as 'the few privileged monuments' of achievement, which serves either to arrogate 'history' wholesale to the imperial centre or to erase it from the colonial archive and produce, especially in the Empire or the so-called New World Cultures, a condition of 'history-lessness', of 'no visible history'. Both notions are part of the imperial myth of history because history is defined by what is central, not what is peripheral and those not central to an assumed teleology or belief system, are without history. It seems to me that even a superficial reading of Ngugi's narrative and his critical essays over the years, point to a conscious project of transforming our inherited notions of history, especially the position of the colonial subjects as inscribed within imperial discursive practices. If the imperial narrative attempted to fix history and to read the empires history as the history of the other, by making reference to its set of signs located in its cultural landscape, Ngugi's position is that the history of Africa need not be contingent upon the imperial allegorising. Allegory here is used to mean a way of representing, of speaking for the 'other', especially in the enterprise of imperialism. Whatever the ideological drifts and shifts in his body of work, Ngugi's fundamental belief is in the restorative agency embedded in all human cultures — the return of the other to the self. This is what he celebrates in his theory of globalectics — a theory that seek seeks to destabilise the privileging Western ways of knowing and instead celebrates those many streams of knowledge, regardless of their origins, as humanities collective experience. The creation of a humanistic wholeness and healing, has been at the core of his poetics over the years. The return to memoirs over the last decade or so was perhaps his last attempt to lay bare his soul and spirit; his life history as fragments of many forces — a rich tapestry into a life crafted around complex and layered forces of family and larger biographical universe. As a person, Ngugi was profoundly warm and down-to-earth, and always carried himself around with a deep sense of humility and ease, not to mention his infectious laughter and humour. He was simply ordinary — a man of the people. May his legacy live on and his soul rest in peace until we meet again in the land our ancestors. James Ogude, Professor of African Literatures and Cultures. Professor and Senior Research Fellow, and author of Ngugi's Novels and African History. Centre for the Advancement of Scholarship, University of Pretoria, South Africa
The South African
an hour ago
- The South African
These surprising cities saw the biggest increase in millionaires
While American cities like New York or the Bay Area still boast the most dollar millionaires in real numbers, a few destinations have emerged as new hubs for the wealthy. These cities have seen the biggest increase in dollar millionaires over the past decade. They're mostly fast-growing centres of technology and innovation. Meanwhile, a few also offer tax incentives to attract the wealthy. That's according to the World's Wealthiest Cities Report 2025, which is published by Henley & Partners, a firm that advises the wealthy on where to move to look after their assets. Between 2014 and 2024, Shenzhen saw a 142% increase in dollar millionaires. The Chinese city is a major technology hub, with companies like Huawei and Tencent based there. Once a rustic fishing village, Shenzhen is now the fastest-growing destination for dollar millionaires. The technology scene continues to attract entrepreneurs and financiers. Most South Africans may not hear much about Scottsdale, but tech entrepreneurs and those with six-figure account balances will know all about it. The American city's millionaire population grew by 125% over the past decade. Like Shenzhen, Scottsdale's attraction is its booming tech industry. It also offers a luxurious lifestyle, especially in golf estates, and favourable state tax conditions. It could be a surprise, but this Indian city is popular with the very wealthy. Bengaluru, also known as Bangalore, saw a 120% increase in dollar millionaires. That took place in just ten years, between 2014 and 2024. The city's flourishing tech industry, affordable living costs, and growing infrastructure have made it a hotspot for the wealthy. Over the past decade, West Palm Beach gained 112% more dollar millionaires. This American city offers the wealthy a laid-back lifestyle, thanks to its coastal location. Because the state of Florida has low taxes, businesspeople and rich professionals also flock to West Palm Beach. 108% more millionaires now live in Hangzhou, compared to ten years ago. That growth coincided with the rise of tech companies in the city, including Alibaba. Hangzhou is a historic city with pretty scenery, making it even more attractive to the affluent. Let us know by leaving a comment below or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 0211. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
Daily Maverick
an hour ago
- Daily Maverick
Boeing, Boeing Gone?
In the annals of American industrial might, Boeing has long stood as a symbol of engineering excellence and national pride—pioneering jet travel, dominating the skies, and contributing to military superiority. But in recent years, the aerospace giant has found itself grounded—figuratively and literally. A combination of fatal crashes, production faults, regulatory clashes, and executive turmoil have battered the company's reputation and balance sheet. The Alaska Airlines door plug blowout in early 2024 and relentless media scrutiny added further fuel to a narrative of decay. To many, Boeing became a cautionary tale of what happens when engineering takes a back seat to financial priorities. But in markets, especially those as cyclical and sentiment-driven as aerospace, despair often precedes opportunity. Could this be one of those times? Could the market be underestimating Boeing's path to redemption—and the value waiting on the runway? It is certainly a question being considered by Laurium Capital's global research team. Let's look at the wreckage before we consider the recovery. Financially, Boeing is still operating in the red. The company has made annual losses since 2019 and forecasts for 2025 remain negative. For a company once known for predictable profitability, this is sobering. Boeing Defense, Space & Security (BDS), previously a bulwark, has suffered through years of charges tied to troubled contracts such as the KC-46 tanker and Starliner. Though the first quarter of 2025 showed no new charges, margins in this business segment remain fragile. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads And yet, there are signs that Boeing is slowly rebuilding altitude. Most notably, the company is progressing in ramping up production of its workhorse 737 MAX. Production rates are stabilizing around 38 planes per month with a pathway toward 42 by early 2026 and potentially even 47 within the year. This recovery in production volumes is critical, as the 737 MAX remains a key earnings and cash flow driver. Likewise, the 787 Dreamliner, one of the most advanced commercial planes ever built, is expected to see material upticks in production numbers by the end of the year. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads CEO Kelly Ortberg, appointed to steady the ship, has instilled a focus on execution and engineering discipline. His message at a recent conference which the Laurium global research team attended was one of pragmatism: Boeing isn't rushing to launch a new aircraft but is instead laser-focused on delivering existing programs reliably, clearing certification hurdles, and winning back customer confidence. Importantly, this potential upside is not just about numbers—it's about sentiment. Boeing is still something of a 'momentum stock.' Its share price has historically surged ahead of fundamentals when the market senses an inflection point. The company's history bears this out: rapid climbs in 2017 and 2021 occurred before tangible improvements in earnings. Today, investors may again be positioning ahead of a visible operational turnaround. Risks, of course, remain. Supply chain hiccups could stall the ramp-up. Further FAA scrutiny could introduce delays. And geopolitical flashpoints—especially concerning deliveries to China—could bite. Boeing's past overpromises linger in investor memory. The road to recovery is rarely linear. Still, the building blocks are taking shape. Boeing's enormous backlog—somewhere close to half a trillion dollars—isn't going anywhere. Neither is global demand for fuel-efficient jets in a rapidly ageing fleet environment. Liquidity has improved, management is steadier, and the execution narrative is shifting from apology to progress. For investors with the stomach for turbulence, Boeing might just be preparing for a long-overdue ascent. DM advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads For more information on Laurium's Global Active Equity Fund, please visit Laurium Capital is an authorised financial services provider (FSP 34142)
