TDS was deducted on employee health insurance payout. Can I get a refund ?
Under the income-tax laws, the value of any benefit or amenities provided by the employer to an employee is taxable as perquisites, subject to prescribed exceptions.
As per the related provisions, medical reimbursements given by the employer for medical treatment of specified diseases/ailments to employees or their specified families are not considered taxable in the hands of employees, subject to satisfaction of specified conditions. It is assumed that your case falls under the prescribed diseases/ailments, the retrospective approval certificate of the hospital covers the period of treatment, and all other conditions are satisfied. Hence, the reimbursements may be considered as non-taxable.
Since the reimbursements were taxed at the withholding stage and a tax was deducted at source by the employer, you may consider the same as non-taxable while filing your income-tax return (ITR) for the FY 2024-25.
While filing the ITR, you may directly exclude the non-taxable reimbursement amount from the salary reported in Schedule Salary (S) under Section 17(2). As this is a non-taxable reimbursement and not an exempt income, the same may arguably not be reported as an allowance exempt under Section 10 in Schedule S, or in Schedule Exempt Income (EI).
In case of any queries from the tax authorities (say on account of variance with the salary reported by an employer in Form 16), it will need to be responded, accordingly. You should also retain supporting documents, such as the hospital's approval certificate and medical bills, to justify the reduced salary reported in the ITR, if required.
Also note that this is a non-taxable reimbursement and does not form part of the specified disallowances under the new tax regime. Hence, the above treatment can be considered irrespective of the tax regime.
Parizad Sirwalla is partner and head, global mobility services, tax, KPMG in India.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
10 hours ago
- Mint
TDS was deducted on employee health insurance payout. Can I get a refund ?
During the previous financial year, my wife had an emergency caesarean delivery, and the baby was admitted to NICU for 5 days. A bill of ₹ 74,505 was generated, of which ₹ 62,833 was approved by the employer. At the time, the hospital had applied for the renewal of income tax exemption status under section 17(2) of The Income Tax Act 1961, read with rule 3A(1) & 3A(2) of Income Tax Rules, 1962, but the certificate was still awaited. Due to this, the sanctioned amount was subject to a tax deducted at source (TDS) of ₹ 19,604 and only ₹ 43,220 was credited. However, the hospital has received the tax certificate now with retrospective effect from 1 July 2024. As a result, the employer will not be liable to deduct tax u/s 192 of the Income Tax Act,1961 for such a sum. I wish to avail the refund of this TDS through income-tax return (ITR). Under the income-tax laws, the value of any benefit or amenities provided by the employer to an employee is taxable as perquisites, subject to prescribed exceptions. As per the related provisions, medical reimbursements given by the employer for medical treatment of specified diseases/ailments to employees or their specified families are not considered taxable in the hands of employees, subject to satisfaction of specified conditions. It is assumed that your case falls under the prescribed diseases/ailments, the retrospective approval certificate of the hospital covers the period of treatment, and all other conditions are satisfied. Hence, the reimbursements may be considered as non-taxable. Since the reimbursements were taxed at the withholding stage and a tax was deducted at source by the employer, you may consider the same as non-taxable while filing your income-tax return (ITR) for the FY 2024-25. While filing the ITR, you may directly exclude the non-taxable reimbursement amount from the salary reported in Schedule Salary (S) under Section 17(2). As this is a non-taxable reimbursement and not an exempt income, the same may arguably not be reported as an allowance exempt under Section 10 in Schedule S, or in Schedule Exempt Income (EI). In case of any queries from the tax authorities (say on account of variance with the salary reported by an employer in Form 16), it will need to be responded, accordingly. You should also retain supporting documents, such as the hospital's approval certificate and medical bills, to justify the reduced salary reported in the ITR, if required. Also note that this is a non-taxable reimbursement and does not form part of the specified disallowances under the new tax regime. Hence, the above treatment can be considered irrespective of the tax regime. Parizad Sirwalla is partner and head, global mobility services, tax, KPMG in India.
Hindustan Times
13 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Adaptive reuse, public-private synergy can drive heritage conservation: Report
New Delhi, Emphasising that heritage conservation must be seen as both a "moral obligation and a strategic investment'', a new report has pitched for greater synergy between public and private sectors, and use of digital technology to drive preservation efforts. Adaptive reuse, public-private synergy can drive heritage conservation: Report Jointly made by a leading business chamber and a global consultancy firm, it has also recommended "adaptive reuse" of old buildings through PPP model and "CSR funding" for heritage conservation. The report 'Building Public-Private Synergies for Heritage Conservation' was released at an international heritage tourism conclave held on the premises of the iconic Lukshmi Vilas Palace in Gujarat's Vadodara on July 25. Tourism, conservation and industry experts gathered at the conclave and deliberated on leveraging India's rich heritage for economic revitalisation, community development, and cultural continuity. "Heritage conservation must be seen seen as both a moral obligation and a strategic investment, where country's heritage could be transformed from static monuments to vibrant and living symbols of identity, enabling it to continue inspiring and enriching future generations," the 28-page report says. It also cited some successful conservation projects in various parts of India, as well as well-known preservation models in the UK, Spain, Italy and other countries. The report, jointly made by the PHD Chamber of Commerce and Industry and KPMG in India, stresses that heritage conservation in India is "at its defining moment". It must be recognised that the 'cultural landscape' around a heritage site is "critical for the interpretation of the site and its built heritage", and thus is very much its integral part. Owing to its importance and nature of role in serving as a record for future generations, it becomes imperative to preserve this history and culture, hence requires time-to-time conservation, it says. The report through succinct examples underlines that heritage conservation means all the processes of looking after a place to retain its historical, architectural, aesthetic, cultural significance and includes maintenance, preservation, restoration, reconstruction and adoption or a combination of more than one of these. It also lays emphasis on adaptive reuse of heritage buildings as cafes, museums, galleries or other cultural spaces, and creating synergy through public-private-partnership models, citing the case study of Uttar Pradesh. Besides, the report also recommends funding through Corporate Social Responsibility and underlines coupling it with community outreach for best results. The report acknowledges the role of technology in this sector, and pitched for using Augmented Reality/Virtual Reality for immersive storytelling and smart management tools for visitors' analysis and climate-responsive monitoring. On digital preservation, it emphasised on using technology to document, conserve and promote heritage and create inventories, especially for sites vulnerable to climate threats or human conflict. It also pitched for combining state and private funds to increase the overall funding available for heritage conservation projects. By combining state and private funds, heritage conservation projects can "reduce their dependence on a single funding source", access a wider range of resources, expertise, this ensuring greater financial stability and sustainability of conservation efforts. As travellers increasingly seek authentic, immersive experiences, heritage tourism has emerged as a "cornerstone of cultural identity, community empowerment, and regional branding, the report says. India, with its vast inventory of monuments, UNESCO World Heritage Sites, historic towns, palaces, forts, and intangible traditions, is "uniquely positioned to lead this space". India is endowed with iconic sites such as the Taj Mahal, Red Fort, Humayun's Tomb, ruins of old Nalanda university, ancient temples, medieval tombs and colonial-era structure and relics, which draw both awe and interest and intrigue among travellers. According to the Ministry of Tourism, Government of India's annual report , cultural and heritage tourism is an important and evolving concept within India's total tourism economy, with growth potential fuelled by rising domestic demand and international interest in India's civilisation legacy, the report says. Citing a 2024 report, it further says that India's heritage tourism market is projected to reach USD 57.14 billion by 2033, driven by its rich cultural diversity, along with rising global interest in spiritual and experience travel, boosting domestic and international tourist inflow. The PHDCCI-KPMG report also cites some of the challenges facing efforts for heritage conservation, such as inadequate funding which can lead to neglect, deterioration, and loss of heritage sites; lack of technical expertise; insufficient community engagement; and maintenance challenges. The other factor is complexity of heritage projects. Heritage assets are often complex and multi-faceted. The complexity of such assets can make it challenging to develop effective conservation strategies. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Mint
17 hours ago
- Mint
These bonds offer tax exemption on long-term capital gains. But are they right for you?
When you sell property or assets and make substantial capital gains, your instinct is to minimise the tax you'll pay. One instrument that can help with this is a capital gains bond, also known as 54EC bond, which offers a tax exemption on long-term capital gains if bought withing six months of selling the asset. These bonds, named after Section 54EC of the Income Tax Act, 1961, are issued by government-approved entities such as Power Finance Corporation Limited (PFC), Indian Railways Finance Corporation Limited (IRFC), and Rural Electrification Corporation (REC). However, with a fixed return of 5.25% and a five-year lock-in, are they the best use of your money? If you can earn an annual return of more than 8% elsewhere – say, in a mutual fund – you may be better off paying the tax and investing the rest. Over five years, an 8% annual return on the post-tax amount could surpass the maturity value of a 54EC bond. Mint spoke with experts to help you decide which option is right for your financial goals and risk appetite. What do the experts say? Harshad Chetanwala, co-founder of explained, "Suppose I have capital gains of ₹25 lakh from a property. The entire ₹25 lakh needs to be invested in 54EC bonds within six months to claim the tax exemption. It offers a return of 5.25% over five years. Alternatively, if pay 12.5% long term capital gains tax and invest the remaining sum in a mutual fund or similar instrument yielding around 8%, the final outcome turns out to be quite close." 'If someone can generate 9% or more through balanced advantage or multi-asset funds, the mutual fund strategy will yield a higher post-tax corpus, provided one is comfortable with the higher risk," Chetanwala added. Mutual funds, especially hybrid ones such as balanced advantage funds (BAFs) and multi-asset funds, can offer long-term returns exceeding 10%, but they carry market risk. Amit Sahita, director at Fincode Advisory Services Pvt. Ltd, said, "I am always in favour of avoiding products like 54EC bonds, which optically save tax but actually end up locking up funds with very low returns over long periods. We have always advised our investors to pay the tax and then invest according to their risk profile and timeline." He added, 'The cap for 54EC Bonds is ₹50 lakh, so extremely risk-averse investors, those who prioritise capital protection and guaranteed returns over higher growth, do end up buying them. But the usual strategy of paying tax and investing in a mix of debt and equity funds works better." What about liquidity? Liquidity is another significant factor. 54EC bonds come with a five-year lock-in, while mutual funds offer easier redemption options and allow for rebalancing – a critical advantage in uncertain markets. Ajay Vaswani, a chartered accountant and an NRI tax advisor, said, 'You can pay the capital gains tax and then invest the remaining funds in more liquid and potentially higher-return instruments like mutual funds. These offer greater flexibility, and over time, could provide better returns," he said. He added, "If you're in the 30% tax bracket, your post-tax return from 54EC could further fall since the interest is taxable, which is barely above inflation." This erodes the appeal of 54EC bonds further, especially for high-net-worth individuals." While the math may favour mutual funds, human behaviour tells a different story. Abhishek Kumar, a Sebi-registered investment advisor and founder of SahajMoney, said, "Most individuals prioritize immediate tax savings over long-term investment growth. When people sell property, they're often more focused on saving taxes than making investment decisions that are aligned with their financial goals." Ultimately, the choice between 54EC bonds and paying capital gains tax to invest elsewhere is a personal one. Factors such as your tax bracket, investment horizon, risk appetite, and portfolio composition all come into play. 'If your debt portfolio is underfunded, investing in government bonds could make sense. The key is to look beyond immediate tax saving and consider long-term financial growth and portfolio balance," Kumar said. Final thoughts For conservative investors or those looking to boost their fixed-income allocation, 54EC bonds can serve a purpose. But for those with a medium to long-term horizon and a willingness to take risk, paying the tax and investing in a diversified mutual fund portfolio is probably the more rewarding strategy. "The decision shouldn't be purely based on tax. We've had real-life cases where we advised clients to invest in 54EC bonds when the gains were significant. But when the gains were marginal, we suggested paying the tax and deploying the funds elsewhere for better long-term outcomes," Chetanwala said.
