logo
Uganda shilling stable on subdued demand

Uganda shilling stable on subdued demand

Reuters08-05-2025
KAMPALA, May 8 (Reuters) - The Ugandan shilling was stable against the dollar on Thursday, with hard currency demand subdued across both merchandise importers and interbank players, traders said.
At 0821 GMT commercial banks quoted the shilling at 3,655/3,665, unchanged from Wednesday's close.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dollar mixed as traders wait on Jackson Hole
Dollar mixed as traders wait on Jackson Hole

Reuters

time28 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Dollar mixed as traders wait on Jackson Hole

NEW YORK, Aug 19 (Reuters) - The dollar was mixed on Tuesday as traders awaited the Federal Reserve's Jackson Hole Economic Policy Symposium later this week for further clues on U.S. interest rate policy. A speech on Friday by Fed Chair Jerome Powell is this week's main focus, with little major economic data to drive market direction. Traders are tuned into whether Powell will push back against market pricing of a rate cut in September. Traders ramped up bets on a rate cut at the Fed's September 16-17 meeting after a weak July jobs report, and as last month's consumer price inflation report showed limited upward pressure from tariffs. But a hotter-than-expected July producer price reading has tempered some rate-cut expectations. Powell has said he is reluctant to cut rates due to an expected increase in inflation this summer from tariffs. "Last week, when we had about 25 basis points priced in for September, and more than two cuts for the rest of the year, there was probably some risk that the Powell speech would disappoint those expectations if he wasn't clear enough in committing to a September cut," said Vassili Serebriakov, an FX and macro strategist at UBS in New York. "Now that we're pricing in about 20 basis points for September and just slightly over 50 basis points for the rest of the year, I think the risks are much more balanced," Serebriakov added. Traders are pricing in 54 basis points of cuts by year-end. The Fed will also release minutes from its July 29-30 meeting on Wednesday, though they may offer limited insight as the meeting came before July's weak jobs report. Data on Tuesday showed groundbreaking for new U.S. single-family homes and permits for future construction rose in July even as high mortgage rates and economic uncertainty continued to hamper home purchases. The dollar index , which measures the greenback against a basket of currencies including the yen and the euro, was last up 0.15% on the day at 98.27, with the euro down 0.12% at $1.1646. Against the Japanese yen , the dollar weakened 0.22% to 147.54. Currency moves have been relatively muted for the past few weeks following a steep drop in the dollar in the first half of the year. "There's been a bit of de-risking in FX over the summer and now investors are just waiting for the more clear catalyst for the next move," said Serebriakov. In other currencies, sterling slipped 0.16% to $1.348. The Aussie dropped 0.62% to $0.6451, the weakest since August 5. Traders are also focused on any developments in peace talks to end the Russia-Ukraine war. U.S. President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he hoped Russian President Vladimir Putin would move forward on ending the war in Ukraine but conceded that the Kremlin leader may not want to make a deal at all, adding this would create a "rough situation" for Putin. In cryptocurrencies, bitcoin fell 2.88% to $113,112.

Brazil's 'soy moratorium' site offline after antitrust ruling setback
Brazil's 'soy moratorium' site offline after antitrust ruling setback

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

Brazil's 'soy moratorium' site offline after antitrust ruling setback

SAO PAULO, Aug 19 (Reuters) - A website containing information about Brazil's "soy moratorium," a private agreement enforced by global grain traders to protect the Amazon rainforest from soy-driven deforestation, was taken offline on Tuesday after Brazil's antitrust authority ordered suspension of the pact. The soy moratorium has long been hailed as one of the most successful initiatives to protect the Amazon rainforest because it bars soybean traders from buying from farmers who cleared land there after July 2008. But the General Superintendent of antitrust regulator CADE on Monday ruled that it represents a potential breach of Brazilian competition law. Superintendent Alexandre Barreto de Souza ordered firms to suspend the pact or pay fines after he concluded a preliminary investigation, prompted by a request in August 2024 from the agriculture committee of Brazil's lower house of Congress. A majority of lawmakers in the committee is backed by farmers opposed to the moratorium. On Monday, Barreto de Souza also initiated a full investigation involving some 30 grain exporters and two industry groups on whether the moratorium, which has been in place for 19 years, "constitutes an anti-competitive agreement" involving rival companies. Brazilian soy farmers celebrated the moratorium's suspension as a historic victory. Farmers, however, are not expected to clear big areas of forest to grow soy as that crop has been advancing over pastureland, according to Mauricio Buffon, president of farm lobby Aprosoja. 'We do not believe there will be a drop in soy trade,' he said. Even so, soy traders are now in a bind. People familiar with the thinking of trade groups Anec and Abiove told Reuters they will appeal the suspension of the pact at CADE's tribunal, which is composed of six commissioners, including its president. While CADE may take years to conclude the investigation and issue a final opinion on the moratorium's legality, companies may settle with the agency during the course of the probe. If traders are found guilty of breaching competition law, their trade groups face fines of up to 2 billion reais ($365.60 million). For traders themselves, fines can reach up to 20% of the company's gross revenue in the last fiscal year before the investigation started. ($1 = 5.4704 reais)

Breakingviews - Dear retail traders: 'can't lose' means can't win
Breakingviews - Dear retail traders: 'can't lose' means can't win

Reuters

time2 hours ago

  • Reuters

Breakingviews - Dear retail traders: 'can't lose' means can't win

NEW YORK, Aug 19 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Everyone loves a casino, except when they lose. As excitable retail traders flood into stocks, cryptocurrencies and more, Wall Street is selling them promises of safe seats at the highest-stakes tables. Unfortunately, 'can't lose' in this case also mostly means 'can't win.' Investors poured $65 billion into so-called buffer exchange-traded funds over the past five years, according to Morningstar, while BlackRock expects them to reach ten times that size by 2030. The gist is simple: take an underlying investment, like the S&P 500 Index (.SPX), opens new tab. Then, wrap it in options that eliminate losses up to a certain threshold, typically 10%. Paying for this requires relinquishing gains, which are usually capped at 15%. So if the market drops 15%, you lose 5%. If it rises 35%, your investment grows only 15%. These funds gained traction after 2022, when both stocks and bonds fell, rendering diversification less effective. Over time, a standard buffer ETF should return about 90% of the market's performance, according to fund managers. In theory, that might be a reasonable cost for protecting against drawdowns. In practice, though, research from hedge fund AQR, opens new tab finds that 80% of buffer ETFs inflict greater-than-claimed maximum losses. Defenders say they work if bought on launch day and held for exactly one year. Yet they trade tick-by-tick, like any stock. The theory goes further awry in more exotic terrain. Gambling on hyper-risky assets – like crypto or speculative technology firms – without chancing catastrophe would obviously be appealing. Ark Investment, run by tech investor Cathie Wood, plans to launch a buffered version of its Innovation ETF. It aims to halve losses, in exchange for surrendering the first 5% of returns and keeping only 60% of upside from there. The problem is the cost of protection on something so risky. Based on the Innovation fund's past performance, an investor who put $1,000 into the buffer fund 10 years ago would have missed $380 in gains annually to pay for options, Breakingviews calculates. That would leave a gain of $2,057.51, slightly underperforming the S&P 500 and with little benefit in terms of volatility. Then there's the 2x Capped Accelerated TSLA ETF, a buffer wrapped around a twice-leveraged Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab fund. A $1,000 investment five years ago would have ended up losing $200, Breakingviews calculates, despite Tesla's stock more than doubling. Themes, the fund's manager, says it works — but only if held for exactly one month. The danger is that this keeps pushing into ever-diminishing payoffs for ever-racier ostensible investments. Just imagine if someone wrapped, say, a bitcoin-hoarder stock like Strategy (MSTR.O), opens new tab in a leveraged ETF, then wrapped it again in a buffer. Or don't: one of those launched last week. Follow Stephen Gandel on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X, opens new tab.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store