President Trump calls for Commanders to go back to old nickname, threatens to block D.C. stadium deal if they don't
Trump made multiple long posts on Truth Social on Sunday calling for the Washington Commanders to switch back to their old "Washington Redskins" team name. He even threatened to block the Commanders' impending move back to D.C. and their new stadium if they fail to do so.
Trump also called for MLB's Cleveland Guardians to go back to their former "Indians" nickname.
While not mentioning Trump by name, Guardians president Chris Antonetti made it clear the team isn't interested in going back Sunday.
'I understand there are very different perspectives on the decision we made a few years ago, but it's a decision we made and we've gotten the opportunity to build the brand as the Guardians over the last four years and we're excited about the future that's in front of us,' he said, via The Athletic.
The Commanders have not addressed Trump's post.
The Guardians officially changed their team name ahead of the 2022 season, shortly after they stopped using the 'Chief Wahoo' logo, which many saw as racist and offensive toward Native Americans.
The Commanders retired their old 'Redskins' nickname in 2020. They went by the Washington Football Team briefly before landing on the Commanders. Their old nickname, which had been in use since 1933, was widely seen as an offensive slur and drew plenty of criticism in its final years of use. 'For obvious reasons,' Commanders owner Josh Harris said in August, that can't return.
'I think [Commanders] is now embraced by our team, by our culture, by our coaching staff,' he said earlier this year, via ESPN. 'So we're going with that.'
Though it's unclear if the threat of blocking their stadium deal, real or not, will sway the Commanders, both Harris and Antonetti seem very content with their franchises' new names.
As for the validity of Trump's stadium threat, the Associated Press wrote:
The Commanders and the District of Columbia government announced a deal earlier this year to build a new home for the football team at the site the old RFK Stadium, the place the franchise called home for more than three decades.
Trump's ability to hold up the deal remains to be seen. President Joe Biden signed a bill in January that transferred the land from the federal government to the District of Columbia.
The provision was part of a short-term spending bill passed by Congress in December. While D.C. residents elect a mayor, a city council and commissioners to run day-to-day operations, Congress maintains control of the city's budget.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jets QB Justin Fields suffers dislocated toe in his right foot during Thursday's practice
New York Jets quarterback Justin Fields suffered a dislocated toe in his right foot during Thursday's practice, the team announced. Fields is considered "day-to-day" and, according to the Jets, "avoided serious injury and significant missed time." Fields threw an incompletion, then sat down and stood up before limping off the field. Trainers were seen removing his right cleat to work on his foot. He was then carted off to the locker room to be examined. The team then ended what they were doing in practice and began working on special teams. [Join or create a Yahoo Fantasy Football league for the 2025 NFL season] Head coach Aaron Glenn told reporters he believed Fields had his foot stepped on. Tests showed no fracture, only the dislocation, according to NFL Network's Ian Rapoport. The Jets are hoping Fields will be ready for Week 1. Fields is in his first season with the Jets after signing a two-year, $40 million contract in the offseason after spending 2024 with the Pittsburgh Steelers. Tyrod Taylor is the Jets' backup quarterback. When asked about the veteran signal caller potentially being needed to play, Glenn said, "I don't think there's any drop off as far as what we want to do when it comes to play calling." Fields making an impression early on Prior to his time in Pittsburgh, Fields played three seasons in Chicago after the Bears selected him with the No. 11 overall pick in the 2021 NFL Draft. The Bears traded Fields to the Steelers in 2024 after obtaining the No. 1 pick in the draft to select Caleb Williams. Fields then split time in Pittsburgh with Russell Wilson. He started Pittsburgh's first six games after Wilson suffered a calf injury in training camp before Wilson took over at quarterback for the rest of the season. In 10 appearances, including his six starts, Fields completed 65.8% of his passes last season for 1,106 yards on 6.9 yards per attempt with five touchdowns and one interception. He ran for 289 yards on 4.7 yards per carry with five rushing touchdowns. The Steelers were 4-2 in games he started, but moved on to Wilson once he was healthy. During offseason work, Fields has impressed Sauce Gardner, to the point that the two-time All-Pro cornerback said Fields has been making throws on the level of the quarterback he is replacing. "There's only a certain amount of quarterbacks that can make [certain throws]," Gardner said earlier this month via "The Pat McAfee Show." "I'm talking about throws on, like, Aaron [Rodgers'] type of level. When it comes to being able to squeeze those throws in there, I always thought Aaron was the best when it came to that. And it's like Justin had made a few throws where I'm like, 'OK, he really been in the lab, for real.' I could just tell." Fields and the Jets won't have to wait long to see Rodgers and his new team, the Steelers. New York and Pittsburgh will meet in Week 1.
Associated Press
25 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Trump's settlement with Columbia could become a model for his campaign to reshape higher education
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration's milestone settlement with Columbia promises to bring stability to a university in crisis. It also delivers a crucial win to President Donald Trump in his campaign to reshape higher education. And at colleges around the country, the deal clarifies the stakes for anyone weighing whether to fight the administration's demands or concede. Columbia agreed Wednesday to pay more than $220 million to the federal government to restore federal research money that was canceled in the name of combating antisemitism on campus. That decision offers a contrast to the path taken by Harvard University, which has lost billions of dollars in government funding as its legal battle escalates with no end in sight. Yet the Columbia deal also raises questions about university independence as the school submits to closer federal oversight. No sooner had Trump announced the deal than he sent a warning: Numerous other universities, he said, 'are upcoming.' The deal is the first to settle a federal investigation into allegations of campus antisemitism since Trump returned to office. It's also the first agreement with a university touching on so many elements of the president's agenda, including diversity, equity and inclusion programs and admissions to women's sports and campus protests. Columbia agreed to some provisions similar to those that Harvard rejected and called a dangerous precedent. The settlement requires the hiring of new faculty in Jewish studies and a review of academics to ensure 'balance.' Additionally, Columbia will be placed under the watch of an independent monitor and ordered to disclose hiring, admission and discipline data to be audited for compliance. In what Columbia described as a victory for university autonomy, the agreement includes a clause saying the government has no authority to dictate hiring, admissions decisions or the content of academic speech. Acting University President Claire Shipman said it was 'carefully crafted to protect the values that define us' while restoring the university's federal research funding. Where some see pragmatism, others see capitulation Some at Columbia called it the best feasible outcome. Some called it capitulation. Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., a Columbia graduate whose district includes the Manhattan campus, called it a 'cowardly' agreement that won't improve the campus. Columbia has effectively waved 'the white flag of surrender in its battle at the heart of the Trump Administration's war on higher education and academic freedom,' Nadler said. Columbia had been threatened with the potential loss of billions of dollars in government support, including more than $400 million in research grants canceled earlier this year. David Pozen, a law professor at Columbia, said the settlement raises legal questions about Trump's strategy of regulation by dealmaking. Instead of applying a single standard across all of higher education, Pozen said, Trump is relying on one-off deals with individual universities as a condition to regain federal funding. It mirrors his hardball approach with trade partners and prominent law firms. 'In short, the agreement gives legal form to an extortion scheme,' he said. Lawrence Summers, a former Treasury secretary and former president of Harvard, called the settlement an 'excellent template' for agreements with Harvard and other universities. He said it preserves Columbia's independence while addressing antisemitism and renewing a focus on merit. 'This may be the best day higher education has had in the last year,' Summers wrote on the social media platform X. Dozens of colleges are facing federal investigations With the deal, Trump has new momentum in his expanding campaign to bring the nation's universities in line with his vision. Dozens of campuses are under federal investigation for allegations related to antisemitism, DEI and transgender athletes in women's sports. Trump has saved his strongest rebuke for elite private universities, yet his administration has also recently turned attention to big public universities including George Mason University. Among Trump's backers, the Columbia agreement is seen as a first step to counteract the liberal bias they say has permeated college campuses. Education Secretary Linda McMahon called Columbia's reforms a roadmap for universities looking to regain public trust. 'I believe they will ripple across the higher education sector and change the course of campus culture for years to come,' McMahon said in a statement. The settlement follows smaller wins for the administration, including a recent deal with the University of Pennsylvania over transgender swimmer Lia Thomas. Penn agreed to modify school records held by Thomas and to apologize to female athletes 'disadvantaged' by Thomas' participation. Just days earlier, the president of the University of Virginia agreed to resign amid a Justice Department investigation over DEI policies. Dozens of university presidents have rallied behind Harvard in its fight against the Trump administration, seeing their own independence jeopardized by the government's sanctions against the Ivy League school. Harvard, the nation's oldest and wealthiest university, is often seen as a bellwether for other institutions, and some regard it as the best hope to repel the Trump administration's pressure campaign. Now even more rides on Harvard's case. Earlier this month, Trump said a deal with Harvard appeared imminent, only to lash out at the university this week following a court hearing in one of Harvard's legal battles. 'A big part of it is going to be how much Harvard gets in the future,' Trump told reporters this week. 'And they're not going to get very much.' Even before Trump took office, more universities had been pulling back on DEI and taking other steps to backtrack on what some see as a leftward political drift. Yet if the Columbia agreement becomes a model, it could force an even deeper reckoning. The agreement requires full compliance with the administration's interpretation of Title IX, the federal law barring sex discrimination in education. Trump officials have used the law to force the removal of transgender athletes from women's sports. The deal also requires regular reports to ensure Columbia does not 'promote unlawful DEI goals.' On admissions, the settlement pushes Columbia to limit the consideration of race even beyond the Supreme Court's 2023 decision ending affirmative action. That decision left open the possibility that universities could consider an applicant's discussion of how their race affected their life, including in college application essays. The Columbia deal appears to bar such considerations. It also requires Columbia to heighten scrutiny of international students and ask questions about their reasons for wanting to study in the United States. It orders the school to take steps to 'decrease financial independence' on international students. Columbia has one of the largest international student populations in the nation, making up about 40% of its enrollment. How much Columbia ceded in exchange may not be clear for years. There's also no guarantee that the school is fully in the clear — the agreement leaves open the possibility of future 'compliance reviews, investigations, defunding or litigation' by the government. Still, Trump commended the university for doing 'what is right.' 'I look forward to watching them have a great future in our Country, maybe greater than ever before!' he said on his social media platform. ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
New York Times
25 minutes ago
- New York Times
One thing is clear after Big Ten media days: The conference is in la-la-land
LAS VEGAS — You wouldn't think it possible to feel secluded in Las Vegas, but the Big Ten pulled it off with its media days location this week. To get there from my hotel room, I needed to walk through the entire Mandalay Bay casino, past the pool, down a long hallway and up two escalators to a palatial conference center. Advertisement And if that didn't make one feel like they'd entered another world, they only needed to wait for the Big Ten's commissioner and coaches to start speaking. This was the place to come to hear people say, as Washington coach Jedd Fisch did: 'We are playing in the best conference in the country, with the toughest schedule in the country.' Or Indiana's Curt Cignetti, whose program has rid itself of Power 4 nonconference opponents through 2029, joking, 'We figured we would just adopt an SEC scheduling philosophy.' Amazing how quickly the crowing starts when a league wins back-to-back national championships for the first time since World War II. However, it was the first speaker of the week, commissioner Tony Petitti, who made me wonder whether I'd somehow landed on an undiscovered planet. Call it Planet Gaslight. Behind the scenes, Petitti has spent more than a year pushing a bizarre 16-team College Football Playoff model in which his conference and the SEC would earn four automatic berths each, the ACC and Big 12 two. This was his first time pitching it to a large public audience. And even though all the proposed details had long since leaked, even though he'd already talked about it on college football analyst Joel Klatt's podcast, something about being here in person and seeing him extoll the merits of such a destructive idea made me question whether we were all being gaslit. Petitti, whose background is in professional sports, not college, doesn't just want to expand the postseason. He wants to alter the sport fundamentally. He wants it to look less like college football and more like the NFL. He wants Playoff berths determined by conference standings, like they are in the NFL. Unlike the NFL, though, the conference standings in college football would only encompass two-thirds or three-fourths of a team's season, which renders the Week 1 Ohio State-Texas showdown comparable to an Indianapolis Colts-Cincinnati Bengals preseason game. Advertisement Mostly he wants those four guaranteed berths, so that the Big Ten can stage its play-in weekend before the Playoff — No. 3 versus No. 6 and No. 4 versus No. 5. So if you're sixth-place Iowa, you can lose to Iowa State, Ohio State and two 5-7 teams and you're still in the CFP race into December. Like a 7-9 NFC East team playing for a wild-card berth. 'If you are 6-3 in the Big Ten, I would argue that's a great record,' Petitti said toward the end of his media day session. 'If you stumbled in a nonconference game, I don't know why that disqualifies you.' It was at that moment that all of college football on X broke out with the same reaction: Is this guy even a college football fan? This guy is not a college football fan. The third straight Big Ten commissioner to try to fundamentally alter the sport at everyone else's expense. — Zach Barnett (@zach_barnett) July 22, 2025 Tell me you don't understand the history and appeal of college football without telling me … — Michael Lev (@MichaelJLev) July 22, 2025 I asked Petitti at his news conference Tuesday whether public opinion factors into these discussions. He took umbrage with my assertion that 'Fans have indicated overwhelmingly they do not want a system where certain conferences get more bids than others.' He responded: 'I'm not aware of massive studies with real research that have demonstrated that.' At that point, I mentioned an admittedly unscientific X poll I'd conducted that morning, in which 75 percent of the respondents preferred a 5-plus-11 model (five conference champs, 11 at-large bids) in a 16-team field. His response: 'We feel pretty strongly that fans will gravitate to a play-in weekend.' Possibly. However, that scientific evidence doesn't exist either. If the CFP expands to 16 teams, which of these two formats would you prefer?5 — Stewart Mandel (@slmandel) July 22, 2025 'Do you think Coke polls the public when it makes changes it thinks are good for its business?' he said in a subsequent interview with columnist John Canzano. Perhaps Petitti is planning to call his system 'New Playoff.' However, whatever you or I think about his plan, the Big Ten's 18 coaches are entirely behind their commissioner. One by one, they took to the podium, made a point of praising Petitti's leadership during their opening comments and then delivered their pre-programmed New Playoff pitch. Advertisement 'I am in 100 percent agreement with what Tony is saying,' said Wisconsin head coach Luke Fickell. 'It's imperative we need four automatic bids, a nine-game schedule in the Big Ten Conference,' Fisch said. 'We can't leave it up to chance with a 5-11 combo.' Oh no. He gaslit the coaches, too. 'If there are seven, eight, nine, ten (Big Ten) teams alive in November that can have a chance to be in the playoffs, that's going to do a world of good for our college football team,' Illinois coach Bret Bielema said. A college football version of the NBA Play-In Tournament would be beneficial for Illinois' football team. But it would be infinitely worse for the sport as a whole if Illinois received special CFP access that its counterparts in the ACC, Big 12 and six other conferences do not. And if that sounds like common sense, well, not here on Planet Gaslight. My sense is that the coaches cared less about the actual format than its potential to whip those cowards in the SEC into line. One after another lamented that the SEC refuses to join them in the land of nine-game league schedules, knowing a four-AQ model may finally push them over the edge. 'When you play nine conference games, it's not the same as someone who plays eight conference games,' Ohio State coach Ryan Day said. 'So, if you're going to be compared against that, then it's just not the same.' We can all agree that the mighty SEC has not been the mighty SEC the past couple of years. First Michigan (against Alabama) and then Ohio State (against Tennessee and Texas) proved that in the Playoff. But there's not a single set of credible data that suggests the Big Ten is playing more demanding schedules than the SEC. (Wisconsin, which plays at Alabama, Ohio State, at Oregon and at Michigan this season, is the notable exception.) Advertisement I'm not sure how the Big Ten can argue with a straight face that the SEC is 'ducking' people. Not when those past two national title teams, the 2023 Michigan and 2024 Ohio State teams, did not play a single Power 5 foe between them. Not when 2025 preseason title favorite Penn State is playing Nevada, FIU and Villanova. How did we get here? Why is a conference that has definitively proved its CFP worthiness so hung up on rigging future Playoffs to its benefit? Well, let's connect the dots. Petitti, the successor to Kevin Warren, began his job in May 2023. Less than three months in, the Pac-12 imploded after USC and UCLA joined the Big Ten; the conference then threw Oregon and Washington a lifeline. Suddenly, the Big Ten had 18 mouths to feed — many with realistic national championship aspirations. Suddenly, a 12-team CFP, which had not even launched yet, already felt too small for them. Meanwhile, it's no secret what entity holds the most influence over Petitti's conference: Fox. In an unusual arrangement, the Big Ten Network, not the conference itself, controls the media rights. Fox owns 61 percent of BTN, effectively giving it control over the Big Ten. And Fox badly wants a bigger piece of college football's postseason than its lone current property, the Holiday Bowl. ESPN has the CFP tied up for another seven years, so those proposed Big Ten play-in games would both provide Fox and/or its sublicensees, CBS and NBC, with more inventory while putting more cash in the coffers of Big Ten members. This helps explain why Petitti talks about a reimagined, watered-down Championship Saturday as if he's delivering water to the Mojave Desert. 'The weekend that we're talking about, where you would have championship games across all conferences, meaningful play-in games — I don't see how that's a bad thing for football, and I think fans will gravitate to it,' he said. Advertisement The problem is, his friends in the SEC haven't gravitated to it. The two parties share equal control of the post-2025 CFP format. That's why these interminable discussions, which began in February 2024, remain at an impasse. 'We are open to considering any format ideas that come from our (conference) colleagues or the CFP staff,' Petitti said, 'but to be clear, formats that increase the discretion and role of the CFP selection committee will have a difficult time getting support from the Big Ten.' A business that fundamentally changes a cherished product, despite no apparent demand for it, will struggle to gain the support of its customers. Ask Coke.
