Why the EU is essential — and why Türkiye belongs in the bloc
It was the day my aunt's husband left Manisa, an industrious town in Western Türkiye, to work in Germany. He returned years later with knowledge, skills, and tools that helped our local community flourish. That is the promise of a truly meaningful partnership.
Later, in my political career, I observed the volatile relationship between Türkiye and the European Union—a journey marked by both hope and frustration.
From the 1999 Helsinki Summit, when Türkiye was granted candidate status, to the 2010s, when negotiations stalled, our path toward full EU membership has been uneven. Missteps and mistrust have occurred on both sides.
Today, however, the world is changing rapidly. The war in Ukraine, the rise of authoritarianism and far-right extremism, and renewed debate over Europe's security and global role reveal an urgent truth: Türkiye and Europe must build a common future.
9 May, Europe Day, offers a moment to ask a critical question: What kind of partnership do we want? One defined by short-term transactions and political expedience? Or one rooted in enduring values, shared responsibility, and mutual trust?
In a world where democracy is under siege, multilateralism is weakening, peace is no longer a given, and global trade faces protectionist threats, the European Union's moral clarity and democratic commitment are more important than ever.
Yes, the EU is under pressure. Populism tests its unity. Migration challenges its compassion. The war in Ukraine demands resilience and resources. Yet precisely in times like these, the EU must double down on its founding principles.
As emphasised in former Italian Prime Minister and former European Central Bank President Mario Draghi's report and the Commission's 'Competitiveness Compass,' the EU must act swiftly to sustain prosperity and global relevance in the face of rising competition from the US and China.
I firmly believe that a dynamic and democratic Türkiye—one committed to the rule of law and human rights—will play a vital role in a mutually stronger future.
As the leader of the Republican People's Party (CHP), the oldest party of the Turkish Republic and a standard-bearer of its social democratic tradition, I affirm that the future we envision for Türkiye is fundamentally aligned with Europe's values.
Our agendas converge in four critical areas: a social Europe that shields its citizens from inequality and insecurity; an inclusive Europe that respects dignity and integrates diversity; a sustainable and innovative Europe where green transition and digital innovation go hand-in-hand; and a dignified Europe where all can live freely, safely, and with opportunity.
These are not abstract ideals. They are the foundation for a renewed Europe, and they reflect the aspirations of the Turkish people.
My vision for Türkiye is one of a democratic republic built on rule of law, secular governance, human rights, and equality.
Gender equality is not a slogan—it is a governing principle. We will rejoin the Istanbul Convention without delay. We are committed to realizing Türkiye's historical potential; a country where no child is deprived of education, no family denied healthcare, no citizen excluded from justice.
Following the 31 March 2024 local elections, in which our party emerged as the leading political force, we are advancing a vision of empowered local democracy. Strong municipalities make for a strong democracy. Transparent, participatory governance is not just a method—it is a promise to our citizens from which we derive our own legitimacy.
I must also express concern that the EU-Türkiye relationship has, at times, devolved into a transactional arrangement—most notably around migration. This neither honors Europe's values nor reflects Türkiye's contributions.
Our country currently hosts over five million refugees and migrants, largely from Syria but also from Afghanistan, Ukraine, Iran, and Iraq. Despite limited means, the Turkish people have shown unmatched generosity.
Türkiye also has one of the youngest populations on the continent—a potential engine of renewal and innovation. Yet in recent years, young people have emigrated in large numbers, discouraged by injustice and authoritarianism. Their talents have been stifled. We intend to reverse that trend.
Since 19 March, when Istanbul's elected mayor and our presidential candidate, Ekrem İmamoğlu, was unjustly detained, young people have risen in peaceful protest—not for a party, but for principles: judicial independence, electoral fairness, and democratic renewal. They are not a threat. They are our biggest source for hope of a better future.
We believe in their future. We believe in their return. We believe in a Türkiye they will want to come back to. A Türkiye that offers not only opportunity, but dignity.
One of the slogans we often use in our struggle is inspired by Bertolt Brecht: No salvation alone—either all of us together, or none of us at all. Solidarity is not a choice. It is a necessity.
This is a defining moment for Europe. The EU must not look away from Türkiye—a founding member of NATO, a member of the Council of Europe and the OECD, and a long-standing candidate for EU accession. Europe must not ignore Türkiye's young people, its democratic determination, or the opportunity for a renewed partnership grounded in shared values.
On this Europe Day, let us go beyond ceremonial words. Let us remember why the EU was built: to heal division, defend democracy, and secure peace. The inclusion of Türkiye in that mission is not a concession—it is a completion.
Let this be the generation that chooses unity over exclusion, principles over convenience, and vision over fear.
Let us shape a Europe that is truly whole.
Happy Europe Day.
Özgür Özel is the leader of Türkiye's Republican People's Party (CHP).
Members of the MAGA movement in the United States have hit out at the new pope over social media posts he made in which he appeared to criticise President Donald Trump and his deputy JD Vance.
Robert Prevost, a 69-year-old from Chicago, became the first ever US pontiff when he was chosen by his fellow cardinals on Thursday, less than three weeks after the death of his predecessor, Pope Francis.
Trump was quick to celebrate Prevost's appointment, sending his congratulations and expressing a desire to meet the pontiff, who is now known by the name Leo XIV.
"What excitement, and what a great honour for our country. I look forward to meeting Pope Leo XIV. It will be a very meaningful moment!" Trump said in a post on his Truth Social platform.
However, not everyone in Trump's orbit was pleased by the news from the Vatican.
Laura Loomer, a far-right activist who was invited by Trump to the Oval Office in early April, called the new pope "anti-Trump, anti-MAGA, pro-open borders and a total marxist like Pope Francis."
Her criticism came in response to an article allegedly reposted by Prevost on X.
A verified account under his name shared a Washington Post opinion piece written by Cardinal Timothy Dolan in 2015.
The article was titled "Why Donald Trump's anti-immigrant rhetoric is so problematic."
In February, the same account reposted an article — written by the National Catholic Reporter (NCR) — that criticised the US Vice President JD Vance over his comments on the Christian concept of "ordo amoris."
"There's this old school – and I think it's a very Christian concept by the way – that you love your family and then you love your neighbour, and then you love your community, and then you love your fellow citizens in your own country, and then after that, you can focus and prioritise the rest of the world," Vance said earlier this year.
His interpretation of the doctrine was widely condemned by leading religious figures, with the NCR article shared by Prevost's account concluding "JD Vance is wrong: Jesus doesn't ask us to rank our love for others."
But unlike Loomer, some Trump allies tried to reserve judgement.
"Is it too much to hope that some 20-year-old ran the new pope's X account and he never looked at it?" asked former Fox News host Megyn Kelly.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fashion Network
3 hours ago
- Fashion Network
Is anybody fighting back in this trade war?
By no means does the firm anticipate zero harm. Business confidence is down but not collapsing. Capital spending will be constrained. And while chances of recession are still high, a better outcome remains very plausible. This sort of guarded optimism — or qualified pessimism — is a break from the dark warnings. Christine Lagarde, head of the European Central Bank, told leaders to prepare for a worst-case scenario in which an antagonistic US drags the world into destructive economic conflict. The prime minister of Singapore, a city-state that thrived during the heyday of free trade, couldn't hide his dismay: Tariffs aren't the actions of friends, Lawrence Wong noted. His Canadian counterpart, Mark Carney, declared that relations with the US would be changed forever. Chinese President Xi Jinping has studiously matched American moves but also toned down his rhetoric and actions when appropriate. Washington and Beijing this week extended a pause on higher tariffs for 90 days, the latest in a series of suspensions. India, which has been the subject of some bullish projections as China's economy has slowed, is one of the few economies of significance that hasn't cut a deal with Trump. But Prime Minister Narendra Modi also hasn't gone measure for measure or shown a desire to get even with American businesses. Yes, there has been indignity and hurt feelings. The governor of the Reserve Bank of India dismissed Trump's claim that commerce was dead there. He touted India's contribution to global growth — about 18% compared to around 11% for the US — and insisted the local economy was doing well. This is in the ballpark, based on IMF projections. It also misses the point that in pure size, America dwarfs India. Brazil, a comer that struggles to make good on its potential, is also refusing to bend. President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva loathes dependence on the US and wants to be treated as an equal. But Trump doesn't like a court case against Lula's predecessor for allegedly plotting a coup. Brazil is trying to develop an alternative to the dollar and places great store in commercial ties to the BRICS group of emerging economies. Many of those nations, and aspiring members of the bloc, have cut deals with Trump, or are likely to do so. Brazil will come to some arrangement. So has Trump got away with it? His aides reckoned that access to the American market is too lucrative to pass up, and they may have been right. It would also be naive to conclude there won't be any cost. The global economy has slowed but hasn't crashed, foreigners still purchase US Treasuries and it's a safe bet that the greenback will be at the centre of the financial system for years. But the nations humiliated won't forget this experience. Asia's economies will only get bigger and the siren call of greater integration with China will get louder. Trump's efforts to destroy the existing order may yet prove an own goal. Just not this year. Clayton, who became the top economic official at the State Department, believed that robust trade among the shattered nations of Western Europe was as important as physical rebuilding. The economic dislocation wrought by the conflagration had been underestimated; capitalism could revive the continent and prevent the political implosion of key countries. According to Benn Steil's book The Marshall Plan: Dawn of the Cold War, Clayton insisted that the US 'must run this show.' Trump's team brag about reconfiguring the system that grew from the ideals of the post-war era. The hubris may ultimately prove misplaced.
LeMonde
18 hours ago
- LeMonde
Trauma lingers in Greece, 10 years after austerity referendum
Katerina Grapsa, a shopkeeper in central Athens, vividly remembers "that summer of 2015, the summer of all dangers," when she almost lost everything, like so many other Greeks. On June 27, the woman in her sixties woke up to learn that Alexis Tsipras, the left-wing prime minister from the Syriza party who had been elected just in January, had announced at 1:20 am that a referendum would be held on July 5. It was to decide whether to reject the third austerity plan imposed by the "troika" (the International Monetary Fund, the European Central Bank and the European Commission) since the beginning of the debt crisis in 2010. The next day, June 28, after the Eurogroup – which brings together the finance ministers of the eurozone countries – refused to extend Greece's loan agreement and capital flight accelerated, the Greek prime minister announced capital controls and the temporary closure of Greek banks until after the vote. Greeks could withdraw only €60 per day, and businesses could no longer pay their employees or suppliers. Greece found itself at an impasse. "While standing in line at the ATM, we laughed at the absurdity of it all. But deep down, we were afraid to hear about another disaster and that our country would no longer be part of the eurozone," Grapsa said.
Euronews
a day ago
- Euronews
Plastic pollution treaty talks end without an agreement
Negotiators working on a treaty to address the global crisis of plastic pollution won't reach an agreement in Geneva on Friday. They were meeting for the 11th day at the United Nations office in Geneva to try to complete a landmark treaty to end the plastic pollution crisis but remained deadlocked over whether the treaty should reduce the exponential growth of plastic production and put global, legally binding controls on toxic chemicals used to make plastics. This round of negotiations was meant to be the last, producing the first legally binding treaty on plastic pollution. But now delegates are leaving without a treaty after talks collapsed, just like they did at the meeting in South Korea last year. Nations deeply disappointed to leave Geneva without a treaty Representatives of Norway, Australia, Tuvalu and other nations said they were deeply disappointed to be leaving Geneva without a treaty. "We came to Geneva to secure a global plastics treaty because we know the stakes could not be higher," European Commissioner for Environment, Water Resilience and Competitive Circular Economy, Jessika Roswall said in a post on social media. "While the latest text on the table does not yet meet all our ambitions, it is a step forward—and the perfect must not be the enemy of the good." Roswall added that the EU will continue to push for a stronger, binding agreement. Saudi Arabia said both drafts lacked balance, and Saudi and Kuwaiti negotiators said the latest proposal takes other states' views more into account and addresses plastic production, which they consider outside the scope of the treaty. No further action on the latest draft text Luis Vayas Valdivieso, the chair of the negotiating committee, wrote and presented two drafts of treaty text in Geneva based on the views expressed by nations at the talks. That draft, released early Friday, did not include a limit on plastic production but recognised that current levels of production and consumption are 'unsustainable' and global action is needed. New language had been added to say these levels exceed current waste management capacities and are projected to increase further, 'thereby necessitating a coordinated global response to halt and reverse such trends.' The representatives from 184 countries did not agree to use either one as the basis for their negotiations. Valdivieso said Friday morning, as the delegates reconvened in the assembly hall, that no further action is being proposed at this stage on the latest draft. Talks in Geneva have been an "abject failure", David Azoulay, health programme director and head of the delegation for the Center for International Environmental Law, said in a statement. "In the final days of the negotiations, we have clearly seen what many of us have known for some time - some countries did not come here to finalise a text, they came here to do the opposite: block any attempt at advancing a viable treaty. "It's impossible to find a common ground between those who are interested in protecting the status quo and the majority who are looking for a functional treaty that can be strengthened over time." What happens now? Delegates are still meeting and have not decided on the next steps yet. Azoulay said that, while negotiations will continue, they will fail again if solutions aren't identified and the process doesn't change. "We need a restart, not a repeat performance. Countries that want a treaty must now leave this process and form a treaty of the willing. And that process must include options for voting that deny the tyranny of consensus we have watched play out here."
