logo
Nada Launches U.S. Home Equity Fund I, Offering Access to One of the Fastest-Growing Asset Classes in Real Estate

Nada Launches U.S. Home Equity Fund I, Offering Access to One of the Fastest-Growing Asset Classes in Real Estate

02/18/2025, Dallas, TX // KISS PR Brand Story PressWire //
Nada has announced the launch of U.S. Home Equity Fund I (US HEF), a first-of-its-kind fund designed to provide qualified investors with direct exposure to the $35 trillion U.S. home equity market through a diversified portfolio of Home Equity Agreements (HEAs), available on their newly launched investment platform, Homeshares.
Since 2013, U.S. home equity has nearly tripled to $35 trillion ( Federal Reserve, Q3 2024), and HEAs have rapidly gained institutional adoption with banks, insurers, and private credit funds increasing participation over the past two years. In 2024, $1.1 billion in HEA-backed securitizations and new rating methodologies from DBRS Morningstar and KBRA cemented their place in institutional portfolios. With HEAs now firmly established as a scalable investment, US HEF expands access beyond institutions, allowing qualified accredited investors, family offices, private wealth groups, and a broader set of alternative asset managers to participate in a structured, scalable approach to home equity investing.
'We are witnessing the emergence of one of the most exciting new asset classes in real estate,' said John Green, Founder and COO of Nada. 'Home equity is the single largest source of wealth in the U.S., yet until recently, the only way to access it was through direct homeownership or traditional mortgage-backed securities. HEAs have changed that, creating a new way for investors to participate.'
What is a Home Equity Agreement (HEA)?
A Home Equity Agreement (HEA) gives homeowners financial flexibility by accessing their home equity without debt, monthly payments, or interest. Instead of a loan, they receive an upfront lump-sum payment in exchange for a share of their home's future value.
For investors, HEAs provide direct exposure to residential real estate appreciation with enhanced returns without the burdens of property ownership. Unlike traditional homeownership, where appreciation is captured dollar-for-dollar, HEAs are structured so that investors earn a multiple of the home's appreciation rate, accelerating returns relative to home value growth.
A Structured Approach to Home Equity Investing
U.S. Home Equity Fund I provides investors with a structured, risk-adjusted way to gain exposure to residential real estate—one of the most stable and high-growth asset classes. US HEF I is built for risk-adjusted growth and institutional liquidity, targeting 14-17% net IRR through exposure to home price appreciation. The fund focuses on owner-occupied properties for stability and diversification while limiting exposure to 35% of any single property's value to ensure downside protection. With assets positioned for future securitization or institutional sales, US HEF offers a scalable, institutional-grade approach to home equity.
With home equity emerging as a recognized institutional investment class, U.S. Home Equity Fund I provides an institutional-caliber approach to an asset that has been a cornerstone of wealth creation for decades—now structured for broader participation.
Nada: Leading the Next Era of Real Estate Ownership
Nada builds on six years of innovation in home equity investing. Having transacted over $100M in gross asset value. Its active HEA portfolio has delivered realized payoffs with a weighted average IRR of 19.3% since inception.
' This is a defining moment for HEAs as an asset class," said Tore Steen, CEO of Nada. " U.S. Home Equity Fund I is structured to capitalize on this momentum—offering a rare opportunity in a rapidly growing market. '
For more information, visit www.homeshares.co.
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release may contain forward-looking statements describing future expectations, plans, results, or strategies. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual outcomes to differ materially from those projected. Changes in product offerings, regulatory plans, and business strategies are potential factors influencing such differences.
Media Contact:

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hakeem Jeffries Declines to Say Whether Democrats Should ‘Embrace' Musk
Hakeem Jeffries Declines to Say Whether Democrats Should ‘Embrace' Musk

Epoch Times

timean hour ago

  • Epoch Times

Hakeem Jeffries Declines to Say Whether Democrats Should ‘Embrace' Musk

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) on Friday cautiously avoided saying whether Democrats should seize on Elon Musk's public falling-out with President Donald Trump as an opportunity to forge political ties with the tech billionaire. Musk and Trump clashed openly on Thursday over the One Big Beautiful Bill Act budget legislation, which is pending in the Senate after narrowly passing the House last week. Musk, aligning himself with the fiscally conservative wing of the Republican Party, criticized the Trump-backed legislation as rife with pork barrel spending and raised alarm over its potential to exacerbate the national debt, which is approaching $37 trillion.

Elon Musk Is Still Not Your Friend
Elon Musk Is Still Not Your Friend

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk Is Still Not Your Friend

This article is part of HuffPost's biweekly politics newsletter. Click here to subscribe. After months of political bliss, it seems as if the president and the world's richest man are ready to call it quits. Donald Trump and Elon Musk traded barbs on their respective social media websites on Thursday and into Friday, as social media users happily looked on. It was only a matter of time before Trump and Musk, who are not known for making and keeping allies, had a spectacular falling out. The inciting incident turned out to be Musk's criticisms of the Trump-backed 'Big Beautiful Bill,' the House's spending bill that slashes the safety net in order to provide $4.5 trillion worth of tax cuts to the rich. At first, Musk's comments were mild, saying the bill doesn't reduce the deficit and 'undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing.' But he went fully nuclear on Thursday. Musk, who already claimed he won the election for Trump, posted to X to accuse the president of being in the 'Epstein files,' or a list of people with suspicious associations with the financier, who died in jail while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. (Trump and Epstein socialized in the 1980s and 1990s, but Trump has denied ever being on his private plane or island, where some of the alleged sex crimes took place.) Trump, in turn, suggested on Truth Social he would cut Musk's government contracts, while the president's allies even started talking about deporting Musk. At this point, it seems clear that the once-budding bromance is toast. Many people reacted with schadenfreude to the world's weirdest celebrity breakup. But it also had a few Democrats seeming ready to slide into Musk's DMs. 'We should ultimately be trying to convince him that the Democratic Party has more of the values that he agrees with,' Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) told Politico on Thursday. 'A commitment to science funding, a commitment to clean technology, a commitment to seeing international students like him.' Other Democrats also signaled that the rift could benefit their party. 'I'm a believer in redemption, and he is telling the truth about the legislation,' Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-N.Y.) said, while still cautioning that Musk's slashing of the federal government is still an open wound. 'There are Democrats who see his decimation of the federal workforce and the federal government as an unforgivable sin.' Making the enemy of your enemy your friend is not always an outlandish idea. There have been multiple reports that even some in the Trump administration were fighting with Musk behind the scenes, making it seemingly feasible to build a new alliance between him and Democrats. And Musk is known for dumping truckloads of money into politics when he's on your side. He was, by far, the largest Republican donor in the 2024 cycle, contributing more than $290 million to Trump's campaign. Then in April, Musk made a Wisconsin Supreme Court race the most expensive judicial race in U.S. history by spending $25 million to boost Brad Schimel, the GOP candidate. (Schimel lost by 10 points.) But there are strange bedfellows, and then there's extending an olive branch to someone as toxic as Elon Musk. For one thing, Musk is deeply unpopular with basically everyone. An April ABC News/Washington Post/Ipsos poll found that Musk only had a 35% approval rating nationwide. It was even worse among the people who the Democratic Party represents — just 4% of those voters approve of Musk's works. In fact, he's so disliked that it seems likely Trump can spin their very public split into a good thing for him politically. And when you boil it down further, nearly everything Musk has done as a part of the Trump campaign, and later, the Trump administration, is anathema to what Democratic voters believe. Musk's purchase of Twitter, which he renamed to X, in 2022 began the South African billionaire's journey to becoming Trump's closest ally and biggest donor. When a 20-year-old Pennsylvania man attempted to assassinate Trump in July 2024, Musk solidified his support by officially endorsing him. Musk appeared at Trump rallies and spent the final weeks of the campaign spreading conspiracy theories and throwing money around in order to send Trump back to the White House. Then at Trump's second inauguration, Musk was widely condemned for doing a Nazi-like salute while speaking to supporters. This didn't stop Trump from giving him a semi-official role in government, with the power to set up the so-called Department of Government Efficiency and hire a cadre of inexperienced employees to ostensibly cut waste from the government. DOGE staffers accessed private data, fired critical employees and were named in multiple lawsuits — many of which are still ongoing today. Musk has repeatedly shared antisemitic posts on social media, including claiming 'Hitler didn't murder millions of people.' He's a proponent of a racist 'Great Replacement' conspiracy theory, which claims that people of color are executing an intentional plot to eliminate white people. While the Trump administration has ramped up deportations, blocked migrants from receiving asylum and used ugly rhetoric about immigrants in general, Musk was able to convince the president to admit white South Africans as refugees, claiming there is a 'white genocide' happening in South Africa. Then there's the fallout from the cuts his team at DOGE has made across the federal government. Musk spearheaded the effort to cut funding for essential agencies, impacting everything from the IRS to HIV prevention to natural disaster response to Social Security. The entire U.S. Agency for International Development was effectively dismantled, which led to the deaths of children abroad and put millions of lives at risk. Across the federal government, everyday people, including Trump supporters, were thrust into unemployment as DOGE officials decided their roles weren't important. 'I want a big tent party too, but Elon's primary policy goals don't fit within the tent,' Democratic pollster Evan Roth Smith of Slingshot Strategies told HuffPost. 'There's nothing around Social Security or Medicare cuts that fits within the tent of the Democratic Party at all.' Over the last five months, Musk has hardly signaled that he's ready to pivot to liberalism. In fact, up until this week, he remained by Trump's side, appearing at Cabinet meetings (despite not being a Cabinet member), irritating those in Trump's inner circle and parading around the White House with one of his children. Musk's time at the White House was scheduled to come to an end at the end of May when his 130-day 'special employee' status expired. The Democrats are in a bit of a political wilderness, and it can be tempting to look for a powerful new ally. After losing to Trump, the infighting has been continuous, with many placing the blame on former President Joe Biden for failing to step aside sooner, with others pointing at former Vice President Kamala Harris for running a campaign that wasn't capable of defeating Trump. But Democrats should remember that their attempts to reach across the aisle and find common ground are not what their base is asking for. A March NBC News poll found that 65% of Democrats did not want the party to compromise with Trump — even if it means getting nothing done in Congress. 'There's no reason to take Elon back,' Roth Smith said. Kevin Robillard contributed reporting.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store