DJ with Apple Music lets you use your subscription with Serato, Rekordbox, Engine DJ and more
In recent years there's been something of a disconnect between the universal ease of streaming music for listening purposes and the convoluted process of streaming music for the purpose of DJing.
That's not to say that streaming isn't a thing in the DJ realm – the likes of Beatport, Beatsource and Soundcloud each offer streaming subscriptions aimed specifically at DJs, and AlphaTheta's recent emphasis on Cloud services means that Rekordbox users can access their library of tracks remotely. But for the most part there's been no way for users of streaming giants Spotify or Apple Music to make use of their subscriptions for DJing.
That's set to change with the launch of DJ with Apple Music, a new functionality for the streaming service aimed at making the platform's library available to DJs.
This manifests in a few ways. Firstly, as a new section within Apple Music's own interface that hosts a variety of curated DJ-focused playlists. This has playlists built around genres, as well as those curated by DJs and DJ gear brands.
More significantly, it also means that Apple Music will now be integrated into a variety of different DJing platforms including Serato, AlphaTheta's Rekordbox, and inMusic's Engine DJ, Denon DJ, Numark, and RANE DJ.
While functionality is a little different across different platforms, this means that Apple Music subscribers can mix with tracks from the service's library within their chosen DJ platform, as well as apply tags, set cue points and build playlists.
On the AlphaTheta front, Apple Music arrives in the desktop version of Rekordbox (v7.1), along with rekordbox for iOS, and will also be implemented into two of the brand's all-in-one DJ systems, the XDJ-AZ and Omnis-Duo.
The company also tells us that integration should roll out for the CDJ-3000s and Opus-Quad in the near future, and will be present in all future product releases.
With Serato, users can access Apple Music tracks from the downloads pages of both Serato DJ Lite and Serato DJ Pro.
It's worth noting that this isn't the first time Apple Music has been integrated into a DJ platform – users of Algoriddim Djay can already stream tracks from Apple Music. Rival streaming platform Tidal is already integrated into several DJ platforms too. However, today's announcement is certainly the most high-profile crossover we've seen between a streaming platform and the DJ realm.
A notably absent name from the list of integrated applications is Native Instruments' Traktor, which is a shame, as the latest iteration – Traktor Pro 4 – impressed us when it finally arrived last year.
'Apple Music is committed to supporting DJs,' says Stephen Campbell, Global Head of Dance, Electronic & DJ Mixes at Apple Music. 'With this latest integration, we're taking that commitment even further – seamlessly connecting Apple Music with the industry's leading DJ software and hardware. This innovation brings the full power of Apple Music into the creative workflow, making it easier than ever for DJs to access, play, and discover music in real time.'
It's worth noting a couple of major caveats that mean this functionality is likely to appeal primarily to beginner and hobbyist DJs, at least for the time being.
Firstly, there's no offline functionality for DJing with Apple Music tracks. This means you can't download and save tracks added to your DJ platform of choice, and won't be able to access them without a stable internet connection – something we'd be wary of when it comes to playing any high-profile sets.
Secondly, Apple Music's terms of service state that music can only be used for noncommercial purposes, which means that using streamed tracks for any paid DJ gigs – including weddings, club gigs, parties, etc – would be a violation of said terms.
To point out the obvious too, making use of Apple Music within any DJ platform will require both a subscription to Apple Music and subscription to/license for your DJ software of choice.
On the positive side, closing the gap between the streaming services we use for listening to music and DJ software libraries is a massive step forward for beginner and at-home DJs. In the past, when DJing relied on physical media like vinyl or CDs, or even in more recent times when a library of purchased tracks or dedicated subscription was required, getting started as a DJ could be a prohibitively expensive process.
Integration like this will certainly make it cheaper for beginners to try their hand at DJing, as well as explore new styles and genres.
Speaking as somebody that no longer DJs in public regularly, but has been roped out of retirement to play at a few friends' weddings in recent years, this functionality would have saved me hours of prep time if it had been available a few years ago. (It's not a violation of the terms of service if you're getting paid in free drinks, right? – I'll have our lawyers look into this).
The launch of DJ with Apple Music follows the platform's introduction of DJ Mixes back in 2021, which integrated streamable mixed sets into the library.
Explore Apple Music's new DJ playlists at the DJ with Apple Music homepage.
Find out more about specific platform integration with Serato, Rekordbox, Engine DJ and Djay.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Android Authority
a day ago
- Android Authority
I subscribe to Spotify, Apple Music, and Tidal, but keep coming back to YouTube Music for one reason
Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority Thanos has his gemstones, and I have my music subscription services. I've subscribed to practically all the major streaming services. Spotify, Apple Music, Tidal — they all have their own unique strengths and quirks. Of course, I've tried to rationalize the cost by saying that I'm keeping my options open and that different services are good for different use cases, and even moods. Spotify Jam comes in clutch when I'm throwing a party. Other days, I want Apple Music's clean interface and easy AirPlay capabilities. Some days I'm chasing the top-tier high-fidelity streaming and catalog on Tidal. You've gotta have options, yeah? No other service's radio stations fill that dialed-in radio DJ-shaped hole in my heart. But when I'm not in the mood to overthink and just want solid 80s hair metal jams to roll on their own, I end up back on YouTube Music. Not because of the app design, collaborative features, or even for the massive content library. It's the radio. No other service's radio stations fill that dialed-in radio DJ-shaped hole in my heart the way that YouTube Music does. What's your preferred music streaming service? 0 votes Spotify NaN % Apple Music NaN % Tidal NaN % YouTube Music NaN % Qobuzz NaN % I like my physical media NaN % The funny thing is, I wasn't intentionally looking to make a move to YouTube Music. The service comes as a free add-on perk with my YouTube Premium subscription and I barely, if ever, used it. However, a while back, while streaming a live concert on YouTube, the autoplay queue filled up with a consistent stream of top-tier, relevant live videos and renditions of some of my favorite, and soon-to-be-favorite tracks. The music selection felt handpicked, though obviously it wasn't. YouTube knows my tastes in media better than most, and it was quietly DJing in the background, helping me discover deep cuts, B-sides, and mixing it up with all the usual favorites. On a lark, I popped open YouTube Music and kicked off a radio stream based on a single song. Little did I know that I was in for a full day of music listening. Predictable is fine, unpredictable is exciting Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority Look, Spotify's radios are fine if you're in the mood to stay within a familiar loop. They are particularly good if you want to stick to the chart toppers. Spotify's algorithms are famous for playlists like Discover Weekly and Release Radar, but everyone will agree that the deeper you go into the radio function, the more you observe that it is recycling the same few artists and tracks. Discoverability isn't Spotify's strong suit. On the other hand, Apple Music's stations tend to be more editorially curated, and I'm not even talking about the excellent Apple Music Classical app. These playlists are highly polished with tracks that seamlessly lead you in a mood or genre-based journey. However, while Apple Music does have a radio function, it also has the same pitfalls as Spotify. They're not very reactive, nor do they encourage discovering new bands. As good as the radio is, it just doesn't feel very personal. Discovery isn't Spotify's strong suit. Apple Music is heavily editorial driven. Tidal sits on its HiFi laurels. YouTube Music's radio works differently, and not just in how it recommends music. To start with, there's the library. YouTube Music doesn't just pull from a list of official studio releases. The app taps into the sprawling catalog of YouTube itself. That means your music feed can blend tracks from studio albums with live cuts, fan uploads that never made an official release, and deep cut remixes. All of that is tied into your own watch history on YouTube, giving it an additional source of truth about your likes and dislikes. All of that combines to give you a much richer variety of source material to pull from, and an algorithm that is willing to take a chance on presenting you with something fresh and unlike what you've heard already. I can, and have, started off with a single obscure track and ended up with a playlist moving seamlessly from 90s alt-rock deep cuts to a modern indie band that I've never heard before, while still retaining that flavor. Occasionally, YouTube Music might even throw in an acoustic version or alternate take on a popular track. There's always a surprise, rarely a bad one. Why YouTube Music wins my listening time Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority Even before we get into the custom radio function, it's worth mentioning that this vast library is tapped into YouTube Music's auto-generated playlists and recommendations, which put them ahead of similar features from other streaming services. The control that you have over a radio station even before it starts is another big reason to look into YouTube Music. The service includes a feature called the music tuner that, like Pandora, lets you blend artists and genres. But not just that, it lets you decide how adventurous you want to be with your music. There's an option to adjust the artist variety to pull in a wider range of acts, a music discovery option that lets you switch between discovery and familiarity depending on how you're feeling. YouTube Music even gives you the option to filter your radio experience further by choosing between popular tracks, deep cuts, new releases, and many more options. Spotify gives you nowhere close to that level of input. You can give YouTube Music's DJ a very specific set of instructions and leave it to figure out the rest. Usually, accurately. Another YouTube Music exclusive that I have my eye on is the new AI-enhanced Ask Music feature. Google tends to do staggered rollouts across geographies and accounts, so I'm still waiting for it to show up, but what I've seen so far looks extremely promising. Positioned as an enhancement of the current radio feature, it lets you create a radio station just by describing what you want to listen to. So, for example, you can type something like 'moody ambient, dark academia-inspired playlist for a rainy night when I'm reading a classic gothic horror book,' and it'll create a playlist fine-tuned exactly for that. If that prompt sounds oddly specific, it is. I've previously used ChatGPT to come up with playlist suggestions like the one I mentioned above, and having a tool like that deeply integrated into the music listening experience sounds fantastic. Most services already include mood-based playlists, but those tend to be fairly static collections that don't adapt to specific tastes. Ask Music takes a conversational, hyper-tuned experience, which is something I'm looking forward to testing out. There's something to be said about YouTube Music's integrated approach to music listening and discovery. Because it's tied to my Google account and a decade or more of YouTube history, it's working with years of implicit data that doesn't just include manually tapped likes or dislikes, but also how long I listened to something, how quickly I moved back or changed to the next track. That's data no other service has, or can have. To give you an example, I recently popped open YouTube Music and started a late-night play of atmospheric music by an Icelandic artist. No, not Bjork. Over the next hour or so, the station automatically introduced me to Scandinavian folk, minimalist piano pieces, and slow-paced electronic ambient tracks that fit the vibe, but not necessarily the genre. It encourages discovery, and by the end of my listening session ,I'd saved half a dozen tracks to my late-night playlist. Discovery meets comfort Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority Of course, YouTube Music isn't perfect either. The app can come across as a bit clunky, downloading music offline is way slower, and the sound quality can vary quite a bit depending on the source of the file. And if you're coming back to the app after a while, YouTube Music too can be guilty of repeating tracks. But it's rare, and it gives you the tools to avoid that. I'm not canceling my other subscriptions just yet. Be it Spotify's collaborative playlists or Jam, Apple Music's elite-tier human-curated playlists, or Tidal's unbeatable sound quality, every app has a cool trick that keeps me coming back for more. But YouTube Music gets a lot of playtime from me for its ability to curate the perfect playlist for what I'm feeling. It's the only streaming service that values my love for music, keeps me listening, discovering, and curious. And that's honestly the best thing a music streaming service can do. Follow
Forbes
3 days ago
- Forbes
Free Apple TV+ And Music: A Credit Card Makes It Possible
Editorial Note: We earn a commission from partner links on Forbes Advisor. Commissions do not affect our editors' opinions or evaluations. The cost of streaming services can add up quickly, but Apple loyalists get included access to their favorite services with the new and improved Chase Sapphire Reserve®. The revamped credit card offers cardholders complimentary memberships to Apple TV+ and Apple Music. The Chase Sapphire Reserve® offers cardholders complimentary subscriptions to Apple TV+ and Apple Music through June 22, 2027—a value of $250 annually. By applying now, new cardholders can get 22 months of free streaming. Currently, Apple TV+ costs $9.99 per month, and an individual Apple Music subscription costs $10.99. The Reserve will effectively save cardholders over $460 through June 2027. While the Reserve costs applicants a pretty penny at an annual fee of $795, a long list of statement credits and perks—added in the card's summer revamp —may make it a desirable choice. To activate your complimentary Apple memberships: Open the Chase Mobile® app. Go to the Card Benefits section. Link your Apple ID through the Apple TV+ and Apple Music prompts. If you have an active subscription directly through Apple, it will be automatically suspended, as the Chase offers supersede it. Earn 100,000 bonus points + $500 Chase Travel℠ promo credit after you spend $5,000 on purchases in the first 3 months from account opening. Credit Score ranges are based on FICO® credit scoring. This is just one scoring method and a credit card issuer may use another method when considering your application. These are provided as guidelines only and approval is not guaranteed. Outside the Apple ecosystem, the Reserve boosts everyday spending with multipliers across a range of categories. Travel, especially, is where the Reserve shines. Cardholders earn: 8 points per dollar on all purchases through Chase Travel℠, including The Edit℠ 4 points per dollar on flights and hotels booked direct 3 points per dollar on dining worldwide 1 point per dollar spent on all other purchases If you're concerned about unlocking enough value with the card to offset its large annual fee, we recommend digging through the card's list of perks and benefits to make sure they align with your lifestyle and spending habits before applying. The updated version of the Reserve includes a $300 annual statement credit for StubHub or Viagogo purchases, annual DoorDash and Lyft credits, a $300 travel credit, and statement credits toward The Edit collection hotels, Sapphire Reserve Exclusive Tables restaurants and Peloton memberships. Was this article helpful?
Tom's Guide
5 days ago
- Tom's Guide
I tested Waze vs. Google Maps for a weekend trip — and there's a clear winner
When I was younger, driving anywhere included figuring out the ultimate challenge: who you would trust with the map. This constant issue was soon replaced by the ever faithful, if limited, TomTom. However, with the rise of smartphones, we had a new way to find our way, the map apps. There have been several apps that help you find your way around, but obviously the most well-known is Google Maps. However, while Google might be the most well-known, there are a couple of competitors, including Apple Maps. However, there is a third option, and it's one that I never really considered: Waze. For some reason, I never really bothered with Waze, partially because I am one of those people who never really change my app when I find one that works. I've been using Google Maps to chart my journey for years, but could it be time for a change? I decided to test the two apps to see which is better for me. To do this, I took both apps and had them navigate an hour-long trip for me, to see which offers the best information and the best overall route. I also wanted to see what the difference was in settings and what was unique about each app, even though both are owned by Google. I never really considered 'setting up' to be a part of a map app, but as it turns out, I was wrong when it comes to Waze. The app is full of options and features, including being able to add a variety of voices to relay directions to you. I have to say, having the option to have Halo's Master Chief was certainly novel, although it was odd that Cortana wasn't an option. Not only that, you can create a full profile on Waze, including a user name, that other people can see when on the app. Honestly, this addition is just confusing to me. Why would I want people whom I don't know to know where I am, and what speed I was going? On top of that, I'm not entirely sure why I would need to know that other people are using the app, other than Waze just showing off. Thankfully, you can turn this option off, which is the choice I went with. Google is much simpler, and doesn't really worry about you needing a profile or showing you other drivers.. There are some voice options, but honestly, I usually turn them off as they interrupt whatever you're listening to on Apple Music or Spotify. You can also set your home address, as well as your office and other sites you constantly visit, but that's about it. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. The first thing I have to mention is that Waze is entirely about driving, so it doesn't offer directions for taking public transport or even walking. Meanwhile, Google Maps is a lot more comprehensive, even if the London Underground's hectic schedule faults and issues can make it have a digital migraine. With that said, both services claim to offer up-to-date traffic information, although Waze has it constantly visible, which I honestly prefer. This allows for more planning, but it can make the actual screen a bit too cluttered, which led me to worry a bit more about issues that I would never see. Meanwhile, Google makes you aware of certain points of interest in your journey, like speed cameras, but doesn't indicate them outside of your route. Both apps also offer digital speedometers, although neither was all that accurate. I wouldn't recommend telling the police that your map app said you were going 50, no matter how convincing you try to be. One thing Waze does offer is up-to-date parking information and if you've ever tried to park in London, this can be a real lifesaver. However, Google has one advantage in that it offers satellite imagery of the area around you, alongside street view. This can be a big deal when your friend forgets to tell you his address and says, 'It's the red house.' Google Maps can also work offline if you download the specific areas of the map onto your device. It's not ideal, and useless if you're in an emergency in an area you didn't download, but it's a nice option to have. So what was the drive actually like and how did the journey go? Honestly, the actual directions were pretty comparable, although Waze can get a bit confused when it comes to roads with restricted lanes. However, for the most part, they both got me where I needed to go. I will note that Google Maps does tend to take me on strange diversions, especially on longer journeys, which can be a bit of a pain. For instance, it decided I should leave a motorway, to then go straight back on the motorway a second later. It was tedious, and didn't happen nearly as much as on Waze. However, having a colored, detailed map was preferable to me over the stagnant white map that Waze uses. Meanwhile, Waze tended to avoid too much detail when it came to the roads, which is odd considering how much other stuff was rammed on the screen. This not only makes the screen look really cluttered, but it also makes it harder to focus on the route I am meant to be taking, which can be a bit confusing. The good news is that you can limit what you see on the map and I think you really should. However, one thing both do is ask if certain issues are still there, like a camera. I don't know who decided that having that was safe, but you can turn off the option in the settings (although it's on by default.) Thankfully, both apps have been updated to allow you to use your voice. At the end of the day, both Waze and Google will get you from point A to point B. The main difference is in the presentation. Google is more utilitarian and allows you to go far more in-depth with your journey options, picking the best one for you. Meanwhile, Waze offers a lot more personality, including the ability to pick interesting voices while also working to keep you up to date. It's ideal for anyone looking for more personality and color in their apps, especially if you rely on having a voice tell you where to go. Overall, Google Maps' options and the ability to use it offline (with some extra steps) help it earn the win for me. I also find all the added icons with Waze to be so much noise and irrelevant to what I want from a navigation app. A lot of this is down to personal preference, so let me know which app you prefer right in the comments.
