Daycare owner faces Rs 10k penalty for hiring a minor
Assistant labour commissioner Ayush Pandey said that the owner of 'Blipee' faces a penalty of up to Rs 10,000 if found guilty of knowingly employing a minor as an attendant at the facility.
The attendant was sent to a correctional home by the Juvenile Justice Board for allegedly beating and biting a 15-month-old toddler earlier this month. A CCTV footage, obtained by the police, showed the attendant pinning the child to the ground, slapping and biting her repeatedly because the child wouldn't stop crying.
You Can Also Check:
Noida AQI
|
Weather in Noida
|
Bank Holidays in Noida
|
Public Holidays in Noida
|
Gold Rates Today in Noida
|
Silver Rates Today in Noida
During interrogation, she told cops that she was a 16-year-old and was hired at the facility weeks ago without any formal training. However, Charu, who is yet to be arrested, had claimed that the teenager was only hired as an attendant after she produced a society card that specified her age as 21. Police have also found an Aadhaar card that shows the girl's age was 21.
"We have asked the minor to produce documents like a school certificate to prove her age, as the Aadhaar card is not considered age proof.
As per her statement, she was born in 2009. So, we have sent an inspection note to the chief judicial magistrate where the case is being heard further so that the owner can be investigated by the police," Pandey said.
An inspection note is a written record of observations made by a labour inspector during an inspection of a workplace or establishment. It details the findings of the inspection, including any violations of labour laws or regulations, and serves as a basis for further action, such as issuing notices, imposing penalties, or requiring corrective measures.
Meanwhile, the child welfare commission has recorded the statements of the owner of the daycare and is in the process of recording the statements of the AOA of the society.
"Once we have all the statements, we will submit our suggestions to the investigating officer on what action, if any, can be taken against the owner and the AOA, and sections may be added to the FIR," CWC chairperson KC Virmani said.
Stay updated with the latest local news from your
city
on
Times of India
(TOI). Check upcoming
bank holidays
,
public holidays
, and current
gold rates
and
silver prices
in your area.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
22 minutes ago
- Economic Times
ETtech Explainer: What's the way forward for gaming industry after Lok Sabha clears Online Gaming Bill?
ETtech The Lok Sabha on Wednesday passed the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025, seeking a blanket ban on real money gaming in India, minutes after it was introduced in the House. The government says this move addresses the risks of fraud, money laundering, and terror financing and encourages the growth of e-sports and skill-based online games in the country. However, industry stakeholders warn that the outright prohibition could backfire – pushing users to illegal offshore gambling and unregulated platforms. ETtech explains the details of the bill and what happens next. First, what are online money games? According to the bill, online money games are those played by the user by 'paying fees, depositing money, or other stakes, in expectation of winning in return for money or other stake, irrespective of whether such game is based on skill, chance, or both.' These include popular games such as Poker, RummyCircle, Junglee Rummy, WinZO Ludo, BigCash, Zupee, and Money Clicker, where players put in money with the expectation of cash rewards. In contrast, skill-based games such as chess, card games played without stakes, arcade games, puzzles, and even poker in a non-monetary context are seen as tests of ability and strategy rather than betting and continue to be encouraged under the bill. Meanwhile, it excludes e-sports and online social games in both casual entertainment and skill-based formats, which do not involve any monetary stakes. What does the bill say? According to the draft bill, which was cleared in the Lok Sabha today, there will be a complete ban on online money games falling under its definition. As a result: Anyone offering these services will face imprisonment of up to three years or a fine of up to Rs 1 crore, or both. Anyone advertising such services could face up to two years of jail and/or a fine of up to Rs 50 lakh. Banks and financial institutions facilitating transactions for such games will also face penalties, including up to three years in jail or a fine of Rs 1 crore. What happens to the companies? The representatives of the Rs 27,438 crore online money gaming sector fear the prospect of being shut down. Companies such as Dream11, MPL, Games24x7, Winzo, Zupee, and publicly listed Nazara Technologies, which has stakes in Classic Rummy and PokerBaazi, could be among those hit by the legal experts noted that there will be no immediate effect. 'There will be no immediate effect, as the bill has only just been passed in the Lok Sabha. It will next move to the Rajya Sabha for discussion and then to the President for assent, so it will take some time before it becomes an Act,' Apeksha Singh, a commercial lawyer at the Bombay High Court, told ET. Also Read: Gaming bodies write to Amit Shah; urge to block blanket ban, warn of Rs 20,000 crore tax loss What about the online money gaming ecosystem?The online gaming sector currently employs more than 200,000 professionals across over 400 startups and has drawn Rs 25,000 crore in foreign direct investment (FDI).Industry leaders warn that this bill will choke foreign investment and cost the exchequer an estimated Rs 20,000 crore in lost taxes. An allied ecosystem that spends nearly Rs 6,000 crore annually on advertising, technology, and infrastructure could also take a to the bill getting passed in Lok Sabha, the All India Gaming Federation (AIGF), the E-Gaming Federation (EGF), and the Federation of Indian Fantasy Sports (FIFS) wrote a joint letter to home minister Amit Shah, saying the draft bill, which seeks to prohibit all real money games, including those based on skill, would 'strike a death knell' for the entire industry. So, why is the government pushing for this bill? After the bill was passed in the Lok Sabha, IT minister Ashwini Vaishnaw said that online money gaming has become a bigger issue than drugs in the country, and many youngsters have died by suicide after losing their savings in such an interview with ET Now, Vaishnaw said that there are three segments to the bill — e-sports, online social gaming, and online money gaming. 'This bill aims to promote the first two segments, wherein an authority will be created. There will be more schemes, employment, and the creator economy grows,' he said, adding that the bill will protect from the harm that the third segment – online money gaming – causes. What are the stakeholders saying? According to the stakeholders, the outright prohibition could backfire, pushing users to illegal offshore gambling and unregulated platforms.'A restriction will push millions of Indian users toward offshore betting websites, matka operators, and unregulated platforms, exposing them to fraud, addiction risks, and zero consumer protection,' said Rameesh Kailasam, president and CEO of an industry group representing internet startups. 'The bill seems aimed at offshore gambling and betting apps but ends up targeting law-abiding, tax-paying Indian startups.''While the government is pursuing a comprehensive ban on online gaming, its enforcement poses significant challenges,' said Rishi Agrawal, chief executive and cofounder of Teamlease Regtech, a regulatory compliance management company. 'The internet's global accessibility makes it likely that new gaming platforms will emerge worldwide, targeting vulnerable Indian youth and heightening risks such as cyberbullying, identity theft, phishing, and other scams.'Further, industry representatives are urging the government to pursue 'smart regulation' that distinguishes games of skill from games of chance, ensures user safety and responsible gaming, enforces grievance redressal, and clarifies taxation policies. Also Read: Online gaming companies prepare for legal battle against new bill Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Swiggy, Tencent backer Prosus gets Rajinikanth fan to script India AI play India's F&O boom puts spotlight on retail protection through education Can new shipping laws bury the ghost of British legacy? As big fat Indian wedding slims to budget, Manyavar loses lustre Stock Radar: Bajaj Auto showing signs of reversal after falling over 30% from highs; medium term should 'buy the dip' F&O Radar | Deploy Bull Call Ladder in JSW Steel stock to benefit from bullish outlook Time for risk-takers to come out of hibernation? 5 mid-cap stocks from different sectors with an upside potential of up to 27% Buy, Sell or Hold: Motilal Oswal initiates coverage on JSW Cement; Emkay Global sees over 30% upside in Gravita India
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
ETtech Explainer: What's the way forward for gaming industry after Lok Sabha clears Online Gaming Bill?
Anyone offering these services will face imprisonment of up to three years or a fine of up to Rs 1 crore, or both. Anyone advertising such services could face up to two years of jail and/or a fine of up to Rs 50 lakh. Banks and financial institutions facilitating transactions for such games will also face penalties, including up to three years in jail or a fine of Rs 1 crore. The Lok Sabha on Wednesday passed the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill , 2025, seeking a blanket ban on real money gaming in India, minutes after it was introduced in the government says this move addresses the risks of fraud , money laundering, and terror financing and encourages the growth of e-sports and skill-based online games in the country. However, industry stakeholders warn that the outright prohibition could backfire – pushing users to illegal offshore gambling and unregulated explains the details of the bill and what happens to the bill, online money games are those played by the user by 'paying fees, depositing money, or other stakes, in expectation of winning in return for money or other stake, irrespective of whether such game is based on skill, chance, or both.'These include popular games such as Poker, RummyCircle , Junglee Rummy, WinZO Ludo, BigCash, Zupee, and Money Clicker, where players put in money with the expectation of cash rewards. In contrast, skill-based games such as chess, card games played without stakes, arcade games, puzzles, and even poker in a non-monetary context are seen as tests of ability and strategy rather than betting and continue to be encouraged under the it excludes e-sports and online social games in both casual entertainment and skill-based formats, which do not involve any monetary to the draft bill, which was cleared in the Lok Sabha today, there will be a complete ban on online money games falling under its definition. As a result:The representatives of the Rs 27,438 crore online money gaming sector fear the prospect of being shut down . Companies such as Dream11, MPL, Games24x7, Winzo, Zupee, and publicly listed Nazara Technologies, which has stakes in Classic Rummy and PokerBaazi, could be among those hit by the legal experts noted that there will be no immediate effect.'There will be no immediate effect, as the bill has only just been passed in the Lok Sabha. It will next move to the Rajya Sabha for discussion and then to the President for assent, so it will take some time before it becomes an Act,' Apeksha Singh, a commercial lawyer at the Bombay High Court, told online gaming sector currently employs more than 200,000 professionals across over 400 startups and has drawn Rs 25,000 crore in foreign direct investment (FDI).Industry leaders warn that this bill will choke foreign investment and cost the exchequer an estimated Rs 20,000 crore in lost taxes. An allied ecosystem that spends nearly Rs 6,000 crore annually on advertising, technology, and infrastructure could also take a to the bill getting passed in Lok Sabha, the All India Gaming Federation (AIGF), the E-Gaming Federation (EGF), and the Federation of Indian Fantasy Sports (FIFS) wrote a joint letter to home minister Amit Shah, saying the draft bill, which seeks to prohibit all real money games, including those based on skill, would 'strike a death knell' for the entire the bill was passed in the Lok Sabha, IT minister Ashwini Vaishnaw said that online money gaming has become a bigger issue than drugs in the country, and many youngsters have died by suicide after losing their savings in such an interview with ET Now, Vaishnaw said that there are three segments to the bill — e-sports, online social gaming, and online money gaming.'This bill aims to promote the first two segments, wherein an authority will be created. There will be more schemes, employment, and the creator economy grows,' he said, adding that the bill will protect from the harm that the third segment – online money gaming – to the stakeholders, the outright prohibition could backfire, pushing users to illegal offshore gambling and unregulated platforms.'A restriction will push millions of Indian users toward offshore betting websites, matka operators, and unregulated platforms, exposing them to fraud, addiction risks, and zero consumer protection,' said Rameesh Kailasam, president and CEO of an industry group representing internet startups. 'The bill seems aimed at offshore gambling and betting apps but ends up targeting law-abiding, tax-paying Indian startups.''While the government is pursuing a comprehensive ban on online gaming, its enforcement poses significant challenges,' said Rishi Agrawal, chief executive and cofounder of Teamlease Regtech, a regulatory compliance management company. 'The internet's global accessibility makes it likely that new gaming platforms will emerge worldwide, targeting vulnerable Indian youth and heightening risks such as cyberbullying, identity theft, phishing, and other scams.'Further, industry representatives are urging the government to pursue 'smart regulation' that distinguishes games of skill from games of chance, ensures user safety and responsible gaming, enforces grievance redressal, and clarifies taxation policies.
Indian Express
22 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘2.27 lakh transactions using single account': CAG flags Rs 59.32-cr excess in Covid-time benefit transfers in Karnataka
A report of the Comptroller and Auditor-General (CAG) of India tabled in the Karnataka Assembly on Wednesday flagged some payments made to beneficiaries in the state during the first wave of the Covid pandemic. The CAG has found that Rs 59.32 crore was paid in excess, while 2,195 beneficiaries could not be verified. The Karnataka Building and Other Construction Welfare Board provided details of around 16.46 lakh beneficiaries to whom aid to the tune of Rs 823.12 crore was provided using direct benefit transfer during the pandemic. 'An analysis of the data provided by the Board revealed that 2,27,231 transactions were conducted multiple times using the same bank account number,' the report noted. Further, 1,08,5689 beneficiaries received benefits multiple times through various payment methods. The CAG audit identified repetitive transactions resulting in excess payments amounting to Rs 59.32 crore. The CAG report on the board said that due to incomplete data provided by the Government, the genuineness of payments amounting to Rs 1.1 crore could not be verified. Irregularities that took place during the Covid pandemic are the subject of an ongoing investigation by the Justice Michael D'Cunha Commission, which has submitted two interim reports related to the procurement of various goods and services and the distribution of benefits during the pandemic. The CAG report also highlighted the registration of ineligible people as construction workers. The CAG scrutinised randomly selected 399 applicants for registration and renewal of beneficiaries available. Its report observed that 'employment certificate furnished along with the applications did not contain the details of employment but were accepted by the Registering Officer'. Tailors, clerks, weavers, and people pursuing some other occupations were registered as construction workers and availed of the benefits, the report said.
