
With orders, investigations and innuendo, Trump and GOP aim to cripple the left
Advertisement
Scott Walter, president of the conservative watchdog group Capital Research Center, which monitors liberal money in politics, recently briefed senior White House officials on a range of donors, nonprofit groups, and fund-raising techniques. The White House group is said to be exploring what more can be done within the law.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
It is not unusual for partisans in Congress, or their outside allies, to push for investigations into political groups on the other side of the aisle.
But using the levers of government to target the opposition has long been considered an abuse of power, sometimes leading to prosecution. Trump himself was impeached in 2019 for pressuring the Ukrainian government to investigate the Bidens.
Trump's continued willingness to defy that norm — including in a grievance-filled speech at the Justice Department on Friday, during which he name-checked a litany of critics and called them 'horrible people,' 'thugs,' and 'scum' — has Democrats sounding the alarm.
'The breadth is breathtaking,' said Cole Leiter, executive director of Americans Against Government Censorship, a coalition of progressive groups and labor unions created last year to defend against an anticipated Republican assault. Taken together, Leiter said, the efforts amounted to an attempt 'to cut the legs out from their opposition.'
It may 'sound conspiratorial,' Leiter said, 'but the reality is it's a sober description of what they're trying to do.'
Advertisement
Harrison Fields, a White House spokesperson, did not directly address the accusation that the administration's actions were aimed at crippling the left. 'The Democrats don't need President Trump to dismantle the Democratic Party,' he said in a statement. 'They are self-destructing with their radical policies.'
Undermining the left would amount to follow-through on Trump's campaign promises to seek 'retribution' against his perceived enemies.
The sentiment has been echoed and expanded upon by some of Trump's closest advisers.
Billionaire Elon Musk, the top Trump donor leading the administration's cost-cutting initiative, has appeared to encourage investigations of institutions that form the financial backbone of the left. They include ActBlue, the donation platform that helps fund virtually the entire Democratic Party and that congressional Republicans are already probing, and Arabella Advisors, a consulting firm that manages difficult-to-trace 'dark money' groups that collectively have spent billions of dollars helping Democrats and their causes.
'Something stinks about ActBlue,' Musk wrote March 7, in one of several social media posts about the platform. A day later, he claimed without evidence that ActBlue was funded by Democratic megadonors including Herb Sandler, who died in 2019.
Megan Hughes, an ActBlue spokesperson, denied that the group was funded by the people Musk named, living or dead. 'The only funders that ActBlue has are small-dollar donors that work sacrificially to fund worthy campaigns and causes,' she said in a statement.
At the recent White House briefing, according to a person familiar with it, Walter presented research about ActBlue and major Democratic donors, leaving behind materials including copies of a book he published last year about Arabella.
Congressional officials say the Trump administration has signaled that it intends to throw its weight behind investigations of ActBlue in the House. And Republican Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, has suggested that ActBlue might have criminal exposure. He has also demanded documents from and threatened to subpoena another key company providing digital infrastructure for the left, Bonterra, which runs a crucial Democratic voter database system and supplies much of the party's organizing software.
Advertisement
For now, Republicans are making wild claims about illegal activity at ActBlue with little to no evidence. But congressional Republicans believe the Trump administration will be far more cooperative in providing financial records to fuel their investigations than the Biden administration was.
'This is not a partisan issue,' said Jonathan Wilcox, deputy chief of staff for Republican Representative Darrell Issa of Calif., 'and we're optimistic this Treasury Department will demonstrate a completely different commitment to public transparency and government oversight.'
Last week, several Republican lawmakers urged Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to investigate ActBlue or to help them do so. Issa sought information on claims that ActBlue had assisted groups accused of supporting terrorism. Representative James Comer of Kentucky, Nick Langworthy of New York, and Bryan Steil of Wisconsin requested reports about suspicious activity related to ActBlue.
The Treasury Department did not respond when asked if it was cooperating with the Republican congressmen.
But the terrorism accusation -- even without evidence -- is notable. A bill that passed the House, over objections from most Democrats and many in the nonprofit world, would have allowed the Treasury secretary to strip a charitable group of its tax-exempt status if it was deemed a 'terrorist-supporting' organization.
The FBI declined to say if it was acting on a request last week by Republican Representative Andy Biggs of Arizona, for an investigation of whether ActBlue had allowed Democrats 'to skirt the integrity of federal campaign finance laws,' including by processing donations that originated in hostile foreign countries. But Kash Patel, the new FBI director and a Trump loyalist, has reportedly expressed willingness to work aggressively to comply with Republican congressional oversight, and a close Trump ally predicted Monday at an event with Donald Trump Jr. that the FBI would take action 'soon' on ActBlue.
Advertisement
The group has denied Republican claims of wrongdoing. Hughes said ActBlue was 'meeting this moment with the same resilience and determination that have fueled our work for decades.'
But Democrats worry that ActBlue may offer a harbinger of what is in store for other important Democratic institutions.
This article originally appeared in
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
8 minutes ago
- CNBC
CCTV Script 12/08/2025
On Monday, local time, U.S. President Trump nominated E.J. Antoni, Chief Economist of the conservative think tank Heritage Foundation, to serve as the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). This move comes shortly after Trump criticized the unfavorable U.S. employment data as being manipulated and subsequently dismissed the previous commissioner. The market has been closely watching who would take over the position and whether this change would impact the statistical reporting of U.S. economic data. Antoni's appointment still requires confirmation by the U.S. Senate before he can officially assume the role. He has long been a critic of the BLS, advocating for a comprehensive, top-to-bottom review of the bureau. Prior to Trump's public criticism and the dismissal of the previous commissioner, the BLS had been a relatively low-profile agency, rarely entering the public eye. It operates under the U.S. Department of Labor but maintains a degree of independence. The BLS is responsible for collecting crucial data on employment, inflation, and wages, which serve as vital references for business and policy decisions, emphasizing the importance of being free from political interference. In addition to the change in leadership, the BLS is also facing challenges and controversies due to budget cuts. Some analysts have noted that due to insufficient staffing, the BLS has ceased collecting inflation data in certain cities, relying more on estimation methods. Recently, concerns about the credibility of the BLS economic data have also begun to emerge on Wall Street. This raises questions about the potential impact of these changes on the accuracy and reliability of the data that businesses and policymakers depend on. Prominent figures, including Jeffrey Gundlach, known as the "Bond King," and Michael Gapen, an economist at Morgan Stanley, have expressed concerns that U.S. economic data has become unreliable. They argue that this could lead to skepticism about the quality of data released by U.S. government agencies. Currently, the market is closely watching the upcoming release of the U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI) report for July, scheduled for Tuesday local time. This inflation report is expected to provide critical insights into the state of the economy. Analysts point out that concerns over inflation data performance led to a decline in the three major U.S. stock indices overnight. Market forecasts suggest that the July CPI will show a monthly increase of 0.2% and a yearly increase of 2.8%. When excluding volatile food and energy prices, the core CPI is expected to rise 0.3% monthly and 3.1% yearly. The market is also hoping to glean signals from the latest inflation data regarding the Federal Reserve's potential rate-cut path. However, Wall Street remains divided on the timing of rate cuts. One camp believes the Fed will cut rates as early as September, arguing that such a move is overdue. This divergence in expectations highlights the uncertainty surrounding monetary policy and its impact on the economy. 'I think the rate right now is modestly because rates are lower, therefore stocks must go higher, but the damage that perhaps modestly restrictive rates are doing to the economy and eventually corporate profits would be reduced." However, another camp believes that the Federal Reserve will continue to wait and see, monitoring the impact of tariffs on inflation before making any decisions. "We don't think it'd be September, so the Fed will take this time. Powell, if he doesn't have too much pressure, will continue at his path, which we believe is the case, and we'll likely see the Fed act in December and then aggressively act next year. " Morgan Stanley and Bank of America both predict that the Federal Reserve will not cut rates this year, while JP Morgan Chase anticipates three rate cuts in 2025.


Wall Street Journal
8 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Gold Edges Lower Amid Prospects of Easing Geopolitical Tensions
2351 GMT — Gold edges lower in the early Asian session amid prospects of easing geopolitical tensions that typically reduce the safe-haven appeal of the precious metal. Although Friday's meeting between U.S. President Trump and Russian President Putin ended without any breakthrough, Trump told European leaders that he was open to offering U.S. security guarantees to Ukraine, according to several European officials. Trump said Putin had accepted that any peace in the Russia-Ukraine conflict would need to include the presence of Western troops in Ukraine. Spot gold is 0.2% lower at $3,327.58/oz. (

8 minutes ago
High-stakes meeting on Ukraine's future to take place in DC
European and NATO leaders are set to join Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy for a face-to-face meeting with President Donald Trump at the White House. August 17, 2025