Man Tells Fiancée Her Friend Can't Bring 'Deadbeat' Boyfriend to the Wedding
The boyfriend is "a complete misogynist and all-around deadbeat," has a collection of inappropriate photos of his girlfriend's friends as well as multiple restraining orders against him
"The last thing I would want is for my fiancée to feel uneasy at her own wedding but I don't feel comfortable having Rick around," the groom wroteA groom-to-be is putting his foot down when it comes to the wedding's guest list.
In a post to Reddit's AITA forum, the groom wrote about a hitch in the guest list: one of the bride's friends has an "insanely rude" boyfriend whom the groom personally and strongly dislikes. But now the groom's refusal to invite the boyfriend to the wedding is causing drama in his fiancée's friend group.
The groom, 26, was sorting out wedding invitations with the bride, 28, when they "came across an issue," the post read. The bride's friend, Emily, is dating a man named Rick, and for as long as the groom has known Emily, she's complained to the couple about everything Rick — "a complete misogynist and all-around deadbeat" — does.
"He would stalk her at every bar, and do a bunch of weird s---, and almost like an African wild dog (they hunt by wearing down their prey), eventually I guess he wore her out until they started dating?" the groom wrote.
Thus the groom developed a "well-known hatred of Rick," he wrote. He argued that "everyone hates Rick," including all of Emily's friends. The man had apparently collected inappropriate photos of Emily's friends, the groom wrote, and has multiple restraining orders against him. He "humiliates Emily publicly for amusement" and overall makes most women around him uncomfortable, he added. Furthermore, the groom's family is mostly made up of women, and he doesn't want to subject them to Rick's behavior at the wedding, he said.
Before Rick and Emily started dating, the groom was vocal about his animosity towards him, so after they got together, "Emily excludes me from all events involving my fiancée's friend group," he wrote.
As the bride and groom were sending out wedding invitations, the groom noticed Rick's name on the list and put his foot down: he didn't want Rick at their wedding. But the bride grew upset, noting that the ultimatum would harm her friend group's dynamic.
"She told me that if this were to go through it would cause Emily to not come at all which would potentially cause even more drama with her friend group which would lead to potentially to a situation that would ruin the wedding," the groom wrote.
Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from juicy celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
He added, "The last thing I would want is for my fiancée to feel uneasy at her own wedding but I don't feel comfortable having Rick around."
Those in the comments agreed with the groom — and pointed out that the bride seemed to have a habit of putting her friend group's interests above her fiancé's boundaries. The pattern didn't just start with the wedding invitations, one argued — it began when she allowed the friend group to ice out her partner instead of Emily's.
"Your fiancé is fine with you being excluded by Emily and Rick but is throwing a tantrum at Rick receiving the same treatment because Emily will throw her own tantrum!" another wrote. "Emily's feelings and 'drama' is more important to your fiancee than you!"
Read the original article on People
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNET
24 minutes ago
- CNET
I'm Rethinking Amusement Park Rides for Good After Watching Netflix's 'Critical' Docuseries
Each week, Netflix releases a list of the Top 10 films and TV shows dominating the platform, and for the week of July 21, the new original docuseries Critical: Between Life and Death made a big impression on viewers, ranking No. 7 in the platform's most-watched shows. While medical shows -- including series like The Pitt, Pulse and ER -- have always been popular, Critical is an unscripted documentary that depicts real-life emergencies as they're happening. What makes it so captivating is the intensity and high stakes of these situations, and there's no shying away from the blood, open wounds and emotionally distraught patients and their friends and family here. Interestingly, the show fell out of the Top 10 pretty quickly -- after its first week, it dropped. That's not to say it's not popular, but my personal theory is that it has proven a little too intense for some people. That was my reaction, anyway. After a couple of episodes, I couldn't keep pace with all the grim, traumatic events. In fact, I'm shocked I kept watching after the first episode, which featured four people getting thrown from or crushed by a malfunctioning amusement park ride. Being that this is the height of summer and there's a Six Flags nearby that my kids and I frequent regularly, this is not what I wanted to see, and seeing this real incident unfold may have turned me off of fairs and amusement parks for good. I can't be the only person who gets a nagging feeling any time I board any kind of thrill ride that something terrible could happen, that I'm an accomplice to my own Final Destination death scene and here it is, proof that those fears -- while obviously not common -- can come true. The episode depicts the hospital call centers that are first notified of the ride collapse, and we witness ambulances, helicopters and emergency responders dispatched to the scene, later returning with their patients, most of whom are unresponsive. As the four patients injured at the funfair (as it's referred to on the show) are sent to several trauma centers around London, 40 cameras follow them and the health professionals who are helping them. We're given a front row seat to all of their treatments as their bodies are cut open, scans are taken and they're assessed for physical and neurological damage. I'm someone who gets grossed out by Dr. Pimple Popper videos, so there were several moments while watching this show where I had to look away. (Spoiler alert: The patients do get an epilogue of sorts where we learn that all of them not only survived but are back to leading healthy, relatively normal lives.) Netflix The show does address the fact that 50% of calls to the trauma centers in London are because of violence; accidents such as this one are much less common. And yet even with that in mind, I will panic forever at the idea that the giant spinner ride at the fair is going to dislodge and become a flying projectile. Critical: Between Life and Death is a remarkable show for just how close the filmmakers are allowed to get to such life-threatening action but watching the show made me realize some fears I didn't even know I had. At least while watching The Pitt, there was a sense of relief that it wasn't real. Here, there's no such comfort.
Geek Wire
24 minutes ago
- Geek Wire
Have we hit ‘Peak AI'? Microsoft, Amazon, and a pivotal week for Seattle tech
This week on the GeekWire Podcast: Microsoft soars past Wall Street expectations, briefly hitting a $4 trillion valuation, while Amazon faces sharper scrutiny over its AI strategy. We break down the contrasting earnings results, analyst reactions, and what it all means for the future of AI — and Seattle's place in it. Plus: insights from Microsoft's Mustafa Suleyman on the future of Copilot, a throwback lesson from the Zune era, and a guestbook entry that shows just how mainstream ChatGPT has become. Related stories and links Recommended listens (final segment) Subscribe to GeekWire in Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen.
Forbes
25 minutes ago
- Forbes
NYT ‘Connections' Hints And Answers For Sunday, August 3rd
Looking for Saturday's NYT Connections hints, clues and answers instead? You can find them here: Stuck on today's NYT Connections puzzle? Don't worry — we've got you covered. Whether you need just a gentle nudge or the full set of answers, this guide will walk you through the hints, clues, and solutions for the Sunday, July 27th edition of The New York Times's Connections. Read on for help grouping those tricky words and completing today's challenge without spoilers — unless you want them! New York Times Connections Guide Sunday July 27th It's August at last, though if we're being honest it feels like 2025 is moving by a little quickly. We just keep hurtling through time. This decade feels quite a lot faster so far than my 30s were. I barely remember my 20s at this point! Be sure to check out my streaming guide if you're looking for some new shows or movies to check out this weekend. There's a lot of good stuff out at the beginning of the month. FEATURED | Frase ByForbes™ Unscramble The Anagram To Reveal The Phrase Pinpoint By Linkedin Guess The Category Queens By Linkedin Crown Each Region Crossclimb By Linkedin Unlock A Trivia Ladder In any case, we have a Connections to solve, so let's group some words! Connections is the second-most popular NYT Games puzzle game outside of the main crossword itself, and an extremely fun, free offering that will get your brain moving every day. Play it right here. The goal is to take a group of 16 words and find links between four pairs of four of them. They could be specific categories of terms, or they could be little world puzzles where words may come before or after them you need to figure out. And they get more complicated from there. There is only one set of right answers for this, and you only get a certain number of tries so you can't just spam around until you find something. There are difficulty tiers coded by color, which will usually go from yellow, blue/green to purple as difficulty increases, so know that going in and when you start linking them together. You pick the four words you think are linked and either you will get a solve and a lit up row that shows you how you were connected. If you're close, it will tell you that you're one away. Again, four mistakes you lose, but if you want to know the answers without failing, either come here, or delete your web cookies and try again. If you want to play more puzzles, you can get an NYT Games subscription to access the full archives of all past puzzles. These are the hints that are laid out on the puzzle board itself, but after that, we will get into spoiler territory with some hints and eventually the answers. First, here are today's Connections words: Alright, the full spoilers follow here as we get into what the groups are today: The full-on answers are below for each group, finally inserting the four words in each category. Spoilers follow if you do not want to get this far. The Connections answers are: They tried to fool us with the animals today. BUG and CRICKET could easily go with BEETLE if there were one more insect in the list. And PARROT goes nicely with BIRD. But CRICKET is a sport, like GOLF and POLO and SQUASH. Had they included more vegetables it would have been trickier. And PARROT is a verb that means COPY or ECHO. Besides, The Beatles aren't spelled BEETLE so this is a little misleading in a not so great way. Still, this was pretty simple as far as Connections go. Find more guides to Wordle, Strands and the Mini Crossword on my blog where you can also follow me for TV and movie and video game coverage. Read my weekend streaming guide right here.
