Man, 21, hospitalised due to risky 'sounding' sex act involving a USB cable
The unnamed college student inserted the object into his urethra—the tube in the penis that carries urine out of the body—as part of a dangerous practice called 'sounding'.
But the thick cable—which he had inserted in a U-shaped loop leaving both ends hanging outside of him—had gotten stuck, requiring an urgent trip to A&E.
American medics, who reported the case, said their patient admitted to having inserted objects like 'cotton swabs and wire cables' in a similar manner before.
But on this occasion he found himself unable to extract the USB cable.
Scans show how the man had pushed the looped cable so deep inside his urethra that it had entered his bladder, where it then become lodged.
Writing in the journal Cureus, the medics said that initial attempts by staff to pull the cable out by hand were unsuccessful.
As a result, they decided to anaesthetise the man and attempted to extract the cable using special tools inserted into the urethra.
This proved successful and the cable was 'gently' pulled out until it could be snipped with scissors and each section extracted more easily.
After keeping him in hospital for a week for monitoring, the man was then discharged with painkillers and antibiotics.
One month later he returned to hospital for a follow up which showed he had suffered no long term problems from his ordeal.
Writing in the report the medics noted: 'Self-insertion of objects into the urethra for sexual or other reasons is rare but can cause serious harm.'
Known risks include an infection, which can in turn lead to life-threatening sepsis as permanent damage to the reproductive organs.
If inserted objects reach the bladder, it also carries the potential of rupturing the organ.
Sounding is a sexual kink whereby people, mostly men, insert long thin objects into their urethra.
Examples of objects previously used include forks, telephone cables metal piping, nail clippers, an allen key, needles, olive seeds, batteries, a skipping rope, a coyote rib, and even a decapitated snake.
While most famously done for sexual pleasure the act is has carried out by people with serious mental health conditions as well as men undertaking an ill-advised attempt to maintain an erection.
UK experts have previously reported a rise in the number of men having sounding issues over the past few years.
They have blamed it the surge in men looking to 'expand their sexual activities and enhance their sexual experiences'.
How many men perform sounding is unknown.
However, the NHS in England reported treating 258 cases where patients had a 'foreign body' stuck in their urethra last financial year.
The vast majority of these cases, 231, were in men with an average patient age of 47.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
22 minutes ago
- Reuters
Report: Jerry Jones fought stage 4 cancer battle for over decade
August 13 - By Field Level Media Cowboys owner Jerry Jones revealed that he fought stage 4 melanoma for a decade, the Dallas Morning News reported. Jones was contacted by the newspaper following a comment he made during the Netflix documentary, "America's Team: The Gambler and His Cowboys." In the documentary, Jones referenced undergoing cancer treatments "about a dozen years ago," per the Dallas Morning News. Jones said he underwent treatment at the MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston in 2010. Jones, now 82, said he had four surgeries over the ensuing decade -- two involving his lungs, two involving his lymph nodes. He credits the experimental trial drug PD-1 (Programmed Cell Death Protein 1) for saving his life. "I was saved by a fabulous treatment and great doctors and a real miracle (drug) called PD-1 (therapy)," Jones said. "I went into trials for that PD-1 and it has been one of the great medicines. I have no tumors." Stage 4 melanoma means "cancer has spread beyond the skin to other organs, such as the lungs or liver," per the Mayo Clinic. According to the Dallas Morning News, the drug helps the immune system "fight cancer cells by blocking PD-1, thus enabling T cells to better recognize and destroy cancer cells."
Medical News Today
39 minutes ago
- Medical News Today
Tryngolza side effects and how to manage them
As with other drugs, Tryngolza (olezarsen) can cause side effects, such as injection site reactions and joint pain. If side effects of Tryngolza become difficult to tolerate, talk with your doctor or (olezarsen) is a brand-name injection that's prescribed to help lower triglyceride levels in adults with familial chylomicronemia syndrome. It's prescribed along with a low fat you have problems with side effects from Tryngolza, talk with your doctor or pharmacist. They can suggest ways to manage side effects or other available treatment options. Do not stop Tryngolza without consulting your doctor first.»Learn more about Tryngolza, including details about its common side effects of TryngolzaTryngolza can cause certain side effects, some of which are more common than others. These side effects may be temporary, lasting a few days to weeks. However, if the side effects persist, bother you, or become severe, be sure to talk with your doctor or pharmacist. These are just a few of the more common side effects reported by people who injected Tryngolza in clinical trials:injection site reactions, such as pain or changes in skin colorlow platelet countjoint painFor more information about some of these side effects, see the 'Managing side effects' side effects of TryngolzaMild side effects can occur with Tryngolza use. This list may not include all possible mild side effects of the drug. To find out more, you can refer to Tryngolza's prescribing side effects that have been reported with Tryngolza include:injection site reactions, such as pain or changes in skin colorlow platelet countjoint painThese side effects may be temporary, lasting a few days to weeks. However, if the side effects continue, worsen, or become too difficult to tolerate, be sure to talk with your doctor or After the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approves a drug, it tracks and reviews side effects of the medication. Sharing your experience helps make medications safer for everyone by giving doctors and researchers more information about how the drug works in real life. If you develop a side effect during treatment with Tryngolza and want to tell the FDA about it, visit MedWatch or call more information about some of these side effects, see the 'Managing side effects' side effects of TryngolzaSerious side effects from Tryngolza weren't reported in the drug's clinical trials. However, they can still occur. If you develop serious side effects during treatment with Tryngolza, call your doctor right away. If the side effects seem life threatening or you think you're having a medical emergency, immediately call 911 or your local emergency reactionFor some people, Tryngolza can cause an allergic general, symptoms of allergic reaction can be mild or to manageFor mild allergic reaction symptoms, such as a mild rash, call your doctor right away. They may recommend treatments to help manage your symptoms. They'll also let you know whether you should continue treatment with the severe allergic reaction symptoms, such as swelling or trouble breathing, call 911 or your local emergency number right away. These symptoms require immediate medical care because they can become life threatening. If you've had a serious allergic reaction to Tryngolza, your doctor may recommend taking a different medication side effectsDuring treatment with Tryngolza, you may be able to take steps to make side effects easier to manage. If you have problems with side effects that do not go away or they become worse, talk with your doctor or pharmacist. They can discuss options for managing side effects or other available treatment site reactionsInjection site reactions, such as pain or changes in skin color, were common side effects reported in studies of Tryngolza. Steps you can take to help manage symptoms associated with this side effect include:taking over-the-counter (OTC) pain medicationsapplying a cold compress to the area, such as an ice packtaking OTC antihistaminesJoint painJoint pain was a common side effect reported in studies of Tryngolza. Steps you can take to help manage symptoms associated with this side effect include:taking OTC nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, such as ibuprofen, or using topical capsaicinusing the RICE methodPrecautions for TryngolzaBefore starting Tryngolza, discuss your health history with your doctor. Tryngolza may not be right for you if you have certain medical conditions or other factors affecting your health. Be sure to talk with your doctor if any of the following apply to you:previous allergic reaction to this or a similar drugpregnancybreastfeedingDisclaimer: Medical News Today has made every effort to make certain that all information is factually correct, comprehensive, and up to date. However, this article should not be used as a substitute for the knowledge and expertise of a licensed healthcare professional. You should always consult your doctor or another healthcare professional before taking any medication. The drug information contained herein is subject to change and is not intended to cover all possible uses, directions, precautions, warnings, drug interactions, allergic reactions, or adverse effects. The absence of warnings or other information for a given drug does not indicate that the drug or drug combination is safe, effective, or appropriate for all patients or all specific uses.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
NASA's nuclear gamble on the moon faces growing skepticism
Fast-tracking a NASA plan to build a nuclear reactor on the moon may sound dubious. Experts say that's because it is. 'The whole proposal is cock-eyed and runs against the sound management of a space program that is now being starved of money,' national security analyst, nuclear expert and author Joseph Cirincione told The Independent. Nuclear has been used in space since the 1960s. That's nothing new. The U.S. launched its first test reactor into orbit in 1965, and the former Soviet Union has sent up dozens more. NASA says that a new 100-kilowatt reactor could be used to power a future base at the lunar South Pole, and fuel prospective missions to Mars and beyond. Nuclear would help to fill gaps in solar energy that occur when that side of the moon is in darkness for two weeks. The majority of space experts have said that placing a reactor on the moon is possible, so, why is NASA's current plan 'cock-eyed?' The problem is the proposed timeline. Interim NASA Administrator Sean Duffy, who also serves as President Donald Trump's Secretary of Transportation, pushed to expedite the project, detailed in a memo this week. Duffy said the administration wanted to have a nuclear reactor ready to launch by 2030. Earlier this year, China and Russia announced a plan to build a nuclear reactor for a lunar base by 2035. 'The first country to do so could potentially declare a 'keep-out' zone which would significantly inhibit the United States from establishing a planned Artemis presence if not there first,' Duffy said. NASA first announced in 2021 that it would put a reactor on the moon 'within a decade.' In 2024, NASA then said that their target date for delivery a reactor to the Earth-based launchpad was the early 2030s. But, Cirincione says essentially no progress has been made. 'It was in the last Trump administration that NASA had put out a press release, they had a YouTube video, they had these announcements about how they're going to develop these small, modular nuclear reactors for use on the moon, and it was going to be ready by 2026,' said Cirincione, who is vice-chair of the Center for International Policy, a non-profit that advocates for a peaceful approach to foreign policy. 'Oh, really? So, where is it?' Ultimately, the expert believes a nuclear reactor on the moon could take up to 20 years to become a reality. NASA would need a working launch vehicle, a small and adaptable reactor, and the ability to land on the moon. Right now, the SpaceX Starship is the only vehicle option – but it has exploded during several of its test flights. NASA has been working with Boeing on a Space Launch System - the main competitor to Space X's Starship - but that program would be canceled under the Trump administration's proposed cuts which slash 24 percent from NASA's overall budget. Landing on the moon is no picnic, and attempts by Japanese space companies in 2023 and 2025 ended in crashes. There are also the scientific and technological advances needed for the nuclear reactors. The reactors must be able to withstand harsh conditions on the moon, including temperatures swings from 250 degrees Fahrenheit during the day to minus 400 degrees at night. 'Small modular nuclear reactors, it turns out, are always just around the corner – a corner you never get to turn,' Cirincione said. Many scientists and nuclear energy experts have shared in Cirincione's skepticism. Dr. Kathryn Huff, a former nuclear energy official at the U.S. Department of Energy, and professor at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, wrote in a Bluesky social media post that she's not 'bullish' on 'unrealistic timelines.' 'The 2030 target does not align well with recent budgetary trends…' she explained in a statement, shared by the university. 'Accelerating the FSP program could come at the expense of other critical priorities, including earth science, climate observation and space-based weather forecasting – all core elements of NASA's public-serving mission.' Dr. Alfredo Carpineti, an Italian astrophysicist, wrote in IFLScience this week that the proposal is 'unfeasible.' 'Even if we allow landing the nuclear reactor on December 31, 2030, the timing is really too short for something that must not have any faults if you want to operate it safely,' Carpineti wrote. Others were more optimistic about NASA's accelerated timeline. Sebastian Corbisiero, a senior program manager at Idaho National Laboratory who leads the Energy Department's space reactor program, told The Independent that a nuclear reactor on the moon is 'doable' by 2030. 'Nuclear reactor technology has been around for decades, so its well known,' he said. 'Some key differences with a space reactor is that it needs to fit on a rocket, so there are mass and volume requirements; and that the system needs to operate in vacuum – so components will need to be built to survive that environment.' Dr. Bhavya Lal, a former associate administrator for technology, policy, and strategy at NASA, and former aerospace executive Roger Myers, recently argued that it would be possible to have nuclear reactor on the moon by 2030, and it would take $3 billion to do so. 'It's possible, but it will require serious commitment,' Lal told The Independent. But even if plans are speeded up, Lal says there's no need to worry about the prospect of the moon blowing up. It's 'simply not grounded in science,' she said.
