Defense industry likely to maintain export momentum amid tensions in Europe, Asia: experts
Such an outlook comes despite international efforts to bring an end to the Ukraine war.
"In my personal view, even if there is a cease-fire or peace agreement, I don't think the overall arms buildup in Europe will decrease," an official from a major South Korean defense firm told Yonhap News Agency on condition of anonymity. "We do not export to Ukraine or Russia, but we are monitoring the situation carefully."
An official at a different defense company said the firm was also closely monitoring the overall situation, pointing to ongoing shifts in the global security landscape.
"We need to look at how the geopolitical landscape is changing. From a business perspective, we will continue to watch these shifts closely and capture new opportunities," the official said, also asking to be unnamed.
The official added that his company was continuously "exploring cooperation with major European defense firms."
A separate industry source from another firm said the rise in overall global demand for advanced weapons systems may even accelerate.
"Personally, I think the global defense market will grow even larger, potentially providing an opportunity for the Korean defense industry," the company official said.
She noted that the Ukraine war has made countries "recognize the importance of preserving their own security."
"I predict governments will strengthen research and development in areas that can help them prepare for future battlefields, such as those involving unmanned and automated warfare," the official added.
South Korea has rapidly expanded its footprint in the global defense market in recent years amid geopolitical risks stemming from the intensifying rivalry between the United States and China, as well as security instability in Europe and the Middle East.
According to data compiled by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, the country ranked 10th in global arms exports between 2020 and 2024.
Notably, earlier this month, South Korea successfully signed a $6.5 billion deal with Poland to export a second batch of K2 tanks from Hyundai Rotem Co., marking the largest-ever export contract won by a South Korean defense contractor.
On his election campaign trail, President Lee Jae Myung pledged to foster defense exports as a major economic driver for the country, promising to turn South Korea into one of the world's top four defense powerhouses during his presidential term if elected.
Ahn Sang-nam, head of the defense industry promotion division at the Korea Defense Industry Association, said the sense of insecurity in Europe was unlikely to fade even if the conflict in Ukraine subsides.
"In my personal opinion, it will not have a major direct impact on South Korean defense exports. Russia continues to pose a threat not only to Ukraine but to the Baltic region at large, and there is a growing perception that each country needs to take charge of its own security," he said.
"Our weapons systems are highly suited for regions that truly need them, so I believe Korea's defense exports will continue their upward momentum for the time being," he added.
Such an outlook is backed by strong earnings in the sector.
According to industry data, the combined operating profit of the country's top five defense firms -- Hanwha Aerospace Co., LIG Nex1 Co., Korea Aerospace Industries Co., Hanwha Systems Co. and Hyundai Rotem -- surged 161 percent on-year to 2.34 trillion won ($1.69 billion) in the first half of this year, reaching 80 percent of their annual earnings in 2024.
In February, Seok Jong-gun, minister of the Defense Acquisition Program Administration, anticipated that, including projects rolled over from last year, South Korea is poised to post its largest-ever defense export results in 2025.
Despite the overall positive outlook for the sector, Ahn said it was "difficult for the industry to guarantee its success in the following decade," stressing the need to continue investments in the field to generate future growth engines. (Yonhap)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
![[Editorial] Focus on jobs](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fall-logos-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fkoreaherald.com.png&w=48&q=75){kind=small}
Korea Herald
4 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Editorial] Focus on jobs
Economic cost of discouraged youth estimated at 44 trillion won over 5 years The economic cost of young people who "just rested" while not actively seeking employment is estimated to have totaled 44.5 trillion won ($31.8 billion) for the five years spanning 2019 to 2023, according to a Federation of Korean Industries study on Monday. The cost was calculated on the assumption that they missed out on earning about 80 percent of the wages that employed youth earned. The population of young Koreans aged 15-29 shrank by 870,000 over the same span, while the number of "discouraged youth" increased from 360,000 to 400,000. The number of college graduates who just rested and their share in discouraged youth are noteworthy: They increased in both cases — from 132,500 to 153,400 and from 36.8 percent to 38.3 percent. In February, the number of discouraged youth topped 500,000 for the first time. The problem is not that young people are not willing to work, but that there are not enough jobs for them. According to a recent survey of more than 2,000 manufacturing companies across the country by the Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry, over 80 percent of them were struggling for a limited share of demand in a "red ocean." About 60 percent could not afford to make new business plans. Manufacturers have historically propped up the South Korean economy, but they are in a dire situation where they dare not increase employment. Young people prefer to work at large companies, but there is a limited number of such decent jobs. To make matters worse, large companies want mostly experienced workers. This discourages many college-educated people. About 140,000 job openings were posted in the first half of the year, and 82 percent of them sought experienced staff. Less than 3 percent were set aside for job seekers without experience. Last year, college graduates accounted for 41 percent of discouraged youth, marking their largest portion on record. This, too, was attributable to companies looking for experienced staff. Labor market rigidity, which the older generation has maintained to protect their vested interests, is another problem. The seniority-based salary system and militant labor unions, coupled with pro-labor government policies, have made it difficult for companies to flexibly adjust the cost of retaining employees. These conditions make companies reluctant to expand employment. Furthermore, the older generation is even demanding that the statutory retirement age be raised to 65. According to a Bank of Korea study comparing employment among the older and younger generations after the retirement age was raised to 60 in 2016, the addition of one worker to the older group aged 55-59 led to a decrease of 0.4 to 1.5 young workers during the 2016-2024 period. A further extension of the retirement age is likely to expand the pool of discouraged youth. The average age at which a college graduate first joins a company surpassed 30 a few years ago. This was largely attributable to a tighter job market and higher qualification barriers for securing stable, regular jobs. With employment preparation taking longer, the number of discouraged youth has increased. Worse yet, the situation of young people shows no signs of improving. Last month, the number of discouraged youth reached 420,000, an all-time high for the month of July. The Korea Development Institute, one of the nation's leading think tanks, forecast that annual employment growth will contract from 160,000 jobs last year to 150,000 this year and 110,000 next year. Structural reform cannot be put off any longer. The basis of the salary system should be changed from seniority to merit. Flexibility in the labor market should be increased. Debates on raising the retirement age might as well be put on hold until youth employment conditions improve. These steps are not only for young people but also for the sustained growth of the Korean economy. Yet the government seems more interested in strengthening the rights of labor than in creating jobs. To stem the tide of discouraged youth, it needs to offer incentives for youth employment.
![[Wang Son-taek] Lessons from Kim Dae-jung's diplomacy](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F08%2F20%2Fnews-p.v1.20250820.80772b0d38a4490b8a1a127155a6a186_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
Korea Herald
4 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Wang Son-taek] Lessons from Kim Dae-jung's diplomacy
This week marks the 16th anniversary of the passing of Kim Dae-jung, former president of the Republic of Korea. Few leaders in modern Korean history left as deep and lasting an imprint on the nation's development as he did. Kim was a champion of democracy, a reformer who guided Korea through economic peril, and a statesman who dared to extend a hand of peace to the North. His life was one of survival and resilience — he overcame five near-death experiences — and those experiences shaped the philosophy and strategy that defined his diplomacy. Kim Dae-jung's diplomacy grew out of his commitment to democracy and human rights, but it was never naive. He believed in values and principles, but he also believed they should never come at the expense of the nation's core interests. What he practiced was not abstract 'values diplomacy,' but a pragmatic diplomacy built on values. This balance allowed Korea to gain moral legitimacy without sacrificing its real national interest. He did not just insist on our position while conducting diplomacy with other countries. Instead, he preferred a way in which the other side naturally supported our proposal by preparing a mutually beneficial plan. Thus, he could deal with the United States, Japan and China with confidence and dignity while not compromising our core interests. He did his best to win the support of domestic public opinion before negotiating with foreign countries in earnest. This way, he was able to be flexible in diplomatic negotiations. The highlight of his diplomacy came with the June 2000 summit in Pyongyang, the first ever meeting between the leaders of South and North Korea. His policy on North Korea was a carefully crafted strategy to reduce confrontation and open channels of dialogue and exchange. The summit was not a sudden breakthrough, but the result of deliberate and systematic preparation. Kim understood that the Korean question was not just a domestic matter but an international one. He therefore worked first to stabilize Korea's external environment. He pursued normalization with Japan, improved ties with China, strengthened policy coordination with Washington, and sought to defuse potential points of friction between Pyongyang and Washington. Only after these foundations were laid did he move forward with the inter-Korean summit. This was a display of sophisticated and calculated diplomacy, a demonstration that peace initiatives must be embedded in a wider international framework to succeed. Kim did not see North Korea merely as an enemy to be contained, but also as a partner with whom reconciliation and reunification were both possible and necessary. This perspective was not sentimental but strategic. It aimed to ease tension on the peninsula, stabilize the regional security environment, and ultimately integrate the Korean question into a broader peace order in Northeast Asia. For these efforts, he won the Nobel Peace Prize, the first Korean leader to receive the honor, and in doing so elevated Korea's international standing. Kim's diplomacy was never divorced from economic statecraft. He took office at the height of the Asian financial crisis, when Korea faced its gravest economic collapse since the Korean War. With steely resolve, he negotiated with the International Monetary Fund and major powers, restoring international confidence in Korea. At home, he pushed painful reforms, demanding sacrifices but also laying the foundation for recovery. At the same time, he looked ahead and planted the seeds of the digital economy. His promotion of broadband infrastructure, IT development and human capital training transformed Korea into a leader of the information age. He also foresaw the power of culture as a diplomatic tool. By promoting the cultural industries as strategic assets, supporting content exports, easing the "screen quota" system that had restricted American movies in Korea, and even opening to Japanese popular culture, Kim created the conditions for what later became the Korean Wave. Cultural diplomacy, he understood, builds soft power, enhances national image and strengthens ties between peoples. Today's Hallyu owes much to the vision of Kim Dae-jung, who saw culture not only as entertainment but as diplomacy. His approach anticipated the way nations today use culture, technology and communication to project influence in a globalized world. These legacies speak loudly to our own turbulent moment. The world is again in flux. The return of President Donald Trump to the White House has shaken the international order. His tariff policies have imposed enormous stress on Korea, too, forcing Korean businesses to endure unfavorable conditions in the US market and putting the government under new economic and diplomatic pressure. At the same time, some in the Trump administration are promoting policies under the banner of 'alliance modernization,' but they distort and weaken the US-Korea alliance, creating unnecessary losses for both countries. Though the current challenges we are facing are quite difficult, we can manage the alliance with the US if we do not forget the basic elements of sophisticated diplomacy that Kim Dae-jung showed a couple of decades ago. Kim Dae-jung's diplomacy demonstrated that confrontation is not the only path, that dialogue and trust can serve national interest more effectively than hostility. He showed that diplomacy requires patience, preparation and the ability to connect domestic needs with international realities. He also showed the courage to take political risks for peace, understanding that leadership sometimes means moving ahead of public opinion to open new horizons. And above all, he proved that values and pragmatism are not mutually exclusive but can reinforce each other when guided by principle and anchored in the national interest. On this anniversary of his passing, we should not only honor Kim Dae-jung's achievements but also recall the wisdom of his diplomacy. His legacy is not a matter of nostalgia but a living guide for today's challenges. When diplomacy seems blocked and the world uncertain, his vision and determination remind us that breakthroughs come not from force or bravado, but from mutual understanding and peaceful coexistence. That is the enduring lesson of DJ diplomacy. Wang Son-taek is an adjunct professor at Sogang University. He is a former diplomatic correspondent at YTN and a former research associate at Yeosijae. The views expressed here are the writer's own. — Ed.
Korea Herald
11 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Lee to meet Bill Gates to discuss global health issues, collaboration
President Lee Jae Myung plans to meet Bill Gates, chair of the Gates Foundation and Microsoft Corp. co-founder, in Seoul on Thursday, the presidential office said Wednesday. Gates, who has spearheaded initiatives on climate change, poverty reduction and global health through the foundation, is visiting South Korea to reportedly explore cooperation with Korean pharmaceutical companies on a vaccine supply project for low-income countries. During the meeting at the presidential office, the two are expected to discuss global health issues and potential collaboration in the sector, according to officials. (Yonhap)
