logo
Opinion - Mass deportations are popular, but they have economic consequences

Opinion - Mass deportations are popular, but they have economic consequences

Yahoo31-01-2025

President Trump's win in the 2024 election is closely linked to voter unhappiness with the spike in U.S. inflation and the influx of immigrants across the southern border during the Biden administration.
Trump's actions on the first day of his second term included a series of orders to seal the border and to crack down on undocumented immigrants in the U.S., as well as a bid to end the birthright citizenship for children of noncitizens.
Trump's motive in making a broad crackdown on illegal immigration his top priority is that it is popular with the electorate. A recent Axios-Ipsos poll found that nine in 10 Republicans and nearly half of Democrats say they support mass deportations of unauthorized immigrants.
However, the enthusiasm wanes considerably when respondents consider various options to carry out the deportations, such as separating families or deporting those who came to the U.S. as children.
Congress is also willing to go along with Trump's wishes. On Jan. 7, the House of Representatives passed the Laken Riley Act, which makes it easier to deport unauthorized immigrants who commit crimes such as burglary, theft, larceny and shoplifting, as well as more violent offenses. On Inauguration Day, the Senate passed its version of the bill by a vote of 64 to 35, with 12 Democrats joining Republicans to vote in favor.
This invites questions about what the economic consequences would be if there were a crackdown on undocumented immigrants.
According to the Pew Research Center, about 11 million unauthorized migrants lived in the U.S. in 2022, of which 8.3 million were in the workforce. With a surge of migrants in the last two years, it is estimated there may now be 10 million unauthorized workers, representing 6 percent of the U.S. labor force. California, Florida, New York and Texas are home to nearly half of them.
One claim by proponents of mass deportations is that they are a boon for American workers. Stephen Miller, Trump's deputy chief of staff, contends that mass removals would create jobs for Americans and increase their wages. This argument assumes that unauthorized immigrant workers compete with native-born workers for similar jobs.
Several studies, however, conclude the opposite is true — namely, undocumented immigrants often take jobs that U.S. workers do not want.
A noteworthy example is a survey the National Council of Agricultural Employers conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic to find out how many unemployed Americans would take about 100,000 seasonal farm jobs. It found that only 337 people applied. The conclusion was that labor shortages (and food shortages) were likely to persist without seasonal immigrants.
A Brookings study documents the share of unauthorized immigrant workers and U.S.-born workers in the 15 most common occupations among unauthorized immigrants. The principal finding is that unauthorized immigrants take low-paying, dangerous and otherwise less attractive jobs more frequently than both native workers and authorized immigrant workers.
The Economist points out that the impact of supply bottlenecks varies considerably by sector. Agriculture is especially vulnerable, with nearly 40 percent of America's 2.5 million farmworkers estimated to be unauthorized immigrants. Housing is also likely to be impacted, with unauthorized migrants accounting for about a sixth of the homebuilding workforce.
The impact on the U.S. economy as a whole will depend on how extensive the deportations are. While Donald Trump has threatened to carry out the 'largest deportation program in American history' involving millions of migrants, the legal, logistical, financial and political obstacles make this outcome implausible.
Meanwhile, Vice President JD Vance has suggested the administration could 'start with a million…and then go from there.' A study by the Peterson Institute for International Economics found that if deportations matched the 1.3 million during President Eisenhower's 'Operation Wetback' campaign in 1956, U.S. GDP in 2028 would be 1.2 percent below its baseline projection.
Another claim about undocumented workers is they are free-riders who receive government-sponsored benefits but do not pay taxes. The government cost-cutting initiative led by Elon Musk said that illegal immigration cost U.S. taxpayers $150 billion in 2023, based on data from the Federation for American Immigration Reform.
According to Steven Camarota of the Center for Immigration Studies, the main reason is that they have a low average education levels, resulting in low tax payments, and they often qualify for welfare programs on behalf of their children.
This is not the case, however, for immigrants as a whole. A report by the Congressional Budget Office estimated that the 9 million surge in immigrants since the COVID-19 pandemic will add $1.2 trillion in federal revenues over the next 10 years, while outlays for federal mandatory programs will increase by $300 billion. One reason is that immigrants tend to be younger than native-born workers and do not derive benefits from Social Security and Medicare until they near retirement age.
Finally, while the debate about immigration today is focused on undocumented immigrants, politicians on both sides should recognize that U.S. immigration laws have not been substantially updated for 34 years. With U.S. population growth slowing due to declining fertility rates, the principal source of U.S. labor market growth will be through legal immigration.
Curbing immigration would likely translate into slower economic growth. Meanwhile, the outdated U.S. immigration laws are a key reason that many migrants to the U.S. arrive chaotically at the southern border.
Nicholas Sargen, Ph.D., is an economic consultant for Fort Washington Investment Advisors and is affiliated with the University of Virginia's Darden School of Business. He has authored three books including 'Investing in the Trump Era: How Economic Policies Impact Financial Markets.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump shrugs off possible reconciliation with Musk
Trump shrugs off possible reconciliation with Musk

Axios

timean hour ago

  • Axios

Trump shrugs off possible reconciliation with Musk

President Trump said he assumes his relationship with Elon Musk has ended and that he has no desire to repair it after the pair publicly fell out last week. "I think it's a shame that he's so depressed and so heartbroken," Trump said of the billionaire in a phone call with NBC News' Kristen Welker. The big picture: Trump's comments also came with a warning to Musk when the president said the Tesla CEO could face "serious consequences" should he fund Democratic candidates in the next election running against Republicans who vote for Trump's "big, beautiful bill." The billionaire, who contributed more than $290 million to Republicans in the 2024 election but has since said he'd cut back on political spending, posted last week that politicians "who betrayed the American people" should be fired in November. Trump declined to elaborate on what the consequences would be for Musk. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said in a Sunday interview on ABC's "This Week" that it would be a "big mistake" for Musk to go after Republicans who vote for the bill. Driving the news: Trump said he has no plans to speak to the Tesla CEO during the Saturday phone interview with Welker. Asked if he thought his relationship with Musk was over, Trump said he "would assume so." He accused the once-close administration ally of being "disrespectful to the office of the President." Catch up quick: The alliance between Trump and the former chainsaw-wielding face of DOGE exploded last week as Musk continuously campaigned against the massive tax-and-spending package, blasting it as a "disgusting abomination." Speaking to reporters during an Oval Office appearance alongside German Chancellor Friedrich Merz Thursday, Trump said he was "very disappointed" in Musk, who he claimed was very familiar with the inner workings of the legislation. While Trump talked, Musk fired back in real-time on X, claiming in one post that Trump would have lost the election without him. Zoom in: In one post that appears to have been deleted, Musk accused the president of being "in the Epstein files." Trump told NBC that it's "old news."

Big Beautiful Bill Looks To Reverse Affordable Care Act Coverage Gains
Big Beautiful Bill Looks To Reverse Affordable Care Act Coverage Gains

Forbes

timean hour ago

  • Forbes

Big Beautiful Bill Looks To Reverse Affordable Care Act Coverage Gains

The House budget reconciliation bill, dubbed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' includes large cuts in Medicaid spending that could lead to millions of newly uninsured individuals if the legislation passes in the Senate. The proposed law also contains provisions that alter the Affordable Care Act exchange landscape, potentially leading to millions more uninsured. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that at least five million current marketplace enrollees would lose coverage by 2034. The nonpartisan and policy research firm KFF says the number of people with marketplace plans could shrink even more, by around eight million. Changes in the ACA marketplace would make coverage more expensive, as enhanced tax credits expire, and harder to obtain as open enrollment windows shorten, the paperwork burden for beneficiaries increases and automatic re-enrollment ends. Americans who purchase health coverage through the ACA marketplace exchanges could also soon face higher out-of-pocket maximums in their coverage plans, which means higher cost-sharing. The United States Treasury Department announced in Sept. 2024 that almost 50 million people have obtained healthcare coverage through marketplace exchanges created by the ACA since its enactment more than a decade ago. The Department data show that one in seven Americans have been or are covered by the law. And between President Biden's inauguration in Jan. 2021 and Sept. 2024, 18.2 million Americans got ACA coverage for the first time. Rising enrollment since 2021 has been driven by an expansion under the Biden Administration of premium tax credits to include individuals and families with household incomes up to 400% of the federal poverty level, which equates to $58,000 for a single person and $120,000 for a family of four. Republican lawmakers in both the House and Senate, in concert with the Trump administration, are now looking to reverse some of those gains. The ACA has gone through a tumultuous history since it was signed in 2010. The law has faced repeated calls for repeal by Republicans. For several years following its passage it wasn't a particularly well-liked piece of legislation, Yet the ACA is now more popular than ever, with over 60% of the public having a favorable view of the law, according to KFF. The ACA is a comprehensive reform bill, passed by Congress in 2010, that increases health insurance coverage for the uninsured and implements a wide range of reforms to the health insurance market as well as an expansion of Medicaid, the public insurance program that provides health coverage to low-income families and individuals. Importantly, under the ACA, individuals who may have been uninsured due to preexisting conditions or limited finances can secure affordable health plans through the health insurance marketplaces established by the law. The demographics of people on Medicaid are fairly similar to those enrolled in ACA plans. The legislation has its critics. They point to certain flaws in design and implementation, Indeed, in the early years under the Obama Administration, insurers exited in droves and premiums rates increased substantially. Under the first Trump administration, ACA enrollment fell overall while numbers of uninsured rose by more than two million. Following unsuccessful efforts to scuttle the ACA, the president issued executive orders to 'improve ACA market dynamics.' ACA exchanges did stabilize in the latter half of Trump's first term as insurers returned and the rate of premium growth decreased. When Biden assumed office, his administration sought to enlarge the ACA program and counter several of the changes implemented by the first Trump administration that had shrunk its size. The Biden administration was largely successful in terms of increasing the number of people who signed up in the ACA exchanges and reducing the percentage of Americans without health insurance. Troubled times for folks enrolled in the ACA exchanges aren't solely because of possible passage of the budget reconciliation bill. CVS Health announced last month it will pull Aetna out of the ACA marketplace in 2026, leaving about one million people across 17 states searching for new healthcare coverage. Aetna's withdrawal from the marketplace will mark the second time the carrier stepped away from the ACA exchanges. The company left the ACA marketplace in 2018 and came back in 2022. Other carriers left the individual health insurance marketplace in 2017 and 2018 amid uncertainty over whether the ACA would be repealed or replaced. While there isn't the same kind of uncertainty now regarding the ACA's survival, disruption is occurring in the space. This could soon lead to more carriers exiting the market.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store