Lumen narrows loss, lifts free cash flow forecast on tax savings
Lumen Technologies
on Thursday reported a smaller-than-expected second-quarter loss and raised its full-year
free cash flow
forecast by more than 60%, helped by cost savings from President Trump's tax cut legislation.
The
telecom and networking
firm posted an adjusted loss of 3 cents per share, compared with analysts' expectations of a 26-cent loss, according to data compiled by LSEG.
Lumen now expects 2025 free cash flow between $1.2 billion and $1.4 billion, up from a prior range of $700 million to $900 million.
"We're taking it up considerably because of strong performance, but also because of the new tax bill, that definitely benefited us and that allows us to invest," CFO Chris Stansbury told Reuters in an interview.
The new tax law enables companies such as Lumen to deduct more interest expenses and speed up how quickly they write off big investments, boosting near-term cash flow.
Revenue for the quarter ended June 30 was $3.09 billion, slightly below analysts' average estimate of $3.11 billion.
The shortfall included a $46 million giveback tied to the FCC's
Rural Digital Opportunity Fund
(RDOF), following the sale of Lumen's consumer fiber business to
AT&T
.
Lumen agreed in May to sell its consumer fiber business to AT&T for $5.75 billion in cash, a move aimed at sharpening its enterprise focus and reducing
capital expenditures
.
The company also recorded a one-time non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $628 million tied to the divestiture, contributing to a net loss of $915 million for the quarter.
Stansbury said the divestiture would reduce annual capital expenditures by about $1 billion while trimming adjusted core earnings by $150 million.
Lumen reaffirmed its full-year adjusted EBITDA guidance of $3.2 billion to $3.4 billion and said it expects to reach the high end of that range.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
7 minutes ago
- Mint
Vijay L Bhambwani's Ticker: Markets will revert to fundamentals
Dear reader, Last week, I wrote about retail traders latching on to a slender hope and the impending Trump-Putin meeting in Alaska triggering a hope-based rally. The executive order signed by Trump to funnel US retirement savings plan 401(k) into riskier assets like stocks and cryptocurrencies triggered some greed. As I wrote last week, big-ticket retirement savings in stock markets have not done well in the past, and a near-term benefit is all we might get. The Trump-Putin meeting in Alaska turned out to be a damp squib with no resolution of the Russia-Ukraine war. Apart from future meetings to thrash out the thornier issues, there seems to be little hope of concrete gains from this exercise, at least for now. The markets will now revert to the usual triggers like retail buying, corporate earnings, cost of funds and inflation, among others. State Bank of India and Union Bank of India announced a 0.25% hike in home loan rates and validated my hypothesis that the cost of funds was rising in spite of headline coupon rate cuts. I had written that borrowers would be unable to avail of loans at the headline rates. Market players had positioned their trades in anticipation of a favourable outcome of the Trump-Putin meeting, and there is a fair probability of some positions being reversed this week. Traders displayed a higher risk appetite for riskier assets and booked profits in bullion. Safe-haven buying may emerge again in bullion on declines. Oil and gas prices eased on hopes of a US-Russia deal and may stabilise or even rise mildly. I maintain my view that energy markets are well supplied and rallies are temporary and seasonal in nature. Industrial metals are witnessing signs of being top-heavy as higher levels encounter selling pressure. The US automobile and construction industries are lobbying for rationalising tariffs on industrial metals, and commodity markets are reacting accordingly. The same pressure on advances may show up in the stock prices of metal mining companies in India. This week, trader focus may remain polarised around public sector undertakings (PSUs) as the government has announced moves to disinvest its stake in the Life Insurance Corp. of India (LIC) and speed up the National Stock Exchange's initial public offering. Public sector banks will likely remain in the limelight as the build-up of positions has been heavy on these counters in the last few quarters. Markets, being hardwired to seek positive triggers, may seek comfort from the expectation of a lower Goods and Services Tax from October 2025, as announced on Independence Day. There may be a rise in the short run. Oil and gas companies may also witness higher-than-average traded volumes in two-way trade as financial markets react to large price swings in the underlying assets in the global commodity markets. Oil contracts expire this week, and gas contracts expire early next week. There may be usual short covering ahead of expiry and a temporary rally ahead. I suggest that my readers continue to trade light and maintain tail risk (Hacienda) hedges. A tutorial video on tail risk (Hacienda) hedges is here - Rear view mirror Let us assess what happened last week to gauge what to expect in the coming week. The upthrust was led by the broad-based Nifty 50, whereas the Bank Nifty brought up the rear. Commodities witnessed profit taking despite a weaker US dollar index (DXY) due to profit taking and switching to riskier assets. The rupee gained marginally against the weaker dollar. Indian 10-year bond yields were flat, and the NSE gained 0.9% in market capitalisation. That tells us the rally was somewhat broad-based. Market-wide position limits (MWPL) rose routinely. US headline indices gained and provided tailwinds to our markets. Retail Risk Appetite I use a simple yet highly accurate yardstick for measuring the conviction levels of retail traders—where are they deploying money. I measure what percentage of the turnover was contributed by the lower and higher risk instruments. If they trade more futures which require sizable capital, their risk appetite is higher. Within the futures space, index futures are less volatile than stock futures. A higher footprint in stock futures shows higher aggression levels. Ditto for stock and index options. Last week this is what their footprint looked like (the numbers are average of all trading days of the week) – Traded turnover slipped in the capital intensive, high volatility futures segment last week. In the relatively lower risk, lower capital options segment the turnover rose in the safest segment of index options. Turnover fell in the stock options segment. These figures betray nervousness in the undertone of the derivatives segment of the markets. Matryoshka Analysis Let us peel layer after layer of statistical data to arrive at the core message of the markets. The first chart I share is the NSE advance-decline ratio. After the price itself, this indicator is the fastest (leading) indicator of which way the winds are blowing. This simple yet accurate indicator computes the ratio of rising to falling stocks. Bulls are dominant as long as the number of gaining stocks outnumber losers. This metric gauges the risk appetite of one marshmallow trader. These are pure intraday traders. The Nifty logged weekly gains after six consecutive weeks of declines. However, the weekly advance-decline ratio did not keep pace with the optimism. It rose to 0.90 (prior week: 0.75), meaning there were 90 gainers for every 100 losers last week. For a sustainable rally, this figure needs to stay above 1.0 with rising prices. A tutorial video on the Marshmallow theory in trading is here - The second chart I share is the market wide position limits (MWPL). This measures the amount of exposure utilized by traders in the derivatives (f&o) space as a component of the total exposure allowed by the regulator. This metric is a gauge of the risk appetite of two marshmallow traders. These are deep pocketed, high conviction traders who roll over their trades to the next session/s. The MWPL data shows swing traders initiated fresh exposure but the same was the lowest compared to the last two expiry months in the comparable week. That tells us the optimism level seems to have tapered off marginally. A dedicated tutorial video on how to interpret MWPL data in more ways than one is available here - The third chart I share is my in-house indicator, 'impetus.' It measures the force in any price move. Last week, both indices rose, but their impetus readings sharply fell. That shows the rally was powered more by short covering than fresh aggressive buying. While short covering can cushion declines or even trigger a temporary rally, fresh buying powers prices to new highs. The final chart I share is my in-house indicator 'LWTD.' It computes lift, weight, thrust and drag encountered by any security. These are four forces that any powered aircraft faces during flight, so applying them to traded securities helps a trader estimate prevalent sentiments. While the Nifty logged net gains after a six-week losing spree, the LWTD reading fell from -0.10 in the prior week to -0.20 last week. That implies that even the short covering that is likely on declines may be a tad weaker in the week ahead. Should there be any negative news, the markets may decline without a lag. A tutorial video on interpreting the LWTD indicator is here - Nifty's Verdict The weekly chart shows a bullish candle after six consecutive weeks of decline. The 24,200 level I advocated as a support level to watch in last week's column was defended by bulls. This level of 24,200 is now a near-term swing low that must be watched in the near future. Optimism may prevail as long as bulls manage to keep the Nifty trading above it. On the flip side, it will take the Nifty staying above the 24,750 level sustainably before bulls can regain their lost initiative. The price is precariously poised above its 25-week moving average, which is a proxy for the six-month holding cost of an average investor. Coercive selling is unlikely as long as the price stays above this threshold. Your Call to Action Watch the 24,200 level as near-term support. Only a breakout above the 24,750 level raises the possibility of a short-term rally. Last week, I estimated ranges between 56,150 – 53,850 and 24,875 – 23,850 on the Bank Nifty and Nifty, respectively. Both indices traded within their specified levels. I estimate this week's ranges between 56,425 – 54,250 and 25,125 – 24,125 on the Bank Nifty and Nifty, respectively. Trade light with strict stop losses. Avoid trading counters with spreads wider than 8 ticks. Have a profitable week. Vijay L. Bhambwani Vijay is the CEO of a proprietary trading firm. He tweets at @vijaybhambwani
News18
17 minutes ago
- News18
With Putin Dominating Alaska Summit, Trump Is Running Out Of Moves Against India
The India-US ties will survive Trump, but it will need unnecessary time and energy to rebuild Almost nothing went as US President Donald Trump had expected at the Alaska summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Putin did not give an inch, except for face-savers in the form of public flattery. With drooping shoulders and a tired face, Trump took it. With pre-summit bluster and bullying — threatening Russia of 'very severe consequences" and slapping India with 25 per cent extra tariffs — Trump had spent all his options. He had left himself hardly any room to calibrate or escalate. From his maximalist position, the only escalation would have been to go to war against Russia; a catastrophic choice which even the US, with its struggling economy, injured alliances and diminishing goodwill around the world, cannot afford. He could not use India as a lever to force his will on Putin. The Russian leader is too seasoned for that, and knows the value of his friendship with India, as well as what India brings as a client, vendor, market, and a geo-strategic ally. It is not that Trump did not try. The US raised tariffs on Indian goods to 50 per cent after secondary sanctions of 25 per cent on Russian oil purchases. India is the second-largest buyer of Russian crude after China. He could not, because Putin had made it evident that he would not be blackmailed into deserting an ally or allowing concessions which hurt Russia's interests. So, Trump swallowed pride and said that he would consider the penalty tariffs on Russian oil in 'two or three weeks", possibly hinting that the August 27 deadline could pass for India without being slapped with the punitive 25 per cent tariff in addition to the 25 per cent reciprocal tariff. The tariffs may hurt India in the short term, but history has proved (the scenario post Pokhran-II blasts, for instance) that sanctions have only strengthened India in the long run, and helped develop its own capacities. Besides, the effect of the tariffs will be felt more by American consumers than the Indian economy. Trump also tried to put on a brave face and declared in an interview to Fox News that India had already agreed to drop purchases of Russian oil. 'Well, he (Putin) lost an oil client, so to speak, which is India, which is doing about 40 per cent of the oil," Trump bragged. The men and women at India's foreign ministry did not reply, perhaps while suppressing laughter. Because India's oil imports from Russia have risen to 20 million barrels per day (BPD) in August from 16 million BPD in July. By chipping away at the US-India relations, Trump has only managed to strengthen India's resolve for autonomy and pushed it to explore alternative global alliances like BRICS, SCO, and BIMSTEC. In the bargain, the US has weakened its biggest bulwark against China in Asia and has been busy alienating a fellow liberal democracy. The India-US ties will survive Trump, but it will need unnecessary time and energy to rebuild. view comments Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Commerce ministry recommends safeguard duty on imports of certain steel items for 3 years
The commerce ministry's arm, DGTR, has recommended final imposition of a safeguard duty on imports of certain flat steel products for three years to protect domestic manufacturers from sudden jump in the inbound shipments. Independence Day 2025 Modi signals new push for tech independence with local chips Before Trump, British used tariffs to kill Indian textile Bank of Azad Hind: When Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose gave India its own currency The duty was recommended by the directorate general of trade remedies (DGTR) in its final findings of a probe initiated on a complaint by the Indian Steel Association . Based on the preliminary findings, the government in April has already imposed a provisional 12 per cent safeguard duty for 200 days. Now in its final findings, the DGTR has concluded "that there is a recent, sudden, sharp and significant increase in imports of PUC (product under consideration) into India at the cumulative level as a result of unforeseen threaten to cause serious injury to the domestic industry/producers," the DGTR has said in a notification. It has recommended a 12 per cent duty in the first year, 11.5 per cent in the second, and 11 per cent in the third year. Live Events The Indian Steel Association on behalf of its members including ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India, JSW Steel , Jindal Steel and Power and Steel Authority of India filed an application seeking imposition of safeguard duty on imports of non-alloy and alloy steel flat products. The applicant alleged that there was a sudden, sharp and significant increase in the volume of imports, which caused serious injury to the domestic industry in India. The applicant also stated that imports took place in such increased quantities and under such circumstances that cause and threaten to cause serious injury to the domestic industry. The DGTR said that taking into account the current serious injury to the domestic industry, and the imminent threat of injury due to the imports of subject goods, the fair selling price and, considering competing interest of all stakeholders, the authority recommends imposition of the duty on certain steel products. Commenting on this, think GTRI said that India's trade watchdog DGTR has confirmed safeguard duties on a wide range of steel imports, rejecting submissions from over 250 stakeholders, including major automakers and electronics firms. It said that the probe, launched in December 2024, covered hot-rolled and cold-rolled products, metallic and colour-coated steel. Chinese exports of these items rose to 110.7 million tonnes in 2024, up 25 per cent over 2023, much of it redirected to India, GTRI said. "GTRI opposed the move, warning it (imposition of final safeguard duty) would raise input costs, hurt export competitiveness, and squeeze downstream users," the think tank's founder Ajay Srivastava said. GTRI argued imports were predictable, not "sudden"; that domestic injury was overstated; and that duties would cripple auto, engineering, and construction sectors, he said.
