Everton running out of time to sign players
Moyes said his club have money to spend but the deals they were hoping to complete have not materialised.
Club sources have distanced themselves from a potential move for Manchester City's unwanted England midfielder Jack Grealish, while an attempt to lure Kenny Tete north from Fulham floundered when the Dutchman opted to sign a new deal at Craven Cottage.
Everton continue to be linked with numerous players and have signed young left-back Adam Aznou from Bayern Munich.
But Moyes said he could offer no guarantees Aznou, 19, would be propelled immediately into the senior starting line-up and said bringing experienced players to Everton this summer was proving troublesome.
"The truth is we're not getting a lot of the deals over the line at the moment, that's a fact," he said to reporters in Chicago before his side's Premier League Summer Series encounter with former club West Ham.
"We're desperate to get things moving on because we know time's running out."
By this weekend, it will be nine weeks since Everton ended their season by beating Newcastle at St James' Park to seal a 13th-placed Premier League finish, their best performance since 2021.
With ambitious new owners and a summer move to their magnificent new stadium, it felt as though a reboot of a once mighty club was on the cards.
It has not turned out the way Moyes imagined.
Four new players, including Aznou and reserve keeper Mark Travers, does not cover for the loss of five experienced regular starters including Dominic Calvert-Lewin and Abdoulaye Doucoure.
Everton drew with League Two Accrington and lost at Championship side Blackburn before heading to the United States for the Premier League Summer Series.
After Saturday's 3-0 defeat by Bournemouth, Moyes, 62, said he needed six more players.
"The one thing I'll do is I'll tell the fans straight, and I'm telling it straight at the moment, we're having a bit of a struggle getting ones in quickly," said Moyes.
"My first thought is yes, I'm surprised, because I think Everton's such a big club, with great traditions and the new stadium's an exciting move for us.
"But when you think again about it, we've been in or around the relegation positions for the last five years, not far off the bottom, so maybe there's been reasons for it."
Latest Everton news, analysis and fan views
Get Everton news sent straight to your phone
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
43 minutes ago
- New York Times
Mateo Joseph: So what now?
Mateo Joseph could probably read the writing on the wall. He finished last season in a scrap for second billing with Patrick Bamford, but Leeds United's promotion and the arrival of Lukas Nmecha in June were warning signs. Then, as Joel Piroe was polishing his Golden Boot trophy, Leeds began to be linked with Fulham's Rodrigo Muniz. Even if they fail to add the Brazilian specifically, it is no secret they want a first-rate striker capable of supplanting Piroe in attack. Advertisement Was Joseph, who began last season as manager Daniel Farke's first-choice striker, willing to go into the top flight as the fourth choice? While Bamford was told in no uncertain terms he is surplus to requirements, Spain's under-21 international had not been shown the door. Instead, with three years still on his contract, there were two likely routes for him at Leeds. Farke may have seen value in the youngster scraping onto his bench and waiting for injuries to get on the pitch. Though if anyone is going to hold down that role next season, will it not be 16-year-old Harry Gray? Or there might be a season-long loan away, which seemed the most likely outcome for Joseph. After 39 Championship appearances last season, including 11 starts, he needs to continue playing regularly to aid his development. However, the striker has instead taken a more aggressive approach: trying to force his way out. Farke tolerated Joseph's request to skip the Manchester United friendly in Sweden following a delayed return for pre-season, but the Germany training camp appears to have been a red line. The striker was expected to take part in a critical week away, but he refused and stayed at home, requesting a transfer in the process. In 2023, Farke was ready to have Wilfried Gnonto and Luis Sinisterra training on their own after they refused to play for the club in an effort to leave after relegation. Sinisterra found his way out on deadline day, but Gnonto, who did not have one of the infamous relegation release clauses in his contract, was forced to reintegrate. Gnonto was the one high-profile player Leeds were able to reject bids for. After losing so much talent in that summer, they were not about to be bullied into losing more. The club is in a very different place two years on and Joseph seems to be ostracising himself from the main group to get a move that was probably coming anyway. In his revelatory post-match press huddle at SC Verl last week, Farke said he will not stand in the way of a player who is not excited about the prospect of playing for Leeds in the Premier League. The sticking point will be the terms of any exit. Sources at Leeds, kept anonymous to protect relationships, say chairman Paraag Marathe rates Joseph very highly. Farke has already pointed to last season's 39 appearances as evidence of how much he likes Joseph, too. This is a talent they have invested in since he arrived from Espanyol at 18 years old in 2022. Advertisement Joseph has been prolific with Spain's under-21s, scoring eight goals in 13 appearances. There was a red-hot run of form during 2024's pre-season with Leeds, too, which saw him start the opening eight league games of last season. There was also the memorable brace at Chelsea in the FA Cup as a starter in 2024. Leeds can see the potential in a player who did ultimately score just three times for the Championship title-winners last season. This is why a loan offer, with a pre-agreed permanent option, does not suit them. Real Betis are understood to have had a £10million offer knocked back in January. The summer has seen at least one further offer from Betis, for a loan with a permanent option, which was rejected by Leeds, who, before Joseph's transfer request, consistently made it clear he was not for sale. Joseph's now-public stance may soften United's resolve, but he will not be allowed to leave cheaply. Parties on all sides of the saga, including Leeds, Betis and Joseph's representatives, agree this will not be resolved quickly or easily. Girona are another club with an interest in taking him. A loan without a permanent option would seem to suit Leeds best, though a significant bid for a permanent deal may tempt them, too, with the player wanting out. United sources, kept anonymous to protect relationships, do not see any sense in a loan with a pre-agreed option to leave for good in July 2026: if Joseph went on loan to Betis and scored more than 15 goals in La Liga, his value, as a young, improving striker in one of Europe's big five leagues, would skyrocket, but if Leeds had agreed to a permanent option of £10m to £15m in that scenario, they would be severely out of pocket. With three years left on his contract, Leeds see no rush or urgency in pushing Joseph out the door. Next season will be critical in shaping how the next phase of his career looks. They are unlikely to object to him playing regularly on the continent, but they want to be masters of their own destiny when it comes to establishing Joseph's real value on the transfer market.
New York Times
43 minutes ago
- New York Times
Guardiola wanted a smaller squad. Instead it's grown. How can Man City trim it?
It has been 73 days since Pep Guardiola said he would quit Manchester City if he did not have a smaller squad next season. That was in May, after a comfortable win at home against Bournemouth, when his lip quivered after committing what he views as the heinous act of leaving four senior players festering at home. Advertisement Joking or not, he might have to leave a dozen at home for the opening match against Wolverhampton Wanderers. Two weeks out from the start of the new Premier League season, the mission to condense the squad still needs work. Rather than trim, City have made a net addition of two first-team players this summer. Sometimes, taking two steps forward and one step back is the way to progress. That is certainly how City will view it, having acted rapidly to acquire their main targets before the Club World Cup. Buying before selling has the benefit that other clubs cannot hold them to ransom, knowing there is money burning a hole in their pocket. But signing James Trafford, Marcus Bettinelli, Rayan Ait-Nouri, Tijjani Reijnders and Rayan Cherki means Guardiola has 31 players. While there has been a conscious effort to reduce the squad's average age and wage bill, it is an expensive squad to run, with several players surplus to requirements and others seemingly having little chance of regular minutes. Here is The Athletic's assessment of the situation… City had the luxury of two leading men for part of this summer. New sporting director Hugo Viana, almost four months into his role since joining from Sporting CP, was being supported by director of football Txiki Begiristain as part of a transition, but he ended his 13-year spell this week. Viana will continue to be aided by Carlos Raphael Moersen, who is director of football transactions at City Football Group (CFG, the club's overarching owner) and has been helping lead some negotiations with prospective buyers this summer. City have brought in some money — Kyle Walker has moved to Burnley for a fee that could reach £5million ($6.6m), Maximo Perrone's switch to Como is worth €15million (£13m; $17m) and €24m has arrived after Yan Couto's loan deal at Borussia Dortmund was made permanent. Advertisement But to get numbers down, established players will have to leave soon. Finding permanent takers for Kalvin Phillips, given the financial package of a fee plus wages, has been tricky. Jack Grealish and James McAtee are expected to leave too. The fourth expected exit is goalkeeper Stefan Ortega, as City now have four senior goalkeepers following Trafford's arrival. City want Ederson to stay until the end of his contract next year and are open to selling Ortega, who also has a year left on his deal and wants to play regularly as he looks to break into Germany's squad for the World Cup next summer. Then there is the possibility of allowing younger players to go out on loan. Sverre Nypan, the 18-year-old who joined from Rosenborg for £12.5million, will go out on loan as part of a development plan but a prospective move to Ajax is thought to no longer be on the cards. La Liga club Girona, part of the CFG network, are keen on loaning Vitor Reis and Claudio Echeverri. A year in Spain represents a good development opportunity for Reis, who is 19 and joined the club in January from Palmeiras for £29.5million. He is highly rated internally but showed in his second start for City against Wydad at the Club World Cup that there are parts of his game that need work. Echeverri is also 19 but represents a different case. Guardiola is a huge admirer and saw fit to bring Echeverri on for his debut in the FA Cup final just months after arriving from Argentina. Girona would love to have him, while Roma have made a case for a year in Italy, but City are deliberating whether it would be better to keep him in-house to learn from the manager and other forwards such as Erling Haaland and Omar Marmoush. Oscar Bobb is very likely to stay, with the 22-year-old winger impressing Guardiola last summer before a fractured leg ruined his season. Advertisement Nico O'Reilly faces a fight for minutes due to the arrival of Ait-Nouri at left-back, where he impressed last season. The plan is for O'Reilly, 20, to stay, as he can also operate in his more natural midfielder role. McAtee is more established but his role last season was largely restricted to substitute cameos. Nottingham Forest have been discussing a fee of around £25million for him but Viana wants more. Eintracht Frankfurt, who McAtee visited last month, view these sums as out of their league. In defence, City are overstocked, with 10 players across the back four, leading to speculation that one or two could depart. John Stones was not given a single minute at the Club World Cup despite fully recovering from an injury-ravaged season. The England centre-back, who has a year left on his deal, said during the Club World Cup that he did not want to leave and there is no prospect of him departing this summer. Manuel Akanji and Abdukodir Khusanov are two others with a point to prove. Khusanov, 21, barely featured in the final few months of the season after joining from Nice in January, but no approaches have been made. In midfield, there is an argument that City are also overstocked. It remains to be seen how quickly Rodri can regain form after his anterior cruciate ligament injury, so the cover provided by Nico Gonzalez and Mateo Kovacic could be important. Tijjani Reijnders can also drop back to play as the deeper No 6. Premier League clubs will have to register their official 25-man squad after the transfer window closes on September 1. They can only name a maximum of 17 non-homegrown senior players, with the rest of the squad comprising 'homegrown players' — those who have trained at an English club for three seasons (or 36) months between the ages of 15 and 21, regardless of nationality. Advertisement City have 17 non-homegrown players above the age of 21 and nine homegrown players above the age of 21. That is only one too many, a situation aided by the Premier League rule that dictates under-21 players, those born after January 1, 2004, do not take up spaces in the 25-man squad. Rico Lewis, Khusanov, Reis, O'Reilly, Savinho and Echeverri all fall into that category, although 22-year-old Bobb becomes a senior homegrown player for the first time. There are different rules in the Champions League, so if City do not loan or sell anyone else, they would have to leave four non-homegrown players out in the cold. UEFA's 'A list' does not offer the same blanket exclusion for under-21 players. They have to be under-21 and homegrown, which means Khusanov, Reis, Savinho and Echeverri all require a space, unlike in the Premier League. Eight spaces are exclusively reserved for locally trained players, with no more than four of that total made up of association-trained players reared at other English clubs. Even if Grealish, Phillips and McAtee all leave, that will not be an issue for City, with Trafford, O'Reilly, Lewis, Bobb and Foden all club-trained, and Betinelli, Stones and Ake all association-trained. It is another reason the two goalkeepers were recruited this summer. The risk of carrying such a bloated squad is not just regulatory, however. It is a matter of identity and contentment, too. Players at this level possess egos and pride. They want to contribute and feel like a valued member of the squad but it is difficult to achieve across an entire squad, with so many players being reduced to a spectator role. City were quick out of the blocks this window but they need to start getting a shift on if they are to satisfy Guardiola's demand for an optimised squad.
New York Times
43 minutes ago
- New York Times
Sunderland have spent over £100m on transfers. This is how they could do it – and why they need to
It is a couple of months after earning promotion. In the north east of England, Sunderland are causing a stir. Before a return to top-flight football, they have spent big. The year is 2007. It is easily forgotten now, but Sunderland's last promotion before this one brought with it a glut of transfers. Sunderland spent £35million on new faces that summer, the fifth-highest total in the Premier League, only trailing Manchester United, Tottenham Hotspur, Manchester City and Liverpool. Advertisement It seems an almost quaint figure now. To sign 21-year-old midfielder Habib Diarra this summer, Sunderland are handing over £27m ($36m). Simon Adingra, Chemsdine Talbi, Enzo Le Fee, and Noah Sadiki have all arrived for between £14m and £18m, before any future add-ons. As revealed by The Athletic on Wednesday, goalkeeper Robin Roefs is set to join for £9m, taking Sunderland's combined transfer spend beyond the £100m mark. The figure has increased following confirmation of Granit Xhaka's arrival on Wearside. Xhaka has returned to England for an initial fee of £13m, fresh from a successful stint at Bayer Leverkusen. Sunderland, just like they did all those years ago, are spending heavily in an attempt to ensure they last longer than a single season in the Premier League. The club's transfer business has raised eyebrows. Sunderland's promotion team comprised a mix of academy graduates and low-cost acquisitions — the starting XI for May's play-off final victory against Sheffield United required less than £10m to assemble. Two months on, Sunderland now have the most expensive squad in the club's history. Xhaka is the club's seventh signing in a month. Add Roefs and some assumed agent fees and transfer levies, and we land at a gross spend this summer of £130m. Sunderland are the seventh-highest-spending Premier League club this window, only trailing the traditional 'Big Six'. On a net basis, including the Roefs deal, they're this summer's eighth-highest-spending club in the world. Sunderland generated significant sales in their most recent financial year but even so, the way they have cleared club spending records is eye-catching. After accounting for sales, alongside fees spent on Wilson Isidor, Milan Aleksic and Ahmed Abdullahi since the start of their financial year last July, The Athletic estimates Sunderland's net transfer spend to be around £94m. Advertisement The spending won't stop there. New faces have primarily arrived in midfield — none of them play in central defence or up front, two positions that need strengthening. Further signings are expected before the season opener against West Ham United on August 16. Sunderland's outlay is reflective of plenty of things, but at least two obvious ones. First, the money involved in English football has never been greater; the figures clubs must reach to remain competitive grow each year. Second, Sunderland have a lot of ground to make up. Spending on transfer fees is only weakly correlated with immediate success but, as The Athletic detailed recently, sustained spending over time tends to prove rewarding on the field. Seventeen of this year's Premier League clubs were in the division last year (and the year before that), and their squads have been built up accordingly. Burnley are back in the top flight after just one year away. Leeds United spent two years out of it. Sunderland last played in the Premier League in 2017. Over a year has passed since the most recently available figures, but even taking squad cost values from the end of the 2023-24 season shows the increasing size of the gulf. Sunderland's £18.4m was around 80 times lower than league-leading Chelsea and, even more strikingly, it was only a 10th of the cost at which Burnley's squad had been assembled. Sunderland's transfer spending has paled in comparison to those they'll face this season. In 2023-24 figures, they were only middling in the Championship. In each of the past two seasons, all three promoted sides have been swiftly relegated. There are other reasons besides money for that, but it is impossible to deny that wealth, or a relative lack of it, is increasingly playing a part. On transfer fees alone, Sunderland have spent £113.6m on new players. That makes them one of only six clubs to spend over £100m in the summer following promotion, and the three who spent more than them — Nottingham Forest in 2022 (£140.4m), Aston Villa in 2019 (£134m) and Leeds (£115.2m in 2020) — all survived relegation. Ipswich spent over £100m and Southampton just under it last summer. Both went down meekly. But when money casts such a large shadow over on-field fortunes, it stands to reason that big spending will improve a survival bid's chances. In the past seven seasons, only three promoted clubs have spent less than £50m in their summer window and stayed up. Bournemouth later invested heavily in January, helping them finish 15th. Sheffield United stayed up in 2019-20 but have since been relegated (twice). Meanwhile, Brentford, ever the outlier, have long been marked out as one of the savviest clubs in England. It's possible to stay up without spending a fortune, but you'll give yourself a better chance if you do. Sunderland's spending might yet catch Forest's £140m promoted-side record, and mentions of their spending a couple of years ago immediately draw thoughts in the direction of what came next: a points deduction for breaching the Premier League's profit and sustainability rules (PSR). Yet there's a key difference. Forest's arrival in the Premier League came on the back of 14 years in the Championship, football's equivalent of a financial black hole. Almost without exception, the longer a club stays in England's second tier, the more money they lose. In Forest's case, that amounted to pre-tax losses of £185m — £62m of those arrived during their final two seasons in the division. This meant they entered the Premier League carrying heavy existing losses on their rolling three-year PSR calculation. Advertisement Sunderland, though, were only in the Championship for three seasons before winning promotion, and spent four years of their Premier League exile in League One. They still lost money, carrying infrastructure and running costs far too large for a third-division side, but in some ways, those seasons allowed for a reset. Majority shareholder Kyril Louis-Dreyfus inherited a near-blank slate when he took over in 2021. Sunderland still lost money, but it wasn't anywhere near as much as would have been lost had they been carrying a Championship wage bill for years. Those losses amounted to £17.5m between 2022 and 2024. Seven Championship clubs lost more than that in 2023-24 alone. Sunderland can add back what the authorities deem 'good' costs in their PSR calculation. In their case, having a Category One academy means those add-backs are sizeable. Exact figures are unknown, but The Athletic estimates Sunderland's PSR result in their first two Championship seasons was profitable. Everything points to another profitable PSR year in 2024-25. Sunderland might even have made a pre-tax profit for the first time in 19 years. Through the sales of Jobe Bellingham, Jack Clarke and Tommy Watson, they've generated over £40m in player profits, to go alongside a much-improved commercial offering and higher attendances than a year ago (as well as higher ticket prices). Sunderland's operating loss (pre-player sales) was £16.9m in 2023-24, and there have been various investment programmes undertaken across the club since then. Wages, inevitably, will have risen, and 2024-25 will also bear whatever bonuses fell due as a result of promotion. Yet those player profits are hefty. Sunderland might have been profitable last season, or at the very least hovering near break-even. Moving into 2025-26, Sunderland and their fellow promoted clubs have lower loss limits than the rest of the division, and the club don't appear to have received 'secure funding' from the owners, limiting them to three-year losses of £15m. But entering the Premier League from a position of profitability stands them in better stead than most others have managed in recent years — including Leeds and Burnley this time around. Advertisement Hardly any of Sunderland's spending this summer fell into their 2024-25 accounting period (we estimate less than £2m), though the same isn't true going forward. Of the £130m gross spend, The Athletic projects £29m a year will hit Sunderland's books as amortisation costs over the next three seasons, before £24m in 2028-29 and £18m in 2029-30. In comparison, the club's 2023-24 amortisation bill was just £4m. That's without even mentioning wages. Those are unknown, but expensive signings rarely come on low salaries. Existing players are likely to have received promotion wage rises too, which means further expense. There are also around £22m in potential add-ons. Sunderland's total future costs across fees and wages may have increased by a quarter-billion pounds. If that sounds like a scary number, then it needs to be viewed alongside the opposing half of the ledger. In broadcast revenue alone, Sunderland will see a £100m increase in turnover this season. Premier League status affords the ability to earn more in other revenue streams, too. By our estimate, Sunderland's transfer activity might have added £60m in annual costs over the next couple of seasons, which is still well below the revenue uptick they'll enjoy this season. It also feels like a necessity. Just as transfer fees rise, so have wages, increasing the cost of Premier League survival. Across the last three seasons, when wage data is available, seven Premier League clubs paid less than £100m in annual salaries. Five were relegated, with only (you guessed it) Brentford the nonconformists both times. Nine-figure wage bills are increasingly important to stay in the Premier League, but Sunderland's most recent wage bill was £31.4m. Sunderland sources, kept anonymous to protect relationships, expect sales will follow. Whether Sunderland have purposely waited until a new accounting period to move out some players is unknown — with Watson and Bellingham, waiting wasn't an option — but it would make financial sense. With no compliance issues in 2024-25, sales from August onwards will hit the 2025-26 books, staying on the three-year rolling PSR calculation until the end of the 2027-28 season. The club have committed to significant future costs, so anything to offset those will be welcome. This summer has seen Sunderland ramp up their level of spending, but they've also largely continued the policy that got them promoted, with sporting director Kristjaan Speakman and head of player recruitment Stuart Harvey dramatically reducing the average age of the squad. Advertisement Since the summer of 2021, including Xhaka and Roefs, 62 players have been signed. Of those, 45 were under 24 years old. This summer, Adingra (23), Roefs (22), Diarra (21), Sadiki and Talbi (both 20) are continuing that trend. Le Fee joined on loan in January, turned 25 in February and saw his deal become permanent the moment the final whistle blew at Wembley — the first time Sunderland have spent a fee on anyone aged older than 24 since embarking upon this new strategy. Xhaka's signing is the second instance and the former Arsenal captain represents a clear departure from recent recruitment strategy. In spending £13m on the Switzerland international, which could rise to £17.3m in future add-ons are triggered, Sunderland have, for the first time under Louis-Dreyfus and company, spent a fee on a player without any clear intention of making their money back via that player's future sale. Xhaka will be almost 36 by the time his three-year contract comes to a close. Sunderland have signed older heads over the past few years but all of them have been for nothing in fees. Reinildo Mandava, the 31-year-old Mozambique international left-back who signed when his Atletico Madrid contract expired at the end of June, continued that theme. Xhaka's signing has bucked it, though it's easy to see why. He brings much-needed experience to a squad that, even with the addition of Adingra, had just 45 full Premier League games played across it — 37 of them by Adingra. If they survive relegation, Xhaka's £13m fee will seem a small price to pay in exchange for another year or more of Premier League riches. If they finish in the bottom three, the Xhaka signing will be viewed as a punt that didn't pay off. Whatever they do this summer, first-time relegation will remain a possibility, and more likely a probability. Where Xhaka and Reinildo have joined on three- and two-year deals, the rest of this summer's cohort have signed up to longer-term contracts. Whichever division Sunderland occupy in a year, they'll own young players with several years left on their contracts who, theoretically, still aren't at their peak. Advertisement That can be viewed in one of two ways. In the negative scenario, this summer's signings are flops and a relegated Sunderland are left with several expensive players they either can't shift or need to accept a loss on. Alternatively, even after relegation, they'll possess assets who can be sold to mitigate the impact of the drop. Resale value has been a key tenet of the club's transfer policy under Speakman and Harvey, and remains so even now that spending has increased. Sunderland have proven adept at understanding the transfer market in recent years, selling players at significant profits. Bellingham's June move to Borussia Dortmund is the latest such example. Even with the sell-on due to Birmingham City, his move should lead to a £20m profit. There's wider evidence that shows relegated clubs have successfully generated big money from selling their better players. Across the 12 teams relegated between 2020 and 2023, after adjusting for Burnley's later accounting date, £716m was earned from player sales in the season following demotion — an average of £60m per team. In 2023-24, Southampton, Leeds United and Leicester City generated £295m in sales between them. Last year, Burnley banked around £96m from post-relegation departures. Naturally, Sunderland believe the players they have signed are capable of performing in the Premier League. Should that prove insufficient to secure survival, they'll trust their ability to move still-young players on without too much of a hit, ensuring those hefty future costs committed to this summer don't actually materialise. The risk is they've bought poorly, but that's true of any transfer. Sunderland followed the expensive summer of 18 years ago with more spending in January. One point above the relegation zone at the turn of the year, a further £8m went on reinforcements. It proved worth it. Roy Keane's men survived, and Sunderland would stay in the Premier League for another nine years. Last weekend, coincidentally, threw up another callback. Sunderland travelled north of the border to Hearts and a testimonial for Craig Gordon, who broke the British transfer record for a goalkeeper when they paid Hearts £9million to sign him in 2007. They lost 3-0 but, perversely, it might not have been the worst thing. Advertisement Amid the excitement that has flowed since the play-off triumph two months ago, a torrent of good feeling that Xhaka's arrival has only bolstered, it is easy to forget the task that stands before Le Bris and his side. The gap between England's top two divisions, in many respects, has never been greater. Sunderland aim to bridge it by spending big, something they can do — and, everything indicates, will continue to do — albeit while trying to remain true to the strategy that got them here in the first place. It might not work. But they certainly can't be accused of not giving it a go. (Top photos: Getty Images)
