Trump's tariffs could trigger EU-US decoupling, warns Brussels' trade chief
Šefčovič said the US president's latest tariff threat, announced on Saturday, would have 'super negative' consequences if it enters into force on 1 August by disincentivising EU exporters from shipping goods to the US.
"30% or anything above 30%... it has more or less the same effect: practically, it prohibits trade," Šefčovič told reporters ahead of a meeting of EU trade ministers in Brussels.
"If it stays at 30%-plus, simply the trading as we know it will not continue," he added, noting that he would 'definitely do everything' to prevent the measure from taking effect.
Šefčovič also stressed that the Commission remains prepared 'if necessary' to impose retaliatory countermeasures to 'restore the balance in our transatlantic relationship." He added that he would speak to his US counterparts later on Monday.
Brussels has already drawn up a retaliatory package targeting €21 billion worth of US exports, which was originally set to take effect on Tuesday but whose imposition was delayed until the start of next month following Trump's threat over the weekend.
The Commission has also prepared a separate €72 billion list that it will present to EU ministers on Monday, which could also be introduced on 1 August if no negotiated solution is reached.
Trump has already imposed a 50% tariff on steel and aluminium, a 25% duty on cars, and a 10% blanket levy since returning to the White House in January, which collectively affect €370 billion worth of EU exports, or 70% of the bloc's total shipments to the US.
The possibility of a protracted trade conflict with the EU's main ally was echoed on Monday by Danish Trade Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen, who warned that a trade war with the US would have "devastating" consequences on both sides of the Atlantic.
"We want the deal, but there's an old saying: 'If you want peace, you have to prepare for war'," said Rasmussen, whose country currently holds the rotating EU Council presidency and who will chair Monday's meeting.
Some ministers, however, said that the EU was prepared for a prolonged trade conflict.
Sweden's Trade Minister, Benjamin Dousa, said Brussels has "more tools in the toolbox" that it could use to hurt US exporters – a thinly veiled reference to the EU's 'anti-coercion instrument', which if invoked, could target US services and whose use is supported by French President Emmanuel Macron.
"I think if the White House wants us to be tough, then we will be quite tough against the White House," Dousa said.
(mm)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
9 hours ago
- Euractiv
Green groups see EU budget bill as death knell for environment funding
While the European Commission has proposed a substantial increase in the size of the bloc's central budget from 2028, green groups have accused the EU executive of lowering the priority of environmental action and warn civil society voices could be excluded from the policy making process. As expected, the European Commission has proposed axing the LIFE Programme, the EU's only stand-alone funding mechanism for environmental action. The 2028-34 budget bill also squeezes broader funding for climate and biodiversity policy goals. But the EU executive put a positive spin on its move to streamline green funding with the massively increased €2 trillion budget. 'We will have a climate and biodiversity spending target, so mainstreaming, of 35% for the new MFF," European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen told reporters on Wednesday, referring to the EU's next multiannual financial framework. "This amounts to around €700 billion.' This substantial sum of money would have to be spent in ways that are compatible with the EU goal of reaching net-zero emissions by mid-century, and reversing biodiversity loss. Nevertheless, it is lower than the combined €658 billion ring-fenced for climate and €113 billion for biodiversity in the current budget. From 2028, central budget funding for climate and environment purposes will be split in two separate pillars: the 'clean transition and industrial decarbonisation' envelope of the €410 billion European Competitiveness Fund (ECF), and some €1 trillion spread across different priorities such as economy, agriculture, rural prosperity and security. 'Our proposal for the next MFF shows that we remain strongly committed to environmental priorities," Environment Commissioner Jessika Roswall said. "Water, circularity, nature and bioeconomy are prominent parts of the new competitiveness fund and the national plans." Less money for nature However some fear this new approach risks decreasing overall funding for nature and biodiversity. 'The loss of LIFE as we know it in the new MFF is not simplification – it's sabotage," said Patrick ten Brink, secretary general of the European Environmental Bureau (EEB), an NGO umbrella group. "The LIFE Programme exists for a reason. It delivers targeted, cost-effective results for nature, climate and public health.' Ester Asin, director of the WWF European Policy Office warned the 35% global target could become little more than a PR exercise. "By grouping all environmental spending under a single target, there is a real danger that biodiversity will be sidelined in favour of industrial priorities that may be presented as green investments," she said. Others warned the proposed budget reform could actually widen a gap in funding for nature restoration that is currently estimated to be €19 billion annually. 'We are deeply concerned by the lack of dedicated biodiversity funding, as the LIFE funding is now suggested to be merged with other programmes," said Andras Krolopp, biodiversity policy lead at The Nature Conservancy. The concerns of civil society groups were also echoed by progressive voices in the European Parliament. 'It is irresponsible and short-sighted for this proposal to end the LIFE programme and leave out funding for biodiversity,' said Green MEP Rasmus Nordqvist, one of the negotiators of the MFF in the Parliament's budget committee. The cancellation of the LIFE Programme also represents an existential threat to numerous environmental NGOs who currently share €15 million in direct grants to cover part of their operational expenses. The Commission says such support could in future be disbursed via national programmes, but it is unclear for now how the funds would be allocated, and whether campaign groups will be able to meet unspecified criteria related to competitiveness or national policy objectives. '[By] repealing LIFE, core funding for environmental NGOs could disappear, leaving civil society under-resourced to support necessary implementation, enforcement, and public engagement," the EEB warned. 'The MFF needs to enable civil society actors to participate effectively in EU-level policymaking," MEP Nordqvist said. "It is essential to safeguard the right of everyone to meaningful participation in decision-making processes and the full cycle of implementation of the EU budget." (rh, aw)
Euractiv
10 hours ago
- Euractiv
The Brief – Von der Leyen's big budget moment ends in chaos
A day of cancelled briefings, internal dissent, angry MEPs and confusion over the budget's biggest numbers: Commission President Ursula von der Leyen may very well have gone too far in her bold bid to re-think the EU project. Fed up with a never-changing EU spending plan under the multiannual financial framework and emboldened by a dual defence and competitiveness crisis, von der Leyen has mobilised all her political savvy to break the status quo and centre the EU project on herself and the European Commission. Since October , she has been socialising radical ideas for what the next EU budget could look like, and meticulously working behind closed doors on a setup to centralise power in a palatable form for key EU countries. She overplayed her hand. In the critical moment to make her pitch, von der Leyen faced rebellion within her own Commission and did not appear to present her budget overhaul herself. A proposal was initially expected this morning, with briefings in parliament throughout the day. Instead, they failed to land final numbers, six commissioners rebelled against her funding plan, and Parliament briefings were repeatedly delayed or cancelled throughout the day. 'I have literally no idea what is going on,' Siegfried Mureșan, Parliament's budget co-lead from von der Leyen's own party, told Euractiv at midday. At the time of writing, the Commission still hasn't provided its actual proposal, despite hours of speeches and presentations. The curse of unanimity Von der Leyen is asking a lot of the next budget. Breaking decades of precedent, the Commission wants to put around €900 billion into a megafund to use as leverage to implement EU-friendly reforms and a €410 billion European Competitiveness Fund for flexible industrial investments. Farmers and regions face serious cuts, wildly unpopular with major recipients of such funds like Poland, Italy and Spain. On top of that, the Commission announced new EU-wide taxes on tobacco, carbon emissions and large companies, which may disproportionately burden many of the same countries. Von der Leyen's play was bold, and she has already landed some wins. For starters, she's managed to get the two biggest players – Germany and France – to listen to her ideas. On top of this, she has succeeded in setting the terms of the debate. With Europe in the clutch of so many crises – and found wanting on so many fronts – aligning behind a vision for a competitive continent that can withstand existential economic and security threats is a must. But von der Leyen may have aimed too high. Not even managing to keep her own commissioners in check, she now faces a daunting task to get every single EU country and hundreds of MEPs onboard. Parliament doesn't even want to start negotiations with the proposed ideas. A parliament source told Euractiv that Commission bureaucrats are fed up with her radical proposals, and that they eagerly await a chance to pick her proposal apart. Ursula von der Leyen has successfully shaken up the budget debate. Now, we will see whether a Europe in crisis is ready to succumb to her vision, or if they reject her for going too far. (jp, cp) Roundup The moment we've all been waiting for: The European Commission proposed the largest long-term EU budget in its history Wednesday, merging historically separate farming and regional spending programmes into country-specific national plans and creating a €400+ billion fund to boost ailing industry, totalling just under €2 trillion, or 1.26% of the bloc's gross national income. The Šefčovič shuffle: The EU's top trade negotiator Maroš Šefčovič is jetting to Washington on Wednesday for talks with his US counterparts in a renewed push to settle the transatlantic tariffs stand-off. The trip follows Trump's threat of a 30% levy on European goods from 1 August. Meta fine: The European Commission is still considering whether to impose further fines on Meta over its advertising model under the Digital Markets Act following a €200 million decision against the social media giant's pay-or-consent ad practices earlier this year, citing remaining issues that the company has yet to clean up. Across Europe Must the show go on? – Valery Gergiev, the world-renowned orchestra conductor and known Putin backer, prepares to perform at a state-backed music festival in southern Italy on 27 July despite mounting concern over his performance – though the region's governor supports the show. My likeness, not yours – The Danish presidency is set to push for EU-wide protection for people's identities, especially to prevent the usage of personal attributes in AI deepfake generation – the law would allow for citizens to require social media companies to take down AI images that imitate them. Out-of-prime minister runs again – French conservative Michel Barnier of Les Républicains, the EU's former chief Brexit negotiator and briefly serving French prime minister in 2024, has announced his candidacy in a September Paris parliamentary election following the annulment of a Macron-aligned candidate's 2024 victory.
Euractiv
11 hours ago
- Euractiv
MEPs push back against lack of dedicated EU space budget
Despite strong efforts by MEPs to secure a dedicated space budget line in the European Commission's new near €2 trillion spending plan for 2028–2034, no such provision appears in the proposal tabled on 16 July. The Commission has instead decided to merge numerous funds into a single €451 billion European Competitiveness Fund so it can be more adaptable to shifting political priorities. "Europe will miss the opportunity to assert its sovereignty in space," French socialist MEP and vice-chair of the sky and space intergroup, François Kalfon, told Euractiv of the decision to scrap a specific space pot. French centrist and former rapporteur for the secure telecommunications satellites regulation covering the IRIS² programme, Christophe Grudler, also said that the European Parliament is seeking to amend the proposal, adding: "You cannot just hand out billions blindly." Last month, a group of cross-party, space-focused MEPs had urged the Commission to allocate a dedicated €60 billion space budget in the next MFF, or multiannual financial framework, matching the industry's top estimates for funding the bloc's space ambitions. Unlike other industries, space companies provide satellites and maintenance services to the EU's operational constellations – such as Earth observation program Copernicus, geolocation system Galileo, and the upcoming secure communications system IRIS². The lack of a dedicated space budget is a U-turn for an industry which has become accustomed to planning investments around predictable public procurement by the EU, set in stone since 2021 in a space funding scheme of €18.7 billion. Under the new approach, the Commission has allocated €131 billion to "resilience and security, defence industry, and space" – but without any breakdown between different budget lines. This means the budget for space is unknown and could fluctuate based on changing priorities. The decision to cut out a dedicated space envelope has drawn swift criticisms from MEPs considering that without a dedicated budget line the bloc's space industry could struggle to plan major investments to operate and maintain the bloc's three major constellations. (nl)
