logo
Huawei Moves Ratchet Up Nvidia's Stakes In The AI Trade War

Huawei Moves Ratchet Up Nvidia's Stakes In The AI Trade War

Forbes01-05-2025

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang made a remarkable admission this week: He's fearful of Huawei. He should be, as Huawei is a formidable technology power in the world, its history of using political advantages to gain market share, and the current trade-war environment all theaten to shift the nexus of power back to China.
Speaking in Washington, D.C. this week, Huang expressed concerns about China's growing technology prowess and its threat in the trade war.
'They're incredible in computing and network tech, all these central capabilities to advance AI,' Huang said. 'They have made enormous progress in the last several years.'
It's a massive moment for both Nvidia and Huawei, as the two powers go head-to-head in the world's most explosive market: AI. And in the backdrop, a global trade war threatens to ratchet up the pressure.
Earlier this week, the Wall Street Journal first reported that Huawei is working on tests of its new Ascend 910D chip, which competes somewhere between Nvidia's midrange H100 and H200 chips, which are targeted at AI applications but subject to export controls to China. Huawei plans to have samples of the chips as early as the next few weeks, said the WSJ.
But this is just one element of the multi-layered threat to U.S. technology since the arrival of escalating tariffs, export controls, and the trade war, which China is using to build momentum for its technology industry with countries that feel alienated from the United States. That tactic appears to be working so far.
For those in the networking industry, Huawei's recent success may be reminiscent of its rise as a power in networking technology in the early 2000s, when it methodically developed products to rival the portfolio of networking giant Cisco. Huawei gained huge market share worldwide, especially in developing nations, before the United States and some European countries moved to ban Huawei products for security reasons.
AI raises those stakes even further, with its increased privacy and data security concerns, as well as its potential market size. Huawei's threat to Nvidia mirrors the threat it posed to Cisco. And with a $25 billion R&D budget, armies of well-trained engineers, and the support of the Chinese government, Huawei has enormous market power.
At the heart of the tech upheaval is the U.S. administration's all-out trade war with China. In addition to the cumulative 145% tariff on imports from China, there are export restrictions on AI chips as well.
Nvidia was told on April 9 that its H20 chip will be subject to licensing for export to China. That chip, which accounts for several billion dollars in revenue annually for Nvidia, was designed especially for the Chinese market due to its limited capabilities compared to other Nvidia GPUs. With the new restrictions, Nvidia is, according to its recent 8K SEC filing, taking 'up to approximately $5.5 billion of charges associated with H20 products for inventory, purchase commitments, and related reserves.'
AMD issued a similar statement on April 15 that it will take an $800 million charge due to restriction of its specially designed MI308 chip for the Chinese market.
CEO Huang has been working overtime to set a more favorable trade policy. Earlier he apparently managed to avoid Trump restrictions on H20 chips for China in return for a pledge to manufacture chips and entire supercomputers in the U.S. over the next few years. But that appears to have been only a temporary relief from export controls.
Mending the tariff troubles was a key focus for Nvidia following Huang's recent trips to Beijing and Shanghai. On April 16, Huang flew to China, where on April 17 he met with Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng and DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng. According to multiple sources, the mission was to provide new avenues in the Chinese market and to improve the environment for negotiations between the U.S. and the PRC. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has also been firm on curbing any chip sales to China, and there's little sign of any break in policy.
Huang has said the Trump administration should consider revising the regulations of AI export controls. Increased U.S. export restrictions on AI chips to China are pushing the Chinese market toward domestic providers such as Huawei—but they could also have the knock-on effect of pushing the rest of the world to look at Chinese technology.
In general, Huang's comments show Nvidia is increasingly concerned about the impact the trade war will have on its business, as is the stock market. Nvidia shares are down 24% in the past six months. A pivotal moment came with the release in January of new AI models from Chinese company DeepSeek, which shows that the prices of AI technology are dropping and China is stepping up its competition. Recent AI chip controls and Huawei's expanding influence contribute to the problem.
Meanwhile, U.S. tariffs and export restrictions imposed by the Trump administration are snarling technology supply chains, threatening production, and forcing a dramatic shift in plans for a range of U.S. companies. Tariffs are among several factors contributing to the recent selloff in technology stocks. The longer that proposed tariff policies go without negotiated settlements, the bigger the trouble for technology and other businesses. Without clear insight into the longer-term path of trade deals, executives will have trouble sourcing components, planning budgets, and figuring out where to build manufacturing facilities.
Apple, one of the largest companies most under threat of the trade war—in addition to Nvidia —has responded by saying it will shift the bulk of its production to India from China.
Apple's problems may be more treatable than Nvidia's, because its challenges are more rooted in the supply side rather than the demand side. Apple can move production out of China but realizes the bulk of revenue elsewhere. Nvidia's challenges are more complex and highlighted by potential competition from Huawei. If geopolitical tension drives more countries away from the U.S., Huawei can benefit by finding new customers.
While at this point the ultimate impacts of export controls and the trade war on Nvidia's overall business are difficult to quantify, the recent trend shows a gathering wave of concerns. This appears to present the largest opportunity to Huawei since the Western embargo of its telecommunications business. It's now emerging as one of Nvidia's chief rivals in the AI chip business.
Like most industry research and analyst firms, Futuriom provides paid research and marketing services to technology companies. These services include subscription research, custom research, and report sponsorships. Of the companies mentioned in this article, Futuriom has had a small paid relationship with NVIDIA in the past 12 months. Individuals from some of the companies mentioned may subscribe to our premium research service, Cloud Tracker Pro.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Electra Wins Audience Prize at WMF 2025 for Advancing Battery Intelligence with AI
Electra Wins Audience Prize at WMF 2025 for Advancing Battery Intelligence with AI

Associated Press

time11 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Electra Wins Audience Prize at WMF 2025 for Advancing Battery Intelligence with AI

BOSTON, MA, UNITED STATES, June 9, 2025 / / -- Electra, the Boston-based company leader in AI-driven battery intelligence, has been awarded the Audience Prize at WMF - We Make Future 2025, Italy's largest innovation and technology festival. Selected as one of six international finalists from thousands of applicants, Electra presented on the event's Mainstage in front of more than 5,000 attendees and a global audience from over 90 countries. During the high-stakes startup competition, Electra's CMO Giovanni Rossi delivered a three-minute pitch focused on one of the most pressing challenges of the energy transition: making battery systems more intelligent, reliable, and efficient. 'As solar and wind become central to global energy production, the role of batteries in storing and delivering energy at the right time is more critical than ever,' said Giovanni Rossi during his pitch. 'However, today's systems suffer from limited monetization potential, unpredictable failures, and slow innovation cycles'. Electra tackles today's battery system challenges with two proprietary software platforms. EnPower is a digital twin solution that accelerates the design, testing, and integration of advanced battery systems, while EVE-Ai is a real-time engine that continuously monitors, optimizes, and controls battery performance. Together, they empower manufacturers and operators to cut development time and costs, predict faults up to three months in advance, extend battery lifespan up to 40%, enhance safety and reliability, and unlock new revenue opportunities (up to a 15% annual increase in ROI). Fully chemistry-agnostic, the system supports a wide range of applications, from electric vehicles to e-mobility to grid-scale energy storage (BESS). Electra's offering stands out in a fragmented battery software market by combining modeling, analytics, and control in a unified platform. The Volta Foundation also recognized the company as one of the few global leaders at the intersection of AI and battery technology. Founded in Boston by Fabrizio Martini, a former NASA engineer, Electra now operates across the United States, Europe, India, and South Korea. Following a successful $21 million Series A, the company is now scaling its international presence and fast-tracking product innovation to support the next phase of growth. Electra shared the WMF 2025 stage with five other finalist startups: Invigilo AI, ALBA Robot, Helix Carbon, CircularPlace, and AndromedAI. The event was hosted by Veronica Maffei and Tiarne Hawkins, and organized by Search On Media Group. The pitch is available to watch here on YouTube. About Electra Vehicles Electra Vehicles is the leading AI-driven cleantech and B2B software company dedicated to unlocking the full potential of battery technology. Our mission is to drive society forward by powering a sustainable, electric future. We deliver cutting-edge AI/ML-enabled solutions and advanced data analytics to Automotive OEMs, Tier 1 Suppliers, Battery Manufacturers, Fleet Operators, and BESS Operators. By transforming battery performance, safety, and efficiency, we empower key stakeholders to lead the transition toward a cleaner, electrified world. Giovanni Rossi Electra Vehicles +1 617-741-8736 [email protected] Legal Disclaimer: EIN Presswire provides this news content 'as is' without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.

PayPal's Undervalued Pivot
PayPal's Undervalued Pivot

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

PayPal's Undervalued Pivot

I've been watching PayPal slide from around $90 in early February to under $70 today, and I think the selloff is overdone. PayPal may look like yesterday's fintech story, but under the surface, a strategic pivot is underwayone that centers on product reinvention and margin-focused execution. While headline TPV growth remains subdued and competition from Apple Pay and Google Pay intensifies, PayPal is quietly reshaping its core checkout experience with AI-powered flows, scaling up Venmo monetization, and pushing deeper into higher-margin branded transactions. These aren't just tweaksthey're a calculated shift toward a leaner, platform-driven model that emphasizes profitability over volume. With transaction margins rising and EPS up 23% year-over-year, the company is proving that it can grow earnings despite top-line headwinds. At just 13.8x forward earningswell below its historical averageI believe the market is underappreciating the strength of this transition and the earnings leverage it unlocks. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Sign with PYPL. PYPL Data by GuruFocus I see the heart of PayPal's business in its transactionsabout 60 per account each month on average, a number they're aiming to grow in 2025. Their main moneymaker is that ~3% fee they take on each transaction, so naturally, more spending means more revenue. They also bring in some money from other stuff like interest on balances, subscriptions, and referral fees, but about 90% of their total revenue still comes from transaction fees. That's why management is so focused on boosting total transactions. In 2024, PayPal processed $1.68 trillion in TPVup a huge 165% since 2018which keeps it at the top of the online payments space. But here's the catch: while TPV keeps rising, the take rate (what PayPal earns from that volume) has steadily dropped. It's now down to 1.72%, which is a 5.3% decline year over year. That tensionbetween massive scale and lower cut per transactionis what makes PayPal's model tricky to evaluate. In the latest quarter, we saw this play out clearly. They beat expectations on EPS, which shows their cost discipline is working, but they missed on transaction margin and saw basically no user growth. Venmo monetization is still a bit of a slow burn too. And yeah, take rate pressure isn't going away overnight. But I don't think those negatives outweigh the positives. Branded checkout TPV grew 6% (adjusting for leap day), and the refreshed checkout experience is now live on over 45% of U.S. flowsup from just 30% last quarter. That's a big move. To me, that signals the pivot is working. If they can keep shifting volume toward high-margin branded flows and roll out more of these AI-powered checkout tools, I think they'll hit their transaction targetsand start expanding margins again too. PayPal is under pressure to turn its massive scale into richer profits. They're leaning into Venmo, PayPal Ads, credit products, and AI?powered checkout to lift margins. With a presence in nearly 200 markets and acceptance of 140 currencies, they've built the infrastructure to evolve from a toll booth into an intelligent commerce platform. The upgraded checkout flow isn't just skin?deepit speeds up logins, cuts latency, and showcases BNPL more prominently, which drove BNPL TPV up 20% and monthly active BNPL accounts up 18% YoY. I expect continued focus on BNPL, since users who buy now, pay later spend 33% more and make 17% more purchases. On top of that, late fees and higher interest rates on these plans give PayPal an extra revenue lift. By making checkout smoother and juicier, PayPal can boost TPV and keep customers coming back. Venmo often gets dismissed as a teen?focused P2P app, but I see it as a hidden engine. Since PayPal's $800 million Braintree deal in 2013, Venmo has exploded in popularityespecially for instant mobile transfers. Revenue from Venmo surged 20% YoY last quarter, fueled by over 50% TPV growth in Pay with Venmo and 40% growth in Venmo debit card users. It's morphing into a full?blown consumer wallet, not just a P2P toy. eMarketer expects U.S. mobile P2P users to climb from 170 million in 2024 to 200 million by 2028 (+16%), which should supercharge Venmo's growth. Notably, PayPal turned around its customer?count decline in Q4 '24, ending Q1 '25 with 436 million users (2% YoY growth), largely thanks to Venmo. I think Venmo can become a cash cow and a major TPV driver for PayPal. Under the surface, PayPal's financial foundation is getting stronger. Transaction Expense Rate fell 8 bps YoY to 0.89% thanks to a better product and merchant mix. That pushed Transaction Margin Dollars (TM$) to $3.7 billion (up 7% YoY), outpacing both revenue and TPV growth. Since Alex Chriss became CEO in Q4 '23, TM$ growth has stayed in the high single digits, showing management's ability to grow profitably. Despite just 1% revenue growth YoY, non?GAAP operating income jumped 16% to $1.616 billion, and non?GAAP margins expanded to 20.7% from 18%. They achieved this by cutting costs, restructuring, and reducing headcount, proving that reinvestment is funding high?ROI initiatives like the new checkout and debit card platform. I expect these operating leverage gains to continuedriven by rising transactions per active account, TPV growth from Venmo, and ongoing cost discipline. Free cash flow looked weaker, down 45% YoY to $964 million, but that was mostly timing on European BNPL receivables. Adjusted FCF was $1.381 billion (down 26%), still solid. In Q1 alone, PayPal repurchased $1.5 billion of stock (average price $77), and $6 billion in buybacks over the past 12 months cut the share count by 7%. With the stock trading around $72 (and even touching $57 in April), I expect management to accelerate buybacks, which will supercharge EPS alongside tight cost control. They reaffirmed FCF guidance of $67 billion and $6 billion in buybacks for the yearso I anticipate aggressive repurchases at these levels to drive further upside. PYPL Data by GuruFocus A recent tariff deal with China froze import duties at 30%, easing fears of higher costs for U.S. online shoppers. March consumer spending jumped 0.7% as buyers rushed to lock in current prices, and April inflation came in cooler than expected (+0.2% vs. +0.3% est.). I believe fears of renewed tariffs will keep pushing online spending higher into 2Q '25. Investors should watch May and beyond for consumer?spending dataif it outperforms, PayPal's TPV could surprise on the upside in upcoming earnings. I've been paying attention to which big?name investors are placing their bets on PayPal, and it tells me something important. Ray Dalio (Trades, Portfolio) boosted his stake by over 50%, Paul Tudor Jones (Trades, Portfolio) piled on 184%, and Jeremy Grantham (Trades, Portfolio) added 22%. Joel Greenblatt (Trades, Portfolio) chipped in another 24%, Lee Ainslie (Trades, Portfolio) was up by 26%, and John Hussman (Trades, Portfolio) upped his position by 150%. Even Mario Gabelli (Trades, Portfolio) increased his holding by 14%. Those are serious moves from people known for finding value. Sure, a few managers like Philippe Laffont (Trades, Portfolio) and Cathie Wood trimmed their exposure, but the real heavy hitters are clearly buying the dip. To me, that reinforces the idea that PayPal's current valuation is too low and that insiders see upside ahead. What really gets me excited is that PayPal is already highly profitable, thanks to its global reach, strong brand, and growing user base. Yet it's trading at just 13.8x forward P/Ewell below its five?year average of almost 30x. At the same time, PayPal is still growing earnings: non?GAAP EPS jumped 23% in Q1 2025, and consensus expects about 12% YoY growth in FY '26. That growth is fueled by sustainable shiftsmore higher?margin branded checkout, ramping up Venmo monetization, and pulling back from low?margin Braintree volumes. Those moves lifted transaction margins by 274 bps in Q1 and are driving strong free cash flow. Plus, PayPal has beaten EPS estimates five quarters in a row, including a $0.17 beat in Q1 2025 with nearly 9% YoY EPS growth. If I anchor my valuation on a conservative 17x18x forward P/E, I get a price target between $88 and $94about 2330% upside. And if sentiment improves enough to push PayPal toward the sector median multiple, I think $100+ per share is within reach. Right now the market treats PayPal like a shrinking middleman instead of a lean, growing platformcreating a rare value?investor opportunity in my view. PYPL Data by GuruFocus Another important point that I noted here was that PayPal projects its Non?GAAP EPS to be in the range of $4.95 to $5.10, representing a 6% to 10% growth compared to the FY 2024 figure of $4.67. Based on the stock price at the time of writing, the implied FWD P/E ratio for FY 2025 is thus approximately 13.8x based on the midpoint of the EPS guidance of $5.025. Assuming a midpoint tax rate of 21.5%, the P/EBT ratio stands at around 10.8x, quite close to the 10x EBT threshold in the so?called Buffett's 10x pretax rule. Just to give some context on this rule: EBT is easier to benchmark against bond yields. The best equity investments are bond?like, and when we speak of bond yield, that yield is pretax. So, a 10x EBT multiple provides a 10% pretax earnings yield, directly comparable to a 10% yield bond. As a result, if I buy a business with staying power at 10x EBT and even if the business stagnates forever, I'm already perfectly happy making a 10% pretax return. Any growth is a bonus. The rule is named after Buffett because he paid about 10x EBT for many of his largest, most successful investmentsCoca?Cola, American Express, Wells Fargo, Walmart, Burlington Northern, and more recently Apple. Hence, with a 10.8x EBT multiple, PayPal fits the rule nicely with a pretax yield close to 10% (9.3% precise). As I mentioned, any growth is a plus in my mind when you start with that kind of earnings yield, and I see plenty of growth potential ahead for PayPalwhether by my estimate or the consensus. I think the market's missing what's really going on with PayPal. While everyone's hung up on slow TPV growth and rising competition, PayPal is quietly shifting gears. They're overhauling checkout with AI, pushing harder on higher-margin branded payments, and finally starting to make real money from Venmo. That's a big deal. It's not just business as usualit's a pivot toward a leaner, more profitable model. Even with all that, the stock is still trading at just ~13.8x forward earnings, which is way below where it's been historically. Plus, they've got strong free cash flow and are buying back shares in a smart, disciplined way. To me, that sets up a classic disconnect between what the company's doing and what the market's pricing in. If these changes keep playing outand I think they willsentiment should shift, and I wouldn't be surprised to see PayPal back above $100. At today's levels, I see a lot more upside than downside. This looks like a solid buying opportunity for anyone thinking long-term. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.

NATO chief Rutte calls for 400% increase in the alliance's air and missile defense
NATO chief Rutte calls for 400% increase in the alliance's air and missile defense

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

NATO chief Rutte calls for 400% increase in the alliance's air and missile defense

LONDON (AP) — NATO members need to increase their air and missile defenses by 400% to counter the threat from Russia, the head of the military alliance plans to say on Monday. Secretary-General Mark Rutte will say during a visit to London that NATO must take a 'quantum leap in our collective defense' to face growing instability and threats, according to extracts released by NATO before Rutte's speech. Rutte is due to meet U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer at 10 Downing St. ahead of a NATO summit in the Netherlands where the 32-nation alliance is likely to commit to a big hike in military spending. Like other NATO members, the U.K. has been reassessing its defense spending since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Starmer has pledged to increase British defense spending to 2.5% of gross domestic product by 2027 and to 3% by 2034. Rutte has proposed a target of 3.5% of economic output on military spending and another 1.5% on 'defense-related expenditure' such as roads, bridges, airfields and sea ports. He said last week he is confident the alliance will agree to the target at its summit in The Hague on June 24-25. At the moment, 22 of the 32 member countries meet or exceed NATO's current 2% target. The new target would meet a demand by President Donald Trump that member states spend 5% of gross domestic product on defense. Trump has long questioned the value of NATO and complained that the U.S. provides security to European countries that don't contribute enough. Rutte plans to say in a speech at the Chatham House think tank in London that NATO needs thousands more armored vehicles and millions more artillery shells, as well as a 400% increase in air and missile defense. 'We see in Ukraine how Russia delivers terror from above, so we will strengthen the shield that protects our skies,' he plans to say. 'Wishful thinking will not keep us safe. We cannot dream away the danger. Hope is not a strategy. So NATO has to become a stronger, fairer and more lethal alliance.' European NATO members, led by the U.K. and France, have scrambled to coordinate their defense posture as Trump transforms American foreign policy, seemingly sidelining Europe as he looks to end the war in Ukraine. Last week the U.K. government said it would build new nuclear-powered attack submarines, prepare its army to fight a war in Europe and become 'a battle-ready, armor-clad nation.' The plans represent the most sweeping changes to British defenses since the collapse of the Soviet Union more than three decades ago.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store