
Josh Hawley and the Republican Populists, at War With Their Party
The lone Republican vote in the Senate last month to protect consumers from bank overdraft fees came from an unlikely Democratic ally: Senator Josh Hawley, the archconservative from Missouri best known for calling out 'wokeness' in all sectors of society, and for raising his fist to offer solidarity with supporters of President Trump hours before the Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol.
And yet the overdraft vote was hardly the first time Mr. Hawley had stood apart from his Republican colleagues. In 2023 he introduced a bill to cap out-of-pocket insulin costs at $25 per month, which died in committee for lack of Republican support. He has broken from his party by refusing to vote for cuts to Medicaid as part of the budget reconciliation process.
In March he joined a Democrat, Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey, to offer a bill that would speed up the contracting process for new unions. A G.O.P. senator, Bernie Moreno of Ohio, signed on as a cosponsor, but otherwise, Mr. Hawley said in a recent phone interview, 'not a single Republican would touch it.'
Since his arrival to the Senate in 2019 at the age of 39 as its youngest member, Mr. Hawley has charted two seemingly parallel courses: as a full-throttle champion of socially conservative causes and, somewhat less noisily, as a populist who aligns himself with Senator Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent, on many populist issues.
'His ultimate goal is to break the alliance the social conservatives have had with the corporate world since the Reagan era,' said Matt Stoller, a former Senate aide to Mr. Sanders.
The term 'populist' conjures two raw-knuckled protagonists of the agrarian South, Andrew Jackson and Huey Long, with whom the whippetlike Mr. Hawley, a Missouri banker's son who attended Stanford and Yale Law School, would seem to have little in common. But prioritizing working-class Americans over elites has been a key rhetorical theme in Mr. Trump's political ascendancy, and Mr. Hawley has embraced it.
His powerful compatriots in the movement include not only the president but also Vice President JD Vance and Stephen K. Bannon, one of Mr. Trump's top allies.
'The Senate is the Hate Trump Club,' Mr. Bannon said in an interview. 'Hawley's the only populist we've got there.'
Mr. Hawley may be a lonely voice, but he underscores a central question of the second Trump term: What will the president do to improve the lives of the working-class Americans who voted him back into office?
Tariffs, Mr. Hawley said in the interview. He called them 'a potentially vital tool' in bringing industry back to the United States, despite the turmoil in the financial markets and the fears of high prices they have ignited, particularly for those with lower incomes.
Mr. Hawley said he was particularly pleased about the 25 percent tariffs on imported vehicles, 'which are being cheered loudly by workers in my state.' He added that Mr. Trump's 'instincts are absolutely correct' in his call to repeal taxes on tips, overtime and Social Security.
But he was more skeptical about extending the corporate tax cuts passed by Congress during Mr. Trump's first term. 'The populist-nationalist case for them was that they were meant to encourage companies to pay workers better and to bring back American jobs,' he said. 'The question is, have they done that? Not really.'
Skeptics suggest that Mr. Hawley's populism and the current Trump-inflected iteration is, like movements past, motivated more by grievance politics than by a desire for economic progress.
'As seriously as I'd prefer to take their ideas, I tend to put the term in quotes,' said Hannah Gurman, an associate professor of U.S. history and American studies at New York University. 'You look at how Vance said he's for unions, but not for the public sector or teachers. And you look at Hawley, who says he wants more industry in America but voted against all the Biden initiatives because they were too woke. There's always a cultural program to use as an excuse not to advance a serious policy.'
An Era Like Roosevelt's
Mr. Hawley said his populism began to take shape in his 20s when he was writing a book, 'Theodore Roosevelt: Preacher of Righteousness,' which included a focus on the economic inequities of the Gilded Age and was published by Yale University Press in 2008. 'I came to realize that we're living through a period like Roosevelt's,' he said, 'one where power has become increasingly concentrated among the very wealthy at the expense of normal Americans.'
Mr. Hawley planted his first populist markers as Missouri's attorney general. In 2017, he filed legal action against three of the state's largest opioid manufacturers, saying they had violated Missouri's consumer protection laws. That same year, Mr. Hawley became the first state attorney general to investigate Google over potential antitrust violations.
Those interests deepened in the Senate where, he said, his experience 'has only confirmed how very real the concentration of economic and political power is.' In his first speech on the Senate floor, in May 2019, Mr. Hawley criticized 'big banks, big tech, big multinational corporations, along with their allies in the academy and the media' as aristocratic architects of a society that 'works mainly for themselves.'
Mr. Hawley's portfolio was soon overshadowed by his allegiance to Mr. Trump, who after his first impeachment trial ended in February 2020 singled out Mr. Hawley as 'one of the greatest supporters on the impeachment hoax.' Ten months later, Mr. Hawley was the first Republican senator to declare that he would object to the 2020 election results.
But Mr. Hawley was also working with Mr. Sanders at the time to steer direct payments of $1,200 to Americans as part of a Covid relief bill.
A year later, Mr. Hawley showed deference to President Joseph R. Biden Jr.'s trustbusting Federal Trade Commission chairwoman, Lina Khan, in a committee hearing. He even offered her a chance to respond to the insinuation by a fellow Republican, Senator Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee, that Ms. Khan had Marxist sympathies. The Wall Street Journal's editorial board later published a column with the arch title 'Josh Hawley Loves Lina Khan.'
Still, Mr. Hawley is regarded as a loner who has not built coalitions in the Senate like Mr. Vance did during his two years there. 'I'm not an arm-twister,' he told The New York Times five years ago.
His aloofness has extended even to those who find common cause with him, like Representative Emanuel Cleaver II, a Democrat and fellow Missourian who took to social media to concur with Mr. Hawley's support for improved rural mail delivery and for banning stock trading for members of Congress. But he said he had yet to hear back from Mr. Hawley. 'He's our state's senior senator, but he's not actively involved in our delegation,' Mr. Cleaver said.
Mr. Hawley is considerably more public-facing when it comes to hot-button cultural issues. His critiques of major corporations often include the view that, as he put it during an interview with Fox Business in 2023, such businesses possess a 'radical ideological agenda' bent on promoting diversity while censoring conservative perspectives.
In a speech last month at the evangelical Liberty University, he asserted that America was the greatest nation in history 'because our spiritual convictions are the convictions of the Bible.' In 2023, he published a book titled 'Manhood: The Masculine Virtues America Needs.' And in December he wrote a letter to Mr. Biden's defense secretary, Lloyd J. Austin III, accusing him of prioritizing 'progressive gender experimentation ahead of warfighting' by permitting a transgender military employee to live in women's barracks.
His wife, the lawyer Erin Morrow Hawley, successfully argued the case before the Supreme Court that overturned Roe v. Wade, and Mr. Hawley is himself an outspoken opponent of abortion. This year, Mr. Hawley introduced a bill that would end federal funding for Planned Parenthood.
Dipping Toes in Populist Waters
Mr. Hawley belongs to a conservative intelligentsia that includes Oren Cass, the influential founder and chief economist of the think tank American Compass. Like Mr. Hawley and Mr. Vance, Mr. Cass, 41, came of age not during the laissez-faire economic policies of the Reagan era but during the financial crisis of 2008 and 2009. 'A key driver for us,' Mr. Cass said, 'is the fundamental insight that free markets aren't delivering on the things we care about the most.'
Some Republican legislators have dipped their toe to test the populist waters, according to Mr. Cass. He included in the group Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas, who has proposed increasing the minimum wage through an e-verify system; Senator Jim Banks of Indiana, who has teamed up with Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat, to address how private equity consolidation is affecting fire truck manufacturing and the communities that rely on effective firefighting; and Senator Roger Marshall of Kansas, who has worked with Senate Democrats to reduce credit card swipe fees.
'I never ran for office thinking I was populist,' Mr. Marshall said in an interview. 'But on the campaign trail, I heard from a lot of farmers, ranchers and union workers who didn't feel like their senators had been fighting for them. I prioritize Main Street over Wall Street.'
Not everyone on the right accepts that dichotomy. 'It's the performative rhetoric of people who think in cartoon categories,' said George Will, the Washington Post columnist and veteran conservative commentator.
Mr. Will described populism as 'the belief that the public knows what it wants and that public opinion should be translated into policy without being delayed or diluted by intermediate institutions.'
'It's the exact opposite of what Madison talked about in using Congress to filter and refine public opinion,' he added, referring to James Madison's advocacy of checks and balances rather than a government continually roiled by public passions.
Representative Don Bacon, Republican of Nebraska, likens his party's emerging attitudes to a partisan role reversal. 'I feel like we're in a blender of changing political identities,' he said in an interview. 'This populism reminds me of Democratic liberals in the '70s: apologists for the Russians, protectionists, skeptics of law enforcement. And now these populists are saying, 'We're tired of war,' when we're not even in one. The last time Republicans were this isolationist was the 1930s, and we lost Congress for most of the next 60 years.'
Mr. Hawley, who is thought to harbor presidential ambitions, has been careful not to get too far out in front of his party, or for that matter Mr. Trump.
But, he said: 'Donald Trump's election showed this: If the Republican Party is going to be a true majority party, we have to be pro-worker. The voters are giving us a chance now, but they've not bought in. We have to deliver.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Associated Press
4 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Inflation data threatened by government hiring freeze as tariffs loom
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Labor Department has cut back on the inflation data it collects because of the Trump administration's government hiring freeze, raising concerns among economists about the quality of the inflation figures just as they are being closely watched for the impact of tariffs. The department's Bureau of Labor Statistics, which produces the monthly consumer price index, the most closely watched inflation measure, said Wednesday that it is 'reducing sample in areas across the country' and stopped collecting price data entirely in April in Lincoln, Nebraska, and Provo, Utah. It also said it has stopped collecting data this month in Buffalo, New York. In an email that the BLS sent to economists, viewed by The Associated Press, the agency said that it 'temporarily reduced the number of outlets and quotes it attempted to collect due to a staffing shortage' in April. The reduced data collection 'will be kept in place until the hiring freeze is lifted.' President Donald Trump froze federal hiring on his first day in office and extended the freeze in April until late July, suggesting future inflation reports will also involve less data collection. The cutbacks have intensified worries among economists that government spending cuts could degrade the federal government's ability to compile key economic data on employment, prices, and the broader economy. The BLS also said last month that it will no longer collect wholesale prices in about 350 categories for its Producer Price Index, a measure of price changes before they reach the consumer. The cutbacks are also occurring at a time of heightened uncertainty about the economy and the impact of Trump's sweeping tariffs on hiring, growth and inflation. 'The PPI is cutting hundreds of indexes from production, and the CPI is now being constructed with less data,' Omair Sharif, chief economist at the consulting firm Inflation Insights, said in an email. 'That alone is worrying given that we're heading into the teeth of the tariff impact on prices.' Earlier this year, the Trump administration disbanded several advisory committees that worked with BLS and other statistical agencies on fine-tuning its data-gathering. The BLS said that the cutbacks 'have minimal impact' on the overall inflation data, but 'they may increase the volatility' of the reported prices of specific items. Alan Detmeister, an economist at UBS, an investment bank, said the cutbacks likely had little impact on April's inflation figures. But 'if these types of cuts continue, they will degrade the reliability and efficacy of these statistical agencies,' he said.


Fox News
9 minutes ago
- Fox News
NEWT GINGRICH: Pay less, know more — Trump is slashing red tape and lowering your healthcare costs
One of the boldest and most consistent themes in President Donald J. Trump's healthcare agenda is his determination to reduce the role and power of middlemen. From insurance companies to pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) – and even hospitals –these intermediaries profit from the inefficiencies of our bloated health system. The result is higher costs for American families. As I explain in my new book, "Trump's Triumph: America's Greatest Comeback," the U.S. healthcare system isn't expensive just because care is costly. It's expensive because the system is complex – by design. The third-party payment structure, whether public or private, adds layers of bureaucracy. This opens the door for middlemen to offer supposed solutions that serve their own bottom lines – not patients. It's a vicious cycle: more rules lead to more middlemen, which lead to even more rules, red tape, and rising costs. President Trump understood this – and he took action. In his first term, he issued a groundbreaking executive order on price transparency. For the first time, hospitals were required to disclose the real cost of procedures, enabling patients to compare prices before receiving care. While the Biden administration weakened enforcement, Trump doubled down in his second term with an even stronger push for what he called "radical transparency." Radical transparency is the antidote to healthcare's worst inefficiencies. When patients and employers can see wide price differences for the same procedures – even within the same hospital system – the games played behind the scenes get exposed. These inflated prices often have little to do with quality and everything to do with how well insurers negotiate – or how many middlemen take a cut. The same is true for prescription drugs. PBMs – giant corporations that control which drugs are covered and at what cost – use their market power to inflate prices. Three PBMs control 80 percent of the market. They're often subsidiaries of major insurers, forming vertically integrated monopolies. New data from the Pacific Research Institute shows that most PBMs skim more money off high-cost prescriptions than European countries charge. It's no wonder Americans are paying more. Hospitals play a role as well. Many exploit a well-intentioned federal program known as 340B, which allows them to purchase drugs at steep discounts. Instead of passing the savings to patients, they bill insurers full price and pocket the difference. The program was meant to expand care for low-income patients, but there's little oversight to ensure this happens. President Trump's recent executive order on drug pricing targets this broken system. By creating a pathway for manufacturers to sell directly to patients, health plans, pharmacies, and clinics – without the markup – he's offering a way to bypass the middlemen. This isn't theory – it's already working. When insulin makers launched direct-to-consumer programs, they sold the same drug at one-fourth the price patients were paying through insurance – while still making a profit. That's the power of real market competition – without a single government price control. This stands in sharp contrast to the Left's top-down vision. Whether it's price controls, centralized purchasing, or government-run insurance, the left's answer is always more bureaucracy. But more bureaucracy means more complexity – and more room for middlemen to thrive. Perhaps the most visionary part of President Trump's health care agenda is his call to Make America Healthy Again. For decades, we've operated a "sick care" system focused on treating illness after it strikes. Trump's approach is different. It emphasizes prevention, lifestyle, and personal responsibility – turning Americans from passive recipients into active participants in their own health. In this model, the government's role isn't to run the system but to create an environment in which patients and doctors can lead – with access to better tools, more transparency, and useful information. That means clearer labeling for ultra-processed foods, ensuring gold standard scientific data free of conflicts of interest, and addressing environmental factors that contribute to chronic disease. These kinds of structural reforms empower people to make informed choices and live healthier lives – without mandates or micromanagement. It's a model that eliminates the ultimate middleman: the system itself. President Trump's leadership has laid the groundwork for a transparent, patient-centered, free-market healthcare system. But the job isn't done. Congress should join him in continuing this fight – not just to lower costs, but to restore power to the American people. America deserves a healthcare system that benefits Americans – not industry middlemen.

Epoch Times
10 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
US Retirement Savings Rates Reach Record High in First Quarter: Fidelity
Americans saved for their golden years at a record pace to kick off 2025, a new In the first quarter, 401(k) savings rates reached an all-time high of 14.3 percent. This was driven by a 9.5 percent employee contribution rate and a 4.8 percent employer contribution rate, falling short of Fidelity's suggested savings rate of 15 percent.