Democrat Roy Cooper jumps into race for North Carolina Senate seat
Cooper served as the North Carolina governor from 2017 to 2025, during which he expanded Medicaid coverage in the state, raised teacher pay and worked to address climate change. He previously served in the state's legislature and as North Carolina's attorney general.
After Cooper's announcement, the National Republican Senatorial Committee, the main campaigm arm for Senate Republicans, quickly released an ad criticizing him as a "wreck."
"There are people you trust in the driver's seat. Roy Cooper isn't one of them," the narrator of the ad says, knocking his decision to implement COVID-19 lockdowns and veto a bill restricting transgender athletes from participating in girls' sports, among other issues.
Though former Democratic Rep. Wiley Nickel of North Carolina announced a Senate run in April, numerous news reports indicate he is deciding whether to suspend his campaign.
Democrats have had mixed success in North Carolina. The party last won a Senate election in North Carolina during the the 2008 cycle, when Kay Hagan defeated then-incumbent Republican Elizabeth Dole. That's also the last time a Democratic presidential nominee won the state when Barack Obama defeated John McCain en route to capturing the White House.
Hagan, meantime, lost her reelection bid to Tillis in the 2014 election. Republicans currently hold a 53-47 majority in the Senate. The North Carolina Senate race will be closely watched as Democrats seek to regain control of the upper chamber and try to block Trump's second-term agenda from advancing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Trump administration to unveil tougher solar and wind subsidy rules
Aug 14 (Reuters) - The Trump administration is expected as soon as Monday to take another step toward curbing the growth of renewable energy in the United States by making it harder for companies to claim federal tax subsidies for wind and solar energy. The Treasury Department next week will reach a 45-day deadline, set by U.S. President Donald Trump in July, to revise rules governing who can qualify for clean energy tax credits that the Republicans' One Big Beautiful Bill Act is phasing out years earlier than planned. The rule under scrutiny centers around what it means for a project to be considered under construction, a definition that is critical to companies building facilities that require years of planning. The OBBBA requires projects to begin construction by July of next year or enter service by the end of 2027 to qualify for a 30% tax credit and bonuses that can push the subsidy even higher. Under previous law, the credits were available through 2032. In an executive order last month, three days after signing the OBBBA into law, Trump directed Treasury to restrict the use of safe harbors, rules that have allowed project owners for years to claim tax credits so long as they incur 5% of their costs or make meaningful physical progress before the credit expires. Washington policy advisory firm Capstone said it could see Treasury requiring developers to incur a higher percentage of costs, such as 10% or 15%. Under the physical work requirement, the agency could exclude off-site construction or require more contact with the government and proof of continuous work. The Treasury Department did not respond to a request for comment. Tightening the requirements would be the latest in a string of steps the administration has taken to stall development of wind and solar energy, which Trump says are unreliable, expensive, and dependent on Chinese supply chains. According to advisory firm Clean Energy Associates, the United States could lose about 60 gigawatts of planned solar capacity through 2030 if stricter "beginning of construction" rules are implemented. That would be enough electricity to power about 10 million homes. Project developers and financiers have leaned on the tax credit rules to guide their investment and construction decisions for the last decade. "The executive order and the uncertainty has actually had a more negative impact than the legislation itself," said Reagan Farr, CEO of solar project developer Silicon Ranch. In the six weeks since the executive order, some companies have stalled progress, while others have ramped up activity to start as many projects as possible, said Javad Asghari, a partner with the law firm Simpson Thacher who focuses on energy and infrastructure projects. Aaron Halimi, founder and president of San Francisco-based solar project developer Renewable Properties, described measures his company has taken to protect its access to subsidies he fears could be at risk. "We've taken many steps to safe harbor a large portion of our pipeline of projects we plan to deliver between now and end of 2029," Halimi said, including buying transformers and American-made panels, and increasing lines of credit for purchasing equipment.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Democrats can win in 2028. But we need to oust corporate candidates first
If the Democratic party wants to win back power in 2028, then look no further than the 2026 election cycle as the most important moment to focus on. It is not three years from now when working class voters will decide, like they did in November, whether they still believe the Democratic party isn't fighting for their interests – it's the next 12 months. And to make it abundantly clear, it is not going to be the same 257 Democrats that are in Congress today that will deliver Democrats their majority. That's why a robust, active, and exciting Democratic primary process in districts across the country is a necessary prerequisite to Democrats winning in 2026, let alone 2028. Voters have made their feelings clear, a majority do not see themselves in this party and do not believe in its leaders or many of its representatives. They need a new generation of leaders with fresh faces and bold ideas, unbought by corporate Super Pacs and billionaire donors, to give them a new path and vision to believe in. That requires working class, progressive primary challenges to the overwhelming number of corporate Democratic incumbents who have rightfully been dubbed as do-nothing electeds. We at Justice Democrats believe people-powered primaries will always be beneficial to the health of our democracy. And it's clear millions of voters believe that too – the primaries they're clamoring for are ones led for-and-by working class people, who put together campaigns with solutions as big as our crises and ambitious enough to inspire a disaffected electorate. People-powered primaries are not corporate-backed. They do not cost tens of millions of dollars to elect a candidate voters believe in – that's an auction. Voters are also not simply seeking to replace their aging corporate shill representatives with younger corporate shills. More of the same from a younger generation is still more of the same. Voters believe a majority of their elected leaders in Congress are unwilling to fight for them with the urgency and energy that they need and they don't believe it's just because they cannot stay awake in committee. They know it's because too much of this party is bought and sold by the same corporate interests and billionaires spreading millions of dollars to ensure their leaders don't fight tooth and nail to deliver universal healthcare, affordable housing, higher taxes on the 1% and lower costs for everyone else. The party has too often failed to deliver real results because corporate-funded Democrats have backed down to corporate special interests. This lack of courage has made it clear to the American people that Democrats are weak, and lack the courage to fight. That is why voters want a new generation of leaders, not just to end the scourge of career politicians that has overrun the Democratic party, but to end their billionaire-dictated approach to politics and policy. It's the moral courage – as evidenced most by the small handful of outspoken progressives in Congress – to stand up for your communities in the face of hundreds of millions of dollars in threats from corporate and rightwing Super Pacs that is the winning path forward for Democrats. But this cycle, as voters make it clear that they want unbossed and unbought leaders, too many Democratic groups, and even some that call themselves progressive, are encouraging candidates' silence in the face of lobbies like Aipac and crypto's multimillion-dollar threats. Silence in the face of genocide, silence in the face of Trump's crypto corruption, and silence on anything that might upset the rich and powerful. Lobbies like Aipac and crypto's strategy is to put fear in the hearts of every candidate and member of Congress. Too often, we hear from candidates and members who claim they are with us on the policy, but can't speak out on it because Aipac or crypto will spend against them. Silence is cowardice and cowardice inspires no one. The path to more Democratic victories is not around, behind, and under these lobbies but it's right through them, taking them head-on and ridding them from our politics once and for all. The solution to their fear-mongering is not acquiescence, it's solidarity. If we all hold the line together, they cannot divide and conquer. They cannot defeat us all. That courage and solidarity is what can unite a fractured nation of voters who distrust the entire institution of electoral politics and its ability to transform their lives for the better. Democrats can win in 2026 and subsequently in 2028 by showing voters that there is a different way to do electoral politics. The leaders of the future of the Democratic party will be defined by those willing to take on the biggest fights. Leaders who are authentically themselves, courageous and morally consistent. Leaders who have the courage to stand up for all people even in the face of massive opposition. People like Summer Lee, who won her primary and general elections in 2022 despite being one of Aipac's first-ever Super Pac targets and has since introduced legislation to ban all Super Pacs from federal elections. In 2028, Democrats will no longer be running against Donald Trump, and so they will have to be running for something. Piecemeal, technocratic, corporate-staged solutions are not a vision for the future of this country. They are a Substack post that has been written 1,000 times by the same pundits, donors, advisers and politicians that brought us a Republican trifecta in Washington and an unchanged, uninspiring, and ill-equipped Democratic party to fight them. Democratic voters are looking to 2026 to see a new generation of working class leaders that understand their struggles and will not be too scared to fight to deliver massive, generational solutions to them. They do not want to simply vote blue no matter who, they want someone and something to vote for. And with a healthy Democratic primary process led by everyday people – and not corporate Super Pacs – willing to challenge their own party's establishment, they will be able to organize and unite behind a Democratic party that can actually win by winning a better life for the people in this country. Alexandra Rojas is the executive director of Justice Democrats
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The tripling energy bills in New Jersey could be fatal for Democrats
New Jersey residents are up in arms over huge spikes in their energy costs, leading to speculation it could prove fatal for Democrats. The New Jersey's Board of Public Utilities (BPU) approved a 17-20 percent hike in June for the majority of households in The Garden State. Republicans in the state have claimed it is tied directly to Democratic Governor Phil Murphy's (pictured) move to shut down the state's nuclear and coal plants in 2017. Murphy touted offshore turbines as the way forward, but none of them have yet to be completed due to issues around costs. According to the Wall Street Journal, electric bills in the state now rank as the 12th highest in the nation, with prices 15 percent higher than the national average. The outlet also reported the state is becoming increasingly depending on out-of-state generation to meet the electricity demand. One resident who spoke with Fox News told the outlet of their horror and confusion over the price gouging. One woman said: '$200 more, I know my electrical bill. I was shocked. So to say the least, I'm very disappointed. This is killing us, and every time you turn around it's something more. You only get little pleasures in life that you enjoy, and my air conditioner is one of them.' Jack Ciattarelli (pictured), a Republican, is running to dispose Murphy in the 2026 gubernatorial election. He has used the high energy costs to blast state Democrats, saying their ambitious ideas have impacted the wallets of state residents. Murphy is term limited from running again, with the Democratic nominee congresswoman Mikie Sherill stepping up. Sherill has sought to deflect the blame on to the region's grid operating company, arguing that they are 'ripping off' citizens. Due to the soaring prices, the BPU announced that $100 in credits would be handed out to curb the rising costs. The regulator's three members approved the move that will see monthly electricity bills reduce by $50 in September, and $50 in October. Commissioner Zenon Christodoulou said: 'This should be helpful for people, but in no way solves the problem. I hope this helps some people get over the hump. This is a very difficult time.' Due to opposition from the Trump administration, plans to build offshore wind farms seem all but dead in the water for the state. In his first day in office Trump paused nearly all offshore projects in New Jersey, after he ordered agencies to stop issuing permits and leases for them.
