When Does ‘Power Book IV: Force' Return? ‘Power Book IV: Force' Season 3 Update
The beloved Joseph Sikora-led spinoff was renewed for a third season all the way back in December 2023, but it was announced in June 2024 that Season 3 would be the final installment. If you find yourself missing Tommy, the official Starz YouTube page has an 11-minute video featuring the character's best moments.
When exactly does Power Book IV: Force return with new episodes? Here's everything you need to know.
Nope. The series isn't airing any new episodes this month.
Yes! But in June 2024, it was announced that the third season of Force would be the show's final installment.
There's no official premiere date, but Starz has announced that the third and final season of Force debuts 'this fall' on the network. The fourth season of BMF concludes on August 15, so our best guess would be September or October for Force.
The new season will be available to watch on Starz.com and the Starz app (available to download on iTunes, Google Play, and Amazon). For a limited time, you can purchase three months of Starz for $3.99/month or $3.00/month when you prepay $17.99 for six months.
Starz is also available with an active subscription to Philo (as well as Sling TV and fuboTV) for an extra $10.99/month. A seven-day free trial is available for new subscribers.
You bet! You can add Hulu to your Starz account for an additional $10.99/month. Hulu offers a seven-day free trial for new subscribers.
You know it. You can add Starz to your Prime Video account for an additional $10.99/month. Amazon offers a seven-day free trial for eligible subscribers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Real Reason Disney Is Killing Hulu
Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily. Approximately two months ago, Disney closed a deal with Comcast, the parent company of NBCUniversal, that sealed Hulu's fate. The House of Mouse owned a majority stake in the junior streamer, but Comcast retained a 33 percent share, and Disney had been itching for full control over the app for years. By June, the two corporate giants had finally ironed out an agreement whereby Disney bought out NBCUniversal's remaining stake in Hulu, working the books so as to underpay its entertainment rival and reap a multibillion-dollar tax benefit in the process. But the more pressing goal behind that transaction became clear this week, when Disney CEO Bob Iger announced on an earnings call that his company will phase out Hulu's individual app and 'fully integrate' it into the Disney+ platform, centralizing both services around one ad server. Hulu is getting buried, but it's not dead yet. Going into next year, viewers will retain the choice of picking only a Hulu subscription or a Disney+ subscription—although, no matter what, they'll have to access one or the other through Disney+ itself. Meanwhile, the plan to merge Hulu With Live TV, specifically, with Fubo (the once indie live-sports streamer that's now majority owned by Disney) is still in the works, with the latter set to absorb all of the Hulu-cable bundle's branding and rights by next year. In other words: Disney, going forward, is putting its property into the streaming game for the long haul, and it will leave hesitant nonsubscribers with no choice but to tether themselves to Disney. Hulu, for all intents and purposes, will exist only in ghost form. It's kinda like how Amazon is absorbing the entire Freevee streaming service and killing off its individual app—except with much more outcry from the populace, considering how long Hulu has thrived as a far more distinctive brand with plenty of subscribers. There's a noteworthy trend here: Disney is clearly impatient to ensure that its subsidiary brands are, to consumers, automatically synonymous with Mickey Mouse, just as Freevee now is with Amazon. Already, Disney+ users could access many Hulu exclusives through the parent-company-branded app, but Hulu die-hards could not see anything from Disney+ in turn. Fubo is not fully owned by Disney and thus not the docket for full absorption (yet). But the House of Mouse owns enough of the smaller sporting enterprise that it can use it as a testing ground for the greater Hulu phasedown. More pertinent to Disney is that Fubo is a part of its portfolio at all; the small streamer had sued Disney on antitrust grounds after it announced a partnership with Fox and Warner to pool together their resources for a megasize sports platform. Disney's respective 70 percent purchase of Fubo stakes was meant to toss some loose change, make the suit go away, and keep Disney focused on its in-house sports missions. It's all in the family, and it happens to be a big family. This leads us to another industry-shifting announcement Iger made on Wednesday. Just one day before Disney's earnings call, its subsidiary brand ESPN announced that it would be more closely intertwined with the NFL than ever before. America's still-dominant athletic league would get a 10 percent stake in ESPN, and the iconic channel would acquire plenty of properties once owned by the NFL. These include broadcasting rights to RedZone's popular Sunday-afternoon game analyses, a new status for ESPN Fantasy Football as the league's official fantasy offshoot, and total ownership of the NFL Network from the airwaves to the digital streams. Iger also confirmed Wednesday that ESPN's official streaming app will launch in two weeks, bringing all the network's multichannel offerings into a $29.99-a-month subscription. ESPN, which is still too recognizable to suffer the same fate as Hulu, will be centralized into one core streaming product with even more sports than ever before: The House of Mouse is also paying the WWE way more money than Peacock could ever pony up for WrestleMania and Royal Rumble, thus wrenching those live events away from NBCUniversal along with the last bits of Hulu. Now the only other streamer with a compelling wrestling offer is Netflix, which holds the license for the popular livecasts of Monday Night Raw. As if that weren't enough, sporting fans will be highly incentivized to take the new app as well as Disney+ in a bundled package that costs the same as the ESPN streaming app, about $30 a month. It was almost as if Iger and his team foresaw the bearish reactions when they informed investors that Disney's current streaming arrangement wasn't really taking off. There was a broader message from all the added and centralized goodies the company was adding to its digital ecosystem: The House of Mouse, like the rest of the entertainment world, has resigned itself to chasing after Netflix as the competition remains far behind—and, in response, will push its core brand to the top, making it as ubiquitous as possible within the streaming world. It's not a coincidence that Iger also mentioned Wednesday that his company would stop publicly reporting those middling subscription numbers for Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ from here on out—you know, just like Netflix stopped doing this year. There was once a time when entertainment giants shared their valuable shows and movies with one another, allowing Netflix to stream and distribute certain movies, or sharing the streaming rights to a particular show with a competitor, or teaming up to share a particular sporting league with the entire country. What we're seeing now with these historic TV-and-movie empires is something more territorial, more bloodthirsty: pivots to streaming that are no longer as interoperable with other services, brand synergy that insists upon keeping the parent-company logo in view at all times, and particular niches that may stand out as the virtual kaleidoscope of streaming takes out what's left of the cable-and-broadcast landscape. It's a long game from Disney, and an aggressive one. Such business decisions can be witnessed across the industry: The restoration of the HBO Max brand (fka Max, fka HBO Max) was symbolic of David Zaslav's move to hoard Warner Bros. Discovery's crown jewels. As the company splits back up into two separate firms, Zaslav has focused on three core brands—Warner Bros., HBO, DC Studios—at the expense of everything else. HBO Max's formerly sprawling streaming library has been gutted. The varied 'hubs' that once featured within the app (e.g., Adult Swim, Turner Classic Movies, Sesame Workshop, the NBA) have been purged or sold off. What's left is a narrowed, frumpy prestige app that feels like HBO Now and HBO Go, complemented only by a limited window of BritBox previews. You can also look at Paramount, which closed its controversial (and likely politically motivated) merger with Skydance Media just this week. The game there is also digital. As CNN's Brian Stelter noted, the first memo from the overarching Paramount-Skydance CEO—David Ellison, the son of infamous tech oligarch Larry Ellison—'used the word 'tech' ten times,' with a matching focus on 'Paramount's streaming businesses and upgrading the company's outdated technology systems.' The melding of Showtime's once-individual app with Paramount+ as a 'Premium' was just a precursor. With the new merger, both Paramount+ and Pluto TV are the key streaming businesses, and they'll surely be at the front of Ellison's efforts to make his conglomerate 'a next-generation media and technology leader.' One key indicator as to how this will unfold: exclusive yearslong rights to stream South Park on Paramount+, yanking its dozens of seasons away from HBO Max. (Whether Ellison will keep his hands away from the show's biting criticism of his business remains to be seen.) On top of that, a deal to use his dad's artificial intelligence infrastructure to make Paramount+ a more algorithmically driven streaming platform—in the vein of Netflix. Ellison is simply voicing the transition that's been well underway. Even smaller players understand this now. Is Roku still primarily a maker of streaming hardware and smart-TV software? Nope—it's buoyed by its own streaming services, thanks to its namesake Roku Channel, its acquisition of the Frndly streamer, and its launch of a cheaper paid service known as Howdy. (By the way, much like with Netflix, you should no longer expect Roku to report the subscription counts for any of those.) What's driving Fox Corporation's growth? Per the Murdochs' admission, much of it comes from ad sales for Tubi, an app unique in the fact that it remains totally free; now Fox wants to shore up its own brand synergy with a 'Fox One' app that will stream live Fox TV, Fox Sports, and Fox News (as separated from the Fox Nation service). Why is Lionsgate slumping? Perhaps because it divested from Starz and has yet to replace that brand with a viable in-house streaming component. Netflix, having been first to the party, is still the king. It's the only service that can operate like a free-for-all hoarder, gobbling up whatever it wants and scaling at its own pace, because it was the pioneer that forced the old guard to catch up with its internet-centric model. Other entertainers, far too late to the streaming world or far too generous with sharing their properties, are finally, belatedly shaping up. It's no longer about just offering as much as you can (Max's mistake), granting junior brands any level of autonomy (Disney's and Paramount's and Amazon's and HBO's mistake), underdeveloping the digital experience (Paramount's and Disney's and HBO's mistake), or simply hoping that big libraries will bring in big subscriber numbers and hard dollars (everyone's mistake). It's about ensuring that the territory you do have stays your territory alone, and that it's synonymous with your broader company name. 'We're at a point, given the way we're operating our businesses, where we don't really look at being in the linear business and the streaming business. We're in the television business,' Bob Iger said on Wednesday. Forget it, Hulu—it's Disney+. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
How to watch ‘Outlander: Blood of my Blood:' Everything you need to know about the new ‘Outlander' prequel series
Outlander fans, are you ready to step even further back in time? Outlander's first prequel series, Outlander: Blood of My Blood, premieres Aug. 8, 2025 (or, at midnight tonight, if you're feeling ambitious). The prequel series stars Harriet Slater, Jamie Roy, Hermione Corfield and Jeremy Irvine and follows Claire's parents after they are thrust back in time, to when (and where) Jamie's parents were first falling in love. You can stream the steamy new sci-fi-meets-historical-drama prequel series on Starz — which is having a huge sale right now. Here's what to know about how to watch Outlander: Blood of My Blood. trailer: When does come out? While we won't be getting the final season of Outlander until 2026, we are getting a prequel spinoff this week, premiering Aug. 8, 2025. What time does come out? The first two episodes of the Outlander prequel land on Starz at Midnight ET on Friday — meaning you could totally stay up late Thursday, Aug. 7, to tune in. channel: Much like the main Outlander series, Blood of My Blood will stream on Starz. How to watch without cable: episode release schedule: Episode 1: "Providence" – Aug. 8, 2025 Episode 2: "S.W.A.K. (Sealed with a Kiss)" – Aug. 8, 2025 Episode 3: "School of the Moon" – Aug. 15 Episode 4: "A Soldier's Heart" – Aug. 22, 2025 Episode 5: "Needfire" – Aug. 29, 2025 Episode 6: "Birthright" – Sept. 5, 2025 Episode 7: "Luceo Non Uro" – Sept. 12 Episode 8: "A Virtuous Woman" – Sept. 19 Episode 9: "Braemar" – Sept. 26 Episode 10: "Something Borrowed" – Oct. 3, 2025 cast: Harriet Slater as Ellen Mackenzie Jamie Roy as Brian Fraser Hermione Corfield as Julia Moriston Jeremy Irvine as Henry Beauchamp Rory Alexander as young Murtagh Fitzgibbons Fraser (originally played by Duncan LaCroix) Sam Retford as Dougal MacKenzie (originally played by Graham McTavish) Séamus McLean Ross as Colum MacKenzie (originally played by Gary Lewis) Conor MacNeill as Ned Gowan (originally played by Bill Paterson) Sally Messham as Mrs. Fitz Terence Rae as Arch Bug Sadhbh Malin as Jocasta Cameron Ailsa Davidson as Janet MacKenzie Annabelle Dowler as Lizbeth Harry Eaton as Private Charlton What is about? This prequel series, from Outlander showrunner Matthew B. Roberts, reimagines Claire"s parents' story, where instead of dying in a car crash, they travel back in time to when Jamie"s parents first meeting. While Brian Fraser falls hard for Ellen MacKenzie, Julia Moriston (Hermione Corfield) finds herself fascinated by a letter from the front lines of WWI written by Henry Beauchamp.
Buzz Feed
3 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
War Of The Worlds 2025 On Amazon Prime: Review
You may have heard that the new War of the Worlds movie on Amazon Prime, starring Ice Cube and Eva Longoria, was just released to a 0% on Rotten Tomatoes. So, I (bravely) watched it to ask the question: Is it really that bad? Yes. Yes it is. Amazon describes this movie as a "fresh take on the legendary novel of the same name" and a "thrilling out-of-this-world adventure that is filled with present-day themes of technology, surveillance, and privacy." Nay, this isn't the first adaptation of H.G. Wells' 1898 novel The War of the Worlds — move-wise, we most recently had the Stephen Spielberg version back in '05, which was fairly well regarded. The 1938 Orson Welles radio adaptation even caused some people to think a real-life alien invasion was happening, but don't ask me about original-versus-adaptation because I haven't seen, read, or listened to the story before. I know, going Ice Cube version first is almost certainly what H.G. Wells would have wanted. This movie was first announced in September 2020, not as a War of the Worlds adaptation but as a "grounded sci-fi film in the vein of District 9 that touches on themes of privacy versus surveillance." It was a "fully remote production," which makes sense given the COVID-19 of it all. Why it was released in the year 2025, I have no idea. My first qualm is not with the movie itself. Despite giving the blood of my firstborn in payment for Amazon, the movie starts with a smug "This movie is brought to you with limited interruptions," followed by two and a half minutes of ads. Except my laptop froze the first time, so it was more like four minutes. Why am I still seeing ads? Don't you have all the money, Amazon? I only agreed to do this story because it was a 90-minute movie! Anyway, so pretty much this entire movie is a screen recording of the computer Domestic Terror Analyst William Radford (played by Ice Cube) as mysterious forces attack the world. If you're the kind of person who thinks that action movies could use more Slack notifications, congratulations, you will love this film. The way different tabs are moved to and fro genuinely made me a little motion sick. Now, I promised myself that I wouldn't pause on every other frame to make fun of it, because I'm not paid enough for that. The exception is the list they show of all the most serious terror threats' names. Tag yourselves: I'm Fancy Bear. Anyway, William has a daughter whom he stalks. Think I'm exaggerating? He has a tab on his laptop called "Faith surveillance" and watches CCTV footage to criticize her for getting a muffin rather than an egg for breakfast. Who says you can't make your heroic lead a psychopath? William also tries to get his video game-playing son a government job, but he says he doesn't want to be "spying on what's in people's Amazon carts." I cannot be held responsible for what will happen if you try and drink every time there is an Amazon reference. When the apocalypse shit hits the fan, a better movie would probably have the lead immediately get up from his computer. This is not that movie. William just messages his daughter's boyfriend (incidentally, an Amazon driver), telling him to go check on her. As chaos reigns in the streets, a video call from his son actually freezes on the same face I was making while watching this movie: This movie is told in real time, which means we get to see scintillating action, such as William making a spreadsheet. Remember when the description said "thrilling"? Throughout this movie, I was haunted by two questions. Firstly, why does my cat keep biting me? Secondly, would this movie be any less of a slog if I were watching it as a so-bad-it 's-good movie with friends? Probably, but the whole schtick of this film gets old real quick. "At least it's nearly the end," I kept thinking, before looking at the progress bar and realizing that it was, in fact, not near the end. But end, it eventually did. No, War of the Worlds is not bad in a spectacular way (such as Megalopolis) or in an offensive way (also: Megalopolis). Instead, it is bad in the blandest, most incoherent sense of the word. But could have worked if it was released in that era of lockdown where we were all drinking too much. Zero aliens out of five. War of the Worlds is now available for streaming on Amazon Prime Video.
