
What is India's advantage in the global trade reset amid US's tariff flip-flops?
The contours of global trade are constantly shifting, and India finds itself navigating an increasingly complex landscape.
The US-China relationship–oscillating between tariff reductions and technology restrictions–has left many countries uncertain about their export prospects. Recent developments include the Trump administration's first free trade agreement with the UK, which tied lower tariffs to excluding China from some supply chains, followed shortly by a temporary US-China tariff cut and then a sweeping ban on Huawei AI chip use.
Read this | Mint Exclusive: India-US trade deal before 8 July, talks next week
This erratic approach puts the 'China plus one" strategy into question and raises concerns about whether other emerging economies could secure similar tariff reprieves, potentially eroding India's tariff-driven export gains. So, where does that leave India? Can it turn these tariff shifts into strategic advantages in the evolving trade reset?
India's strategic positioning
A crucial consideration is that China has established itself as a global leader in industries integral to both economic and national security, such as steel, aluminium, cement, shipbuilding, and automotive manufacturing. Aware of the strategic risk of relying on China, especially during conflicts or pandemics, the US is advocating for diversified global value chains.
India, while not matching China's manufacturing prowess, holds a unique advantage: its capacity for scaling up without being perceived as a threat. As one of the world's top three producers of steel, aluminium, and cement, India is well-placed to become part of the new, less China-centric supply chains.
Push and pull factors
To assess India's trade prospects, it is essential to distinguish between 'push" and 'pull" factors. Push factors stem from external global shifts, while pull factors are rooted in India's own economic structure.
Initially, the high tariffs on China presented a positive push for Indian exports. The subsequent easing of these tariffs weakens but does not entirely negate this advantage. Moreover, two geopolitical factors continue to work in India's favour.
Read this | RBI prepares for Trump tariff fallout with liquidity moves
First, India's relatively modest manufacturing share, rising from 1.5% in 2004 to 2.9% in 2023, contrasts sharply with China's leap from 8.6% to 28.8% over the same period. Ironically, this perceived weakness might turn into an asset, as India is not seen as a direct competitor to China.
Second, India has never been a hub for re-routing Chinese exports to the US, unlike countries such as Vietnam or Mexico. And given India's relationship with China, it is unlikely to take on this role in the future. This positions India as a more reliable partner for trade realignment.
On the pull side, India has two advantages, both originating from its unique economic structure.
The first is its large domestic market: household consumption is the mainstay of economic growth, and contributes to two-thirds of its gross domestic product. In contrast, China's strong investment and export focus has led to its disproportionately low private consumption rate for its level of income. The fact that China accounts for 30% of global manufacturing but only 11% of consumption is one of the global imbalances that the current US administration wants to correct.
In addition, robust domestic consumption is a source of comfort to foreign companies setting up export-oriented facilities. For example, Maruti Suzuki, which was set up with Japanese collaboration in the 1980s, is the market leader in passenger cars and also a leading car exporter (it has been exporting made-in-India cars since 1986).
In a flip scenario, Apple Inc., which has plans to assemble all US-bound iPhones in India, could eventually supply India's rapidly growing smartphone market also. The idea is not far-fetched: by 2030, India is expected to have 773 million consumers, next only to China and far higher than comparable emerging economies.
The second pull factor is the rising importance of India in future industries and technologies.
Of the 44 future technologies analysed by the 2023 Critical Technology Tracker, the US and China lead the world in high-impact research capability by a wide margin, but India and the UK, together with Australia and Japan, frequently appear among the countries next in line. These countries could, potentially, band together to create an alternate ecosystem to complement China's striking progress in advanced technologies.
Read this | Asian factories bear scars of Trump's tariff blast
The path forward
World trade is projected to decline in 2025 on the back of rising trade tensions. A tariff advantage would have been incredibly useful as Indian exporters compete for a share of the shrinking trade pie. But given that more countries are turning protectionist, relying solely on tariffs is not sustainable.
Also read | Donald Trump's chaos goes beyond tariffs. Here's how some are trying to cope
Instead, India has to stack up its strengths: young labour force, strong growth, rapid digitisation and core industrial capacity; and boost these macro positives with business-friendly policies to pull in trade.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's military move: Was it in response to Los Angeles riots or a long-planned strategy against Democrates and Kamala Harris?
President Donald Trump has signaled that the military deployment in Los Angeles may just be the beginning, hinting at similar actions across other Democrat-led cities as protests intensify over his immigration crackdown. Speaking from the Oval Office on Tuesday, Trump defended the deployment of 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to Los Angeles, where demonstrators have clashed with law enforcement in recent days. 'This is the first—perhaps of many,' Trump said. 'If we didn't hit this hard, you'd see the same thing erupt across the country. But let me be clear: If others try this, they'll be met with equal or greater force.' Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:00 Loaded : 0% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track default , selected Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Indonesia: New Container Houses (Prices May Surprise You) Container House | Search ads Search Now Undo The president added that his administration would not tolerate violent protests targeting ICE operations and vowed strict enforcement of deportation policies. Notably, Trump had floated the idea of using military force in Democrat-led cities during his 2024 campaign, proposing federal intervention to combat unrest or gang violence. 'In cities where there's been a total breakdown of law and order, I won't hesitate to send in federal assets, including the National Guard, until safety is restored,' he said at the time. Live Events According to The New York Times , nearly 5,000 troops are already present in the Los Angeles area. Reuters reported that 700 Marines were in a staging area in Seal Beach, about 30 miles south of the city, awaiting specific deployment orders. As of Tuesday, 2,100 National Guard members had been activated in the region—more than half the planned total. Both Marines and National Guard personnel are restricted from making arrests and are tasked solely with protecting federal facilities and personnel. Trump's remarks and actions have sparked fears of broader federal crackdowns in Democrat-controlled cities across the U.S., raising questions about the political motivations behind the military mobilization.


Mint
23 minutes ago
- Mint
Domestic private capital plays a key role in financing Indian businesses
Private capital deployment in India has risen steadily from $37 billion in 2012–2014 to $137 billion in 2022–2024, and its role in financing private enterprises has expanded over this time. The share of domestic private equity (PE) in overall PE activity in India has also grown from 9% to 11% during this period, as McKinsey data shows. What's fuelling domestic funds?: Three drivers are underpinning the development and growth of domestic funds in India: more domestic general partners (GPs or fund managers); greater fund-raising and fund sizes; and emerging interest among limited partners (LPs or investors) in India-specific portfolios. Also Read: A private capex slump: An imperfect but indicative survey points to one The number of domestic GPs with $50 million or more deployed has more than doubled from 34 to 80 between 2016–2018 and 2022–2024. Their average deal size has also risen from $98 million to $114 million, and they are addressing a more diversified set of needs among mid-market enterprises. Despite this growth, the share of domestic GPs in total PE deployment in India is a relatively modest 11% compared to 62% in Korea and 26% in Japan, leaving headroom for growth. Fund-raising by Indian domestic GPs has been picking up, going from $8.2 billion in 2016–2018 to $13.7 billion in 2022–2024. Over half (or 59%) of all capital, however, was concentrated in the top six funds in 2016–2018. By 2022–2024, the concentration rose to 64%, indicating a marked preference for managers with strong track records and successful and stable teams. Uniquely, over 90% of this capital comes from foreign investors, as domestic fund-raising remains constrained by regulation. Further, unlike other markets where domestic investors are a material source of funding for domestic GPs, India's domestic GPs compete with global GPs for the capital of foreign LPs. Also Read: Reform agenda: What India must do to get private sector investment going Domestic GPs offer attractive, India-specific growth exposure to globally diversified LP portfolios, especially as India is projected to contribute over 17% of global GDP (excluding China and the US) growth as its GDP grows from $3.5 trillion currently to $20 trillion in 2045. Value proposition of domestic GPs: They offer diversified exposure compared to global and regional peers. Top domestic funds deploy about 80% of their capital across four to six sectors, whereas global and regional managers typically concentrate 80% of deployment across two or three sectors. As the economy expands, such diversification could be a virtue for two reasons: emerging investment opportunities in traditional high-growth sectors (such as logistics, wellness services, energy transition, supplemental education and asset management) and sunrise sectors supported by a push for import substitution (such as electronics, medical devices) and the government's production-linked incentive scheme. Growth is a priority as about 75% of capital goes into expansion: Capital in India is needed to fund private enterprise research and development, product development, growth in sales and distribution and new market entries, apart from working capital, unlike more mature markets where funding goes into consolidation and ownership changes. India's degree of inorganic consolidation, with an M&A (mergers and acquisitions)-to-GDP ratio of 2-4%, is far lower than the US's 8-10%. Domestic GPs remain well positioned to fund early- to mid-stage expansion in fast-growing sectors, where ticket sizes or risk profiles often do not suit bigger regional and global funds that focus on big-ticket buyouts with stakes acquired in relatively well-capitalized businesses from existing owners. Also Read: Seven reform pathways to bridge India's urban investment gaps Address a broader spectrum of capital needs: Ready to invest anywhere between $25 million and $200 million, domestic managers can address a broader spectrum of opportunities aligned with the evolving needs of Indian businesses. Domestic GPs also view emerging public markets, private credit and real assets as important. This promotes investments in new India-specific capabilities without the burden of legacy approaches. What attracts global and domestic LPs?: Global LPs seeking to increase their allocation to India say they look to domestic GPs for access to more diversified India-specific portfolios. They prioritize internal rate of return and distributed-to-paid-in capital performance measures while treating strong governance and co-investment rights as table stakes. On the other hand, domestic LPs, including family offices and high net worth individuals, view domestic GPs as a way to get exposure to private alternatives, diversify investments beyond their core business and exercise co-investment rights in well-governed businesses that they find attractive. They tend to focus on absolute returns and have a high bar, given India's public market return record. Domestic GPs have played a meaningful role in private capital deployment in other Asian markets. They are also an increasing source of foreign direct investment and can play a key role in financing the needs of mid-market businesses as well as sunrise sectors in India. Last but not the least, they provide India-specific exposure to global private capital participants. Anmol Chaudhary and Mridul Chandgothia of McKinsey & Co. contributed to this article. The authors are, respectively, a senior partner & a partner in McKinsey's Mumbai office.


Hans India
25 minutes ago
- Hans India
Vedanta Resources eyes invest grade rating, plans to cut debt
New Delhi: London-based Vedanta Resources Ltd (VRL) is targeting an investment grade credit rating on the back of its sustained deleveraging, the proposed demerger at its Indian subsidiary, Vedanta Ltd, and its robust growth, operational efficiencies and strong financial performance. VRL is committed to reducing its total debt from the current $5 billion to $3 billion by FY27 while strengthening its critical minerals, transition metals, energy and technology portfolio. A person aware of the matter said that VRL, at a recently held investor conferences in Hong Kong and Singapore, shared that the company is looking for an immediate credit rating upgrade to BB levels by proactively refinancing and prepaying its high-interest cost $550 million private credit facility due in August 2026. In the medium term, the company plans to achieve an investment grade rating on the back of its improved debt profile, financial and operational performance. Vedanta highlighted its robust earnings, healthy free cash flows, ongoing growth projects, strengthened balance sheet, and future deleveraging plans to the investors, the source said. An investment-grade credit rating signifies a company's strong capacity to meet its financial obligations and is considered a safe investment for institutional investors. It also allows a company to borrow money at lower interest rates, attracting a broader range of investors and gaining easier access to global debt markets. At present, VRL has a credit rating of B+ by S&P, Fitch & Moody's, with S&P giving a 3-notch upgrade to the company in FY25. The investment grade rating is linked to VRL's debt reduction target (to $3 billion) by FY27, so they are looking for an investment grade in about two years from now. Sources indicate that VRL is currently working with banks to refinance and pre-pay a $550 million private credit facility that will expire in August 2026. It is likely to use a bank loan with single-digit interest rates to refinance the facility, with savings of 800-900 basis points, resulting in interest cost savings of $47 million, said the person quoted above.