I Went To The ER. I Ended Up Handcuffed In The Back Of A Cop Car.
I didn't expect to end up handcuffed in the back of a police cruiser, stripped of my clothes, my rights, and any remaining dignity.
I had been struggling. Sleep-deprived and in the throes of a bipolar mixed episode, physically wrecked by chronic illness, and stressed to the max. I didn't want to die, living had just become too painful. When I finally said it out loud, honestly and clearly to a psychiatrist in the ER, I wasn't in any immediate danger. I was asking for help early, while I still could.
The plan was agreed on with the consulting psychiatrist: a voluntary admission to a reputable hospital with a decent psychiatric unit. We even made a list of hospitals I was OK with, and two I absolutely was not.
I knew from personal experience as a peer support volunteer that one was poorly managed, unsafe and chaotic. The other was underfunded and more like a holding pen for people. I wasn't asking for five stars; I just wanted to avoid any more trauma.
But when it came time to transfer me, none of the hospitals we had agreed to had a bed.
Guess who did.
I refused. Calmly, clearly. I offered to remain in the ER on suicide precautions until a bed opened elsewhere. I was told that was unreasonable because I was 'stable' and the ER is for emergencies. I asked to be discharged to go directly to another hospital, with my partner. I was told that would put me at risk of harm.
I was in crisis, yes — but I was asking for help. I did not understand that by self-reporting that I was at risk, I had given away my control. Their solution was to issue a 72-hour Temporary Detention Order (TDO) and force me to go.
Two police officers showed up. Quiet. Professional. Still cops.
They took my clothes, my phone, my belongings and my autonomy. Strip search. Handcuffs. I was paraded through the hospital in front of patients and staff like I was being arrested ― because I told the truth about being in pain.
I have no criminal history. The only time I've been inside a 'correctional' facility was as a peer support volunteer, working with others who were also detained against their will. But now I was being treated like something dangerous, just because I'd admitted I was vulnerable.
What followed was one of the worst weeks of my life.
The conditions in the psych unit were worse than anything I ever saw in jails. I was locked in my room nearly the entire time. No TV. No books. The food was inedible, and I barely ate. My bed was a wooden plank. My blanket? ONE hand towel. Two hand towels are apparently highly dangerous. I was not permitted to shower unobserved.
Related:
My roommate, deep in psychosis, spent most of the time arguing with ghosts and screaming at Jesus. He wasn't violent, just suffering. During his brief lucid moments, he was sweet and apologized profusely. It was heartbreaking.
There was no therapy. No individual counseling. No structured treatment of any kind. There was an hour of crafts run by a warm and caring volunteer, which was one of the few times I was allowed out of my room. I wasn't consulted about my treatment plan or offered options or alternatives.
Just crafts and lithium.
Lithium can be incredibly effective for many people in crisis, but has a long list of side effects and risks. Also, in some cases — like mine ― it is simply ineffective. Which, if anyone had cared to listen to me, I could have told them. There is no better historian about me than me.
At the conclusion of the 10 minutes I had with my doctor, he was annoyed that I had been TDO'ed there. He agreed that I was experiencing a crisis, but far from an urgent one, and definitely not worth being on his ward for psychotic and violent patients.
He knew I didn't belong there, and he wanted me out as much as I did. He also didn't want to medicate me unnecessarily. But he knew how the judge operated. The bipolar TDO checklist was in play. If my lithium levels weren't in the therapeutic range, my clinical status wouldn't matter.
Seventy-two hours would then become 30 days.
So he said, gently: 'Just take it. Two days. It'll suck, but it's the only way out.'
I was less than 24 hours in, and it was already unbearable. So, I agreed, reluctantly.
My court-appointed lawyer showed up five minutes before the hearing, also trying to help. He advised me to surrender my Second Amendment rights, not because I posed any danger, but because the judge would require it. If I declined: 30 days.
I didn't own a gun and have no intention of ever buying one. I'm something of a pacifist and abhor tools of violence. The lawyer explained that I could later apply to have my rights restored and that it was technically voluntary ... but it might still show up on legal forms, indefinitely. An administrative scarlet letter. A permanent mark from a temporary hold.
Related:
I reluctantly agreed. But the best time to make consequential legal decisions is NOT during involuntary detainment with only five minutes of legal counsel. And if I was too unwell to make medical decisions, how was I somehow competent enough to waive constitutional rights? If I was well enough to make those decisions, maybe I didn't belong there at all.
The judge, barely looking at me or my file, asked if my lithium levels were therapeutic. He asked if I'd surrendered my gun rights. He checked the boxes on his list. He still extended the TDO to 30 days, but allowed a provision for my doctor to override it, which he immediately did.
And just like that, I was discharged. No therapy. No plan. No follow-up. Just out. Still in crisis, but now disoriented, sick from the lithium, humiliated, and traumatized on top of it. I left worse than when I entered.
Now, when things get bad, when I'm sleep-deprived, when my body isn't working right, when my thoughts start to splinter, I instinctively hesitate to tell anyone. Because now I know that honesty isn't always safe.
What happened to me wasn't an outlier. It wasn't a rare failure inside a system that usually works. This IS how the system works. A system that responds to pain and suffering with containment instead of care. A system that substitutes police for therapists, and compliance for healing.
So, I'm cautious. If I end up in crisis again, the ER is the last place I would turn. Not unless someone I trust can promise me that I won't be punished for trying to stay alive. That I won't be criminalized for being sick. That the words I say won't be used to take away my voice.
I didn't end up in that facility by accident. I ended up there because I'm publicly insured, because I have a chronic illness, because I live in the wrong zip code and asked for the wrong kind of help on the wrong day of the week.
Many people, especially those already marginalized, have no trusted provider, no family support, no safety net. And for people in that position, ERs are often the only option, but also the most expensive and the least likely to provide care.
And if you're poor, disabled, incarcerated, uninsured, a person of color, an immigrant, identify as a woman or LGBT+, or as part of any marginalized group? The chances that you'll receive actual care drop even further.
Yet my story is not a message to stay silent, or to avoid seeking help. It's a message to demand better helpn— and to ask for it in ways that protect your dignity.
Start with someone you trust. A partner, a close friend, a spiritual adviser. Someone who truly cares and can walk with you, literally or figuratively. If you have an established relationship with a family doctor or a mental health professional, built on trust, start there. Ask them to help you navigate, to advocate, to hold space.
Don't be afraid to ask how providers handle mental health emergencies. Tell your loved ones and providers your wishes if you are ever in crisis. Create a 'Psychiatric Advance Directive.' Put your wishes in writing. Identify who should speak for you, what medications you will or won't accept, what facilities are off-limits. A crisis is not the time to start setting boundaries. Do it now.
There are some organizations doing it differently. If you're struggling, The Trevor Project offers 24/7 crisis support and can help you figure out the safest route forward. Or try searching for 'crisis warm lines.' These are peer-run resources — people who've been there, who can help you figure out where to start. No judgment. No police.
I can't promise that your experience will be better than mine. But I can say this: You deserve for it to be. We all do.
If you or someone you know needs help, call or text 988 or chat 988lifeline.org for mental health support. Additionally, you can find local mental health and crisis resources at dontcallthepolice.com. Outside of the U.S., please visit the International Association for Suicide Prevention.
This article originally appeared on HuffPost in June 2025.
Also in Goodful:
Also in Goodful:
Also in Goodful: Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ben Askren Reveals What Awakened in Him After His 45-Day Coma
Ben Askren Reveals What Awakened in Him After His 45-Day Coma originally appeared on Athlon Sports. Ben Askren opens up after dying four times and waking from a 45-day coma The combat sports world has seen its share of comebacks—but none like this. After a 45-day coma, multiple cardiac arrests, and a life-saving double lung transplant, former UFC star Ben Askren has returned home and broken his silence. The 41-year-old revealed that he flatlined not once, but four times while battling a severe staph infection that left him on life support. What followed wasn't just a physical transformation—it was a spiritual one. In a clip shared by Happy Punch, Askren confirmed that he woke up from his coma with a newfound faith after 15 years of denying Christianity. 'I woke up and I started as a Christian. I hadn't gone with my wife to church for 15 years—that was part of the deal. I said, 'I'm not a Christian, but I will support you.' When I woke up, I knew I had to do it.' he revealed in an emotional video posted to social media. He's now focused on recovery after spending 59 days in the hospital—but the journey has taken another turn. Askren is currently back in the hospital following concerns over a suspected chest tube infection, as reported by Yahoo Sports. He's receiving antibiotics and undergoing additional imaging to monitor the situation. While it's a discouraging setback, Askren has remained positive, acknowledging that healing isn't always a straight line and expressing hope to be back home soon. Askren's battle isn't over—but his second act is just beginning. With each step forward and every obstacle faced, he continues to show the same resilience that once made him a champion in the cage—only now, the fight is for something far greater than a title. This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Aug 7, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
12 Bath Products For Babies and Toddlers
Splish splash, it's time for baby's bath. Rubber duckies, bubble bath soap, and cozy towels are all classic baby bath time staples. Now, in addition to those childhood favorites, there are more products on the market than ever before for parents to choose from. Between shampoo and wash, toys and aftercare, the drugstore aisle can get a little overwhelming. Don't fret. Instead, here are some suggestions for suds (and other helpful stuff) that make for a more blissful bath time. Bath Support Assuming your bathtub is too big for a little baby (which is more than likely), here's a tool to help them lay comfortably in the tub and free your hands for soaping, shampooing and rinsing. Wash Time to get fresh and clean, without worrying about skin sensitivities. Shampoo & Wash Save time (and space) with these 2-in-1 bath products. Bath Toys Add some entertainment to bath time with toys. Who said getting clean isn't fun? Hair Brush Even babies have flyaways and messy hair. Thankfully, there are tools to gently fix baby's bedhead. Booger Help Stuffed noses happen, but nasal assistance is on the way! Baby Oil Although baby oil can be used to moisturize on its own, it can also be added to bath time. Lotion Dermatologist-tested lotion for the whole body (and the whole family) is a win. Apply after bathing and as needed. Towels When the bath ends, it's time to dry off with absorbent towels that are soft to the touch. Toothbrush It's never too early to start a good oral hygiene routine.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Are Rewards for Children Actually Harmful?
The anti-reward movement seems to be growing... but is it really backed by research? Sticker charts, earning something special for 'good behavior,' and paying children an allowance for completing chores have long been common practice among parents. Yet, in recent years, these type of reward systems have come under attack by many parenting influencers and experts. In the world of 'gentle parenting,' rewards for behavior are a big no-no. Dr. Becky, Big Little Feelings, Janet Lansbury, and many other popular parenting influencers advise parents to avoid rewarding their children— even claiming that rewards can be disrespectful or damaging for children. As Dr. Becky says, 'we are raising humans, not training animals.' Yet, at the same time, most child psychologists advocate that parents use rewards and most evidence-based parenting programs include the use of a reward system. Interestingly enough, both sides claim that their position is backed by research. So why is the advice of parenting influencers so different from child psychologists and how can both sides claim to have research on their side? What does research really find about rewards? The Anti-Reward Movement The crusade against rewards was initially spearheaded by author and gentle parenting icon, Alfie Kohn. [An interesting side note is that Alfie Kohn also led the crusade against the phrase 'good job'.] In 1993, Alfie Kohn wrote a book titled Punished by Rewards: The Trouble with Gold Stars, Incentive Plans, A's, Praise, and Other Bribes. In this book, Kohn claims that rewards are 'useless' and 'counterproductive' because rewards ultimately make children lose interest in what you are rewarding them for and they become motivated only by the reward rather than the task itself. In other words, he argued that when you provide external motivation (such as rewards) children lose internal or intrinsic motivation. According to this line of thinking, rewarding children for cleaning their rooms could prevent them from developing an internal drive to take care of their spaces and, perhaps more importantly, from grasping the ethical importance of contributing to the household in a meaningful way. According to Kohn, rewards result in short-term gain in exchange for long-term damage to motivation, creativity, learning, achievement, and even moral development. So are these claims backed by research? What Does the Actual Research Say? The confusion around rewards make sense because at an initial glance the research itself is confusing. Some research has backed up the claims of Alfie Kohn and the parenting influencers, finding that rewards decrease intrinsic motivation (translation: rewards make children lose interest in the task or behavior that you are rewarding and they become less likely to engage in it when you take your reward away). Yet, some research finds that rewards increase intrinsic motivation (translation: rewards actually make children more likely to do the task or behavior you are rewarding them for, even after you take the reward away). A closer examination of the research reveals a pattern— rewards intrinsic motivation for an activity that a child already enjoys (such as drawing) but intrinsic motivation for an activity that a child doesn't already enjoy (such as cleaning their room). Even for tasks that a child already enjoys, rewards may only decrease intrinsic motivation if they are tangible (that is, a reward you can touch such as candy, stickers, or money). This is a really important distinction because it really only makes sense that parents would reward children for activities that children don't already enjoy and aren't motivated to do on their own. For example, if your child really enjoys taking a bath and they eagerly get in the bath every night, you wouldn't think to set up a reward system for taking a bath. However, if your child hates taking a bath and it is a fight every night, a reward system might be just what you need. Translation: Research suggests that you don't really have to worry about rewarding your child for the types of tasks you would typically set up a reward system for (that is, the tasks they aren't doing on their own). For activities your child isn't already doing on their own, rewards may help to 'jumpstart' intrinsic motivation. How this works is that rewards get the child to engage in something they may not have without the reward and eventually they start to see the intrinsic motivation. Going back to the bath example— your child may initially hate bathing and only take a bath to get a reward. Yet, when they start taking a bath every night, they may start enjoying the calming experience of the bath in their bedtime routine and the feeling of being clean. Eventually they love bathing for bathing's sake and, just like that, they have developed the intrinsic motivation to take a bath. Another example— your child may not be initially motivated to have a clean room but if you give them rewards for cleaning their room, they may start to realize that they like being able to easily walk around their room and find everything they need and they may start to enjoy the sense of accomplishment they get from cleaning their room. Ultimately, they become intrinsically motivated to keep their room clean. You can eventually fade out the rewards as the activity itself becomes intrinsically rewarding. There is also no doubt that rewards have other benefits above and beyond increasing intrinsic motivation such as encouraging persistence and improving children's control over their own behavior. In addition, parenting training programs that use reward systems have been found to have significant and long-lasting positive impacts on children's behavior and the parent-child relationship. An Important Exception… There is some evidence that providing tangible rewards for social behavior, such as helping others or sharing, may undermine intrinsic motivation (that is, make children less likely to want to help others or share in the future). This makes sense since these types of social behaviors should be rewarding in themselves. Intangible rewards such as praise or positive attention do not seem to have the same impact and parents should feel free to use praise and positive attention for any social behavior they would like to see more often ('I noticed that you shared your toys with your friend'). Bribes Versus Rewards Many parents have heard that they should not bribe their children. But what exactly is a bribe and how is it different from a reward? A bribe is when a parent promises a reward to stop 'bad' behavior. For example, if your child is hitting their sibling in the backseat and you say: 'If you leave your sister alone, then we can go get ice cream'. A reward on the other hand would be offered in the absence of 'bad' behavior . Bribes are a problem because they are actually rewarding the 'bad' behavior because your child may learn that if they engage in that behavior, you will reward them to stop doing it which indirectly rewards the 'bad' behavior. What About Children with ADHD? It is also important to note that reward systems may be particularly effective with children with ADHD. However, research also shows that children with ADHD may respond more positively to smaller, more immediate rewards than larger delayed rewards. Overall Translation Using rewards with children may have many positive impacts and we have no consistent evidence of negative impacts (with the very important exception of using rewards for tasks your child is already motivated to complete or positive social behavior like sharing or helping). More research is needed but the research we do have gives parents some guidance. Here are some evidence-based tips for using rewards with children in a way that does not decrease intrinsic motivation and may actually improve your child's behavior: Avoid using rewards for tasks your child already enjoys or is already motivated to do. For example, if your child is very motivated to be potty-trained and interested in using the potty, you may not want to use rewards. However, if your child does not seem motivated or interested, rewards may be essential. A good rule of thumb is whether they are doing the task without you asking them to do it. Avoid using rewards for any type of social interaction (such as sharing, playing nicely with siblings, or helping others). These activities should be enjoyable and motivating in themselves. However, praising and giving positive attention to these behaviors can be very effective and should not impact intrinsic motivation. Base rewards on the child's performance. Decide in advance which specific behaviors you will reward and only reward those behaviors. If rewards are given willy-nilly, they lose their meaning. Reward your child immediately and consistently after the behavior. Rewards need to be immediate and consistent or children will not link the behavior to the reward. Research also finds that immediate rewards tend to increase intrinsic motivation more than delayed rewards. Don't use bribes. In other words, don't use rewards to stop 'bad' behavior or your child may ultimately link the reward to that behavior. Find the system that works best for you and stick to it. Some parents prefer a sticker chart, some prefer tally marks on a piece of paper, some prefer apps (I personally love and use the app Stellar). Go through some trial and error to find out what system you can use consistently and seems to be the most motivating to your child. You may have to use concrete and immediate rewards for children who are three or younger (this is very important to remember if you are considering using rewards for potty training). Gradually stop using rewards when they are no longer necessary. There isn't research specifically informing when and how parents should fade rewards so pay attention to your child and notice when the reward seems less and less important and gradually phase it out. Solve the daily Crossword
