logo
This Owl Will Live Forever

This Owl Will Live Forever

The Atlantic15-02-2025

Flaco, the Eurasian eagle-owl that escaped from the Central Park Zoo in 2023, is still with us (even though he's dead).
He spent about a year roaming New York City—hunting in the park, hooting from fire escapes—and in that time, he became a celebrity. Then he flew into a building while disoriented by rat poison and pigeon herpes. It has been a year since Flaco's untimely death, and now the New York Historical is hosting an exhibition memorializing his life. I went on opening day, in the middle of business hours, and found the space packed with Flaco fans. ('I couldn't move,' Rebecca Klassen, the museum's curator of material culture, told me afterward.)
'Packed' is an unusual state for a historical society. But people were eager to look, in person, at photos they most likely had already seen online: Flaco flying, Flaco preening, Flaco peering in a window, Flaco sitting on a pitcher's mound. An older woman with a cane stood in front of a photo of Flaco avoiding recapture and chuckled to herself, then said quietly, 'Marvelous.'
'The Year of Flaco' features videos and photographs of the beloved bird, as well as dozens of trinkets and letters that were left at a memorial for Flaco at the base of an oak tree in Central Park last March. Those items were collected and stored by a group of Flaco fans, who over the summer presented Klassen with the idea for the exhibition. Klassen was convinced by their sincerity and their presentation about Flaco's significance to the city. She told The New York Times, 'He was a raptor. Raptors have a hold on people,' which I thought was fantastic reasoning.
The exhibition takes up half of a long, narrow space that could more accurately be called 'a hallway.' But it tells Flaco's story in satisfying detail. Flaco escaped from the Central Park Zoo when an unknown vandal cut open the mesh of his enclosure. Though zoo employees initially made several attempts to recapture Flaco, mostly out of concern for his ability to care for himself in the 'wild' (New York City), they gave up because he was evading them so well and because he started hunting and seemed to be enjoying his exciting new life. He mostly roamed Central Park, but in the fall of 2023, he took a few trips downtown. One day he was photographed sitting on the fire escape of a building on the Upper West Side. At the exhibition, this image—-and the idea of such an encounter—nearly brought me to tears. Imagine if that had happened to you! (Imagine if that had happened to me!) The luck of some people.
You may think this feeling is out of proportion, and you may not be wrong, but I am not alone. Flaco was the pride of the city for a season—or four—and Michiko Kakutani, the legendary and technically retired Times book critic, came back to write not one but two reported stories about him. He was somehow petite and precious (weighing only a few pounds) but also huge and terrifying (wingspan of about six feet). Just after he escaped, my colleague Matteo Wong used the words of Walt Whitman to describe him: 'well-form'd, beautiful-faced, looking you straight in the eyes.' It's true: His irises were a gorgeous shade of chrysanthemum orange. His talons looked like they could maim a medium-size dog. In letters displayed at the New York Historical, fans are startlingly—and even unsettlingly—vulnerable. They express attachment to Flaco that goes into the realm of the feelings they might have for their own actual pet, or for a person (one thanks Flaco for inspiring the writer to apply to law school). Others are short and sweet: 'Fly high, Flaco'; 'Freedom and peace our beautiful hero.' There is one acrostic poem: 'Fabulous / Liberated / Awesome / Captivating / Owl.'
After Klassen asked visitors if they had any Flaco stories to share, a woman in a cream turtleneck told me and the other onlookers that she'd gotten a Flaco tattoo on her back that she couldn't show—because of the turtleneck—and that it was a cityscape done by an artist who has painted murals of Flaco. The woman shared that she'd seen Flaco herself on seven or eight occasions while running in the park. Sometimes, a crowd was around him already. If one wasn't, she would keep his secret. 'I would see him and I would wink,' she said.
Flaco was perpetually hounded by paparazzi (regular people with iPhones), and his apparent ease in that situation was what made him such a good celebrity. Many random animals do become symbols and social-media stars. When they die, we mourn them, but they also trigger our imagination ('I think for a lot of people, he symbolized that all things are possible,' the actor Alan Ruck said about Los Angeles's favorite mountain lion, P-22, five months after he was hit by a car.) Think of the tragic story of Harambe the gorilla, which challenged the premise of zoos and then became a distasteful meme. Think of the white-tailed deer in Harlem that was labeled a Christmas reindeer just because he happened to appear in December. His death—though it actually had nothing to do with our lives—was read as poetic because it came at the end of 2016, when many New Yorkers were already quite emotional and glum due to the first election of President Donald Trump.
And though we like any animal with a story, we like escaped animals best. When some poor beast escapes from whatever zoo or circus or (sorry) slaughterhouse we put them in, we love to see it. We want them to get out. We want them to live like us. This is projection to an understandable but somewhat morbid degree. Many Flaco fans, including my co-worker Matteo, described Flaco as a New Yorker while he was alive, but of course, Flaco didn't know what New York was or that he lived there. Others said he was an immigrant, though this is not true—his is a non-native species, but he was born in North Carolina. They said he was proving that everyone longs for freedom and the American dream, but he didn't know about rights and probably didn't even know about longing. They said he was gritty, but I honestly don't know what that means when you're talking about a bird.
Now that he is dead, we are thrusting martyrdom onto him. I think we love Flaco still, after all this time, because he lived on our toxic planet and in our wretched (wonderful) city that is so inhospitable to life, and he did it with dignity, grace, and humor until he couldn't—until he lost all control of his faculties and died alone.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Judge dismisses Justin Baldoni's lawsuits against Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds and New York Times
Judge dismisses Justin Baldoni's lawsuits against Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds and New York Times

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Judge dismisses Justin Baldoni's lawsuits against Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds and New York Times

A New York judge has tossed out Justin Baldoni's $400-million US defamation lawsuit against Blake Lively, her husband Ryan Reynolds and their publicist, while also dismissing a $250-million US defamation suit against the New York Times for reporting on Lively's claims of sexual harassment during the filming of the 2024 movie It Ends With Us. Judge Lewis J. Liman granted the motions to dismiss the suits from Baldoni and his production company Wayfarer Studios on Monday, saying Lively was not liable for sexual misconduct claims against the 41-year-old because they were made in a civil rights complaint and are legally protected. In his written opinion, Liman noted Baldoni and Wayfarer had not alleged Lively was liable for any other claims than the ones made in her civil suit. In her own lawsuit, Lively, 37, has accused Baldoni of harassment, alleging that he and Wayfarer conducted a co-ordinated smear campaign to attack her reputation for coming forward about her treatment on the set. Baldoni, too, has accused the actor of trying to destroy his reputation. Liman wrote that Reynolds, publicist Leslie Sloan and the New York Times also did not make statements beyond what Lively had alleged about Baldoni. "The Wayfarer parties have alleged that Reynolds and Sloane made additional statements accusing Baldoni of sexual misconduct, and that the Times made additional statements accusing the Wayfarer parties of engaging in a smear campaign. But the Wayfarer parties have not alleged that Reynolds, Sloane or the Times would have seriously doubted these statements were true based on the information available to them, as is required for them to be liable for defamation under applicable law," the opinion reads. Liman is allowing Baldoni to amend some of his claims and refile by June 23. WATCH | Blake Lively accuses It Ends With Us director, co-star of trying to 'destroy' her reputation: Lively's legal team celebrated Monday's decision. "Today's opinion is a total victory and a complete vindication for Blake Lively, along with those that Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer parties dragged into their retaliatory lawsuit, including Ryan Reynolds, Leslie Sloane and The New York Times," Lively's lawyers said in a statement published by Variety. "As we have said from Day 1, this $400-million lawsuit was a sham, and the court saw right through it. We look forward to the next round, which is seeking attorneys' fees, treble damages and punitive damages against Baldoni, [Steve] Sarowitz, [Melissa] Nathan, and the other Wayfarer parties who perpetrated this abusive litigation." Baldoni's suit, filed in December, sought at least $400 million in damages that include lost future income. Lively filed her own federal lawsuit against Baldoni and several others tied to It Ends With Us, alleging harassment and a co-ordinated campaign to attack her reputation for coming forward about her treatment on the set of the romantic drama. That suit was filed in New York just hours after Baldoni and many of the other defendants in Lively's suit sued The New York Times for libel for its story on her allegations, saying the newspaper and the star were the ones conducting a co-ordinated smear campaign. WATCH | Duelling lawsuits from It Ends With Us stars Blake Lively, Justin Baldoni:

Justin Baldoni's lawsuit against Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds dismissed
Justin Baldoni's lawsuit against Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds dismissed

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Justin Baldoni's lawsuit against Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds dismissed

Justin Baldoni's $400 million lawsuit against his "It Ends With Us" co-star Blake Lively and her husband, Ryan Reynolds, was dismissed by a federal judge on Monday, according to court documents. Baldoni accused the couple, along with Lively's publicist, Leslie Sloane, of civil extortion and defamation after Lively accused Baldoni of sexual harassment and retaliation in a complaint filed in December. Baldoni has denied the accusations. Baldoni also sued The New York Times, which was first to report Lively's sexual harassment complaint. That lawsuit was also dismissed Monday. Baldoni and his production company Wayfarer Studios, which was a plaintiff in his suit, are able to amend some of the claims by June 23, the judge ruled. Lawyers for Lively called the judge's decision "a total victory and a complete vindication." "As we have said from day one, this '$400 million' lawsuit was a sham, and the Court saw right through it," attorneys Esra Hudson and Mike Gottlieb said in a statement. Representatives for Baldoni did not immediately respond to a request for comment. This is a developing story. Please check back for updates. Kristi Noem says "we are not going to let a repeat of 2020 happen" amid L.A. crackdown Magic in the dark: The fantastical worlds of Lightwire Theater Trump blasts Newsom as "grossly incompetent" as tensions rise over L.A. protests

Justin Baldoni's $400 million lawsuit against Blake Lively has been dismissed
Justin Baldoni's $400 million lawsuit against Blake Lively has been dismissed

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Justin Baldoni's $400 million lawsuit against Blake Lively has been dismissed

A judge dismissed the $400 million countersuit Justin Baldoni brought against Blake Lively. Baldoni accused Lively of defaming him and seizing creative control of "This Ends With Us." Baldoni can still allege Ryan Reynolds tried to get his agent to drop him. It ends with a judge's 132-page opinion. US District Judge Lewis Liman on Monday tossed the $400 million countersuit Justin Baldoni brought against Blake Lively and her husband, Ryan Reynolds. Baldoni's lawsuit, filed in federal court in New York, accused Lively, who was his "This Ends with Us" costar, of taking over his movie and trying to destroy his reputation. The lawsuit, which included his production company Wayfarer Studios and several publicists he worked with as plaintiffs, also alleged that Lively falsely accused him of sexual harassment to gain control over the film's creative direction and promotion. The case was combined with a separate lawsuit against The New York Times and Leslie Sloane, Lively's public relations representative. Baldoni accused Sloane of planting false stories in publications about him, and The New York Times of acting as a "conduit" for Lively's allegations that he sexually harassed her on set. Lively has alleged in a separate lawsuit and in a California Civil Rights Department complaint that Baldoni and his public relations representatives tried to smear her in the press. US District Judge Lewis Liman's Monday decision weighed whether Baldoni's allegations — and the evidence his lawyers collected in court filings — sufficiently proved that the defendants defamed him, and that Lively extorted him by threatening to withhold publicity for "This Ends With Us" unless the movie was made under her own creative vision. Over 132 pages, Liman wrote that Baldoni and his studio couldn't sufficiently prove their claims to bring the case to trial. "The Wayfarer Parties cannot recover for Lively's alleged actions to steal creative control of the film from Baldoni and the Wayfarer Parties," he wrote. "Regardless of the propriety of these actions, they do not constitute civil extortion under California law." Lively's allegations against Baldoni — accusing him of sexual harassment, and of his production company violating her employment contract for "This Ends With Us" — still remain alive. Liman is weighing whether to dismiss Lively's lawsuit against Baldoni or let it proceed to trial. Monday's opinion did, however, leave a door open for Baldoni to renew allegations that Lively and Reynolds illegally tried to get WME — the talent agency that represents all three actors — to cut ties with him. According to Baldoni's attorneys, Reynolds approached a WME executive during the premiere of "Deadpool and Wolverine" and told him that Baldoni was a "sexual predator." The agency dropped Baldoni as a client shortly after Lively's complaint against him. A spokesperson for Baldoni didn't immediately return a request for comment from Business Insider. Read the original article on Business Insider

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store