These Are Your Worst Experiences With A Recall
Read more: These Are The Dumbest Looking Cars Of All Time, According To You
In 1991, I had a 1986 Fiero and there was a recall about the exhaust manifold, which could crack and lead to a fire risk. I was in college and took it into the local Pontiac/BMW place for the recall, which took a couple hours.When I drove off, the gauges were all messed up, the windows rolled up and down without commands, the headlights came on and turned off randomly, etc . I turned around within 100 feet of the dealership and drove it back, and told them they had messed it up, which of course they claimed they did not. So, I opened the engine hatch/truck and found the problem.Instead of unplugging the wiring harness to get to the exhaust manifold, they had cut it. They butted the two halves together and wrapped it with tape. They claimed the car was like that when they got it, but I happened to have a picture of the engine bay available. They refused to replace the wiring harness, but they did splice each wire they cut. I ended up with the car running right, but a ball of electrical tape the size of a softball back there.The entire time, the BMW salespeople kept strongly suggesting that I get a new car. They offered $100 for the Fiero in trade-in because it was messed up.
Submitted by: hoser68
The Kia Stinger forums are filled with horror stories of people getting their Turbo Oil line recall done and the dealerships having no idea how to work on the engines, Kia quoting a 3-hour job that supposedly takes six and some places thinking they need to drop the whole engine.I need to get mine done, and I'm worried.
Submitted by: ProjectNeo
My dad had a 1975 Corvette and back around 1978 or so he had a set of Firestone 500 radials put on the car. They were recalled and replaced before there was any issue, fortunately.Fast forward 20 years and my dad lets me take the car on a road trip about 200 miles from home. My buddy and I hear a noise from the right rear and sure enough, the tire's gone flat. I nurse the car to a safe spot, jack it up and drop the spare from underneath and, boom... there's a 20-year-old Firestone 500 just waiting to finally see daylight.
Submitted by: BuddyS
Getting a recall taken care of from a defunct OEM is really difficult... I had a 2006 Saab 9-2X (essentially a rebadged Subaru Impreza) that fell under the Takata recall. I get the recall letter from GM telling me that the car needs to be taken to a certified Saab service center in order to get it taken care of. Problem is, Saab had gone under 8 years prior. Logic would dictate that any GM dealership or even a Subaru dealership could handle it but nope. I had to call GM's customer support line to find an aftermarket shop that GM was willing to work with to handle the recall. The shop was a 2-hour drive in a complete different county from mine.
Submitted by: RemainKalm916
Where to start? Well, my worst experience with a recall was the Chrysler A-604 transmission back in the early '90s. Good old Lee Iacocca pushed this new FWD application 4-speed auto out to the market well before it was fully baked.It was a disaster on all fronts.As a young Chrysler District Service Manager at the time, I had the misfortune of dealing with a lot of VERY angry customers who bought new cars that very quickly failed spectacularly.Typically, the cars went into limp-in mode, which locked them in 2nd gear and made them barely drivable, aside from limping them into one of our overwhelmed dealers who neither had the parts nor enough transmission techs to fix them.The issue was not so much that there was a recall. It was that we were ill-prepared to fix them, even when the recall came out.
One of the challenges with NHTSA regulations is manufacturers are required to send recall notices out within a very tight time window, regardless if they have the parts or training to do the fix.Of course, being Chrysler in the early '90s, we ran fast and loose with quality on most fronts. There were plenty of disasters somewhat akin to the A-604, but it was the pinnacle of doing things the wrong way.I still remember driving in one morning to see one of my dealers when my own company car's transmission went into limp-in mode.I was not amused.
Submitted by: Factoryhack
2017 Kia Optima PHEV. Get a recall notification to install anti-knock software to keep the engine from grenading. Never had an issue with knocking or ticking before this. Pick the car up after the work is "done". Within 20 miles of driving, engine starts knocking on the freeway and completely grenades. Between that, hybrid battery failure, wiring harness failure, and a short in the stereo that drained the 12V system, it sat at the dealer for 18 months between Dec 2021 and April 2024Cherry on top: they offered me a $2000 "goodwill" payment tied to an NDA and a clause that said if I sold the car and the next owner sued them, I was on the hook for the damages. No thank you
Submitted by: dubgasm
2018 Pacifica hybrid. It was undrivable due to a wiring issue in the transmission. We had to wait 4 months for a new transmission because of the UAW strike. Chrysler did cover a rental.We're still waiting to get the charging system recall fixed (again) so it doesn't burst into flames when charging. We haven't been able to charge it for over a year, and that's the main reason we bought it over Honda/Toyota.The first and absolutely last FCA product we will ever buy...
Submitted by: DCnative
The Hyundai engine recalls on my manual 2014 Elantra GT.In mid-2021, I got the knock-sensor recall upgrade from Hyundai Canada meant to monitor my engine for signs of engine knocking. It would put my engine into a safety mode if any engine knocking was discovered. Potentially, I could get the engine replaced under warranty. The warranty had been extended to 10 years or 200,000km. I fell within both criteria, luckily.Early January 2022, the knock sensor engages and I limp back to the dealership in safe mode (can't rev the engine over 2000 RPM in safe mode). Hyundai Canada had the car for 4 weeks, no communication with me. Finally, they gave me back the car, claiming my oil filter was the issue (they said it wasn't OEM and that caused the knock sensor to falsely engage). Next day, the knock sensor kicks in while on the highway as I drove 110kmph; it was like someone slammed on the brakes and I nearly got rear-ended getting off the highway when it happened. I parked the car at home, called the dealership back, told them to come tow the car back and fix the issue and that I wouldn't drive it again until fixed as it was not safe to drive.For 3 weeks, they wouldn't give me an update or rental. Finally, after 4 weeks, they said they found metal shavings in the oil pan and engine and I got a rental car. 6 weeks total elapsed before I got the car back with a brand new engine, but they made me pay for a new oil pan (they said the warranty wouldn't cover it and it was needed).
Sold the car only a few months later.
Submitted by: Jeffaulburn
Here in Canada, some Hyundai models have a recall for premature rusting on the brake lines and subframe. My 2015 Veloster was under this recall. As a tech of a Hyundai dealer, I knew it had to be done. The day I drove it in, the brakes were getting worse and worse. After being left in the parking lot for a few hours, the brakes were completely lost and it had to be driven in using the handbrake to stop it.
Submitted by: ThatYoteGal
The airbag recall for Acura several years ago.... Was told to park my car and not drive until parts became available.... That ultimately was 6 months... Fortunately, my lawyer got Acura to supply a free rental from Hertz for the entire time. The Hertz rental experience is a whole other story and near disaster.
Submitted by: Jdg000
I got a ticket due to a recall once. I brought my Miata in for an annual inspection/preventative maintenance. The recall fix required a computer reset, which they did before running the emissions test. But when you reset the computer, you've got to run the engine for some number of miles (maybe 100?) before you can run the test. I only drive the car maybe 1500 miles a year, so it took me a while to hit 100 miles. And in that time, I got a late registration ticket.
Submitted by: Give Me Tacos or Give Me Death
I knew a guy in college who was on his way to pick up some mail that had been delivered to his previous address. On the way, he was in an accident and was seriously injured by a bad Takata airbag. The mail he was going to get included a recall notice for the airbag.
Submitted by: Tycho
Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox...
Read the original article on Jalopnik.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Motor 1
7 hours ago
- Motor 1
The 2025 BMW M5 Touring Is Absurd and Great: Review
Does any new car come with more baggage than the latest BMW M5 ? The name carries with it the weight of huge expectations, and in case you hadn't heard, the new M5 simply carries a huge weight—5,390 pounds for the sedan and 5,530 pounds for the Touring wagon. A lot of people have made up their minds about this car, and they're not fans. So, it's impossible to go into this car without expectations. The least I can do is approach the M5 Touring with an open mind and judge it on its merits. I'll cut to the chase: The M5 Touring is brilliant. And compromised. Quick Specs 2025 BMW M5 Touring Engine 4.4-Liter Twin-Turbo V-8 Plus Electric Motor Output 717 Horsepower / 738 Pound-Feet 0-60 MPH 3.2 Seconds Base Price / As Tested $125,275 / $140,775 As a quick refresher, the new M5 takes the previous car's formula—twin-turbo V-8, eight-speed automatic transmission, all-wheel drive—and adds hybridity to it. A 14.8-kilowatt-hour battery pack built into the floor powers a 194-horsepower electric motor sandwiched between the engine and transmission. Total output is 717 hp and 738 pound-feet of torque, while the all-electric driving range is 25 miles. Photo by: Chris Perkins / Motor1 Photo by: Chris Perkins / Motor1 Photo by: Chris Perkins / Motor1 The M5 drives like a big M3. BMW's latest generation of M cars have a super sharp front end and wonderfully neutral handling balance. I figured, given its weight and size, the M5 would feel pretty different, but I was astonished at how similar this thing felt. It's agile in a way it has no right to be, and even at reasonable road speeds, it's very throttle-adjustable. I kind of couldn't believe it. On narrow country lanes, it still feels big, of course, but get the M5 out on faster, flowing roads and it comes into its own. The grip is immense, and you get a good sense of what the car is doing through the seat of your pants. Even the steering is good, with a very natural weight buildup off-center that communicates what the huge front Pirellis are feeling. Braking is excellent, too, on these $8,500 carbon-ceramics, and the brake pedal is well-tuned to the point that you don't even know it's blending friction and regenerative braking. Photo by: Chris Perkins / Motor1 Pros: Astonishing Handling, Powerful, Well-Integrated Hybrid, Wagon Practicality / Cool-Factor Then there's the speed. The electric torque helps with transient response, and the engine loves to rev in typical BMW fashion. The twin-turbo 4.4-liter V-8 even sounds pretty tuneful with the eight-speed gearbox cracking off shifts with absolute smoothness and precision. At no point does the M5 feel like it'll stop accelerating either. Triple-digit speeds are all too easy here. But with the M5 Touring, you can't have your cake and eat it, too. The ride is firm, unbearably so at times. BMW doesn't use any fancy suspension tech here—no adjustable anti-roll bars, air springs, or a fully active system like Porsche's —just steel springs and adaptive dampers. The damping is well judged, but there's so much spring and anti-roll bar here to control the weight and make the M5 turn like anything worth a damn. Even expansion joints can send a jolt through the cabin, and on New York City's crumbling streets, the M5 is plain uncomfortable. On some level, I can understand why BMW tuned the M5 like this. The handling is astonishing for a vehicle of this type, and you're never in any doubt that you're in an M car. But at the same time, shouldn't an M5, of all things, offer a blend of ride and handling? It's a luxury car that, in the case of the Touring, costs $127,675. And in truth, the lighter M3 rides better. Photo by: Chris Perkins / Motor1 Photo by: Chris Perkins / Motor1 That's about it for major faults, though. The only other criticism I have is that there are a lot of drive modes to manage when you add in the five settings for the hybrid system on top of the typical customizations for steering, suspension, transmission, etc. Oh, and the driver's seat in this tester was creaky after just 9,000 miles of use. The hybrid system can benefit efficiency, too, despite this surely being one of the only hybrids on the market subject to a Gas Guzzler tax. At least in the kind of driving I do, mixing Metro New York highways and city streets, with a full battery and the lower average speeds typical of the area, you can exceed 30 miles per gallon. Even with a dead battery, I managed 28 mpg on a drive from Westchester back into Brooklyn. It's no Prius, and if you're driving super hard, using the engine to charge the battery, it will drink fuel prodigiously, but it's way more efficient than I was expecting. Photo by: Chris Perkins / Motor1 Cons: Incredibly Firm Ride, Too Many Drive Modes, Need To Keep Battery Charged For Decent MPG With time, I grew fonder of the M5 Touring. I think it being a wagon helped, not just because of the added practicality, but because of the incongruity of the thing. What a strange world we live in, where we've arrived at an enormous, 700-plus-hp BMW station wagon with bulging fender flares, a gaping maw, and a bright orange interior. It's bizarre, and undeniably cool. In this shade of Isle of Man Green, the M5 Touring has serious presence, even making E63 Wagons and RS6 Avants look understated. It gets tons of positive attention, since it isn't like anything else on the road. So much of the hate this car gets online just doesn't translate to the real world, where people aren't so fussed about spec sheets. There's a magnetism here—every time I get out of it, I look back at it. Photo by: Chris Perkins / Motor1 The ride quality is a big drawback here. It's livable on nicer roads, but if you live where the roads are tough, it's too much. But I find myself falling in love with the M5 in spite of it. Nothing else is quite so impressive from an engineering standpoint, while also being downright goofy. An M5 that turns like an M3, a Gas-Guzzling hybrid, a practical station wagon that accelerates like a supercar, a performance car that weighs as much as a full-size pickup. It is ridiculous and sublime. Competitors Audi RS6 Avant Mercedes-AMG E53 Estate Porsche Taycan Cross Turismo Check Out These Reviews BMW M5 Touring vs. Audi RS6 Avant: Performance Wagon Showdown Audi RS6 Avant GT Review: For the Nerds Gallery: 2025 BMW M5 Touring Review BMW Make: BMW Model: URL: BMW 21 Source: Chris Perkins / Motor1 2025 BMW M5 Touring Engine 4.4-Liter Twin-Turbo V-8 Plus Electric Motor Output 717 Horsepower / 738 Pound-Feet Drive Type All-Wheel Drive Speed 0-60 MPH 3.5 Seconds Maximum speed 155 MPH (190 With M Driver's Package) Efficiency 13 MPG Combined (Gas Only) / 54 MPGe (Gas + Electric) EV Range 25 Miles Seating Capacity 5 Cargo Volume 27.2 Cubic Feet / 67.0 Weight 5,523 Pounds Base Price $125,275 As-Tested Price $140,775 Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )

USA Today
7 hours ago
- USA Today
Mysterious 1955 Chrysler Falcon concept car makes rare appearance. Is it the only one left?
A lovely and legendary car shrouded in mystery, the 1955 Chrysler Falcon made a rare public appearance Sunday, Aug. 17, at the Pebble Beach Concours d'Elegance classic car show in California. The elegant Falcon was conceived to elbow Chrysler into the spotlight shining on the new and exciting Chevrolet Corvette and Ford Thunderbird, graceful two-seaters drawing acclaim and buyers to Chrysler's crosstown rivals in Detroit. 'The car is significant as a window into what might have been if Chrysler had decided to match the Corvette and Thunderbird with a two-seater of its own,' said Matt Anderson, transportation curator at The Henry Ford museum in Dearborn, Michigan. 'The Falcon blended the sportiness of the Corvette with the personal luxury of the T-Bird quite well. 'Whether there was a market for that mix, we'll never know.' The Chrysler Falcon is part of the Bortz Auto Collection of concept cars preserved by enthusiast Joe Bortz. His cars are not permanently displayed anywhere, but make the rounds of leading museums and auto events. The Chrysler Falcon is unrelated to the 1960s Ford compact sedan of the same name. Off-the-shelf parts Chrysler styling lost its edge when it resumed passenger-vehicle production after World War II. Chairman J.T. Keller charged design chief Virgil Exner with revitalizing the brand. Exner enlisted Italian coachbuilder and designer Ghia to build what he called his 'idea cars.' The string of concept cars for Chrysler included the K-310, Norseman and Imperial Crown. They were one-off projects, show cars designed to fire the imagination, not for production and sale. 'The Falcon changed that,' Stellantis historian Brandt Rosenbusch told me. 'It was conceived to compete with the Corvette and Thunderbird, so it used off-the-shelf parts for easy production.' That included a shortened 1955 Chrysler 300 chassis ― 105 inches long, 11 inches less than the production sedan. Other production features included a Hemi V8 and power steering, brakes and windows. The car is drivable.'It's a stunning car. The proportions are perfect,' Bortz said. 'It's unusual for its time because it had so little chrome.' But committing to produce the low, graceful Falcon was too much to ask of a chairman who once declared every Chrysler's roof must be high enough that a gentleman could wear his hat while driving. The car never made it to the assembly line. Nobody's entirely certain how many Ghia's old-world workshop in Turin built. It was once believed Ghia built only one Falcon, but we know now there were at least two. Maybe three, according to a Ghia memo citing a build order from Chrysler. Where can I see the 1955 Chrysler Falcon concept? Somehow, they vanished Supporting the three-car theory, Chrysler archives have photos of Falcons in three different colors: 'There's a lot of guesswork,' Bortz said. The Falcon was first shown to the public in New York in August 1955, alongside Chrysler's Flight Sweep I and II concept cars. Nobody knows what happened to the Flight Sweeps. Many early concept cars were sold to private buyers and driven till they died. The Falcon lived on. Its grille inspired the 1998 Chrysler Chronos concept car and the sensational 2005 Chrysler 300. The car will be on the 18th fairway at Pebble Beach this year, one of several Exner cars that are part of a tribute to Chrysler's centennial. Bortz will display it with the convertible top up, a seldom seen configuration. 'Exner will always be remembered for the 'Forward Look' Chryslers of the late 1950s,' Anderson said. 'Those cars absolutely remade the company's image from old fashioned to cutting edge. 'The 1957 ad campaign said it best: 'Suddenly it's 1960!' 'While he didn't invent the tailfin, Exner employed it to greater effect than any of his contemporaries.' The Falcon 'was considered Exner's finest car,' Bortz said. 'He kept a model on his desk.' 1955 Chrysler Falcon at a glance Built in Turin by Carrozerria Ghia SpA Wheelbase: 105 inches Length: 182 inches Width: '68½ inches' Height: '51 1/8 inches' Engine: 'Special Chrysler Corp. V8 hemispherical combustion chamber Tires: 15-inch From Chrysler's description: Interior: Source: Stellantis archives Contact Mark Phelan: mmphelan@ Follow him on Twitter @mark_phelan. Read more on autos and sign up for our autos newsletter. Become a subscriber.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
GM Once Again Shows Off Radical Corvette Concepts
Once again, GM has revealed some Corvette concepts which push the sports car in an exotic hypercar direction. The Corvette CX and CX.R Vision Gran Turismo were paraded at The Quail during Monterey Car Week. Thankfully, neither one will ever roll off a production this is the third time this year GM has revealed such concepts for the Corvette's future and we think it's a not-so-subtle hint of things to come. But we have a serious problem with this direction. Since its inception, the Corvette has been a blue collar sports car, America's sports car, that was not only fast and cool but also accessible. You didn't have to be some rich guy with a mansion to own one, unlike Ferraris and such. While the C8 Corvette pushed the sports car upmarket some, while also giving it an exotic flavor by putting the engine midship, it has remained fairly accessible, although sadly not as much as in the past. But it seems GM really wants to make the Corvette its vanity project to take on Ferrari, Koenigsegg, Lamborghini, McLaren, and others. We guess it's to show Americans can make ridiculous hypercars with inflated prices, too. This sort of attitude has birthed other ridiculous things like modern muscle cars which cost more than $100,000 (those were supposed to be even more attainable than the Corvette). GM says it's doing the work to 'propel (the Corvette) into the future.' And we guess in the future one will have to be a rich and powerful executive to enjoy one. We get these concepts are design exercises, but we also know concepts affect future production cars. Our hope is this fascination with making the Corvette so over-the-top doesn't result in a future model that has a base MSRP of $750,000 or more, pricing out the enthusiasts who have been loyal to the sports car for decades. Images via GM Join our Newsletter, subscribe to our YouTube page, and follow us on Facebook.



