Day of Giving surpasses goal of raising $700K in a day for Fairmont State
With a goal of raising $700,000 for programs, athletics and scholarships throughout campus,1,686 donors stepped forward to support the local university.
Donors had more than 60 different programs from which to choose when they made their gift during that 24-hour window last month.
Fairmont State Foundation President Anne Bolyard thanked Day of Giving donors for rising to the challenge.
'From the initial planning conversations to the present, the Fairmont State Foundation team has demonstrated unfailing commitment and dedication to exceeding the 2025 Day of Giving goal," Bolyard said. "Their dedication and unmatched professional expertise are deeply appreciated and embody the mission and success of our Foundation.'
Fairmont State's five colleges raised a combined total of $99,133 to help fund various academic programs and initiatives. An additional $197,558 was raised for academic scholarships.
The College of Education, Health & Human Performance earned the distinction of being the academic unit that raised the most money. The $43,443 raised will be used to fund such programs as the PRAXIS Test Support Fund, Outdoor Leadership, Exercise Science and the Autism Individualized Mentoring and Support Services program. The College of Business & Aviation had the most individual donors at 133. Of those, 95 made donation to help fund the aviation program.
In terms of athletics, 802 donations totaling $247,185 came in for the university's sports program. Falcons football came out No. 1 with $35,089 from 101 donors, while women's basketball raised $22,010 from 40 donors. Donors gave an additional $14,998 to help fund athletic scholarships. The women's volleyball team had the most donors of any athletic team this year with 143, and they earned an additional $2,250 in prizes for their program with this achievement.
'To be able to raise over $250,000 in one day is amazing, and the fact that it came from over 800 donors, just shows us how much our community cares about our Fighting Falcons. Thank you to all who were able show their support,' Fairmont State Athletic Director Greg Bamberger said. 'I also want to thank everyone who was responsible for the entire day. I know months of planning was put into it by members of the University and the Foundation.
"The coordination and organization required to pull this event off was top shelf. These resources will be used to aid athletic scholarship support for our student-athletes and let us occasionally do something special for our student-athletes that reminds them of the fact Fairmont State is a Great Place.'
Individual and corporate donors stepped up to provide 80 prizes and matching gifts. For example, William Laughlin and Lois Muto Laughlin provided matching gifts for each of the five colleges and athletics, totaling $15,000.
The Mike Ross Family Foundation matched a total of $13,000 split evenly between the College of Nursing and the Falcon Surveyors student organization.
Gary K. and Barbara Bennett matched a total of $11,000 in gifts, supporting the Student Veteran's Organization, the Aviation Center of Excellence, the Glenn A. Harman Accounting Excellence Award, PRAXIS Test Support Fund and University Bands.
The Thrasher Group provided $3,000 to the Architecture program and $3,000 to the Engineering Technology program after challenging 15 or more Thrasher employees to make a gift to any participating area on Day of Giving.
Fairmont State President Mike Davis and Alumni Association Board Chair Nick Fantasia each provided $1 to the Falcon Fund for every donor on Day of Giving.
Davis sponsored a final-hour challenge that awarded $1,000 to the giving area that hauled in the most donors from 11 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
Omni Associates sponsored the Lunch Rush Challenge this year, which provided $1,000 to the giving area with the most donors between 11 a.m. and 1 p.m.
EMCOR Services Scalise Industries sponsored a Midnight Madness challenge, which offered $500 to the giving area with the most donations in the first hour of Day of Giving.
Campus community members were encouraged to stop by the Falcon Center throughout the day to make a gift, try their luck at the punch-a-bunch board for prizes, sign a thank you note, and watch livestream interviews with donors and representatives from featured programs.
'This year's Day of Giving once again demonstrated the incredible impact we can achieve together,' Davis said. 'Surpassing our $700,000 goal means more scholarships, enhanced student experiences, and stronger academic and athletic programs. We extend our deepest gratitude to every donor—your generosity helps make Fairmont State a truly Great Place to Learn, Work, and Call Home.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk says Google has the best shot at being the leader in AI
Elon Musk says Google "currently has the highest probability of being the leader" in AI. But that "may change in a few years," he added. Musk's comment comes as he again escalates his ongoing feud with Sam Altman and OpenAI. xAI CEO Elon Musk paid a rare compliment to his rival Google on Wednesday. "Outside of real-world AI, Google has the biggest compute (and data) advantage for now, so currently has the highest probability of being the leader," Musk wrote in an X post. But that "may change in a few years," he added. "For the foreseeable future, the major AI companies will continue to prosper, as will xAI. There is just so much to do!" Musk wrote. Musk and Google did not respond to requests for comment from Business Insider. Google has long been a mainstay in AI. In 2017, Google Research released a paper titled "Attention Is All You Need." This seminal work introduced the world to the concept of the Transformer, the technology that powers large language models like ChatGPT. The search giant has also invested in AI startups such as Anthropic and Safe Superintelligence. Google owns a 14% stake in Anthropic, a startup founded by former OpenAI employees, per legal filings obtained by The New York Times. Google has continued to make hefty investments in AI. During its second-quarter earnings call last month, the company said it was raising its capital expenditures by $10 billion this year to $85 billion. Google's CEO, Sundar Pichai, said the increase in capital expenditures would help meet the increased demand for chips and Google's AI products. Last year, Google DeepMind's CEO, Demis Hassabis, was one of three researchers awarded the Nobel Prize in chemistry. Hassabis and his colleague, John Jumper, were recognized for Google DeepMind's work on protein-structure prediction. Musk's comments come as he continues to escalate his feud with Sam Altman and OpenAI. On Monday, Musk said xAI would take "immediate legal action" against Apple for what he said was Apple's bias toward OpenAI in its App Store rankings. A spokesperson for Apple told Business Insider on Tuesday that the App Store is "designed to be fair and free of bias." Musk and Altman cofounded OpenAI in 2015, but their relationship soured after Musk left its board in 2018. Last year, Musk sued OpenAI and accused the ChatGPT maker of violating its nonprofit mission when it partnered with Microsoft. Musk launched his own AI startup, xAI, in July 2023 and debuted his chatbot, Grok, later that year. xAI raised over $12 billion in its Series A, B, and C funding rounds in 2024 and was valued at a reported $50 billion. Last month, Musk said on X that his EV company, Tesla, will ask its shareholders to vote on whether to invest in xAI. He did not specify when the vote would take place. "It's not up to me. If it was up to me, Tesla would have invested in xAI long ago," Musk wrote on X on July 13. Read the original article on Business Insider Sign in to access your portfolio
Forbes
6 hours ago
- Forbes
From Polish To Presence: What Storytelling Demands Of Leaders
Slides that sparkle. Phrases engineered to trend. Strategic decks with bold pillars and even bolder adjectives. Somewhere in the race to produce the perfect message, leaders are slipping into performative storytelling — technically flawless yet emotionally vacant. It's not surprising that, according to a Gallup study, only 13% of employees strongly agree that the leadership of their organization communicates effectively. In my work with executives, I've seen leaders treat storytelling as another metric to hit. They deliver the right beats, smile at the right time, hit the applause lines — and leave no trace. It's like watching a movie trailer that never convinces you to see the film. Nancy Duarte has spent over three decades shaping how leaders communicate. As CEO of Duarte, Inc. and the author of six best-selling books — including Slide:ology, Resonate, Illuminate and DataStory — she's taught visual storytelling to some of the highest-performing brands and executives in the world. Her firm designed the makeover of Al Gore's slide presentation that inspired the Academy Award–winning documentary An Inconvenient Truth. Recognized globally for her expertise, she has advised CEOs, political leaders, and entrepreneurs whose work has shifted public discourse. We recently had a wide-ranging conversation about the power of storytelling. 'Most leaders aren't short on polish. They're short on presence,' Duarte told me. 'I've sat through so many presentations that were technically flawless, yet gave no clue why the leader cared about the message at all.' The Multiverse Problem: Micro Stories Without A Master Narrative Duarte describes today's communication environment as a 'multiverse of stories,' where micro-narratives fly across TikToks, Instagram Reels, and Slack posts. Leaders now must make each one fit into a coherent whole. Leaders who built their careers in an era of long-form storytelling — town halls, memos, full speeches — now work in an attention economy that measures interest in seconds. 'Micro stories are powerful, but if they're not tied back to the master narrative, the big picture gets lost,' she said. 'The core message should hold true across every platform. One person might bring it to life with visuals on LinkedIn, another might deliver it as a monologue at an event, but the essence stays the same.' Consider a CEO who shares a deeply personal customer moment at a conference. A week later, a short version of that story circulates widely, stripped of its emotional context. Internally, it's reduced to a bullet point. The same story now carries three meanings — none fully aligned. The Fog Index And The Clarity Test Duarte and I spoke about the Gunning Fog Index — a readability tool that estimates how many years of education a person might need to fully understand a piece of content. It's a quick way to see whether your language is clear or unnecessarily complex. We looked at two famous 2007 speeches: Bill Gates' CES keynote scored a Fog Index of 10.5, while Steve Jobs' Macworld address scored just 5.5. In practical terms, understanding Gates' speech might require roughly five more years of schooling compared to Jobs'. Both had their strengths. Gates built layered, detail-rich arguments; Jobs leaned on simplicity and narrative flow. Duarte's point wasn't to favor one over the other but to underscore the importance of knowing your own style — and being intentional about clarity. As she put it: 'When you're the one making it, and you're in there up to your elbows, you get really caught up in the technical features instead of the benefits.' Leaders don't need to strip away complexity, but they do need to speak in a way that connects. Compare this: 'A transformational growth agenda leveraging synergistic capabilities…' (Fog.) 'We're entering three new markets in two years — here's why it matters to customers.' (Clear.) I've seen executive meetings where dense shorthand lost half the room. The plan was robust — but buried in abstraction. Strategy Lost In Translation A 2025 Axios HQ report found that 33% of leaders had to set aside their own priorities to fix problems caused by poor communication. Another 30% were drawn deeper into projects than necessary, while 27% spent excessive time clarifying or reiterating objectives, goals, or organizational policies. The study estimated the cost of this inefficiency at $10,140 per employee per year. The same research revealed a striking perception gap. While 80% of leaders believe their internal communications are helpful, relevant, and provide the context teams need to do their jobs, only 53% of employees agree. That gap shows how easily clarity and connection can get lost when information moves faster than people can absorb it. 'When you try to produce too much content too fast, you end up in a race to the bottom,' Duarte told me. 'Messages get shorter, but also shallower. And in that rush, leaders lose the thread of what actually matters.' I've seen leadership teams chase engagement metrics over meaning. What sticks isn't the substance but the clever caption. A slogan fades quickly. A clearly articulated purpose endures. Can AI Be the Storyteller's Assistant? 'We've made storytelling look presentable,' she said. 'But we've forgotten to make it personal.' The result is messaging that sounds plausible but lands flat — especially when it's generated or augmented by tools designed to produce language without grounding it in belief. Duarte's critique is blunt: 'It's a race to the bottom. Chum and chum and chum.' By 'chum,' she isn't just talking about poor writing. She means the flood of technically fine but soulless output, stripped of originality and the leader's voice. 'I can load a model with my own IP and have it churn something out,' she said. 'It comes back fine, but I still spend hours rewriting it.' The tool can help, but it's a means, not the destination. And when leaders treat storytelling as just another deliverable, the voice that makes people care often disappears with it. The Risk Of Narrative Drift Every organization has a formal message — strategy decks, town halls, culture statements. Underneath those is the lived narrative, the one people actually believe. When those two stories diverge, trust fades. Duarte was direct: 'A really good leader would have his or her whole leadership team saying the same language. They might express it a little differently to their constituents, but there shouldn't be that much deviation.' Drift happens quickly when storytelling is fragmented by function or flattened by jargon. Marketing promotes a campaign. HR announces a change. Operations reorders the work. Everyone's speaking, but the signals conflict — and employees start filling in the gaps with their own stories. 'You stayed transparent and authentic,' she said, reflecting on how organizations must respond in moments of public pressure. 'If you're living your values and living your culture and you put something out there… and it has a reaction… you stayed true to yourself.' That, she added, is the real test: 'All the company values get pressed, and that's when employees say, you claim to value integrity, but look what you just did under pressure.' Anchoring Stories In Passion And Purpose For a story to resonate, leaders must connect with it personally. 'If you can't connect to it emotionally, your audience won't either,' Duarte emphasized. A product lead can explain a release roadmap in bullet points — dry. Or they can tell the story of the original customer email that inspired it. Through that lens, the same facts gain meaning. When I coach senior leaders, I've seen both sides. One spent months perfecting cadence, rehearsing until every pause and gesture felt choreographed. The result was flawless — and forgettable. Another, far less polished, spoke plainly about a difficult choice and why it mattered. Their voice caught. The room went still. That moment lingered far longer than any slide. In Duarte's experience, that personal connection shapes tone, pace, presence. When a leader truly cares, people lean forward. Without it, even the most polished delivery feels empty. Building A Story That Lives Beyond You Duarte stresses that a leader's story must survive without them in the room: 'If the only way the story works is when you're the one telling it, it's too fragile. It has to move through the organization without losing shape.' She believes the leader's role isn't just to announce strategy but to carry its arc through time and disruption. That arc can't just live in slides. 'All the little stories, all the bites, all the tweets… they should all align.' In Illuminate, she describes the leader as torchbearer — not the one with all the answers, but the one who carries forward meaning. 'Business is an epic tale — especially for those that rise and fall.' When leaders treat communication as episodic rather than cumulative, they lose what builds belief. 'Your values should be able to endure the pressure,' she said. 'Otherwise they're just slogans.' That applies to individuals too: 'You should be able to say one of the company values and tell a personal story about how you lived it today.' Storytelling, in that sense, isn't about shaping a message — it's about reinforcing what already matters. Leader's Story Check Before your next presentation, run your story through these filters. If it fails more than one, it may be performance — not presence. A story worth telling meets all six. It feels lived in, edged with humanity, and carries the leader's fingerprints — not just their polish. It's the kind of story they can't help but tell. Duarte left me with a powerful closing reminder: 'When leaders find the story they can't help but tell, everything changes. It's not about delivering the perfect line. It's about making people believe you believe it.' Trust is in short supply. Belief, too. In that climate, a story a leader can't help but tell becomes more than a message — it's a survival skill. It can reconnect the disengaged, cut through the noise, and give people something solid to hold onto. But only if it reflects what they already suspect to be true. In the end, presence matters more than polish. The slides can still sparkle — but the story has to breathe.
Fast Company
10 hours ago
- Fast Company
Mentorship will grow the next generation of leaders
Effective mentorship will be the secret recipe to grow the next generation of leaders. I'll be the first to admit that this isn't a new concept, but it's extremely hard to get mentorship right. I've seen organizations toss mentorship into internal and external communications content as a vague component of professional development, with no real structure. Similarly, I know too many wildly talented, well-intentioned executives who are fully on board with the concept of mentorship but stop short of adopting it as a core element of their lives. The same goes for those just starting out in their careers: Being or finding a mentor is an afterthought, a 'nice to have,' something to consider when their to-do list gets shorter. Spoiler alert to those starting a career: Your to-do list never gets shorter. Mentorship is a foundation The word 'mentor' is a noun, describing a person who mentors, but it's also a verb — an action you to do. I'm passionate about this because I wholeheartedly believe that mentorship is the key to breaking down self-imposed artificial barriers and unlocking our true potential as professionals, and as people. Before I go any further, here's a critical point: Mentorship is traditionally characterized as benefitting the mentee, as altruism on the part of the mentor who's 'doing a favor' for the person who is less advanced in their career. Please, if you take nothing else from reading this, hear me on this one: Mentorship doesn't just break through barriers for the mentees. Done right, mentors too, will find themselves reimagining what's possible. This may sound like Pollyanna-style thinking, but I am speaking from my own experience and from observing countless other mutually beneficial mentor/mentee relationships. Break self-imposed ceilings Here's why mentorship matters so much. Most of us construct invisible barriers that limit our potential. That applies even to those who are—or believe they are—at the so-called 'top' of their careers. These self-imposed ceilings manifest in surprising ways, not just in career aspirations but in how we approach work itself. I've placed limitations on myself, too. And I had every reason not to—my mother was an executive, picking me up from gymnastics practice in a suit, typically the last one to arrive. I've seen what climbing the corporate ladder looks like. But there's a difference between seeing it and immersing yourself in what's possible, because the latter requires confronting your real goals. Consider how many talented departmental leaders hesitate to pursue paths beyond the head of their department. How often do we see a CMO who wants to become CEO? There's nothing inherently wrong with 'topping out' at anycareer level, but it should be because that's where you want to be, not because that's where you think your path is supposed to end. In so many cases, the stopping point isn't due to capability gaps but because of internalized assumptions about where your career should plateau based on your background or expertise. Rethink what's possible This is where mentorship comes in. Effective mentorship creates space to examine and challenge these self-constructed limitations. When someone asks the right questions and provides consistent support, seemingly fixed boundaries suddenly become permeable. Clearly, this is important for mentees who are rising through the ranks in their careers. I've found that serving as a mentor forces you to confront your own path, assumptions, and limitations. You might never dream of telling a mentee, 'This is where your path should end; don't explore any lateral moves to a different area of expertise, and don't pursue a role that most people with your background would consider too 'advanced.'' And yet, we—subconsciously or blatantly—tell that to ourselves all the time. Cross-functional experiences build leaders Many of the limitations we place on ourselves are constructed from a traditional perception of career paths. And yet, my own path taught me that leadership excellence requires perspective from multiple angles. My first job involved fulfilling collateral packages for inside sales. And while my career has been centered around marketing, I've branched out the last few years by embracing customer success and renewals. This diversity of experience has done more than build my resume—it completely changed how I understand business. Each role offered a different vantage point on the same organizational challenges, creating a comprehensive picture impossible to see from a single department. When mentoring emerging professionals, I encourage similar exploration beyond their comfort zones. Breaking down silos between departments improves organizational efficiency and develops leaders with a fuller understanding of how businesses function. Win-win! You don't have to stay in your lane to advance. The most effective leaders combine deep expertise with broader business acumen gained through varied experiences. Making membership work It's a misconception that mentor/mentee relationships must be someone from an older generation mentoring someone from a younger generation, or that they must be at opposite ends of a traditionally linear career path. An effective mentor/mentee relationship encourages people with different experiences and perspectives to share and grow together. Find someone with whom you click, who challenges you, who holds you accountable, and who has a similar level of commitment to the relationship. For the mentees, show up with something to offer, whether that's a useful perspective or even just a high level of preparation so you're making the best use of your mentor's time. I encourage my mentees to come prepared with clear agendas for our discussions—ensuring we address priorities efficiently whether we have five minutes or 30. From mentorship to legacy I have benefited tremendously from mentors throughout my career. And my commitment to developing the next generation of diverse business professionals has become central to my leadership philosophy. I measure success not only by my achievements but by the growth of those I've mentored and the ripple effects their advancement creates. Again, mentoring isn't about doing favors—it's about building something larger than individual careers. It's about creating pathways for others to follow while simultaneously expanding your own vision of what's possible.
