
Men aren't trusted to take the contraceptive pill - I'm proof we should be
The drug – known as the YCT-529 pill – has undergone tests that indicate it is safe for humans, with no side effects.
It's good news. For years women have been expected to take the lead in reproductive responsibility, and that's long been unfair on them.
You'd think most women would be excited – at last, men can pull their weight. Not necessarily. The online discourse surrounding it has been troubling, with people asking if they can actually trust men to take the pill.
It's a story that comes around every few years, and it always elicits the same reaction.
'I can't trust my fiancé to remember to put the bins out' wrote The Sun's Joely Chilcott back in 2019, 'let alone take charge of taking a pill every day to stop ME getting pregnant.'
In 2024, Helen Coffey wrote for the Independent, about how women 'just can't trust men' to take the pill.
Just this morning,Amol Rajan asked on Radio 4, 'is it the case that some men might be useless at… taking a pill daily for a sustained period of time?'
I get the mistrust, but it raises some uncomfortable questions: – 'are men really that unreliable?', and the more troubling one: 'Why do so many women think so?'
A 2022 survey done by the American Chemistry Society found that, though 49% of men would be willing to take a daily contraceptive pill, 42% of women were worried that men would simply forget to take it.
The baffling thing here is that men obviously take medicine all the time.
I've taken Sertraline for the last decade or so to manage my depression. I take it every morning with my breakfast. It's part of my daily routine.
One of the first things I do when I wake up is take a puff on the preventative inhaler I use to manage my asthma. Like many people, I've recently started using GLP-1 injections to help with weight loss. I take my jab every Sunday, regularly as clockwork.
That's three regular medications, and my GP trusts me to take them all by myself.
I've done courses of antibiotics. I had daily pain meds when I had a bike accident a few years ago. I've applied topical cream to rashes as prescribed. I once spent two years taking daily pills for acid reflux.
More to the point, gay and bisexual men (like me) have been taking PrEP– a daily pill that prevents HIV infection – for years. The NHS estimates that over 100,000 people in England are currently on PrEP, the majority of them men who have sex with men.
They take it religiously, because their lives depend on it. HIV-positive men take antiretroviral therapy daily, often multiple pills, to manage their condition. Trans men take testosterone regularly.
Here I am, a man, and I've been trusted absolutely to take my pills, like a good boy. And somehow, miraculously, despite my poor, unreliably male brain, I've pulled it off. So why wouldn't a partner trust me to take The Pill?
The idea that men can't handle daily medication is proveably nonsense.
What's more, when you consider that studies have found that around 50% of women reportedly miss the pill at least once a month due to forgetfulness, the concern about male reliability starts to look a little more like projection.
So why this persistent myth that we can't be trusted with contraception?
Maybe it comes down to bodily autonomy and reproductive control, and I do get that. For decades, women have had to bear the physical and emotional burden of preventing pregnancy.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
They've endured hormonal side effects, weight gain, mood swings, and decreased libido – all while being told these are acceptable trade-offs.
The deeper issue is that pregnancy happens in women's bodies, not men's. When the consequences of contraceptive failure fall disproportionately on women, it makes sense they'd be hesitant to hand over control, even to trustworthy partners.
There's also historical precedent for women's scepticism – men have been known to intentionally deceive women about using contraceptives, also known as reproductive coercion. A 2017 study from Bournemouth University found that as many as one in four women reported coercion over their reproductive lives.
Even if women can bring themselves to trust their partners, there's still deep-seated attitudes on the male side that could cause issues.
Marc Burrows is appearing at the Edinburgh Fringe in 'The Britpop Hour' at 6.10 every day, Underbelly Bristo Square.
Men may worry about appearing 'less masculine' or 'weak' or fear the pill might mess with their libido. These hang-ups – rooted in outdated ideas about what makes a man manly – could prove way more problematic than any trust issues.
It's something both genders need to work on. The truth is, we desperately need more contraceptive options for everyone.
The current setup is bonkers: women get to choose from a smorgasbord of pills, implants, and injections (with many recorded side effects), while men get… condoms and the snip. That's it. More Trending
This lopsided situation forces women to shoulder the burden and costs of preventing pregnancy. It's high time we evened the score.
If we can trust men to take life-saving medications for depression, HIV, diabetes, and countless other conditions, we can certainly trust them with contraception.
View More »
The question isn't whether men are capable – it's whether we're ready to ditch the tired assumptions that keep reproductive responsibility so ridiculously one-sided.
Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing jess.austin@metro.co.uk.
Share your views in the comments below.
MORE: Calvin Harris' placenta Instagram post isn't 'vile' but the backlash is
MORE: England defeat to India shows finishing touches are missing ahead of the Ashes
MORE: TV reboots aren't evil – but this remake has made an unforgivable mistake
Your free newsletter guide to the best London has on offer, from drinks deals to restaurant reviews.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
I have 'Ozempic penis'. It's a new side effect that men aren't even telling their doctors... but their wives are all discussing it online!
It's the miracle drug known to curb appetite, stimulate weight loss and even help kick unhealthy addictions like smoking. But some men have claimed that taking 'GLP-1' injections, more commonly known by brand names including Ozempic and Wegovy, have brought on another surprising - and welcomed - side effect.


Powys County Times
3 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Harry left ‘devastated' by boardroom battle at his charity Sentebale
The Duke of Sussex has been left emotionally devastated by the events surrounding the boardroom battle that saw him leave his Sentebale charity, a source has said. The dispute, which prompted Harry to step down as patron in support of trustees who resigned in opposition to board chairwoman Dr Sophie Chandauka, was described as a 'hostile takeover' by the source. On Tuesday, the Charity Commission published a report into the episode criticising all sides for making the fallout public with interviews and statements, but the war of words has continued. Sentebale appeared to suggest allegations made by Dr Chandauka of bullying, harassment and misogyny at the charity – which the commission found no evidence of – may be pursued against individuals through 'avenues more appropriate'. A source said: 'This has been emotionally absolutely devastating for Prince Harry and (Sentebale co-founder) Prince Seeiso (of Lesotho). What's been perpetrated over the last few months is nothing short of a hostile takeover.' Seeiso also stepped down as patron of the charity which works in Botswana and Lesotho supporting the health and wellbeing of young people, especially those with HIV and Aids. The source added: 'You have to remember Prince Seeiso and Prince Harry started this charity nearly two decades ago to honour the work and continue the legacy of their mothers Queen Mamohato and Princess Diana, and the work that they had done in southern Africa to support those living with HIV and Aids. 'In the 19 years that they have worked with this charity, and a lot of the former board of trustee members, they have raised tens of millions of pounds and distributed tens of millions of pounds.' The commission criticised all parties in the dispute for allowing it to play out publicly and described how all trustees contributed to a 'missed opportunity' to resolve the issues that led to the serious disagreement which risked undermining public trust in charities generally. The regulator, which cannot investigate individual allegations of bullying, found no evidence of systemic bullying or harassment, including misogyny or misogynoir at the charity but acknowledged 'the strong perception of ill treatment' felt by some involved. After conducting its regulatory compliance case the commission issued a Regulatory Action Plan with Sentebale saying it had complied with the steps, from implementing an internal dispute policy to improving the charity's complaints and whistle-blowing procedures. The trustees who resigned said in a statement they were 'gravely concerned for the future of the charity' adding they were 'disheartened' by the way the regulator had 'chosen to ignore key concerns and irrefutable evidence raised with them regarding the leadership and oversight of Sentebale's chair'. Sentebale said in statement: 'The Charity Commission is explicitly clear, including in its public guidance, that it is not the commission's responsibility to adjudicate or mediate internal disputes. This would include individual allegations of bullying, harassment, misogyny, misogynoir etc. 'As a result, the commission has not investigated any individual allegations and therefore has not made any findings in relation to individuals, including Prince Harry. 'The issues not investigated by the commission can and may be dealt with through avenues more appropriate than the commission.'


South Wales Guardian
4 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Harry left ‘devastated' by boardroom battle at his charity Sentebale
The dispute, which prompted Harry to step down as patron in support of trustees who resigned in opposition to board chairwoman Dr Sophie Chandauka, was described as a 'hostile takeover' by the source. On Tuesday, the Charity Commission published a report into the episode criticising all sides for making the fallout public with interviews and statements, but the war of words has continued. Sentebale appeared to suggest allegations made by Dr Chandauka of bullying, harassment and misogyny at the charity – which the commission found no evidence of – may be pursued against individuals through 'avenues more appropriate'. A source said: 'This has been emotionally absolutely devastating for Prince Harry and (Sentebale co-founder) Prince Seeiso (of Lesotho). What's been perpetrated over the last few months is nothing short of a hostile takeover.' Seeiso also stepped down as patron of the charity which works in Botswana and Lesotho supporting the health and wellbeing of young people, especially those with HIV and Aids. The source added: 'You have to remember Prince Seeiso and Prince Harry started this charity nearly two decades ago to honour the work and continue the legacy of their mothers Queen Mamohato and Princess Diana, and the work that they had done in southern Africa to support those living with HIV and Aids. 'In the 19 years that they have worked with this charity, and a lot of the former board of trustee members, they have raised tens of millions of pounds and distributed tens of millions of pounds.' The commission criticised all parties in the dispute for allowing it to play out publicly and described how all trustees contributed to a 'missed opportunity' to resolve the issues that led to the serious disagreement which risked undermining public trust in charities generally. The regulator, which cannot investigate individual allegations of bullying, found no evidence of systemic bullying or harassment, including misogyny or misogynoir at the charity but acknowledged 'the strong perception of ill treatment' felt by some involved. After conducting its regulatory compliance case the commission issued a Regulatory Action Plan with Sentebale saying it had complied with the steps, from implementing an internal dispute policy to improving the charity's complaints and whistle-blowing procedures. The trustees who resigned said in a statement they were 'gravely concerned for the future of the charity' adding they were 'disheartened' by the way the regulator had 'chosen to ignore key concerns and irrefutable evidence raised with them regarding the leadership and oversight of Sentebale's chair'. Sentebale said in statement: 'The Charity Commission is explicitly clear, including in its public guidance, that it is not the commission's responsibility to adjudicate or mediate internal disputes. This would include individual allegations of bullying, harassment, misogyny, misogynoir etc. 'As a result, the commission has not investigated any individual allegations and therefore has not made any findings in relation to individuals, including Prince Harry. 'The issues not investigated by the commission can and may be dealt with through avenues more appropriate than the commission.'