If not given RJD ticket, will contest as Independent from Mahua: Tej Pratap Yadav
"The people of Mahua only want me to contest from here. They are saying that if anyone else from the RJD is fielded here, they will not vote for him. If the party (RJD) gives me a ticket, I will contest for the RJD. If it doesn't, I will contest as an Independent candidate, but will fight from Mahua only. It is my land of action," Tej Pratap told India Today TV.Mahua is the Assembly segment where Tej Pratap won in the 2015 state elections and was appointed a minister in Nitish Kumar's Cabinet, serving till 2017. RJD's Mukesh Kumar Roshan is the incumbent MLA from Mahua.Reminiscing his tenure as the state's health minister, Tej Pratap said, "I helped build a medical college and roads in Mahua. My mother (Rabri Devi) used her MLC funds and provided ambulance vans to the constituency. So, I will fight from the place I have worked for".Tej Pratap also promised that if voted to power, he would vouch for the constituency to be declared a district and would also set up a degree college there.This came days after Tej Pratap and his supporters were seen carrying a green-and-white flag, with "Team Tej Pratap Yadav" written on it, suggesting that he might not contest the polls on an RJD ticket.During the conversation, the former Mahua MLA spoke about Team Tej Pratap Yadav- an outreach campaign to connect with the people of Bihar ahead of state polls. "It is a platform through which people can connect with me. People can get associated with Team Tej Pratap Yadav through social media and share their issues with me. So, I can help resolve them".Tej Pratap, Lalu Yadav's elder son, also claimed that Nitish Kumar will not be the Chief Minister after the polls and some young leader will rise to power.advertisement"You saw during the BPSC students protest when the protesters demanding justice were caned. This indicates that Nitish Kumar will lose his position and some young leader will rise to the throne," Tej Pratap predicted.Earlier this year, thousands of students seeking the cancellation of the 70th Integrated Combined Competitive (Preliminary) Examination (CCE), 2024, conducted by the BPSC over allegations of question paper leak, were caned, sparking widespread outrage against the Nitish Kumar government for its handling of the matter.Upon being asked whether he expected his younger brother, Tejashwi Yadav, who has been the state's deputy chief minister previously, to rise to the top post this time, Tej Pratap said that he would be happy to see that happen. However, he opined that it will be difficult as long as Tejashwi is surrounded by "traitors"."Tejashwi is surrounded by Jaichands (a historical figure infamous for his treachery). He will become the chief minister only if such people allow that to happen," he added.The 243-member Legislative Assembly of Bihar will go to elections later this year, either in October or November. The key contest is between the NDA, comprising Nitish Kumar's JDU, the BJP and Chirag Paswan's Lok Janshakti Party (Ramvilas) and others, and the Mahagathbandhan of the RJD, Congress and Left parties.- EndsWith inputs by AniketTrending Reel
IN THIS STORY#Bihar#Tej Pratap Yadav#Rashtriya Janata Dal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Assembly loses morning session after ruckus during SIR discussion
1 2 3 Patna: The state assembly lost its morning session on Wednesday, when an all-party discussion on the ongoing special intensive revision (SIR) of the electoral roll, initiated by the leader of the opposition, Tejashwi Prasad Yadav , ended with speaker Nand Kishore Yadav adjourning the House after some members of the treasury benches didn't pay heed to an order. The House was adjourned within 24 minutes of the start of the morning session following a heated exchange of words between deputy CM Vijay Kumar Sinha, and urban development and housing minister Jibesh Kumar, and senior RJD member Bhai Birendra over an unsavoury remark against CM Nitish Kumar . The Wednesday's session, however, started on a positive note, as CM Nitish and the speaker met in the latter's chamber before the start of the morning session, and decided an all-party discussion on the SIR. Like Tuesday, the opposition continued with its black dress code and a dharna under the portico of the assembly building before the House met. The morning session started with the speaker criticising Tuesday's ruckus. "A few assembly employees were hurt. Ensuring security and 'samman (dignity)' to the employees of the House is the responsibility of all of us," the speaker said, and asked Tejashwi to first make his statement to initiate the discussion on the SIR exercise. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas Prices In Dubai Might Be More Affordable Than You Think Villas In Dubai | Search Ads Get Quote Undo However, after a while, the CM interrupted Tejashwi, saying the coming assembly elections were going to be tough for the opposition, especially Tejashwi, whom he described as a "bachcha (child)" who did not know how bad the situation was in the state when his father Lalu Prasad and mother Rabri Devi had ruled before 2005. When the CM had taken his seat, senior RJD member Bhai Birendra, seated in the front row with Tejashwi, made an unsavoury remark in a muffled voice, irritating deputy CM Vijay Kumar Sinha, also a former speaker of the House, seated in the front row of the treasury benches with the CM. He stood up and asked the speaker to seek apology from Birendra, and take action against him. Birendra shot back: "The House does not belong to anyone's father." It exacerbated the situation, as more members from the ruling NDA demanded action against the RJD member. Tejashwi later stood up and apologised on his party member's behalf: "It was not meant to hurt anyone. If anyone is hurt, I apologise, but the matter is not so big as is being made." But Sinha, minister Jibesh and some others on the treasury benches were not convinced, and demanded apology directly from Birendra, while the speaker asked them to be silent and sit down. His orders, however, fell on deaf ears, and he adjourned the House to meet again for the post-lunch session.
NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
Bihar Voter List Revision Could Cut 23,000 Per Constituency Before Election
New Delhi: Fifty-six lakh people across Bihar will be removed from the voter list after the Election Commission 's ' special intensive revision ', the poll panel said Wednesday evening. The list of 'unverified' voters include 20 lakh dead people, 28 lakh whose primary residence is now in another state (making them ineligible to voter in Bihar), and seven lakh registered in more than one place. An additional one lakh people on the curent list cannot be contacted. Meanwhile, a further 15 lakh voters did not return verification forms, meaning they too are likley to find themselves struck off the roll when voting begins later this year. On Tuesday the poll panel said around 52 lakh entries had been deleted, and last week that a number of registered 'voters' were from foreign countries. Meanwhile, The re-verification of voters - a regular and constitutionally mandated exercise - has run into problems in Bihar because of the proximity of the exercise to the Assembly election. The opposition has criticised the timing and alleged it was orchestrated to eat into its voter base. The reference was to voters from poorer and marginalised sections, who may struggle to gather thedocuments - not including even the EC's own ID card - needed to re-verify themselves. NDTV Explains | Row Over 'Special Intensive Revision' Of Bihar Voter List Challenges to the exercise were filed in the Supreme Court. The matter is being heard and the court allowed the revision to continue for now, but it did also ask questions about the timing. The court also directed the EC to ensure the process is completed, including hearing and settling of appeals by people removed from the list, before the election. The EC has said the final list will be published September 30. What This Means For Bihar Election The state has 243 constituencies. Deletion of 56 lakh names from the voter list means an average of 23,045 voters per constituency will not be allowed to vote. The opposition has said that even a one per cent purge of names on the existing list of voters - a list used for the past 10 major elections in the state - would be unacceptable. For context, a one per cent exclusion is around 7.9 lakh voters or about 3,251 voters per constituency. In the 2020 election the opposition Rashtriya Janata Dal lost 52 seats by margins of 5,000 or fewer votes and 40 by margins of 3,500 or fewer. The RJD won 75 seats - the most by any one party - but still fell short of the halfway mark of 123 after its ally, the Congress, flopped. Combined, the RJD-led alliance won 110 seats. The political slugfest between the opposition RJD-Congress and the ruling BJP-JDU played out ferociously in the Bihar Assembly this afternoon, with the RJD's Tejaswhi Yadav and Chief Minister Nitish Kumar of the JDU leading their parties' charge. There was also a big twist after a MP from Nitish Kumar's party, Girdhari Yadav, offered his 'personal opinion' - that the Election Commission had "forcefully imposed" the voter list revision.
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
FGG for V&E probe into ‘misuse' of special development funds
The Forum for Good Governance (FGG) has urged Chief Minister A. Revanth Reddy to order a Vigilance & Enforcement (V&E) inquiry into the alleged misuse of Special Development Funds (SDF) released for taking up developmental works in Assembly constituencies. FGG president M. Padmanabha Reddy said that the government sanctioned ₹1,190 crore at ₹10 crore for each Assembly constituency in 2023-24. The amount was released to District Collectors for taking up developmental works with the approval of the District In-Charge Minister. The SDF funds were meant to be spent on education infrastructure (₹2 crore), drinking water (₹1 crore), maintenance of collectorates or government offices (₹50 lakh) and balance ₹6.5 crore for other developmental works. However, the fund was not being implemented as per the guidelines leading to misuse and wastage of taxpayers' money. Citing examples in a letter addressed to the Chief Minister, he said that Devarakonda MLA proposed an amount of ₹1.14 crore for his office-cum-residence when there was no provision for renovation of MLA's residence. 'It is not clear how the district in-charge Minister approved such works. There are many similar cases in other districts also,' Mr. Padmanabha Reddy said. He said that tenders ought to be called for works more than ₹5 lakh in line with the rules, but executing agencies were splitting the works into bits of ₹5 lakh each and allotting them on nomination basis. The Congress Assembly constituency in-charges were proposing works bypassing the MLAs and the district in-charge Minister was sanctioning them. For instance, the sitting MLA was ignored in the Karimnagar Assembly constituency and proposals were received from the Congress in-charge, which were subsequently approved. There were many villages in Karimnagar Assembly constituency where infrastructure for schools and drainage facility were required, but sanction was made for 50 high mast lights in villages at a cost of ₹60 lakh and open gym in 25 villages at a cost of ₹1.25 crore. 'No tenders were invited and works were allotted on a nomination basis,' he lamented. In view of these, he wanted the government to order an inquiry and authorise the Collector to approve the works.
