Karnataka High Court notice to BMRCL on Tejasvi's plea to make fare fixation panel's report
Justice S. Sunil Dutt Yadav passed the order after MP's advocate pointed out to the court that BMRCL did not upload a copy of the FFC report on its website or provided a copy of the report to the general public or the media organisation, who have sought a copy of the report through RTI Act.
It has been contended in his petition that BMRCL being a joint venture between the Union government and the Government of Karnataka that uses public funds has a constitutional duty to function transparently without claiming immunity from its obligation to disclose the FFC report when the decision to hike fare affects the general public, steps from the FFC report.
Also, the MP pointed in the petition that in the past, Delhi, Mumbai and Hyderabad metro rail corporations have duly published such reports on their websites for the benefit of general public thereby reflecting transparency in public governance and decision-making process.
Stating that there exists no distinguishing factor between BMRCL and other metro rail corporations to justify BMRCL's refusal to publish the FFC report, it has been contended in the petition that the report being a ministerial act requiring no exercise of discretion at the hands of BMRCL, no discretionary power can be claimed by it to withhold publication as no such provision exists in the Metro Railways (Operation and Maintenance) Act, 2022. The FFC was headed by R. Tharani, a retired judge of the Madras High Court.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
3 minutes ago
- The Hindu
MGP flags concerns over footpath encroachments, delay in Kukkarhalli lake rejuvenation
The city-based NGO Mysore Grahakara Parishat (MGP) has raised serious concerns about the growing footpath encroachments in the city and the delay in rejuvenation work at Kukkarhalli lake and Poornaiah canal. The civic group has called for a coordinated and transparent approach from the district administration, pointing to legal, administrative, and safety challenges. The recent fatal accident of a senior citizen who was run over by a KSRTC bus near Vivekananda Circle, has reignited the debate on pedestrian safety, with MGP questioning the ability of authorities to ensure unobstructed footpaths in the face of rising street vending. The MGP pointed out that the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014, which allows licensed vendors to operate, and a more recent Supreme Court directive from May 2025, which directs governments to remove encroachments to uphold the right to safety under Article 21, seemed to be contradictory in nature. In a letter addressed to Deputy Commissioner G. Lakshmikanth Reddy, MGP stated the legal contradiction between the central law and the Supreme Court order could hamper enforcement to clear footpath encroachment. Bhamy V. Shenoy founding working president of the MGP, and S. Shobana, working president of the NGO, raised apprehensions whether the Mysuru City Corporation (MCC) has the capacity to provide alternate vending locations to all 7,000 licensed vendors in the city. Mr. Shenoy and Ms. Shobana also wondered whether there is a system in place to verify the authenticity of vendor permits and how MCC plans to prevent corruption in issuing or overlooking licenses. It urged authorities to act against the many unlicensed vendors from footpath encroachment. In a bid to address the issue in an accountable manner, MGP has proposed the formation of a Pedestrian Safety Committee with representation from elected leaders, vendor associations, NGOs, police, urban planners, and MCC officials. The MGP said while pedestrian safety and removal of footpath encroachment was necessary, one could not overlook the economic imperatives of the vendors and hence mooted the idea of offering incentives to those who relocate to new areas. This was necessary given the difficulty of replicating foot traffic and business opportunities that some streets currently provide, said the MGP. The attention of Mr. Reddy was also drawn to Kukkarhalli lake rejuvenation project and the MGP underlined the imperatives of restoring the lake and the canal system by removing the encroachments obstructing the natural flow of water. Urging the Deputy Commissioner to expedite the tendering process, the MGP said there was sufficient local expertise with extensive knowledge of the lake and the feeder canal and it should be tapped while drawing the new DPR for the project.
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Gujarat state information commission orders cops to share CCTV footage, mask identities
Ahmedabad: In a key ruling, the Gujarat State Information Commission has directed Rakhial police station to provide CCTV footage to an RTI applicant arrested in a gambling case, but after masking the identities of other accused persons. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Mohammed Sufiyan Rajput, arrested on Feb 25, 2024, filed an RTI on March 19 seeking footage showing entry and exit of all accused at the police station. The public information officer (PIO) denied the request under Section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act, citing potential interference with investigation. Rajput's first appeal was rejected by the deputy commissioner of police, Zone 5. He then approached the commission on July 16, 2024, demanding the footage and penal action against the PIO. During the hearing, the PIO argued that the footage could not be shared due to the presence of other accused. However, the commission observed that "the information related to the applicant could be segregated and shared without compromising others' privacy." The state information commission, in its final order on July 8 this year, directed the PIO "to provide the relevant CCTV footage to Rajput free of cost, after masking other individuals' identities, within 30 days by RPAD". It also directed the PIO to submit a compliance report. Rajput, however, expressed dissatisfaction, "What will I do with a masked video footage? How will I fight my innocence?" RTI advocate Pankti Jog of Mahiti Adhikar Gujarat Pahel insists that the nature of information sought by Rajput relates to issues of governance, public duties and responsibilities, "A masked video footage is like providing a blank page under RTI. When someone seeks information, they seek it as proof. If they do not get meaningful information, how will they pursue justice?" Former central information commissioner and RTI activist Shailesh Gandhi added, "The proviso to Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act clearly states that information which cannot be denied to Parliament or a state legislature shall not be denied to any person. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now If the public body believes masked footage is sufficient, would it provide the same to Parliament or state legislature? I think the complete footage should be provided to the citizen. " Inspector B G Chetaria confirmed the footage was sent via registered post aknowledgment due (RPAD) following the commission's order but claimed ignorance about whether Rajput received it. Rajput, however, alleged he never got the video. "Since I did not receive the masked footage, I did not sign an acknowledgement."
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
No proposal to reallocate idle coal blocks to SCCL: Kishan Reddy
Union Minister of Coal and Mines G. Kishan Reddy has reiterated that coal blocks are now allocated through a transparent and fair auction process and suggested that the Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) participate in the ongoing auctions conducted by the Ministry of Coal. Responding to Warangal MP Kadiyam Kavya's query on Wednesday regarding coal block allocations to SCCL, Mr. Reddy stated that his ministry had received a request from Chief Minister A. Revanth Reddy on July 4 last year for allocating specific blocks, including Koyagudem Block III and Sathupalli Block III, to SCCL under sections 11A/17A(2) of the Mines and Minerals Development and Regulation (MMDR) Act, 1957. However, Mr. Reddy clarified that coal blocks are now allocated through a transparent and fair auction process. The MP also inquired about the non-operational status of previously auctioned blocks, such as Koyagudem and Sathupalli, which remain idle due to the failure of private allottees, and pressed for their reallocation to SCCL. The Minister made it clear that no such proposal is currently under consideration. The government noted SCCL's commitment, conveyed by the Chief Minister, to offer a 0.5% higher revenue share than previous bidders for these blocks. Emphasising the need for sufficient coal reserves to sustain SCCL's production capacity and meet Telangana's future power demands, Ms. Kavya urged the Centre to prioritise the State-owned company.
