Malaysia turns to AI to future-proof journalism
Malaysia is marching toward digital transformation, integrating emerging technologies into key sectors of its economy, with journalism tapped to join the trend.
According to a report, the Malaysian government has earmarked RM30 million (US$6.35 million) to digitize media houses in the Southeast Asian country. The grant to publishing outlets will power the integration of emerging technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain into their internal operations.
The US$6.35 million grant was announced at HAWANA 2025, an annual journalism conference with Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim in attendance. The Malaysian Prime Minister confirmed the grant at the Kuala Lumpur World Trade Center in a hall packed to the rafters.
In his keynote address, the Prime Minister expressed hope that the digital transformation grant would improve the state of journalism, aligning with the pace of global digitization. Attendees to the event hailed the development, noting that the funds will strengthen the quality of reporting while improving turnaround times.
'Digital transformation is no longer an option but a necessity,' said one Editor-in-Chief of a leading Malaysian publication. 'This support will help us face the evolving challenges brought by new technologies and changing reader behaviour.'
Apart from the capital injection into media houses, Malaysia has launched an AI-based fact-checking chatbot designed to combat AI-generated fake news. The chatbot, dubbed AIFA, is now integrated into social media platforms like WhatsApp, where most residents consume news.
Key media sector players have confirmed a raft of international and regional partnerships to maintain 'credible and culturally rooted' reporting across Southeast Asia.
Malaysian authorities are embracing AI en masse, with the country's anti-corruption agencies leaning on the technology to fight graft. The regulatory watchdog uses AI tools for real-time monitoring and predictive analytics to stifle the operation of scammers.
Journalism at risk from AI advancements, experts warn
The United Nations (UN) has raised the alarm at heightened risks from AI, citing the mass dissemination of fake news and the use of AI models for censorship by rogue states. Furthermore, the UN points out the risks of monopolization from a few AI companies controlling a large market share.
Global regulators are scrambling to set up new regulatory standards to combat the attendant risk of AI in the media sectors. Conversely, tech firms are rolling out tools to verify AI-generated content while social media platforms are clamping down on the circulation of deepfakes.
Amazon announces $13 billion investment to expand Australia's AI and data center infrastructure
On another part of the globe, Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) has announced an AU$20 billion (US$13 billion) investment in Australia to improve the country's artificial intelligence and data center capabilities.
The $13 billion investment is the largest technology investment announcement in the country's history, dwarfing previous capital injections. A look at the announcement reveals that a significant chunk of the sum will be deployed toward expanding Australia's cloud and AI capabilities. The latest capital injection builds on a ten-year streak of Amazon's investment in Australia, marked by six data centers in the region. From the announcement, it is unclear whether new data centers will be created or if the funds will be solely used to expand the capabilities of existing data centers.
However, the statement confirms that a part of the funds will be used to invest in three new solar farms to power Amazon's data center operations. Amazon is aiming to scale its combined energy capacity to 170 megawatts (MW) from the three solar farms.
Currently, the technology giant has eight solar farms across Australia, generating 1.4 million MW hours per year.
'This is the largest investment our country has seen from a global technology provider, and is an exciting opportunity for Australia to build AI capability using secure, resilient infrastructure,' said Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.
Amazon has committed to deploying a slice of the funds to back a wave of AI education initiatives across Australia. The technology giant has launched AWS AI Spring Australia, following up on previous AI learning initiatives like Generative AI Accelerator and AWS AI Launchpad for individuals and enterprises.
So far, Amazon has trained over 400,000 Australian residents with AI and emerging technology skills. Several Australia-based corporations have embedded Amazon's AI offerings into their core operations, with small businesses leading in adoption metrics.
'The investment will generate economic opportunity for Australians, including skilled jobs and infrastructure that can support complex AI and supercomputing applications,' said the Prime Minister.
Australia records meteoric AI growth
AI adoption in Australia has surged to an all-time high, driven by a swathe of government initiatives and heavy private investment. Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) has previously invested over $3.2 billion to improve Australia's AI and data center capabilities, pledging to deepen the technology talent pool.
In terms of utility, use cases are soaring, with an Australian charity turning to AI to protect the Daintree rainforest from ecological challenges. Furthermore, military AI applications in Australia have spiked, and regulators are turning to regional partnerships to ensure the safe development and use of AI systems.
In order for artificial intelligence (AI) to work right within the law and thrive in the face of growing challenges, it needs to integrate an enterprise blockchain system that ensures data input quality and ownership—allowing it to keep data safe while also guaranteeing the immutability of data. Check out CoinGeek's coverage on this emerging tech to learn more why Enterprise blockchain will be the backbone of AI .
Watch: AI and Big Data will be a long-term trend
title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen="">
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
42 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Myanmar junta guilty of ‘systematic torture' in detention centres, claim UN investigators
The Myanmar junta has beaten, strangled, electrocuted and raped people held in detention facilities in a campaign of 'systematic torture,' United Nations investigators have alleged. In its annual report on Tuesday, the Independent Investigative Mechanism for Myanmar (IIMM) – a body formed in 2018 to analyse serious violations on international law in the southeast Asian country – said it has collected 'significant evidence' of widespread torture inside detention facilities operated by the military. This includes pulling people's fingernails out using pliers and administering electric shocks, as well as sexual slavery, burning genitals with cigarettes and gang rapes. In some cases, the torture had fatal consequences. Children have also been affected, according to the IIMM, which said it has eyewitness testimony that toddlers as young as two years old were put in detention as 'proxies for their parents'. The 16-page report alleged: 'Some of the detained children have been subjected to torture, ill-treatment or sexual and gender-based crimes.' It is now more than four years since the military seized power in a coup in February 2021, plunging the country into a brutal civil war after a violent crackdown on peaceful protesters. At least 6,000 civilians have since been killed, according to the UN. But tens of thousands of people have also been put behind bars. The Assistance Association for Political Prisoners has tracked more than 29,000 arrests so far, including 622 children and 6,137 women, while at least 172 people have been sentenced to death. The latest IIMM report covers the year from July 2024, and is based on more than 1,300 sources – including 600 eyewitness testimonies, plus photographs, documents, forensic evidence and audio recordings. It covers several areas, from the deteriorating situation in the northwest Rakhine state to the constant threat of air strikes, and military blockades of aid – including in the aftermath of the devastating 7.7 magnitude earthquake earlier this year. Joe Freeman, a Myanmar researcher at Amnesty International, said the additional documentation on the torture and ill-treatment of detainees is 'an important contribution to an area that is vastly under-reported'. 'Thousands of Myanmar detainees are suffering in silence in interrogation facilities and prisons across the country, where health care, access to legal services, and food are inadequate,' he told the Telegraph. 'Torture and other ill-treatment in Myanmar detention facilities is common, but few people have a way to lodge complaints or stop the abuse without risking serious retribution, from beatings to solitary confinement to sexual violence.' The IIMM said it has identified some of the perpetrators of crimes against detainees, which includes senior military officials. They have not been named to avoid alerting the individuals, but include high-level commanders. 'We have made headway in identifying the perpetrators, including the commanders who oversee these facilities,' Nicholas Koumjian, head of the IIMM, said in a statement. 'We stand ready to support any jurisdictions willing and able to prosecute these crimes.' Yet so far, no individuals have been held accountable for violations for violations since the coup, despite mounting evidence against them. There are, however, ongoing cases focused on the individual criminal responsibility of alleged perpetrators in crimes against the Rohingya during the 'clearance operations' between 2016 and 2017. Many of those accused, including at the International Criminal Court, are also implicated in post-coup crimes. Bryony Lau, Deputy Asia Director for Human Rights Watch, said: 'The IIMM's latest report shows the full range of horrors being perpetrated by the military junta against Myanmar's people. It is also a reminder to all perpetrators that their crimes are being documented for future prosecutions. 'In the last year progress has been made towards holding individuals criminally liable, including through the ICC for crimes committed against Rohingya in 2016-2017. That was a significant step towards justice – but to ensure accountability for the full scope of crimes committed against all communities, the UN Security Council should refer the situation in Myanmar to the ICC.' Mr Freeman said: 'Given not a single official has ever been held accountable for violations since the coup, it may seem unlikely or unrealistic to expect Myanmar military officials to one day appear in court. 'But several investigations are proceeding, and this kind of evidence-gathering by the IIMM lays the groundwork for future prosecutions,' he added. 'Perpetrators of atrocities in Myanmar should be worried.' Myanmar's military did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Telegraph. The IIMM said it had not responded to more than two dozen requests for information.
Reuters
42 minutes ago
- Reuters
AI startup Perplexity makes bold $34.5 billion bid for Google's Chrome browser
Aug 12 (Reuters) - Perplexity AI said it has made a $34.5 billion unsolicited all-cash offer for Alphabet's (GOOGL.O), opens new tab Chrome browser, a low but bold bid that would need financing well above the startup's own valuation. Run by Aravind Srinivas, Perplexity is no stranger to headline-grabbing offers - it made a similar one for TikTok US in January, offering to merge with the popular short-video app to resolve U.S. concerns about TikTok's Chinese ownership. Buying Chrome would allow the startup to tap the browser's more than three billion users for an edge in the AI search race as regulatory pressure threatens Google's grip on the industry. Google did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. The company has not offered Chrome for sale and plans to appeal a U.S. court ruling last year that found it held an unlawful monopoly in online search. The Justice Department has sought a Chrome divestiture as part of the case's remedies. Perplexity did not disclose on Tuesday how it plans to fund the offer. The three-year-old company has raised around $1 billion in funding so far from investors including Nvidia and Japan's SoftBank. It was last valued at $14 billion. Multiple funds have offered to finance the deal in full, a person familiar with the matter said, without naming the funds. As a new generation of users turns to chatbots such as ChatGPT and Perplexity for answers, web browsers are regaining prominence as vital gateways to search traffic and prized user data, making them central to Big Tech's AI ambitions. Perplexity already has an AI browser, Comet, that can perform certain tasks on a user's behalf and acquiring Chrome would give it the heft to better compete against bigger rivals such as OpenAI. The ChatGPT parent has also expressed interest in buying Chrome and is working on its own AI browser. Perplexity's bid pledges to keep the underlying browser code called Chromium open source, invest $3 billion over two years and make no changes to Chrome's default search engine, according to a term sheet seen by Reuters. The company said the offer, with no equity component, would preserve user choice and ease future competition concerns. Analysts have said Google would be unlikely to sell Chrome and would likely engage in a long legal fight to prevent that outcome, given it is crucial to the company's AI push as it rolls out features including AI-generated search summaries, known as Overviews, to help defend its search market share. A federal judge is expected to issue a ruling on remedies in the Google search antitrust case sometime this month. Perplexity's bid is also below the at least $50 billion value that rival search engine DuckDuckGo's CEO, Gabriel Weinberg, suggested Chrome may command if Google was forced to sell it. Besides OpenAI and Perplexity, Yahoo and private-equity firm Apollo Global Management have also expressed interest in Chrome.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Killing Palestinian journalists in Gaza renders the world blind - what is Israel so afraid of?
Anas al-Sharif, 28, feared he would be assassinated by Israel. The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) and the UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression were worried too. The Al-Jazeera star correspondent, who had tirelessly documented the horrors in north Gaza, faced a deadly smear campaign from the Israeli military. They accused the Palestinian father-of-two of being a Hamas militant, which Sharif vehemently denied, and the CPJ said were completely unfounded accusations. In fact just a few weeks ago, the CPJ said the campaign 'represented an effort to manufacture consent to kill Al-Sharif' and that the danger to his life was now acute. UN Special Rapporteur Irene Khan urged the world to act against the 'blatant attempt to endanger his life'. No one did. On Sunday night, Israel deliberately bombed the tent he was sleeping in, killing Anas, four of his Al Jazeera colleagues, as well as a freelance journalist in a neighbouring tent and a passerby. All within the complex of a hospital compound. The military celebrated, claiming this state-sponsored assassination was a successful hit on a Hamas operative. The CPJ called it 'murder plain and simple' and said it is part of a pattern of accusing Palestinian journalists without providing any credible proof. And it is simple. Israeli strikes have already killed more than 200 Palestinian journalists and media workers in Gaza since October 2023. The more Palestinian journalists like Anas in Gaza that Israel kills, the fewer people there are to report on one of the most unprecedented humanitarian catastrophes of our time. That renders the world blind. Since the start of this war Israel has also barred international correspondents like me from entering and reporting in Gaza, except in controlled military embeds. And so, newsrooms rely entirely on our courageous Palestinian colleagues to be the eyes on what is going on inside the besieged, bombarded, blasted strip. They are the eyes for the world. I do not see any reason to bar international journalists from entering Gaza to also report. I, like hundreds of other correspondents, covered the devastating 2012 and 2014 wars on Gaza from inside Gaza. Back then, Israel permitted us to enter via land crossing points. I have repeatedly asked the Israeli authorities why they will not let us in, and have yet to receive a clear explanation. It begs the question: What is it we are not supposed to see? The slaughter of Palestinian journalists, and the blockade on international reporters, means that you, me, all of us sitting in the comfort of our living rooms, know less about what is going on in Gaza. In Gaza, where Israel's bombardment and war with Hamas militants has killed over 61,000 people, according to local officials; where famine is unfolding, according to the UN-backed global hunger monitor; where more than 90 per cent of the 2.3 million population have been forced to flee their homes multiple times, trapped within this kill box. It means we know less about conditions in Gaza, where at least 50 hostages and captives seized by Hamas militants during its deadly 7 October raids on southern Israel are being held. The deliberate targeting and killing of journalists constitutes war crimes under international humanitarian law. If the killing of the Al-Jazeera journalists - and freelancer Mohammed al Khalidi– goes unanswered; if there is no truly impartial investigations and no accountability into the killings of all of the journalists and no justice for their families, it sets a dangerous precedent for our brave colleagues who are still (barely) alive in Gaza and under threat. And it sets a dangerous precedent for journalists everywhere. And the pursuit of truth. It signals that it is acceptable for a western ally - of the UK and the USA - to engage in the killing of reporters with impunity. That makes us all less safe. Right now, Gaza is the most dangerous place on earth to be a journalist. To cite Amnesty: 'No conflict in modern history has seen a higher number of journalists killed than Israel's genocide against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.' For the sake of the Palestinian journalists still inside Gaza. For the sake of all of those suffering inside Gaza right now. For the sake of the future of journalism. For the future of truth itself, we must demand answers and justice.
