
OpenAI Releases Free, Downloadable Models In Competition Catch-up
The release of gpt-oss-120b and gpt-oss-20b "open-weight language models" comes as the ChatGPT-maker is under pressure to share inner workings of its software in the spirit of its origin as a nonprofit.
"Going back to when we started in 2015, OpenAI's mission is to ensure AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) that benefits all of humanity," said OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman.
An open-weight model, in the context of generative AI, is one in which the trained parameters are made public, enabling users to fine-tune it.
Meta touts its open-source approach to AI, and Chinese AI startup DeepSeek rattled the industry with its low-cost, high-performance model boasting an open weight approach that allows users to customize the technology.
"This is the first time that we're releasing an open-weight model in language in a long time, and it's really incredible," OpenAI co-founder and president Greg Brockman said during a briefing with journalists.
The new, text-only models deliver strong performance at low cost, according to OpenAI, which said they are suited for AI jobs like searching the internet or executing computer code, and are designed to be easy to run on local computer systems.
"We are quite hopeful that this release will enable new kinds of research and the creation of new kinds of products," Altman said.
OpenAI said it is working with partners including French telecommunications giant Orange and cloud-based data platform Snowflake on real-world uses of the models.
The open-weight models have been tuned to thwart being used for malicious purposes, according to OpenAI.
Altman early this year said his company had been "on the wrong side of history" when it came to being open about how its technology works.
He later announced that OpenAI will continue to be run as a nonprofit, abandoning a contested plan to convert into a for-profit organization.
The structural issue had become a point of contention, with major investors pushing for better returns.
That plan faced strong criticism from AI safety activists and co-founder Elon Musk, who sued the company he left in 2018, claiming the proposal violated its founding philosophy.
In the revised plan, OpenAI's money-making arm will be open to generate profits but will remain under the nonprofit board's supervision.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
12 hours ago
- DW
Is plastic production just going to keep increasing? – DW – 08/06/2025
The exponential growth in plastic is damaging ecosystems, the climate and human health. Why is reducing production so hard? The amount of plastic being churned out annually is far outpacing the global capacity to manage and recycle it. While some products are vital, much is made for single-use items that not only lead to direct plastic pollution but have a long tail of climate and environmental impacts. Some 99% of plastics are derived from fossil fuels, which at a time when the world is gradually transitioning towards clean energies to power homes, cars and economies, serves as a lifeline for the oil and gas industries that are heating up the planet. In addition, the process of refining and processing fossil fuels into plastic products such as packaging, textiles, electronics and construction materials, releases billions of tons of greenhouse gases. In 2019 it accounted for over 5% of the world's emissions. Despite this the production of new, or virgin plastic has rapidly expanded in the last two decades and is projected to increase two or even three-fold by 2050 — potentially tripling associated global emissions. This would account for around a quarter of the remaining carbon budget scientists say the world can afford to use if it hopes to prevent runaway heating. Yet experts say there is little sign of a changing trend away from growth. It is "absolutely true" that plastic production is rapidly increasing, said Ambrogio Miserocchi, business coalition co-lead at the Ellen MacArthur Foundation, a UK charity focusing on promoting a circular economy. "Even if you look at the planned investment, even if you look at the capacity that is being is actually growing very fast." This is despite the fact an increasing number of countries are limiting single-use plastic products, with at least 140 nations having introduced either bans or restrictions on some form of plastic products. "The only place where capacity is going down slightly is in the European Union," said Joan Marc Simon, founder of Zero Waste Europe, a network dedicated to reducing plastic waste. "The rest of the world is increasing." However, Simon added that is because high production costs have led to producers either manufacturing outside Europe or importing plastic from elsewhere. "We know for sure is that all main producers are increasing capacity: US, China, South Africa, Brazil, Iran, Saudi Arabia," said Simon, adding that more virgin plastic is also being produced in countries such as Malaysia, Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia — very often by Chinese companies. China is the world's biggest plastics manufacturer, accounting for around a third of global production. Activists have long argued the solution to overflowing plastic is to slow production in the first place, but for years, public narratives and international negotiations have instead focused on tackling the resulting waste with things like beach clean-ups and recycling. But only around 9% of plastics are recycled, and many types can't be made into new products. As a result, the vast majority end up in landfills or being incinerated. Much leaks into the environment in the form of microplastics, which have been found in the most remote parts of the earth, in the air we breathe and even our bodies. Reduction was the main sticking point at the inconclusive global plastic talks in Korea last December. It will likely again be a key point of contention during resumed negotiations in Geneva. Giulia Carlini, senior attorney in the environmental health program at the Center for International Environmental Law says that while capping production raises many open questions — including whether it should mean stopping new plants coming online — the primary hurdle is simply reaching a consensus on reduction. "What's really not there, is agreement on doing it." Last year, while over 100 nations supported capping production, a handful — including Russia, Saudi Arabia, Iran and China — blocked the measure, said Christina Dixon, ocean campaign lead at the UK charity, Environmental Investigations Agency. "This very small group of countries who are, I guess, predominantly petro-states are saying like, just no, it's a hard red line." Carlini says one of the obstacles to reducing production is the strong influence that powerful corporate actors have established at international negotiations. According to CIEL analysis,fossil fuel and chemical lobbyists comprised the largest delegation in Korea, larger than those of the entire EU and its member states. Carlini adds that in some cases they are "enshrined" at the governmental level with some corporate lobbyists registered as part of national delegations. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Experts say that capping supply is not the only means of reducing plastic production; lowering demand is also important. It would also make a difference if most countries that import plastic either "don't accept the plastic products in the first place or they start reducing how much they accept," said Carlini. Similarly, Simon highlighted the idea of a treaty between non-producers, especially those countries in Africa or Asia that are bearing the brunt of plastic pollution. He said their decision to restrict plastic use "could have quite some impact on the production because demand will be limited". Miserocchi said there are signs that reduction is possible even outside a UN framework. He pointed to a global commitment facilitated by the foundation of over 1,000 organizations to reduce plastic use. It claims to have cumulatively avoided 9.6 million tons of virgin plastics production since 2018. He added that not only NGOs but also some businesses are calling for a reduction in plastic production. For example, through the Business Coalition for a Global Plastics Treaty, a grouping that includes businesses from across the plastics supply chain. Although specific proposals have been made — such as Rwanda and Peru suggesting reducing global production 40% by 2040 — Miserocchi says putting a specific figure on the issue is difficult, partly because of a lack of data on plastic production. He adds that ultimately reduction, while important, needs to be paired with shifts in business models and product design to avoid merely replacing plastic with huge increases in other material streams. "We need to change the way we use products."


Int'l Business Times
16 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Investors Walk Fine Line As Trump Tariffs Temper Rate Hopes
Asian investors trod warily Wednesday amid lingering uncertainty over Donald Trump's trade war, while another round of data indicated further weakness in the US economy but added interest rate cut speculation. The US president's claim that Washington was "very close to a deal" to extend a China truce provided some optimism, though that was tempered by his warning of fresh levies on pharmaceuticals and chips. After a strong start to the week sparked by hopes that painful jobs data will force the US Federal Reserve to lower rates next month, another batch of figures added fuel to the fire. A closely watched index of services activity showed it had barely grown in July as companies contend with weaker hiring conditions and rising prices. The news came after Friday's jobs data revealed far fewer US jobs were created than expected in May, June and July. "Market pricing has moved aggressively in favour of a September rate cut by the Federal Reserve, after a weak July jobs report and ugly revisions to May and June signalled the US labour market may finally be cracking under the pressure of tariffs," said Neil Wilson at Saxo Markets. "The data pushed the US closer to stagflationary territory," he said. "So far, the market has held up and looked beyond the tariff risks, but we may at last be seeing the hard data finally catch up with the soft survey data." But while bets on a rate cut in September have soared, he remained unsure that such a move was a certainty. Stocks fluctuated through the morning. Tokyo, Shanghai, Sydney, Wellington, Manila and Jakarta rose but Hong Kong, Singapore, Seoul and Taipei were in the red. Confidence remains thin as Trump's tariff threats linger, with several countries -- including India and Switzerland -- still to hammer out deals before his delayed deadline Thursday, and agreed levies with others begin to kick in. In his latest salvo, Trump told CNBC he was looking at hitting pharmaceuticals with tolls that eventually reach 250 percent, while semiconductors were also in the firing line. He has said he will also hammer India over its purchases of Russian oil. Still, Trump did strike a positive note on China, which is in talks with US officials to continue a truce agreed in May that saw the world's two largest economies pare down their eye-watering triple-digit tariffs. Regarding Chinese President Xi Jinping, Trump told CNBC's "Squawk Box" that "I'll end up having a meeting before the end of the year, most likely, if we make a deal. "If we don't make a deal, I'm not going to have a meeting. I mean, you know, what's the purpose of meeting if we're not going to make a deal? "But we're getting very close to a deal." He added that his relationship with Xi was "very good" and that "I think we'll make a good deal. It's not imperative, but I think we're going to make a good deal". Tokyo - Nikkei 225: UP 0.6 percent at 40,802.73 (break) Hong Kong - Hang Seng Index: DOWN 0.2 percent at 24,844.94 Shanghai - Composite: UP 0.1 percent at 3,619.78 Euro/dollar: DOWN at $1.1570 from $1.1582 on Tuesday Pound/dollar: UP at $1.3303 from $1.3294 Dollar/yen: UP at 147.61 yen from 147.55 yen Euro/pound: DOWN at 86.97 pence from 87.01 pence West Texas Intermediate: UP 0.5 percent at $65.46 per barrel Brent North Sea Crude: UP 0.5 percent at $67.96 per barrel New York - Dow: DOWN 0.1 percent at 44,111.74 (close) London - FTSE 100: UP 0.2 percent at 9,142.73 (close)


Int'l Business Times
18 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Trump Targets Tariff Evasion, With Eye On China
As the United States ramps up tariffs on major trading partners globally, President Donald Trump is also disrupting strategies that could be used -- by Chinese companies or others -- to circumvent them. Goods deemed to be "transshipped," or sent through a third country with lower export levies, will face an additional 40-percent duty under an incoming wave of Trump tariffs Thursday. The latest tranche of "reciprocal" tariff hikes, taking aim at what Washington deems unfair trade practices, impacts dozens of economies from Taiwan to India. The transshipment rule does not name countries, but is expected to impact China significantly given its position as a manufacturing powerhouse. Washington likely wants to develop supply chains that are less reliant on China, analysts say, as tensions simmer between the world's two biggest economies and the US sounds the alarm on Beijing's excess industrial capacity. But "it's a little more about the short-term effect of strengthening the tariff regime than it is about a decoupling strategy," said Josh Lipsky, chair of international economics at the Atlantic Council. "The point is to make countries worried about it and then have them err on the side of not doing it, because they know that Trump could then jack up the tariff rates higher again," he added, referring to tariff evasion. The possibility of a sharply higher duty is a "perpetual stick in the negotiations" with countries, said Richard Stern, a tax and budget expert at the conservative Heritage Foundation. He told AFP that expanding penalties across the globe takes the focus away from Beijing alone. Experts have noted that Vietnam was the biggest winner from supply chain diversions from China since the first Trump tariffs around 2018, when Washington and Beijing engaged in a trade war. And Brookings Institution senior fellow Robin Brooks pointed to signs this year of significant transshipments of Chinese goods. He noted in a June report that Chinese exports to certain Southeast Asian countries started surging "anomalously" in early 2025 as Trump threatened widespread levies. While it is unclear if all these products end up in the United States, Brooks cast doubt on the likelihood that domestic demand in countries like Thailand and Vietnam rocketed right when Trump imposed duties. "One purpose of the transshipment provisions is to force the development of supply chains that exclude Chinese inputs," said William Reinsch, senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "The other purpose is to push back on Chinese overcapacity and force them to eat their own surpluses," he added. But Washington's success in the latter goal depends on its ability to get other countries on board. "The transshipment penalties are designed to encourage that," Reinsch said. Lipsky added: "The strategy that worked in the first Trump term, to try to offshore some Chinese manufacturing to other countries like Vietnam and Mexico, is going to be a much more difficult strategy to execute now." Lipsky noted that Beijing could see the transshipment clause as one targeting China on trade, "because it is." "The question is, how China takes that in the broader context of what had been a thawing relationship between the US and China over the past two months," he added. While both countries temporarily lowered triple-digit tariffs on each other's exports, that truce expires August 12. The countries are in talks to potentially extend the de-escalation, although the final decision lies with Trump. It will be tough to draw a line defining product origins, analysts say. Customs fraud has been illegal for some time, but it remains unclear how Washington will view materials from China or elsewhere that have been significantly transformed. The burden lies with customs authorities to identify transshipment and assess the increased duties. "That will be difficult, particularly in countries that have close relations with China and no particular incentive to help US Customs and Border Protection," Reinsch added. Analysts have noted signs of transshipment of Chinese goods this year AFP