
Can Indonesia stay non-aligned while joining BRICS?
President Prabowo Subianto leveraged the moment to call for a revitalized multilateral order, greater South–South cooperation and fairer global governance. He invoked the spirit of Bandung — the 1955 conference Indonesia famously convened to unite newly independent nations under the banner of peace, solidarity and nonalignment.
But for all the talk of balance, Indonesia's BRICS debut also raised fresh concerns about tilt as questions arise about whether Prabowo's Indonesia is drifting into China and Russia's orbit and away from the West.
The evidence is not conclusive, but the optics are striking. In one of his first diplomatic moves after winning the presidency, Prabowo flew to Beijing — even before formally taking office. He later signed a joint statement with China, which many in the region saw as overly conciliatory, particularly regarding the South China Sea, where the two nations have overlapping claims.
Meanwhile, at the St Petersburg International Economic Forum, Prabowo praised China and Russia as countries 'without double standards,' raising eyebrows given both countries' questionable records on sovereignty, repression and international norms. His absence from the G7 summit only deepened the perception of lean.
Indonesia has good reasons to challenge the dominance of Western institutions. Western powers have long wielded influence in ways that often ignore or exploit the interests of the Global South. The failures are real — from broken climate finance promises, to selective outrage over territorial violations, to a rules-based order applied unequally. Indonesia is right to demand reform.
But opposing Western hypocrisy should not mean excusing the same behaviors when they come from elsewhere.
This is the core danger of being seen as part of an 'anti-Western axis': it casts foreign policy not as a principled stand, but as an act of alignment — the very thing Indonesia's bebas aktif doctrine was designed to avoid.
That doctrine, which has guided Indonesia since the Cold War, rests on two pillars: independence and active engagement. It allowed Indonesia to work with all sides without serving any. It's what gave Jakarta the credibility to lead the Non-Aligned Movement and host the Bandung Conference. And it remains one of Indonesia's most strategic diplomatic assets.
But independence is not neutrality. And active engagement means speaking up, especially when it's inconvenient.
Indonesia's foreign policy cannot succeed if it avoids difficult conversations. Jakarta must be willing to call out abuses of power wherever they occur: in the West, yes, but also in China, Russia and other BRICS members. Remaining silent on Russia's invasion of Ukraine or downplaying China's human rights violations in Xinjiang doesn't look like independent diplomacy. It looks like avoidance.
Indonesia's power lies in its ability to serve as a bridge — between the developed and developing world, between major powers and emerging ones. But bridges require trust. And trust comes from consistency.
Right now, that consistency is in question. If Indonesia speaks forcefully against Western double standards but not against the violations of its new BRICS partners, it risks being seen as selective rather than principled.
Indonesia should engage the West and the non-West. It should deepen cooperation with China and maintain strong ties with the US, Europe and Japan. It should continue playing an active role in ASEAN and take full advantage of its BRICS membership to promote reform of global governance.
But with every new partnership comes a harder obligation: the obligation to hold partners accountable. This is especially critical as BRICS – now expanded to include Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Iran, the UAE and Indonesia, thus representing more than half the world's population – itself evolves.
What started as an economic bloc is now drifting into the realm of political identity. With members like Russia and China in the fold, BRICS risks becoming more about opposition to the West than about offering meaningful alternatives. Indonesia's job is not to amplify that drift — it's to anchor the bloc in something more constructive.
At the Rio summit, Prabowo rightly invoked the legacy of Bandung. But Bandung was not about polite diplomacy. It was about bold leadership from the Global South — leadership that challenged colonialism, injustice and domination in all forms. That legacy only lives on if Indonesia is willing to confront power, not just shift its gaze from one pole to another.
The world doesn't need another country choosing sides. It needs countries willing to speak honestly to all sides. That is the test Indonesia now faces.
At BRICS, Indonesia took a step onto a bigger stage. What it says next — and who it's willing to say it to — will determine whether it becomes a global leader or just another cautious voice in a crowded room.
Muhammad Zulfikar Rakhmat is director of the China-Indonesia Desk at Center of Economic and Law Studies (CELIOS).
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South China Morning Post
32 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
‘Own the story': China urged to control narrative and engage Asia to counteract the West
China must leverage its new cultural symbols and stay open to interacting with scholars across Asia to reshape its global messaging, Chinese experts have said, urging Beijing to counterbalance what they say is a historically dominant Western narrative. They also noted that Beijing should take a more proactive role in shaping international rules and norms in emerging fields to align soft power with China's growth, especially as the foundations of the United States' hard power appeared increasingly fragile. Zheng Yongnian , a prominent political scientist, said China must take a leading role in shaping the 'Asian narrative' with an open and inclusive mind, invite more Asian scholars to engage, seek common ground and promote dialogue to push back against an entrenched dominance of Western discourse. 13:27 'Made in China 2025': how has the nation changed 10 years after setting its manufacturing blueprint? 'Made in China 2025': how has the nation changed 10 years after setting its manufacturing blueprint? Asian values were rooted in the principle of 'harmony and diversity' and the region should return to its tradition of consensus-based politics, he said in an interview published on July 17 by China International Communications Group (CICG) Asia-Pacific, a state-owned organisation operated by the Communist Party's Central Propaganda Department. 'For a long time, Western discourse held absolute dominance, and most Chinese scholars were educated within that framework. As a result, China had struggled to project its voice internationally. Today, that is beginning to change – but it will take time,' he said. 'China must take the lead in the next stage of shaping an Asian discourse. We must approach this with an open mindset. You can't have a ready-made narrative to forcibly impose on others – like the US does.' As global power dynamics change – with the US shifting from international engagement to a more domestic focus, and emerging economies, such as the Global South and the Brics bloc, seeking a more active role in global governance – discourse power has become a key arena of international competition, according to experts.


South China Morning Post
12 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
China backs Brazil as looming Trump tariffs escalate trade tensions
China offered to strengthen economic ties with Brazil on Monday and defend what it called 'fairness' in global trade, days before sweeping US tariffs on Brazilian exports are set to take effect. Advertisement The move added another layer of diplomatic complications to a fast-deepening trade rift between Brasília and Washington . The tariffs are scheduled to begin on Friday . At a news briefing in Beijing on Monday, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun said that Beijing was willing to work together with Brazil and other Brics and Latin American nations to uphold a multilateral trading system centred on the World Trade Organization. Guo also noted China's interest in expanding cooperation with Brazil in the aviation sector. Embraer, a leading global producer of mid-size commercial aircraft, relies heavily on the US as its main export market. The potential new tariffs have raised concerns about the company's financial stability. Talks to announce aircraft sales during Chinese President Xi Jinping's state visit to Brasília in 2023 did not move forward despite initial efforts. Advertisement 'China attaches importance to its result-oriented cooperation with Brazil, including cooperation on aviation. We stand ready to promote relevant cooperation based on market principles and give a boost to respective national development,' Guo said.


RTHK
21 hours ago
- RTHK
Thailand and Cambodia agree to ceasefire
Thailand and Cambodia agree to ceasefire Sealing the ceasefire deal in Putrajaya are, from left, Hun Manet of Cambodia, Anwar Ibrahim of Malaysia and Phumtham Wechayachai of Thailand. Photo: Reuters The leaders of Thailand and Cambodia agreed to a ceasefire on Monday effective midnight, in a bid to bring an end to their deadliest conflict in more than a decade after five days of fierce fighting. Amid an international effort to quell the conflict, the Thai and Cambodian leaders held talks in Malaysia hosted by its Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, the current chair of the Asean regional bloc, where both sides agreed to halt hostilities and resume direct communications. Anwar said when opening a press conference alongside the Thai and Cambodian leaders that there would be "an immediate and unconditional ceasefire with effect from midnight tonight. This is final." The Southeast Asian neighbours accuse each other of starting the fighting last week, before escalating it with heavy artillery bombardment and Thai air strikes along their 817km land border. Anwar had proposed ceasefire talks soon after a long-running border dispute erupted into conflict on Thursday, and China and the United States also offered to assist in negotiations. US President Donald Trump called both leaders at the weekend urging them to settle their differences, warning he would not conclude trade deals with them unless they ended the fighting. The tension between Thailand and Cambodia has intensified since the killing of a Cambodian soldier during a brief skirmish late in May. Both sides reinforced border troops amid a full-blown diplomatic crisis that brought Thailand's fragile coalition government to the brink of collapse. "Today we have a very good meeting and very good results... that hope to stop immediately the fighting that has caused many lives lost, injuries and also caused displacement of people," Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet said, expressing appreciation to China for its efforts in participating in the process and to Trump. "We hope that the solutions that Prime Minister Anwar just announced will set a condition for moving forward for our bilateral discussion to return to normalcy of the relationship, and as a foundation for future de-escalation of forces." Acting Thai Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai, who had earlier expressed doubts about Cambodia's sincerity ahead of the negotiations in Malaysia, said Thailand had agreed to ceasefire that would "be carried out successfully in good faith by both sides". (Reuters)