
Nick Bruining: Delays to Home Equity Access Scheme applications frustrate retirees seeking extra cash
Former Centrelink financial information officer-turned independent financial planner Annette Sinclair said the delays had been significant.
'While some go through reasonably quickly, the majority seem stuck in the system for at least two months — and often longer,' Mrs Sinclair said.
One reader who contacted Your Money lodged a completed application in December last year. The application was cancelled because of some missing information and later resubmitted.
After waiting several weeks for a response, it was discovered the insurance cover for the home came up for renewal during that period. Although renewed, it appears Centrelink had not requested proof of renewal and, therefore, rejected the application.
The HEAS is a low-cost reverse mortgage arrangement which allows senior Australians to tap into their home's equity at a relatively low interest rate of 3.95 per cent. Like other reverse mortgages, only real property can be offered as security. Houseboats, mobile homes and lease-for-life retirement village arrangements are ineligible.
Commercial reverse mortgage rates are typically more than double the scheme's rate, ranging between 8 and 10 per cent a year.
The rate you are charged is important because unlike a conventional mortgage, you are not required to make any repayments. Instead, the interest cost is added to the loan and compounds. When the property is disposed of, the loan plus interest is repaid from the proceeds of the house sale.
The higher the interest rate and the longer the loan is in place, the larger the amount that has to be repaid.
Under the HEAS arrangements, people aged over 67 can access payments of up to 150 per cent of the age pension. That can be in the form of a boosted fortnightly pension payment or two lump sum amounts each year, separated by a six-month interval.
That means a single could currently access up to $44,811 a year. For a couple, it's a combined $67,555. Those amounts are less any age pensions received, so a single on a full fortnightly pension could access an extra $14,937 in a year and a couple $11,259 each, or a combined $22,518.
Those amounts would be greater if the person was only receiving a part-pension because of means testing.
'People accessing the lump sum amounts are often doing it for some urgent reason,' Mrs Sinclair said. 'Travelling to visit a very sick relative, or replacing something like a car. The delays in processing an application just add to the stress.'
Services Australia is the department responsible for administering HEAS applications.
General manager Hank Jongen apologised for the delays and revealed there were about 16,000 applications currently in the system.
'Processing times for the scheme vary because they are complex assessments,' Mr Jongen said.
'They also often require information from third parties, such as a valuation request, which can add time to claim finalisation.
'We invest significant time training staff and right now, we're training more staff on these claims to help people faster.'
Mr Jongen said that anyone experiencing hardship should contact Centrelink and explain their circumstances.
That can be done in person or by booking a phone appointment with a Centrelink officer. Bookings can be made via the website or the dedicated older Australians phone line on 13 23 00.
Nick Bruining is an independent financial adviser and a member of the
Certified Independent Financial Advisers Association
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sydney Morning Herald
24 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Hollowed out of thinkers, Sussan Ley's party dreams of nothing other than opposition
As Minister for Energy and Emissions Reduction, Angus Taylor attacked Labor's renewables policy as 'socialist planning' and ignored expert advice to invest in cost-effective fast batteries, instead committing $600 million of public money to a gas power plant in the Hunter Valley already rejected by the market. Costs are now reported to exceed $1 billion. Menzies led the Liberals to power for the first time in 1949 with an anti-socialist platform that attacked the Curtin Labor government's bank nationalisation plans. Now, 75 years on, the party's policy brain appears to have atrophied sometime between the Russian Revolution and the fall of the Berlin Wall. When Labor introduced legislation to bring its 'Future Made in Australia' industrial policy to fruition in April 2024, Ley referred to the government as 'radical' while Taylor dismissed the policy as a slush fund for the PM to 'pick winners'. But industrial policy is one area where government intervention makes sense. Australia sits below Botswana at 105 out of 133 on the Economic Complexity Index, reflecting overreliance on commodities and underinvestment in innovation and manufacturing compared to other advanced economies. A policy to build sovereign manufacturing capacity and high‑skill jobs in strategically important sectors reflects a 21st-century economic consensus that markets are a means to a societal goal, not an end in themselves. Socialist smears may resonate with rusted-on conservatives, but risk alienating voters the party desperately needs. A 2024 YouGov poll found 53 per cent of Australians aged 18-24 favour a more socialist direction, compared to 22 per cent preferring more capitalism. According to a June Redbridge Group poll, voters aged 65+ were the only cohort in which the Coalition won more votes than Labor at the May election. A paltry 19 per cent of 18-34 year-olds voted Coalition, less than half of those who voted for Labor – a result dubbed a 'youthquake' by Redbridge director and former Liberal Party official Tony Barry. Loading Where to now for a party that defines itself in opposition to a Labor Party that's colonised the political centre? How does the party of 'lower taxes' resonate in a social democracy where overall taxation is already well below the OECD average? Unfortunately for Ley, she has inherited a party lacking the policy hardheads to write the necessary software update. In the wake of the election result, Institute of Public Affairs Senior Fellow John Roskam bemoaned the loss of the 'serious thinkers' at the heart of the party in the 1970s and 1980s. Roskam says the party is verging on 'anti-intellectual' and is lacking the personnel to think critically about how Liberal principles can be adapted to 21st-century realities. Meanwhile, the pews of a once broad church have been gradually purged of moderates since Ian McPhee lost preselection for opposing John Howard's hard-line rhetoric on Asian immigration in the late 1980s. Others followed, among them Julia Banks, John Hewson, Fred Chaney, and former PMs Fraser and Turnbull. Loading What remains is a party with an uninspiring message about small government that airbrushes over Menzies' nation‑building legacy of universities, the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, and delivering the publicly funded Snowy Mountains Scheme – the largest engineering project in our nation's history. Ley deserves some patience as she tries to rehabilitate the Liberals. She's saying all the right things about 'listening' and addressing issues that concern young people, but uncertain times call for a leader, not populist vessel. We must judge her on whether she can reignite a contest of ideas anchored in sound values and serious policy work. The outcome from her working group on energy and emissions reduction will be a test she cannot afford to fail.

The Age
24 minutes ago
- The Age
Hollowed out of thinkers, Sussan Ley's party dreams of nothing other than opposition
As Minister for Energy and Emissions Reduction, Angus Taylor attacked Labor's renewables policy as 'socialist planning' and ignored expert advice to invest in cost-effective fast batteries, instead committing $600 million of public money to a gas power plant in the Hunter Valley already rejected by the market. Costs are now reported to exceed $1 billion. Menzies led the Liberals to power for the first time in 1949 with an anti-socialist platform that attacked the Curtin Labor government's bank nationalisation plans. Now, 75 years on, the party's policy brain appears to have atrophied sometime between the Russian Revolution and the fall of the Berlin Wall. When Labor introduced legislation to bring its 'Future Made in Australia' industrial policy to fruition in April 2024, Ley referred to the government as 'radical' while Taylor dismissed the policy as a slush fund for the PM to 'pick winners'. But industrial policy is one area where government intervention makes sense. Australia sits below Botswana at 105 out of 133 on the Economic Complexity Index, reflecting overreliance on commodities and underinvestment in innovation and manufacturing compared to other advanced economies. A policy to build sovereign manufacturing capacity and high‑skill jobs in strategically important sectors reflects a 21st-century economic consensus that markets are a means to a societal goal, not an end in themselves. Socialist smears may resonate with rusted-on conservatives, but risk alienating voters the party desperately needs. A 2024 YouGov poll found 53 per cent of Australians aged 18-24 favour a more socialist direction, compared to 22 per cent preferring more capitalism. According to a June Redbridge Group poll, voters aged 65+ were the only cohort in which the Coalition won more votes than Labor at the May election. A paltry 19 per cent of 18-34 year-olds voted Coalition, less than half of those who voted for Labor – a result dubbed a 'youthquake' by Redbridge director and former Liberal Party official Tony Barry. Loading Where to now for a party that defines itself in opposition to a Labor Party that's colonised the political centre? How does the party of 'lower taxes' resonate in a social democracy where overall taxation is already well below the OECD average? Unfortunately for Ley, she has inherited a party lacking the policy hardheads to write the necessary software update. In the wake of the election result, Institute of Public Affairs Senior Fellow John Roskam bemoaned the loss of the 'serious thinkers' at the heart of the party in the 1970s and 1980s. Roskam says the party is verging on 'anti-intellectual' and is lacking the personnel to think critically about how Liberal principles can be adapted to 21st-century realities. Meanwhile, the pews of a once broad church have been gradually purged of moderates since Ian McPhee lost preselection for opposing John Howard's hard-line rhetoric on Asian immigration in the late 1980s. Others followed, among them Julia Banks, John Hewson, Fred Chaney, and former PMs Fraser and Turnbull. Loading What remains is a party with an uninspiring message about small government that airbrushes over Menzies' nation‑building legacy of universities, the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, and delivering the publicly funded Snowy Mountains Scheme – the largest engineering project in our nation's history. Ley deserves some patience as she tries to rehabilitate the Liberals. She's saying all the right things about 'listening' and addressing issues that concern young people, but uncertain times call for a leader, not populist vessel. We must judge her on whether she can reignite a contest of ideas anchored in sound values and serious policy work. The outcome from her working group on energy and emissions reduction will be a test she cannot afford to fail.

Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
How a 'snowballing' $76 blockchain token trend could become the first rung on the property ladder for Australian renters
Trying to save a 20 per cent deposit now feels like running on a treadmill that keeps speeding up. A recent analysis shows the average renter would need more than eight years to scrape one together, and that's if rents stop jumping tomorrow. Many young Australians have quietly decided the old dream is broken. But a different path is opening on their phones: buy a sliver of a house for the price of a night out, collect rent the next morning, repeat. What a $50 token buys On the US platform Lofty you can tap 'buy' on a $50 USD ($76 AUD) blockchain token tied to a Detroit duplex or an Atlanta townhouse. The token records your slice on the blockchain, sends your cut of the rent every day, and lets you sell whenever another investor clicks 'buy'. The idea is snowballing. Six in ten people using fractional platforms this year are under 40, the very group priced out of full ownership. The tech that makes it possible The heavy lifting sits in code. Blockchain keeps an unchangeable ledger of who owns what. Smart contracts split the rent and push it to digital wallets while we sleep. Artificial-intelligence programs crunch vacancy data and tweak rents in real time. Paperwork, conveyancing fees and month-long settlements vanish. Proof it isn't hype There have been successful models worldwide. The 'Lofty' platform in the US has already tokenised more than 140 US properties. Investors pocket rent daily and vote online if a tenant trashes a kitchen or an offer comes in. In Britain, London House Exchange (once Property Partner) runs a regulated exchange where anyone can trade slices of single flats just like shares. Singapore's RealVantage is pulling in investors from across Asia to co-own apartments in many countries, including Australian cities. None of these ventures relies on wishful thinking; they charge modest management fees and still turn a profit. Big money is noticing. Global transaction volumes from institutional investors jumped 43 per cent in the first quarter of 2025, a vote of confidence from pension funds and private equity giants. Market researchers tip real-estate tokenisation to swell from about US $3.5 billion today to nearly US $19.4 billion by 2033. Why Australia should care right now Our wage growth lags price growth. Land is scarce. Construction firms keep collapsing. Fractional ownership can't solve everything, but it can start turning renters into owners sooner. A uni graduate could drip-feed a few hundred dollars a month into tokens spread across several cities instead of hoarding every spare dollar for a single monster deposit. Over a decade, those micro stakes have grown, paid rent along the way, and built a credit-file story banks understand. It could also unlock a new supply. When thousands of small investors pool cash through a platform, developers get cheaper equity to build mid-rise rentals or retrofit empty offices. The model is already nudging US build-to-rent projects off the drawing board. There's no reason it can't bankroll medium-density infill around Parramatta or Geelong. A simple road map for Canberra Start small. Let the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) extend its existing crowd-funding sandbox to cover blockchain property tokens. Cap how much anyone can tip in while the rules bed down. Invite super funds chasing steady, green income to co-seed the first portfolios; they provide ballast and credibility. Next, pick a patch of surplus state-owned land, think car parks near train stations, package the air-rights into tokens and sell half to retail investors on a local platform. Use the cash to build energy-efficient flats and promise a slice of the rent back to token holders. The public sees a tangible project, not another scheme stuck in consultation. Finally, borrow a lesson from London. There, fractional platforms must hold each property in a stand-alone trust. If the company dies tomorrow, the trust still owns the building, and investors still own their slices. We can replicate that safeguard, and most fears about 'crypto scams' fade fast. Honest warnings Tokens are easier to sell than whole houses, but they're less liquid than shares. Some days, nobody will want your slice. Rules will keep shifting as regulators catch up. And governance matters: if a roof leaks, someone has to vote to fix it. Smart platforms make those votes painless, but buyers still need to read the fine print. The upside for a generation locked out For Gen Z, the appeal is obvious. It's low-cost. It's quick. It lives on the same screen as banking apps and streaming queues. You can track rent in real time and brag about owning a bit of a house in Texas or Toowoomba. More importantly, it flips the story from 'wait ten years, then maybe buy' to 'start building equity today'. Australia missed the first big wave of ride-sharing and watched foreign platforms set the rules. We don't need to repeat that mistake with property tokens. The technology is mature, the consumer appetite is raging and the regulatory pieces already exist. With a light touch from Canberra and a push from super funds, a $50 blockchain token could become the first rung on the property ladder for millions of young Australians. It won't cure the housing crisis overnight, but it might give the next generation something better than hopeless spreadsheets and landlord letters: a real stake in the roof over their heads, even if they only own a few shingles to start. Dr Ehsan Noroozinejad is a senior researcher at Western Sydney University who writes about innovative housing policy, modular construction, and urban resilience. He advises governments and industry on affordable-housing strategy and has appeared on ABC News, Sky News, The Guardian, The Policymaker, The Sydney Morning Herald and The Conversation.